Russia’s Shifting Black Sea Policies: Regional and International Implications

Year 2026, Volume: 15 Issue: 1 , 161 - 180 , 31.03.2026

Ayşegül Ketenci

https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.1703337

https://izlik.org/JA66EJ74HC

Abstract

This study examines the Black Sea region within the framework of Regional Security Complex Theory and focuses on the relational and multi-layered nature of security dynamics among actors. Drawing on the theoretical framework developed by Buzan and Wæver, the study argues that security in the Black Sea should be evaluated not only in terms of material capabilities but also on the basis of historically shaped perceptions and interactions among multiple actors. The security complex emphasizes the importance of relational dynamics among actors and highlights that these dynamics intensify at the regional level. The analysis addresses the historical development of Russia’s security policies in the Black Sea and examines how these policies have transformed over time. In particular, the annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the Russia–Ukraine war that began in 2022 are considered as turning points that have fundamentally transformed the region’s security environment. The study reveals how these developments have reshaped regional security dynamics and their effects on the broader international context. In the study, the Black Sea is addressed as a critical geopolitical space where regional and extra-regional actors intersect, and Russia’s central position within this space, as well as its perception of the region as a vital buffer zone for its national security, are analyzed. The study places the Black Sea within a broader international framework by considering the roles of external actors such as NATO, the United States, and China. While NATO seeks to increase its deterrence capacity in the Black Sea, the United States develops strategies through its partners due to its lack of direct access to the region. China, on the other hand, attempts to expand its sphere of influence in the Black Sea, which it regards as a key component of the Belt and Road Initiative. In the Black Sea, the military, economic, and political dimensions of security relations among regional and extra-regional actors are of critical importance. Security dynamics among actors influence one another; this influence is not limited to the regional level but also has global repercussions. In the study, an analysis based on a literature review has been conducted, and various sources have been utilized in order to interpret both historical and contemporary developments.

Keywords

Black Sea , Russia , Shifting Policies , Regional Security Complex , International Politics

Rusya’nın Değişen Karadeniz Politikaları: Bölgesel ve Küresel Yansımalar

https://izlik.org/JA66EJ74HC

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Karadeniz bölgesini Bölgesel Güvenlik Kompleksi Teorisi çerçevesinde inceleyerek, aktörler arasındaki güvenlik dinamiklerinin ilişkisel ve çok katmanlı doğasını konu edinmektedir. Çalışma, Buzan ve Wæver tarafından geliştirilen kuramsal çerçeveden hareketle, Karadeniz’deki güvenliğin maddi kapasitelere ek olarak tarihsel olarak şekillenmiş algılar ve çoklu aktörler arasındaki etkileşimler temelinde değerlendirilmesi gerektiğini savunmaktadır. Güvenlik Kompleksi, aktörler arasındaki ilişkisel dinamiklerin önemine vurgu yapmakta ve bu dinamiklerin bölgesel düzeyde yoğunlaştığına değinmektedir. Analiz, Rusya’nın Karadeniz’deki güvenlik politikalarının tarihsel gelişimini ele almakta ve bu politikaların zaman içerisinde nasıl dönüştüğünü incelemektedir. Özellikle 2014’te Kırım’ın ilhakı ve 2022’de başlayan Rusya–Ukrayna Savaşı, bölgenin güvenlik ortamını köklü biçimde değiştiren dönüm noktaları olarak ele alınmaktadır. Çalışma, bu gelişmelerin bölgesel güvenlik dinamiklerini nasıl yeniden şekillendirdiğini ve daha geniş uluslararası bağlam üzerindeki etkilerini ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışmada, Karadeniz bölgesel ve bölge dışı aktörlerin kesiştiği kritik bir jeopolitik alan olarak ele alınmakta ve Rusya’nın söz konusu alan içerisindeki merkezi konumu ve bölgeyi ulusal güvenliği açısından hayati bir tampon bölge olarak algılayışı ele alınarak analiz edilmektedir. Çalışmada Karadeniz, NATO, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri ve Çin gibi dış aktörlerin rolleri dikkate alınarak daha geniş bir uluslararası çerçeve içine yerleştirilmektedir. NATO, Karadeniz’de caydırıcılık kapasitesini artırmaya çalışırken, ABD ise doğrudan Karadeniz’e erişimi olmadığı için ortakları üzerinden stratejiler geliştirmektedir. Çin ise Kuşak-Yol Girişimi’nin kilit bileşeni olarak gördüğü Karadeniz’de etki alanını artırmaya çalışmaktadır. Karadeniz'de bölgesel ve bölge dışı aktörlerle ilgili güvenlik ilişkilerinin askeri, ekonomik ve siyasi boyutu kritik önemdedir. Aktörler arasındaki güvenlik dinamikleri birbirini etkiler; bu etki sadece bölgesel değildir, küresel yansımaları da olmaktadır. Çalışmada, literatür taramasına dayanan bir analiz yapılmış ve gerek tarihsel gerek güncel gelişmeleri yorumlayabilmek için farklı kaynaklardan istifade edilmiştir.

