Karbon Nötr Şehirlerin Tasarımı: Kent ve Mimarlık Sosyolojisi Bağlamında Sıfır Enerji Binaların Uygulanabilirliği

Abstract

Bu makale, karbon nötr şehirlerin tasarımını, kent ve mimarlık sosyolojisi bağlamında inceleyerek, sıfır enerji binaların uygulanabilirliğini ele almaktadır. Küresel iklim krizi ve artan enerji talepleri, sürdürülebilir şehirler ile yeşil bina teknolojilerinin önemini arttırmıştır. Araştırmanın temel amacı, karbon nötr şehirlerin tasarımı ile sıfır enerji binaların uygulanabilirliği üzerine sosyolojik ve mimari bir çerçevede kapsamlı bir değerlendirme sunmaktır. Çalışma, küresel iklim krizine çözüm olarak öne çıkan sürdürülebilir kentleşme ve yapılaşma modellerini analiz ederek, teknik yeniliklerin yanı sıra bu yaklaşımların toplumsal kabul edilebilirliği, erişilebilirliği konularına odaklanmaktadır. Çalışmada, binaların enerji verimliliği, yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarının kullanımı ve kent altyapısına entegrasyonu incelenerek, sürdürülebilir bir kentsel yaşamın nasıl sağlanabileceği tartışılmaktadır. Ayrıca, sosyal adalet ve erişilebilirlik gibi faktörler de göz önünde bulundurularak, bu tür projelerin toplumsal kabul görmesi/ yaygınlaşması için öneriler sunulmaktadır. Çalışma için önerilen yöntem, karbon nötr şehirlerin ve sıfır enerji binaların uygulanabilirliğini hem teknik hem de toplumsal açılardan değerlendiren “Entegre Sosyo-Teknik Değerlendirme” (ESTE) yaklaşımıdır. Araştırmanın bulguları, sıfır enerji binaların teknik açıdan uygulanabilir olduğunu ancak sosyoekonomik eşitsizlikler, kültürel direnç ve yüksek maliyetlerin geniş çaplı benimsemeyi zorlaştırdığını göstermektedir. Karbon nötr şehirlerde sıfır enerji binaların kullanımı, geleneksel kent kültürleriyle uyumlu olduğu sürece başarılı sonuçlar vermektedir. Teknolojik altyapı yeterli olsa da toplumsal kabul ve erişilebilirlik sınırlıdır. Kültürel uyum sağlanabilmesi için yerel katılımcı planlamalar kritik önemdedir. Ekonomik sürdürülebilirlik açısından, uzun vadede düşük işletme maliyetleri avantajlıdır ancak ilk yatırım maliyetleri yüksek kalmaktadır. Karbon nötr şehirler ve sıfır enerji binalarını teknik bir perspektifin yanı sıra sosyolojik, kültürel/ ekonomik açılardan entegre/ bütünleşik bir yaklaşımla ele alması çalışmanın özgün katkılarındandır.

Keywords

• Kent Sosyolojisi
• Entegre Sosyo-Teknik Değerlendirme (ESTE)
• Karbon Nötr Şehirler
• Sıfır Enerji Binalar
• Sürdürülebilir Kentleşme

Designing Carbon-Neutral Cities: The Feasibility of Zero-Energy Buildings in the Context of Urban and Architectural Sociology

Abstract

This article examines the design of carbon-neutral cities within the context of urban and architectural sociology, focusing on the feasibility of zero-energy buildings. The global climate crisis and increasing energy demands have heightened the importance of sustainable cities and green building technologies. The primary aim of this research is to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the design of carbon-neutral cities and the applicability of zero-energy buildings through a sociological and architectural framework. The study analyzes sustainable urbanization and construction models that have emerged as solutions to the global climate crisis, emphasizing not only technical innovations but also the societal acceptability and accessibility of these approaches. It explores how sustainable urban living can be achieved by examining building energy efficiency, the use of renewable energy sources, and integration into urban infrastructure. Furthermore, factors such as social justice and accessibility are considered, and recommendations are offered to enhance the societal acceptance and widespread adoption of such projects. The proposed methodology for the study is the “Integrated Socio-Technical Evaluation” (ISTE) approach, which assesses the feasibility of carbon-neutral cities and zero-energy buildings from both technical and social perspectives. The findings indicate that while zero-energy buildings are technically feasible, widespread adoption is hindered by socioeconomic inequalities, cultural resistance, and high initial costs. The use of zero-energy buildings in carbon-neutral cities yields successful outcomes when aligned with traditional urban cultures. Although the technological infrastructure is sufficient, societal acceptance and accessibility remain limited. Local participatory planning is critical to achieving cultural compatibility. From an economic sustainability standpoint, low operating costs offer long-term advantages, yet initial investment costs remain high. The study’s original contribution lies in its integrated approach, addressing carbon-neutral cities and zero-energy buildings not only from a technical perspective but also through sociological, cultural, and economic lenses.

