BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3, 190 - 194, 01.05.2016

Fedor F. Glisin Vladimir V. Kaluzhnyi Pavel B. Melnik Sergey B. Shchepanskiy

https://izlik.org/JA44GD22RZ

Öz

Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3, 190 - 194, 01.05.2016

Fedor F. Glisin Vladimir V. Kaluzhnyi Pavel B. Melnik Sergey B. Shchepanskiy

https://izlik.org/JA44GD22RZ

Öz

The growing role of S&T funds as one of the important mechanisms for financing science results in necessity to improve methods for evaluating and
planning activities of such funds. In this paper we identified some indicators of scientific activity based on statistical data analysis. On our opinion
these indicators should be taken into account for evaluation and planning of R&D activities, in particular, regarding S&T funds. One of the key
indicator, which determines pace of scientific development is GERD per one researcher. Accelerated development of science, which manifests itself
in a significant increase in its effectiveness. At the same time, it is sufficient to keep the magnitude in order to achieve high values of performance and
efficiency of scientific activity if management of financial flows is enough efficient. If each researcher publishes approximately 1 work in 2 years, it
will be enough to ensure the quality and relevance of scientific publications.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Corrector Moderator Tutor Subject Teacher Meta-competence

Toplam 0 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA22FZ25FS
Yazarlar

Fedor F. Glisin Bu kişi benim

Vladimir V. Kaluzhnyi Bu kişi benim

Pavel B. Melnik Bu kişi benim

Sergey B. Shchepanskiy Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Mayıs 2016
IZ https://izlik.org/JA44GD22RZ
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Glisin, F. F., Kaluzhnyi, V. V., Melnik, P. B., & Shchepanskiy, S. B. (2016). Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(3), 190-194. https://izlik.org/JA44GD22RZ
AMA 1.Glisin FF, Kaluzhnyi VV, Melnik PB, Shchepanskiy SB. Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity. IRMM. 2016;6(3):190-194. https://izlik.org/JA44GD22RZ
Chicago Glisin, Fedor F., Vladimir V. Kaluzhnyi, Pavel B. Melnik, ve Sergey B. Shchepanskiy. 2016. “Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity”. International Review of Management and Marketing 6 (3): 190-94. https://izlik.org/JA44GD22RZ.
EndNote Glisin FF, Kaluzhnyi VV, Melnik PB, Shchepanskiy SB (01 Mayıs 2016) Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity. International Review of Management and Marketing 6 3 190–194.
IEEE [1]F. F. Glisin, V. V. Kaluzhnyi, P. B. Melnik, ve S. B. Shchepanskiy, “Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity”, IRMM, c. 6, sy 3, ss. 190–194, May. 2016, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA44GD22RZ
ISNAD Glisin, Fedor F. - Kaluzhnyi, Vladimir V. - Melnik, Pavel B. - Shchepanskiy, Sergey B. “Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity”. International Review of Management and Marketing 6/3 (01 Mayıs 2016): 190-194. https://izlik.org/JA44GD22RZ.
JAMA 1.Glisin FF, Kaluzhnyi VV, Melnik PB, Shchepanskiy SB. Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity. IRMM. 2016;6:190–194.
MLA Glisin, Fedor F., vd. “Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity”. International Review of Management and Marketing, c. 6, sy 3, Mayıs 2016, ss. 190-4, https://izlik.org/JA44GD22RZ.
Vancouver 1.Fedor F. Glisin, Vladimir V. Kaluzhnyi, Pavel B. Melnik, Sergey B. Shchepanskiy. Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity. IRMM [Internet]. 01 Mayıs 2016;6(3):190-4. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA44GD22RZ