Research Article

Adaptation of the Social Presence Scale into Turkish: A Validity and Reliability Study

Volume: 6 Number: 1 June 30, 2025

Adaptation of the Social Presence Scale into Turkish: A Validity and Reliability Study

Abstract

This study aims to adapt the Social Presence Scale (SPS), developed by Kizilcec et al. (2015), into Turkish to measure perceptions of social presence in online learning environments. Social presence refers to individuals' ability to perceive the physical or psychological presence of others in a digital environment, which plays a significant role in fostering interaction, motivation, and engagement in learning processes. The study evaluates the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the scale and its applicability in the Turkish context.The research was conducted with 221 associate degree students enrolled in a distance education program at a public university. The validity of the scale was tested using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), confirming its single-factor structure. Fit indices (χ²/df = 2.33, RMSEA = 0.065, CFI = 1.0) indicate a high level of model fit. Reliability analysis revealed a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.918, demonstrating a high level of internal consistency.The findings indicate that the Turkish version of the SPS is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring social presence in online learning contexts. This scale will serve as a valuable tool for evaluating social presence perceptions and their impact on learning processes.

Keywords

Social Presence Perception , Instructor presence , Validity and Reliability , Scale Adaptation

References

  1. Alpsülün, M. (2025). Eğitsel videolarda eğitmen görünürlüğünün bilişsel yük, sosyal varlık ve öğrenme performansına etkisi: Bir göz izleme çalışması [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Fırat Üniversitesi.
  2. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2017). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum (23. baskı). Pegem Akademi.
  3. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çokluk, Ö., & Köklü, N. (2020). Sosyal bilimler için istatistik (24. baskı). Pegem Akademi.
  4. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (2. baskı). Pegem Akademi.
  5. Gu, C., Peng, Y., Nastase, S. A., Mayer, R. E., & Li, P. (2024). Onscreen presence of instructors in video lectures affects learners’ neural synchrony and visual attention during multimedia learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(12), e2309054121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2309054121
  6. Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  7. Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2), 147–166.
  8. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
  9. Kizilcec, R. F., Bailenson, J. N., & Gomez, C. J. (2015). The instructor’s face in video instruction: Evidence from two large-scale field studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 724–739. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000013
  10. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99.
APA
Türel, Y. K., & Alpsülün, M. (2025). Adaptation of the Social Presence Scale into Turkish: A Validity and Reliability Study. Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning, 6(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.52911/itall.1605036