Araştırma Makalesi

A Ḥadīth and Its Indication Problem within the Context of Relationship between Faith and Deeds

Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2 23 Aralık 2018
PDF İndir
EN

A Ḥadīth and Its Indication Problem within the Context of Relationship between Faith and Deeds

Öz

The ḥadīth on the importance of ṣalāh, namely, “Whoever performs five daily prayers (ṣalāh) is guaranteed heaven by Allah. Whoever does not fulfil it, however, shall have no guarantee in the presence of Allah; Allah, at His will, may torment him or put him in His Heaven,” has been considered by numerous scholars as evidence that a person who abandons ṣalāh partially or completely with no reasonable excuse may still be forgiven by Allah. The followers of this approach construe the phrase “whoever does not fulfil it” as “whoever does not perform five daily prayers.” Nevertheless, the indication “whoever performs five daily prayers” in the initial section of the ḥadīth is reinforced by expressions such as “without missing any rule,” “without undervaluing it,” and “paying attention to its time, bows (rukūʿ), and prostration (sujūd)” in various narratives of the same ḥadīth. Given this fact, the phrase “whoever does not fulfil it” in the second part of the ḥadīth may be pointing at the essentials of ṣalāh and not at ṣalāh itself. In addition, the latter approach is supported by the general attitude of Islam about forgiving sins, conveniences with regard to the performance of ṣalāh, as well as various Qurʾān verses and ḥadīths that concretely outline the punishment for abandoning ṣalāh. In light of the foregoing, it seems inappropriate to consider the abovementioned ḥadīth as evidence with regard to the relationship between faith and deeds, and particularly “punishment of abandoning ṣalāh;” rather, the ḥadīth may concern the complete fulfillment of the essentials of ṣalāh.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. ʿAbd al-Bāqī, Muḥammad Fuʾād. al-Muʿjam al-mufahras li-alfāẓ al-Qurʾān al-karīm. Cairo: Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣriyyah, 1364.
  2. ʿAbd ibn Ḥumayd, Abū Muḥammad ʿAbd ibn Ḥumayd ibn Naṣr al-Kissī. al-Muntakhab min Musnad ʿAbd ibn Ḥumayd. Edited by Ṣubḥī al-Badrī al-Sāmarrāʾī and Maḥmūd Muḥammad Khalīl al-Ṣaʿīdī. Cairo: Maktabat al-Sunnah, 1988.
  3. Abū Dāwūd, Sulaymān ibn al-Ashʿath al-Sijistānī. Sunan Abī Dāwūd. 4 vols. Edited by Muḥammad Muḥyī al-Dīn ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd. Beirut: al-Maktabah al-ʿAṣriyyah, 2011.
  4. Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad al-Shaybānī. Musnad al-Imām Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal. 50 vols. Edited by Shuʿayb al-Arnāʾūṭ, ʿĀdil Murshid, Muḥammad Naʿīm al-ʿIrqsūsī, Ibrāhīm al-Zaybaq, Muḥammad Riḍwān al-ʿIrqsūsī, and Kāmil al-Kharrāṭ. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risālah, 2001.
  5. al-ʿAsqalānī, Abū l-Faḍl Shihāb al-Dīn Aḥmad ibn ʿAlī. Kitāb Tahdhīb al-Tahdhīb. 12 vols. Hyderabad: Maṭbaʿat Majlis Dāʾirat al-Maʿārif al-ʿUthmāniyyah, 1326.
  6. al-ʿAsqalānī, Abū l-Faḍl Shihāb al-Dīn Aḥmad ibn ʿAlī Fatḥ al-bārī bi-sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Imām Abī ʿAbd Allāh al-Bukhārī. 13 vols. Edited by ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn Bāz, Muḥammad Fuʾād ʿAbd al-Bāqī, and Muḥibb al-Dīn al-Khaṭīb. Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifah, 1959.
  7. Aydınlı, Abdullah. Hadis Istılahları Sözlüğü. Istanbul: Hadisevi, 2006.
  8. al-ʿAynī, Abū Muḥammad Badr al-Dīn Maḥmūd ibn Aḥmad. Sharḥ Sunan Abī Dāwūd. 7 vols. Edited by Abū l-Mundhir Khālid ibn Ibrāhīm al-Miṣrī. Riyadh: Maktabat al-Rushd, 1999.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Din Araştırmaları

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

23 Aralık 2018

Gönderilme Tarihi

19 Temmuz 2017

Kabul Tarihi

27 Nisan 2018

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2018 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Kahraman, H., & Şahin, H. (2018). A Ḥadīth and Its Indication Problem within the Context of Relationship between Faith and Deeds. Ilahiyat Studies, 9(2), 211-248. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2018.92.181
AMA
1.Kahraman H, Şahin H. A Ḥadīth and Its Indication Problem within the Context of Relationship between Faith and Deeds. IS. 2018;9(2):211-248. doi:10.12730/13091719.2018.92.181
Chicago
Kahraman, Hüseyin, ve Hacer Şahin. 2018. “A Ḥadīth and Its Indication Problem within the Context of Relationship between Faith and Deeds”. Ilahiyat Studies 9 (2): 211-48. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2018.92.181.
EndNote
Kahraman H, Şahin H (01 Aralık 2018) A Ḥadīth and Its Indication Problem within the Context of Relationship between Faith and Deeds. Ilahiyat Studies 9 2 211–248.
IEEE
[1]H. Kahraman ve H. Şahin, “A Ḥadīth and Its Indication Problem within the Context of Relationship between Faith and Deeds”, IS, c. 9, sy 2, ss. 211–248, Ara. 2018, doi: 10.12730/13091719.2018.92.181.
ISNAD
Kahraman, Hüseyin - Şahin, Hacer. “A Ḥadīth and Its Indication Problem within the Context of Relationship between Faith and Deeds”. Ilahiyat Studies 9/2 (01 Aralık 2018): 211-248. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2018.92.181.
JAMA
1.Kahraman H, Şahin H. A Ḥadīth and Its Indication Problem within the Context of Relationship between Faith and Deeds. IS. 2018;9:211–248.
MLA
Kahraman, Hüseyin, ve Hacer Şahin. “A Ḥadīth and Its Indication Problem within the Context of Relationship between Faith and Deeds”. Ilahiyat Studies, c. 9, sy 2, Aralık 2018, ss. 211-48, doi:10.12730/13091719.2018.92.181.
Vancouver
1.Hüseyin Kahraman, Hacer Şahin. A Ḥadīth and Its Indication Problem within the Context of Relationship between Faith and Deeds. IS. 01 Aralık 2018;9(2):211-48. doi:10.12730/13091719.2018.92.181

SCImago Journal & Country Rank