Keywords

Karadeniz , Rusya , Değişen Politikalar , Bölgesel Güvenlik Kompleksi , Uluslararası Siyaset

References

• Antonenko, O. (2009). Towards a comprehensive regional security framework in the Black Sea region after the Russia–Georgia war. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 9(3), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683850902934275
• Akgül, P. (2020). Karadeniz’in bölgesel güvenlik kompleksi olarak incelenmesi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(2), 550–569.
• Ay, H. M. & Söylemez A. (2023). Grain Corridor Agreement and Turkey’s role in the Russia-Ukraine War. Islamic World and Politics, 7(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.18196/jiwp.v7i1.27
• Bechev, D. (2025, June 19). The Black Sea has become the fulcrum of Europe’s security. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/europe/strategic-europe/2025/06/the-black-sea-has-become-the-fulcrum-of-europes-security?lang=en
• Borisocheva, K. (2007). Analysis of the oil- and gas-pipeline-links between EU and Russia: An account of intrinsic interests. Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zurich. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/47031/Analysis%20Oil%20and%20Gas.pdf
• Buzan, B. (1983). People, states and fear: The national security problem in international relations. Brighton, UK: Wheatsheaf Books.
• Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
• Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Clough, G. (2024). To fend off Russia in the Black Sea, the US and NATO need to help boost allies’ naval power. Atlantic Council. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/to-fend-off-russia-in-the-black-sea-the-us-and-nato-need-to-help-boost-allies-naval-power/
• Coşkun, A. (2024, February 27). The shifting balance of power in the Black Sea. GIS Reports. https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/Türkiye-black-sea/
• Dalay, G., & Sabanadze, N. (2024, March 12). How geopolitical competition in the Black Sea is redefining regional order. Chatham House. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2024/03/how-geopolitical-competition-black-sea-redefining-regional-order
• Delanoe, I. (2024, February 22). Russia’s Black Sea Fleet in the special military operation in Ukraine. Foreign Policy Research Institute (FPRI). https://www.fpri.org/article/2024/02/russias-black-sea-fleet-in-the-special-military-operation-in-ukraine/
• Dellal, İ. (2022). Grain corridor and its importance. Türkiye Humanitarian Action Overview. https://yillik.kizilayakademi.org.tr/en/grain-corridor-and-its-importance/
• Dunlevie, T. (2023, December 5). China and Russia in the Black Sea Region: Moving towards Pax Sinica? Center for Maritime Strategy. Retrieved from https://centerformaritimestrategy.org/publications/china-and-russia-in-the-black-sea-region-moving-towards-pax-sinica/
• Flanagan, S. J., Binnendijk, A., Chindea, I. A., Costello, K., Kirkwood, G., Massicot, D., & Reach, C. (2020). Russia, NATO, and Black Sea Security (RAND Report RRA357-1). RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RRA300/RRA357-1/RAND_RRA357-1.pdf
• Fota, I. (2023). Western interests in the Black Sea region. Connections: The Quarterly Journal, 22(3), 31–43. https://connections-qj.org/system/files/download-count/22.3.01_western_interests.pdf
• Frühling, S., & Lasconjarias, G. (2016). NATO, A2/AD and the Kaliningrad challenge. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 58(2), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2016.1161906
• Hodges, B., Horrell, S., & Kız, I. (2022). Russia’s militarization of the Black Sea: Implications for the United States and NATO. Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA). https://cepa.org/comprehensive-reports/russias-militarization-of-the-black-sea-implications-for-the-united-states-and-nato/
• Hooker, R. D. (2023). A security strategy for the Black Sea. Atlantic Council. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/a-security-strategy-for-the-black-sea/
• Kain, E., & Asal, U. Y. (2023). NATO ve Rusya Federasyonu’nun yeni mücadele alanı: Karadeniz’in jeopolitiği. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Dış Ticaret Dergisi, 1(4), 112–135. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3367958
• Ketenci, A. (2023). Russia’s war on Ukraine and the Montreux Convention as Türkiye’s international law instrument and policy tool for the security of the Black Sea. Connections: The Quarterly Journal, 22(3), 72-87. https://connections-qj.org/article/russias-war-ukraine-and-montreux-convention-turkiyes-international-law-instrument-and-policy
