Türk Gelir İdaresinde Çalışanların Örgütsel Bağlılıkları ve Örgütsel Performansları Arasındaki İlişkide Elektronikleşmenin Moderatör Etkisi; İVDB EYDS Hizmeti

Nusret Göksu; Mehmet Taşkırmaz

doi:10.15869/itobiad.269461

EN TR

The Moderator Effect of the Electronicization in Relation to Organizational Commitment and Performance of Employees at Turkish Revenue Administration: SEIA Service at Istanbul Revenue Administration

Abstract

Provided by tax units under the organization roof of Turkish Revenue Administration, Tax services has character of duty in today's modern states, it also has constitutional basis in the Republic of Turkey. In this paper, it is examined that if electronicization at Turkish Revenue Administration has or not moderator effect in relation to organizational commitment and performance of employees. System of Electronic Inspection and Audit (SEIA) serviced by public employees that employed in the application group directorates of the Istanbul Revenue Administration takes part in this study as a research topic. In this paper, in terms of organizational commitment and organizational performance in Turkish Revenue Administration it is tried to explain how important SEIA service is. Consequently, it is found that there is a moderate positive relationship between organizational commitment and performance, electronicization has moderator effect in relation to variables specified as well.

Keywords

Commitment,Performance,Electronicization,TRA,SEIA

References

Allen, N.J. ve Meyer, J.P. (1990). The measurement and antecendets of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
Conchas, E. (2000). Company profits tied to employee commitment. Dallas Business Journal, 2(29), 37-48.
Delaney, J.T. ve Husalid, M.A. (1996). The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptıons of Organizational Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 949-969.
Dess, G.G. ve Robinson, R.B. (1984). Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: the case of privately-held firm and conglomerate business units. Strategic Management Journal, 5(3), 265-273.
Faisal, M.N. ve Al-Esmael, B.A. (2013). Modeling the enablers of organizational commitment. Business Process Management, 20(1), 25- 46.
Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı (GİB). Türk Gelir İdaresi Mükellef Hakları Bildirgesi. Erişim tarihi: 09.10.2016, http://www.gib.gov.tr/
Hwang, I.S. ve Chi, D.J. (2005). Relationships among internal marketing, employee job satisfaction and international hotel performance: an empirical study. International Journal of Management, 22(2), 285-293.
İstanbul Vergi Dairesi Başkanlığı (İVDB). Misyonumuz ve Vizyonumuz. Erişim tarihi: 09.10.2016, http://www.ivdb.gov.tr/
Kim, S. (2005). Individual-level factors and organisational performance in government organisations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), 245-261.
Kur’an-ı Kerim, Kehf Suresi.

Li, Ye-Chuen. (2014). Impact of leisure farm resource base on organizational commitment and performance. The International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 6(4), 122-134.
Meyer, J.P. ve Allen, N.J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.
Meyer, J.P., Stanley, D.J., Herscovitch, L. ve Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization: A Meta- analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20-52.
Miller, D. ve Lee, J. (1999). People matter: commitment to employees, strategy and performance in Korean firms. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 579-593.
Mitchell, T.R., Holtom, B.C. ve Lee, T.W. (2001). How to keep your best employees: developing an effective retention policy. Academy of Management Executive, 15, 96-108.
Mowday, R.T., Steers, R.M., ve Porter, L.W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224- 247.
Nazir, S., Shafi, A., Qun, W., Nazir, N. ve Tran Q.D. (2016). Influence of organizational rewards on organizational commitment and turnover intentions. Employee Relations, 38(4), 596-619.
Oberholster, F.R. ve Taylor, J.W. (1999). Spiritual experience and the organizational commitment. Info, 2(1), 57-78.
Oxford Dictionaries. Definition of performance in English. Erişim tarihi: 10.10.2016.https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/
Oxford Dictionaries. Definition of organizational in English. Erişim Tarihi: 10.10.2016. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/
Porter, L., Steers R., Mowday, R. ve Boullian, P. (1974). Organizational Commitment, job satisfaction and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603-609.
Richard, O.C., McMillan-Capehart, A., Bhuian, S.N. ve Taylor, E.C. (2009). Antecedents and consequences of psychological contracts: does organizational culture really matter?. Journal of Business Research, 62(8), 818-825.
Rousseau, D.M. (2004). Psychological contracts in the workplace: understanding the ties that motivate. Academy of Management Executives, 18, 120-127.
Sawitri, D., Suswati, E. ve Huda, K. (2016). The impact of job satisfaction, organization commitment, organization citizenship behavior (ocb) on employees’ performance. The International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 9(2), 24-45.
Schneider, B., Hanges, P.J., Smith, D.B. ve Salvaggio, A.N. (2003). Which comes first: employee attitudes or organisational financial and market performance?. Journal of Psychology, 88(5), 836-851.
Scholl, R.W. (1981). Differentiating organizational commitment from expectancy as a motivating force. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 589-599.
Sipahi, B., Yurtkoru, E.S. ve Çinko, M. (2008). Sosyal Bilimlerde SPSS’le Veri Analizi, 2.Bs., Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım, İstanbul.
Stebbins, R.A. (1970). On misunderstanding the concept of commitment: A theoretical clarification. Social Forces, 48, 526-529.
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasası. Siyasi Hak ve Ödevler, Vergi Ödevi. Erişim tarihi: 09.10.2016, http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/
Türk Dil Kurumu (TDK). Güncel Türkçe Sözlük. Erişim tarihi: 09.10.2016, http://www.tdk.gov.tr/
Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organizations: A normative view. Academy of Management Review, 7, 418-428.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Nusret Göksu
Türkiye

Mehmet Taşkırmaz

Publication Date

March 10, 2017

Submission Date

November 25, 2016

Acceptance Date

March 10, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 6 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.269461

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA59SB39NW

APA

Göksu, N., & Taşkırmaz, M. (2017). Türk Gelir İdaresinde Çalışanların Örgütsel Bağlılıkları ve Örgütsel Performansları Arasındaki İlişkide Elektronikleşmenin Moderatör Etkisi; İVDB EYDS Hizmeti. İnsan Ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(1), 443-457. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.269461

Journal of the Human and Social Science Researches is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC).

35894

The Moderator Effect of the Electronicization in Relation to Organizational Commitment and Performance of Employees at Turkish Revenue Administration: SEIA Service at Istanbul Revenue Administration

The Moderator Effect of the Electronicization in Relation to Organizational Commitment and Performance of Employees at Turkish Revenue Administration: SEIA Service at Istanbul Revenue Administration

Abstract

Keywords