Research Article

Religion, Religiosity, and Research in Psychology of Religion in Turkey: An Assessment of Locality and Universality Problem

Volume: 3 Number: 2 February 21, 2013
EN TR

Religion, Religiosity, and Research in Psychology of Religion in Turkey: An Assessment of Locality and Universality Problem

Abstract

A uniform and universal understanding of science is an invalid precept, especially for the social sciences and humanities. Hence, the modern version of psychology is but a reductionist, limited, and abstract description of human reality in general. One of the most recent achievements in psychology is the recognition that every culture has a special frame of meaning and that individuals develop their identities and personalities accordingly. Therefore, to understand the spiritual world of human beings and their behaviors, a new intercultural perspective is needed. This need also applies to the field of psychology of religion, which is currently based upon the so called Judeo-Christian tradition. While the issues addressed, theories and concepts developed and introduced, have considerable relevance for the individuals within the mentioned tradition, they say very little, if any, about the religious structure of the individuals outside it. For that reason, there is urgent need in research conducted in the field of psychology of religion in Turkey to consider the basic beliefs of Islam, and social, cultural, historical, and contemporary developments within it.

Keywords

References

  1. Abu Raiya, Hisham, A Psychological Measure of Islamic Religiousness: Evidence for Relevance, Reliability, and Validity (PhD dissertation; Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University, 2008).
  2. Arkonaç, Sibel A., "Kartezyen Olmayan Özne, Öteki, Fail ve Yerel Gerçekliğin İnşası [Noncartesian Subject, Other, Agent, and Construction of Local Reality]," in idem. (ed.), Doğunun ve Batının Yerelliği: Bireylik Bilgisine Dair [The Locality of the West and East: About Individuality Knowledge] (Istanbul: Alfa Yayınları, 2004), 249-274.
  3. Armaner, Neda, İnanç ve Hareket Bütünlüğü Bakımından Din Terbiyesi [Religious Discipline with regards to Faith and Behaviour Integrity] (Istanbul: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Basımevi, 1967).
  4. Armaner, Neda, Psikopatoloji'de Dinî Belirtiler [Religious Symptoms in Psycho-pathology] (Ankara: Demirbaş Yayınları, 1973).
  5. Armaner, Neda, Din Psikolojisine Giriş I [Introduction to Psychology of Religion I] (Ankara: Ayyıldız Matbaası, 1990).
  6. Badrī, Mālik (as Malik Babikir Bedrî), Müslüman Psikologların Çıkmazı [The Dilemma of Muslim Psychologists] (translated into Turkish by Harun Şencan; Istanbul: İnsan Yayınları, 1984).
  7. Belzen, Jacob A., "Din Psikolojisinde Tarihsel-Kültürel Yaklaşım: Disiplinlerarası Araştırmalar İçin Bakış Açıları [The Historicocultural Approach in the Psychology of Religion: Perspectives for lnterdisciplinary Research]," (translated into Turkish by Ali Ayten), Marmara Üniversitesi İlâhiyat Fakültesi Dergisi [Marmara University Journal of the Faculty of Divinity] 33/2 (2007), 221-240.
  8. Egemen, Bedi Ziya, Din Psikolojisi: Sâha, Kaynak ve Metot Üzerine Bir Deneme [Psychology of Religion: An Essay Concerning Scope, Source, and Method] (Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, 1952).

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Religious Studies

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

February 21, 2013

Submission Date

September 4, 2012

Acceptance Date

November 14, 2012

Published in Issue

Year 2012 Volume: 3 Number: 2

APA
Hökelekli, H. (2013). Religion, Religiosity, and Research in Psychology of Religion in Turkey: An Assessment of Locality and Universality Problem. Ilahiyat Studies, 3(2), 223-245. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2012.32.60
AMA
1.Hökelekli H. Religion, Religiosity, and Research in Psychology of Religion in Turkey: An Assessment of Locality and Universality Problem. IS. 2013;3(2):223-245. doi:10.12730/13091719.2012.32.60
Chicago
Hökelekli, Hayati. 2013. “Religion, Religiosity, and Research in Psychology of Religion in Turkey: An Assessment of Locality and Universality Problem”. Ilahiyat Studies 3 (2): 223-45. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2012.32.60.
EndNote
Hökelekli H (February 1, 2013) Religion, Religiosity, and Research in Psychology of Religion in Turkey: An Assessment of Locality and Universality Problem. Ilahiyat Studies 3 2 223–245.
IEEE
[1]H. Hökelekli, “Religion, Religiosity, and Research in Psychology of Religion in Turkey: An Assessment of Locality and Universality Problem”, IS, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 223–245, Feb. 2013, doi: 10.12730/13091719.2012.32.60.
ISNAD
Hökelekli, Hayati. “Religion, Religiosity, and Research in Psychology of Religion in Turkey: An Assessment of Locality and Universality Problem”. Ilahiyat Studies 3/2 (February 1, 2013): 223-245. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2012.32.60.
JAMA
1.Hökelekli H. Religion, Religiosity, and Research in Psychology of Religion in Turkey: An Assessment of Locality and Universality Problem. IS. 2013;3:223–245.
MLA
Hökelekli, Hayati. “Religion, Religiosity, and Research in Psychology of Religion in Turkey: An Assessment of Locality and Universality Problem”. Ilahiyat Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, Feb. 2013, pp. 223-45, doi:10.12730/13091719.2012.32.60.
Vancouver
1.Hayati Hökelekli. Religion, Religiosity, and Research in Psychology of Religion in Turkey: An Assessment of Locality and Universality Problem. IS. 2013 Feb. 1;3(2):223-45. doi:10.12730/13091719.2012.32.60
SCImago Journal & Country Rank