Research Article

A Ḥadīth and Its Indication Problem within the Context of Relationship between Faith and Deeds

Volume: 9 Number: 2 December 23, 2018
EN

A Ḥadīth and Its Indication Problem within the Context of Relationship between Faith and Deeds

Abstract

The ḥadīth on the importance of ṣalāh, namely, “Whoever performs five daily prayers (ṣalāh) is guaranteed heaven by Allah. Whoever does not fulfil it, however, shall have no guarantee in the presence of Allah; Allah, at His will, may torment him or put him in His Heaven,” has been considered by numerous scholars as evidence that a person who abandons ṣalāh partially or completely with no reasonable excuse may still be forgiven by Allah. The followers of this approach construe the phrase “whoever does not fulfil it” as “whoever does not perform five daily prayers.” Nevertheless, the indication “whoever performs five daily prayers” in the initial section of the ḥadīth is reinforced by expressions such as “without missing any rule,” “without undervaluing it,” and “paying attention to its time, bows (rukūʿ), and prostration (sujūd)” in various narratives of the same ḥadīth. Given this fact, the phrase “whoever does not fulfil it” in the second part of the ḥadīth may be pointing at the essentials of ṣalāh and not at ṣalāh itself. In addition, the latter approach is supported by the general attitude of Islam about forgiving sins, conveniences with regard to the performance of ṣalāh, as well as various Qurʾān verses and ḥadīths that concretely outline the punishment for abandoning ṣalāh. In light of the foregoing, it seems inappropriate to consider the abovementioned ḥadīth as evidence with regard to the relationship between faith and deeds, and particularly “punishment of abandoning ṣalāh;” rather, the ḥadīth may concern the complete fulfillment of the essentials of ṣalāh.

Keywords

References

  1. ʿAbd al-Bāqī, Muḥammad Fuʾād. al-Muʿjam al-mufahras li-alfāẓ al-Qurʾān al-karīm. Cairo: Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣriyyah, 1364.
  2. ʿAbd ibn Ḥumayd, Abū Muḥammad ʿAbd ibn Ḥumayd ibn Naṣr al-Kissī. al-Muntakhab min Musnad ʿAbd ibn Ḥumayd. Edited by Ṣubḥī al-Badrī al-Sāmarrāʾī and Maḥmūd Muḥammad Khalīl al-Ṣaʿīdī. Cairo: Maktabat al-Sunnah, 1988.
  3. Abū Dāwūd, Sulaymān ibn al-Ashʿath al-Sijistānī. Sunan Abī Dāwūd. 4 vols. Edited by Muḥammad Muḥyī al-Dīn ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd. Beirut: al-Maktabah al-ʿAṣriyyah, 2011.
  4. Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad al-Shaybānī. Musnad al-Imām Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal. 50 vols. Edited by Shuʿayb al-Arnāʾūṭ, ʿĀdil Murshid, Muḥammad Naʿīm al-ʿIrqsūsī, Ibrāhīm al-Zaybaq, Muḥammad Riḍwān al-ʿIrqsūsī, and Kāmil al-Kharrāṭ. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risālah, 2001.
  5. al-ʿAsqalānī, Abū l-Faḍl Shihāb al-Dīn Aḥmad ibn ʿAlī. Kitāb Tahdhīb al-Tahdhīb. 12 vols. Hyderabad: Maṭbaʿat Majlis Dāʾirat al-Maʿārif al-ʿUthmāniyyah, 1326.
  6. al-ʿAsqalānī, Abū l-Faḍl Shihāb al-Dīn Aḥmad ibn ʿAlī Fatḥ al-bārī bi-sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Imām Abī ʿAbd Allāh al-Bukhārī. 13 vols. Edited by ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn Bāz, Muḥammad Fuʾād ʿAbd al-Bāqī, and Muḥibb al-Dīn al-Khaṭīb. Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifah, 1959.
  7. Aydınlı, Abdullah. Hadis Istılahları Sözlüğü. Istanbul: Hadisevi, 2006.
  8. al-ʿAynī, Abū Muḥammad Badr al-Dīn Maḥmūd ibn Aḥmad. Sharḥ Sunan Abī Dāwūd. 7 vols. Edited by Abū l-Mundhir Khālid ibn Ibrāhīm al-Miṣrī. Riyadh: Maktabat al-Rushd, 1999.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Religious Studies

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 23, 2018

Submission Date

July 19, 2017

Acceptance Date

April 27, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 9 Number: 2

APA
Kahraman, H., & Şahin, H. (2018). A Ḥadīth and Its Indication Problem within the Context of Relationship between Faith and Deeds. Ilahiyat Studies, 9(2), 211-248. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2018.92.181
AMA
1.Kahraman H, Şahin H. A Ḥadīth and Its Indication Problem within the Context of Relationship between Faith and Deeds. IS. 2018;9(2):211-248. doi:10.12730/13091719.2018.92.181
Chicago
Kahraman, Hüseyin, and Hacer Şahin. 2018. “A Ḥadīth and Its Indication Problem Within the Context of Relationship Between Faith and Deeds”. Ilahiyat Studies 9 (2): 211-48. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2018.92.181.
EndNote
Kahraman H, Şahin H (December 1, 2018) A Ḥadīth and Its Indication Problem within the Context of Relationship between Faith and Deeds. Ilahiyat Studies 9 2 211–248.
IEEE
[1]H. Kahraman and H. Şahin, “A Ḥadīth and Its Indication Problem within the Context of Relationship between Faith and Deeds”, IS, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 211–248, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.12730/13091719.2018.92.181.
ISNAD
Kahraman, Hüseyin - Şahin, Hacer. “A Ḥadīth and Its Indication Problem Within the Context of Relationship Between Faith and Deeds”. Ilahiyat Studies 9/2 (December 1, 2018): 211-248. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2018.92.181.
JAMA
1.Kahraman H, Şahin H. A Ḥadīth and Its Indication Problem within the Context of Relationship between Faith and Deeds. IS. 2018;9:211–248.
MLA
Kahraman, Hüseyin, and Hacer Şahin. “A Ḥadīth and Its Indication Problem Within the Context of Relationship Between Faith and Deeds”. Ilahiyat Studies, vol. 9, no. 2, Dec. 2018, pp. 211-48, doi:10.12730/13091719.2018.92.181.
Vancouver
1.Hüseyin Kahraman, Hacer Şahin. A Ḥadīth and Its Indication Problem within the Context of Relationship between Faith and Deeds. IS. 2018 Dec. 1;9(2):211-48. doi:10.12730/13091719.2018.92.181
SCImago Journal & Country Rank