• Kılıç Yaşın, G. (2022, June 29). Karadeniz güvenliği için riskler ve fırsatlar [Analysis]. Avrasya İncelemeleri Merkezi (AVİM). https://avim.org.tr/tr/Analiz/KARADENIZ-GUVENLIGI-ICIN-RISKLER-VE-FIRSATLAR
• Kollakowski, T. (2023). Interpreting Russian aims to control the Black Sea region through naval geostrategy (part two): ‘Establishing full control over Southern Ukraine and the Donbas is one of the tasks of the Russian Army’. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 36(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2023.2251306
• Knight, J. (1975). American statecraft and the 1946 Black Sea Straits controversy. Political Science Quarterly, 90(3), 451–475. https://doi.org/10.2307/2148296
• Lewis, D. G. (2019, July). Strategic culture and geography: Russia’s Southern Seas after Crimea (Marshall Center Security Insights, No. 36). George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies. https://www.marshallcenter.org/en/publications/security-insights/strategic-culture-and-geography-russias-southern-seas-after-crimea-0
• Montgomery, A. E. (1972). The making of the Treaty of Sèvres of 10 August 1920. The Historical Journal, 15(4), 775–787. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2638042
• Nettles, A. C. (2022). The Black Sea thread in Russian foreign policy and how the United States should respond. Marine Corps University Press. https://www.usmcu.edu/Outreach/Marine-Corps-University-Press/MCU-Journal/JAMS-vol-13-no-2/The-Black-Sea-Thread-in-Russian-Foreign-Policy/
• Office of the Historian. (1947). The Truman Doctrine. U.S. Department of State. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/truman-doctrine
• Özkural Köroğlu, N., & Özgüven, F. (2024). An analysis of Türkiye’s role in the Black Sea region-building process. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, 13(2), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.1548202
• Papadimitriou, Y., & Solaker, G. (2023). Greece and Türkiye: The Treaty of Lausanne 100 years on. https://www.dw.com/en/greece-and-turkey-the-treaty-of-lausanne-100-years-on/a-66307830
• Polat, D. Ş. (2017). NATO ve Rusya Federasyonu’nun yeni mücadele alanı: Karadeniz. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(4), 86–122. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/301425 President of Russia Official Website. (2022, July 19). Meeting with President of Türkiye Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/69590
• Rumer, E., & Sokolsky, R. (2021, May 27). Russia in the Mediterranean: Here to stay. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/05/27/russia-in-mediterranean-here-to-stay-pub-84605
• Sanders, D. (2007). U.S. naval diplomacy in the Black Sea: Sending mixed messages. Naval War College Review, 60(3), 61–72. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26396849
• Sanders, D. (2021). Can China promote stability in the Black Sea region? Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 21(3), 415–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2021.1935771
• Saraçlı, M. (2015). Rusya Federasyonu’nun yakın çevre politikasında dış Rusların yeri ve Kırım meselesi. Karadeniz Araştırmaları, 45(Bahar), 69–88.
• Santora, M., & Erlanger, S. (2023, August 8). Turbulent waters: How the Black Sea became a hot spot in the war. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/08/world/europe/black-sea-russia-ukraine.html
• Sinovets, P. (2020, November 12). The real and projected strategic dimension of the Russian Black Sea Fleet. PONARS Eurasia. https://www.ponarseurasia.org/the-real-and-projected-strategic-dimension-of-the-russian-black-sea-fleet/
• Stronski, P. (2021, May 20). What is Russia doing in the Black Sea? Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/05/20/what-is-russia-doing-in-black-sea-pub-84549
• Toucas, B. (2017, May 4). Russia’s design in the Black Sea: Extending the buffer zone. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). https://www.csis.org/analysis/russias-design-black-sea-extending-buffer-zone
• Tüysüzoğlu, G. (2013). Debates on multipolarity and regional outlook of the Black Sea Basin. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, 8(3), 241–273. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/17711
• Wigell, M., & Vihma, A. (2016). Geopolitics versus geoeconomics: The case of Russia’s geostrategy and its effects on the EU. International Affairs, 92(3), 605–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12555
• Wintour, P. (2023, July 20). What was the Black Sea grain deal and why did it collapse? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/20/what-was-the-black-sea-grain-deal-and-why-did-it-collapse