Keywords

• Urban Sociology
• Integrated Socio-Technical Evaluation (ISTE)
• Carbon-Neutral Cities
• Zero-Energy Buildings
• Sustainable Urbanization

References

1. Acuto, M., & Ghojeh, M. (2019). C40 cities inside out. Global Policy, 10(4), 709–711. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12760
2. Ayoub, J. (2013). Towards net zero energy solar buildings. Net-Zeb. https://natural-resources.canada.ca/sites/www.nrcan.gc.ca/files/canmetenergy/files/pubs/2011-118_PM-FAC_411-IEAT40_ayoub_e.pdf adresinden 28.10.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
3. Baden, S. (2006). Hurdling financial barriers to lower energy buildings: Experiences from the USA and Europe on financial incentives and monetizing building energy savings in private investment decisions. Proceedings of 2006 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy.
4. Boeri, A., Longo, D., Orlandi, S., Roversi, R., & Turci, G. (2022). Community engagement and greening strategies as enabling practices for inclusive and resilient cities. International Journal of Environmental Impacts, 5(1), 1–14. DOI:10.2495/EI-V5-N1-1-14
5. Boy, J. D. (2021). ‘The metropolis and the life of spirit’by Georg Simmel: A new translation. Journal of Classical Sociology, 21(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X20980638
6. Brown, J. (2021). How cities are going carbon neutral. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20211115-how-cities-are-going-carbon-neutral adresinden 27.10.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
7. BSİ. (2009). High Street sets standard for demonstration of carbon neutrality. http://www.bsigroup.com/en/About-BSI/News-Room/BSI-News-Content/Disciplines/Sustainability/PAS-2060-release/ adresinden 29.10.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
8. Buttel, F. H. (2000). Ecological modernization as social theory. Geoforum, 31(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00044-5

