Abstract
The purpose of this
study is to adapt the “Self-Efficacy in Romantic Relationships Scale”, which
was developed by Riggio and Weiser, Valenzuela, Lui, Montes and Heur
(2011), into Turkish culture and conduct its validity and
reliability study. The study was carried out with a total of 367 students (243
girls and 124 boys), including senior students attending various departments
and receiving pedagogical formation education in Dokuz Eylul University Faculty
of Education. The two-factor structure of the SERRS was tested with
confirmatory factor analysis method. The results showed that the two-factor
structure of the SERRS was confirmed. The language validity of the scale was
also examined. In addition, “General Self-Efficacy Scale” was used as criterion
to determine the concurrent validity of the scale. The reliability of the SERRS
was calculated with test-retest reliability coefficient and internal
consistency coefficient methods. The results show that the SERRS can be used as
a valid and reliable measurement tool.
References
- Aypay, A. (2010). Genel Öz Yeterlik Ölçeği’nin (GÖYÖ) Türkçe’ye uyarlama çalışması. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11 (2), 113-131.Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 8, 191–215.doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Cui, M., Fincham, F.D. ve Pasley, B.K. (2008). Young adult romantic relationships: The role of parents' marital problems and relationship efficacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1226–1235. doi:10.1177/0146167208319693. Fincham, F. D., Harold, G. T. ve Gano-Phillips, S. (2000). The longitudinal association between attributions and marital satisfaction: Direction of effects and role of efficacy expectations. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 267–285.Haigh, E. A. P., Moore, M. T., Kashdan, T. B. ve Fresco, D. M. (2011). Examination of the factor structure and concurrent validity of the Langer Mindfulness/Mindlessness Scale. Assessment, 18(1), 11-26.Hu, L. ve Bentler, P.M (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.Lopez, F.G., Morúa, W. ve Rice, K.G. (2007). Factor structure, stability, and predictive validity of college students' relationship self-efficacy beliefs. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 40, 80–96.Riggio, H.R., Weiser, D.A., Valenzuela, A.M., Lui, P.P., Montes, R. ve Heuer,J.(2013). Self efficacy in romantic relationships: Prediction of relationship attitudes and outcomes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 629–650. doi:10.1080/00224545. 2013.801826.Riggio, H.R., Weiser, D., Valenzuela, A., Lui, P., Montes, R. ve Heuer, J. (2011). Initial validation of a measure of self efficacy in romantic relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 601–606. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.026.Schermelleh-Engel. K ve Moosbrugger. H.(2003). Evaluating the fit of stuctural equation models: Tests of significant descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Research Online,8 (2).23-74.Tabachnick, B. G ve Fidell, L.S. (2015). Çev Ed: Baloğlu, M. Çok değişkenli istatistiklerin kullanımı. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.Tong, Y. ve Shanggui, S. (2004). A Study on general self-efficacy and subjective well-being of low ses college students in a Chinese university. College Students Journal, 38 (4), 637-642.Weiser, D. ve Weigel, D., J. (2016). Self-efficacy in romantic relationships: direct and indirect effects on relationship maintenance and satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences,89, 152-156. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.013
Abstract
Bu araştırmanın amacı, Riggio ve Weiser,
Valenzuela, Lui, Montes ve Heur (2011) tarafından geliştirilen “Romantik
İlişkilerde Öz Yeterlik Ölçeği”ni (RİÖYÖ) Türk kültürüne uyarlayarak, geçerlik
ve güvenirlik çalışmasını yapmaktır. Araştırma, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi’nde
Eğitim Fakültesi’nin çeşitli bölümlerine devam eden lisans 4. sınıf öğrencileri
ile pedagojik formasyon eğitimi alan 243’ü kız ve 124’ü erkek olmak üzere
toplam 367 kişi ile yürütülmüştür. RİÖYÖ’nin iki faktörlü yapısı doğrulayıcı
faktör analizi yöntemi ile test edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar, RİÖYÖ’nin iki
faktörlü yapısının doğrulandığını göstermiştir. Bununla birlikte ölçeğin dil
geçerliği de incelenmiştir. Ayrıca ölçeğin benzer
ölçek geçerliğini belirlemek için “Genel Öz Yeterlik Ölçeği” ölçüt olarak
kullanılmıştır Ölçeğin güvenirlik çalışması, test-tekrar test güvenirlik
katsayısı ve iç tutarlılık katsayısı ile hesaplanmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar,
RİÖYÖ’nin geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olarak kullanılabileceğini
göstermektedir.
References
- Aypay, A. (2010). Genel Öz Yeterlik Ölçeği’nin (GÖYÖ) Türkçe’ye uyarlama çalışması. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11 (2), 113-131.Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 8, 191–215.doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Cui, M., Fincham, F.D. ve Pasley, B.K. (2008). Young adult romantic relationships: The role of parents' marital problems and relationship efficacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1226–1235. doi:10.1177/0146167208319693. Fincham, F. D., Harold, G. T. ve Gano-Phillips, S. (2000). The longitudinal association between attributions and marital satisfaction: Direction of effects and role of efficacy expectations. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 267–285.Haigh, E. A. P., Moore, M. T., Kashdan, T. B. ve Fresco, D. M. (2011). Examination of the factor structure and concurrent validity of the Langer Mindfulness/Mindlessness Scale. Assessment, 18(1), 11-26.Hu, L. ve Bentler, P.M (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.Lopez, F.G., Morúa, W. ve Rice, K.G. (2007). Factor structure, stability, and predictive validity of college students' relationship self-efficacy beliefs. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 40, 80–96.Riggio, H.R., Weiser, D.A., Valenzuela, A.M., Lui, P.P., Montes, R. ve Heuer,J.(2013). Self efficacy in romantic relationships: Prediction of relationship attitudes and outcomes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 629–650. doi:10.1080/00224545. 2013.801826.Riggio, H.R., Weiser, D., Valenzuela, A., Lui, P., Montes, R. ve Heuer, J. (2011). Initial validation of a measure of self efficacy in romantic relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 601–606. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.026.Schermelleh-Engel. K ve Moosbrugger. H.(2003). Evaluating the fit of stuctural equation models: Tests of significant descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Research Online,8 (2).23-74.Tabachnick, B. G ve Fidell, L.S. (2015). Çev Ed: Baloğlu, M. Çok değişkenli istatistiklerin kullanımı. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.Tong, Y. ve Shanggui, S. (2004). A Study on general self-efficacy and subjective well-being of low ses college students in a Chinese university. College Students Journal, 38 (4), 637-642.Weiser, D. ve Weigel, D., J. (2016). Self-efficacy in romantic relationships: direct and indirect effects on relationship maintenance and satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences,89, 152-156. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.013
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Other Fields of Education |
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 30, 2019 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2019 Volume: 8 Issue: 2 |
