AN INVESTIGATION OF THE WRITING PROCESSSES OF STUDENTS WITH HEARING LOSS: IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHING OF WRITING

Year 2016, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 1 - 10, 30.06.2016

Ghulam Haıder

Abstract

This study explores the writing processes of students with hearing impairment. Students were given an expository essay for writing. The students produced two data sets: first was obtained at entrance test and second on the completion of the course. All data sets were scored with the help of a scoring guide that was provided by the English department of Govt. Training College for Teaches of the Deaf. Findings have revealed that although the students texts had very clear errors of language and vocabulary, they improved the organization and content of their texts. This presentation reviews literature on deaf adolescents’ writing before exploring the structural gains the students in this study demonstrated. Sample papers and their rating scores will be used.

Keywords

Writing processes, organization, content, hearing impaired students.

References

• Albertini, J. & Schley, S. (2003). Writing: Characteristics, instruction and assessment. In M. Marschark & P. Spencer (Eds.) Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language and education. (pp.123-135). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Albertini, J. (1990). Coherence in deaf students’ writing. In J. Peeton (Ed.), Students and teachers writing together: Perspectives on journal writing (pp. 125-136). TESOL Publications.
• Albertini, J., Bochner, J, Cuneo, C., Hunt, L., Nielsen, R., Seago, L. & Shannon, N. (1986). Development of a writing test for deaf college students.Teaching
• Bochner, J. &Albertini, J. (1988). Language varieties in the deaf population and their acquisition by children and adults.In M. Strong (Ed.), Language learning and deafness (pp.3-48). New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Bochner, J., Albertini, J. Samar, V. & Metz, D (1992). External and diagnostic validity of the GOVT. TRAINING COLLEGE FOR TEACHES OF THE DEAF Writing Test: An investigation using direct magnitude estimation and principal components analysis. Research in the Teaching of English, 26, 299-314. English to deaf and second-language students, 4, 5-11.
• Gormley, K. & Sarachan-Deily, A. (1987). Evaluating hearing impaired students’ writing: A practical approach. Volta Review, 89, 157-170.
• Haider, G. (2012). An Insight into Difficulties Faced By Pakistani Student Writers: Implications for Teaching of Writing, Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2(3),17-28
• Haider, G. (2012). Teaching of Writing in Pakistan: A Review of Major Pedagogical Trends and Issues in Teaching of Writing, Journal of Educational and Social Research,2,(3),215-226
• Haider, G. (2012). “Process Approach in Writing: Issues and Implications for Teaching in Pakistan, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2 (2), 147-150
• Haider, G. (2012). An investigation of problems faced by L1 (Urdu) 5th grade Hearing Impaired students in Urdu written expression: Implications for Teaching of L1 (Urdu)”, Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 1, (02), 253-265
• Haider, G. (2012). An Investigation of Pakistani L2 HI Writers’ Perceptions of Previous Writing Experience in L2: Implications for Literacy Development in Pakistan for HIC, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences,3,(11), 221-234
• Haider, G. (2012). What the Pakistani L2 Writers Do When They Write An Investigation of the Composing Processes of Pakistani L2 Writers, Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 1, (2), 171-180
• Haider, G. (2013). Cognitive Discourse Analysis of L2Writer’s ‘Think-Aloud Protocol: A Case Study.Language In India, 13:11, 591-606.
• Haider, G. (2013). The Effects of Peer (Group) Discussion on L2 Writing of Students with Learning Difficulties (LD) and Students without Learning Difficulties (LD Implications for Teaching of Writing in Pakistan. Turkish International Journal of Special Education and Guidance & Counseling2, (02), 47-57
• Haider, G. (2013). "Self-Accessed and Self- Regulatory Practices in Teaching of Writing In Pakistan" European Journal of Educational Sciences,1,(1),53-61
• Haider, G. (2013). Perceptions of ESL Teachers towards CALL:Implications for ELT(English Language Teaching) at the Intermediate Level-A Case Study from Pakistan. Language In India,13:8, 204-238.
• Haider, G. (2014). A Brief Review of Writing Processes in the Light of the Holy Quran. International Journal of English and Education 3, (02), 447-461
• Haider, G. (2014). A Comparison of English and Urdu Organizational P atterns in Argumentative Writing of Pakistani EFL Students International Journal of English and Education 3, (01), 200-212
• Haider, G. (2014). Analysis of MalalaYousafZai’s Speech: Application of Aristotle’s Ethos, Pathos and Logos. International Journal of English and Education 3, (01), 115-119
• Haider, G. (2014). An Exploratory Study of Organizational Problems Fcedby Student writers in Expository L2 Writing in Pakistan. International Journal of English and Education 3, (01), 127-145
• Haider, G.(2014). Attribution Theory and L2 Writing Processes: Results and Implications. International Journal of English and Education3, (02), 436-446
• Haider, G.(2014). Perception of Students with Learning Difficulties towards English Composition Writing through Activities.Turkish International Journal of Special Education and Guidance & Counseling volume 3, (1), 27-35 Heefner, D. & Shaw, P. (1996). Assessing the written narratives of deaf students using the six-trait analytical scale.Volta Review, 98, 147-168.
• Klecan-Aker, J. & Blondeau, R. (1990). An examination of the written stories of hearing-impaired school-age children.The Volta Review, 92, 275-282.
• Musselman, C. & Szanto, G. (1998). The written language of deaf adolescents: patterns of performance. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 3, 245-256.
• Schirmer, B. R., Bailey, J., & Fitzgerald, S. M. (1999).Using a writing assessment rubric for writing development of children who are deaf.Exceptional Children, 65, 383-397.