9. BZE. (2024). About us. Beyond Zero Emissions. https://www.bze.org.au/about-us adresinden 29.10.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
10. C40 Cities. (2021). More than 100 American cities make historic pledge to accelerate net-zero emissions, deliver action needed to meet national climate goals. https://www.c40.org/news/american-cities-net-zero-climate-goals/ adresinden 28.10.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
11. Castells, M. (2013). Theory and ideology in urban sociology. In C. G. Pickvance (Ed.), Urban sociology (pp. 60–84). Routledge.
12. Caves, R. W. (2004). Encyclopedia of the City. Routledge.
13. Chandra, R., Saxena, G., & Kumar, V. (2015). Phytoremediation of environmental pollutants: an eco-sustainable green technology to environmental management. Advances in Biodegradation and Bioremediation of Industrial Waste, 1–29. CRC Press.
14. Clark, G. & Knight, Z. (2019). Towards the zero-carbon city. HSBC Centre of Sustainable Finance.
15. Coates, G. J. (2013). The sustainable urban district of Vauban in Freiburg, Germany. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 8(4), 265–286. https://doi.org/10.2495/DNE-V8-N4-265-286.
16. Crawley, D., Torcellini, P., Pless, S. & Deru, M. (2006). Zero energy buildings: A critical look at the definition. U.S. Department of Energy.
17. Cugurullo, F. (2016). Urban eco-modernisation and the policy context of new eco-city projects: Where Masdar City fails and why. Urban Studies, 53(11), 2417–2433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015588727
18. D’Agostino, D., & Mazzarella, L. (2019). What is a Nearly zero energy building? Overview, implementation and comparison of definitions. Journal of Building Engineering, 21, 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.10.019
19. Damsø, T., Kjær, T., & Christensen, T. B. (2017). Implementation of local climate action plans: Copenhagen–Towards a carbon-neutral capital. Journal of cleaner production, 167, 406–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.156
20. Daus, R. (1995). Large extra-European cities. The construction of nationalities (Großstädte Außereuropas. Die Konstruktion des Nationalen). Vol.2, Ursula Opitz Verlag, Babylon Metropolis Studies.
21. Eley, C. (2016). Design professional’s guide to zero net energy buildings. Island Press.
22. Elgendy, K. (2021). Carbon neutral cities: Can we fight climate change without them? Climate Champions. https://climatechampions.unfccc.int/carbon-neutral-cities-can-we-fight-climate-change-without-them/ adresinden 27.10.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
23. El-Khoury, J. (2020). Urban carbon politics: civil society, policymaking and the transition to carbon-neutral cities. [Doktora tezi, Universite de Montreal] http://hdl.handle.net/1866/26238
24. Encyclopedia Britannica. (2020). Paris Agreement. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Paris-Agreement-2015 adresinden 31.10.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
25. Fankhauser, S., Smith, S. M., Allen, M. et al. (2022). The meaning of net zero and how to get it right. Nat. Clim. Chang. 12, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01245-w
26. Ghazal, E. (2020). Embodied carbon and deep retrofits. Pembina Institute. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep25464. Adresinden 25.10.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
27. Gillingham, K., Newell, R. G., & Palmer, K. (2009). Energy efficiency economics and policy. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ., 1(1), 597–620. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.resource.102308.124234
28. Hamiduddin, I. (2015). Social sustainability, residential design and demographic balance: Neighbourhood planning strategies in Freiburg, Germany. Town Planning Review, 86(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2015.3.
29. Hamiduddin, I., & Daseking, W. (2022). Community-based planning in Freiburg, Germany: The case of Vauban. N. Gallent & D. Ciaffi (Ed.). Community action and planning: Contexts, drivers and outcomes (s. 237–258) içinde. Bristol University Press.
30. Hardy, C. (2013). Social space. M. Grenfell (Ed.). Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts. (s. 229-249) içinde. Routledge.
31. Harvey, D. (2010). Social justice and the city (Vol. 1). University of Georgia Press.
32. Hı-Smart. (2024). Concepts of nZEB buildings. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/erasmus-plus/project-result-content/48ff898e-a503-414a-b112-fba01dd2976e/HI-SMART_1.2_nZEB_definition_presentation.pdf adresinden 25.10.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
33. Hu, M. (2019). Net zero energy building: Predicted and unintended consequences. Routledge.
34. Huovila, A., Siikavirta, H., Rozado, C. A., Rökman, J., Tuominen, P., Paiho, S., ... & Ylén, P. (2022). Carbon-neutral cities: Critical review of theory and practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 341, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130912
35. Jones, P. (2011). The sociology of architecture: Constructing identities. Liverpool University Press.
36. Jones, P. R. (2006). The sociology of architecture and the politics of building: The discursive construction of Ground Zero. Sociology, 40(3), 549–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803850663674
37. Kenis, A., & Lievens, M. (2017). Imagining the carbon neutral city: The (post) politics of time and space. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(8), 1762–1778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16680617
38. Kipfer, S., & Milgrom, R. (2002). Henri Lefebvre-urbanization, space and nature: Editors’ preface. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 13(2), 37–41. https://www.cnsjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Henri-Lefebvre-Urbanization-Space-and-Nature-Editors-Preface.pdf
39. Komninos, N. (2022). Net Zero Energy districts: Connected intelligence for carbon-neutral cities. Land, 11(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020210
