Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity

Volume: 6 Number: 3 May 1, 2016
  • Fedor F. Glisin
  • Vladimir V. Kaluzhnyi
  • Pavel B. Melnik
  • Sergey B. Shchepanskiy
International Review of Management and Marketing Cover
International Review of Management and Marketing
PDF Download
EN

Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity

Abstract

The growing role of S&T funds as one of the important mechanisms for financing science results in necessity to improve methods for evaluating and planning activities of such funds. In this paper we identified some indicators of scientific activity based on statistical data analysis. On our opinion these indicators should be taken into account for evaluation and planning of R&D activities, in particular, regarding S&T funds. One of the key indicator, which determines pace of scientific development is GERD per one researcher. Accelerated development of science, which manifests itself in a significant increase in its effectiveness. At the same time, it is sufficient to keep the magnitude in order to achieve high values of performance and efficiency of scientific activity if management of financial flows is enough efficient. If each researcher publishes approximately 1 work in 2 years, it will be enough to ensure the quality and relevance of scientific publications.

Keywords

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Fedor F. Glisin This is me

Vladimir V. Kaluzhnyi This is me

Pavel B. Melnik This is me

Sergey B. Shchepanskiy This is me

Publication Date

May 1, 2016

Submission Date

May 1, 2016

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2016 Volume: 6 Number: 3

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA44GD22RZ

Cite

RIS / Bibtex
APA
Glisin, F. F., Kaluzhnyi, V. V., Melnik, P. B., & Shchepanskiy, S. B. (2016). Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(3), 190-194. https://izlik.org/JA44GD22RZ
AMA
1.Glisin FF, Kaluzhnyi VV, Melnik PB, Shchepanskiy SB. Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity. IRMM. 2016;6(3):190-194. https://izlik.org/JA44GD22RZ
Chicago
Glisin, Fedor F., Vladimir V. Kaluzhnyi, Pavel B. Melnik, and Sergey B. Shchepanskiy. 2016. “Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity”. International Review of Management and Marketing 6 (3): 190-94. https://izlik.org/JA44GD22RZ.
EndNote
Glisin FF, Kaluzhnyi VV, Melnik PB, Shchepanskiy SB (May 1, 2016) Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity. International Review of Management and Marketing 6 3 190–194.
IEEE
[1]F. F. Glisin, V. V. Kaluzhnyi, P. B. Melnik, and S. B. Shchepanskiy, “Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity”, IRMM, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 190–194, May 2016, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA44GD22RZ
ISNAD
Glisin, Fedor F. - Kaluzhnyi, Vladimir V. - Melnik, Pavel B. - Shchepanskiy, Sergey B. “Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity”. International Review of Management and Marketing 6/3 (May 1, 2016): 190-194. https://izlik.org/JA44GD22RZ.
JAMA
1.Glisin FF, Kaluzhnyi VV, Melnik PB, Shchepanskiy SB. Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity. IRMM. 2016;6:190–194.
MLA
Glisin, Fedor F., et al. “Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity”. International Review of Management and Marketing, vol. 6, no. 3, May 2016, pp. 190-4, https://izlik.org/JA44GD22RZ.
Vancouver
1.Fedor F. Glisin, Vladimir V. Kaluzhnyi, Pavel B. Melnik, Sergey B. Shchepanskiy. Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity. IRMM [Internet]. 2016 May 1;6(3):190-4. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA44GD22RZ