40. Koskela, E., Sinn, H. W., & Schöb, R. (2000). Green tax reform and competitiveness. German Economic Review, 2(1), 19–30. https://www.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/fachbereich/vwl/schoeb/forschung/forschung_dateien/greenTaxReformAndComp.pdf
41. Kurnitski, J. (2013). Cost optimal and nearly zero-energy buildings (nZEB): Definitions, calculation principles and case studies. Springer.
42. Lechner, F. J. (1991). Simmel on social space. Theory, Culture & Society, 8(3), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327691008003013
43. Lloyd, A. (2018). Architecture 2030 goes after embodied carbon and this is a very big deal. Treehugger Voices. https://www.treehugger.com/architecture-goes-after-embodied-carbon-and-very-big-deal-4852211 adresinden 30.10.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
44. Lloyd, A. (2019). Landmark Study Shows How to Change the Building Sector From a Major Carbon Emitter to a Major Carbon Sink. Treehugger Voices. https://www.treehugger.com/study-shows-how-to-change-building-sector-to-cut-carbon-4854259 adresinden 27.10.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
45. Machline, E., Pearlmutter, D., Cohen, C., & Schwartz, M. (2023). COVID-19: A catalyst for revitalizing mixed-use urban centers? The case of Paris. Building Research & Information, 51(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2022.2149451
46. Maclay, B. (2014). The new net zero: Leading-edge design and construction of homes and buildings for a renewable energy future. Chelsea Green Publishing.
47. Market Research Future.(2024). Zero energy Buildings Market Size, Share, Growth/ Report, 2032. https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/zero-energy-buildings-market 26.10.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
48. McLeod, R. (2017). The Passivhaus designer’s manual: A technical guide to low and zero energy buildings. Routledge.
49. Medeiros, E. (Ed.). (2024). Self-Sufficiency and Sustainable Cities and Regions: Planning for Sustainable, Circular and Carbon-Neutral Development. Taylor & Francis.
50. Moezzi, M., & Janda, K. B. (2014). From “if only” to “social potential” in schemes to reduce building energy use. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.014
51. Mohai, P., Pellow, D., & Roberts, J. T. (2009). Environmental justice. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34(1), 405–430. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-082508-094348
52. Mössner, S. (2015). Urban development in Freiburg, Germany–sustainable and neoliberal? DIE ERDE–Journal of the Geographical Society of Berlin, 146(2-3), 189–193. https://doi.org/10.12854/erde-146-16
53. Net Zero Foundation. (2024). Understanding Clean Energy Economics. https://netzerofoundation.org/ adresinden 30.10.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
54. Nieuwenhuijsen, M., de Nazelle, A., Pradas, M. C., Daher, C., Dzhambov, A. M., Echave, C., ... & Mueller, N. (2024). The Superblock model: A review of an innovative urban model for sustainability, liveability, health and well-being. Environmental Research, 251, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.118550
55. Ochoa, J. J., Tan, Y., Qian, Q. K., Shen, L., & Moreno, E. L. (2018). Learning from best practices in sustainable urbanization. Habitat International, 78, 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.05.013
56. Pacheco Torgal, F., & Mistretta, M. (Ed.). (2013). Nearly zero energy building refurbishment: A multidisciplinary approach. Springer.
57. Pahl, R. E. (2013). A perspective on urban sociology. Readings in urban sociology: Readings in sociology, 3. Pergamon Press.
58. Plinke, M. (2020). The year-round solar greenhouse: How to design and build a net-zero energy greenhouse. New Society Publishers.
59. Reeder, L. (2016). Net zero energy buildings: Case studies and lessons learned. Routledge.
60. Reinhart, C. F. & Cerezo, D. C. (2016). Urban building energy modeling – A review of a nascent field. Building and Environment, 97, 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.12.001
61. Saijo, T. (2020). Future design: Bequeathing sustainable natural environments and sustainable societies to future generations. Sustainability, 12(16), 64–67. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166467
62. Sartori, I., Napolitano, A. & Karsten, V. (2012) Net zero energy buildings: A consistent definition framework. Energy and Buildings (48), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.01.032
63. Scheurer, J., & Newman, P. (2009). Vauban: A European model bridging the green and brown agendas. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 2(2), 75–92. https://mirror.unhabitat.org/downloads/docs/GRHS2009CaseStudyChapter06Vauban.pdf.
64. Schroepfer, T. & Hee, L. (2008). Emerging forms of sustainable urbanism: Case studies of Vauban Freiburg and solarCity Linz. Journal of Green Building, 3(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.3.2.65.
65. Shen, L., Peng, Y., Zhang, X., & Wu, Y. (2012). An alternative model for evaluating sustainable urbanization. Cities, 29(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.06.008
66. Weng, M., Ding, N., Li, J., Jin, X., Xiao, H., He, Z. & Su, S., (2019). The 15-minute walkable neighborhoods: Measurement, social inequalities and implications for building healthy communities in urban China. Journal of Transport & Health. 13, 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.05.005
67. Wray, S. (2021). We need to do more: COP26 city highlights. Cities Today. https://cities-today.com/we-need-to-do-more-cop26-city-highlights-november-2/ adresinden 28.10.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
68. Zeiler, W., & Boxem, G. (2013). Net-zero energy building schools. Renewable Energy, 49, 282–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.01.013
69. Zhang, X., Shen, J., Yang, T., Tang, L., Wang, L., Liu, Y., & Xu, P. (2016). Smart meter and in-home display for energy savings in residential buildings: a pilot investigation in Shanghai, China. Intelligent Buildings International, 11(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2016.1213694