Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Rabble, Masses or Humanity: Kraus and Canetti Responding to the July Revolt of 1927

Year 2024, Issue: 51, 37 - 47, 26.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.26650/sdsl2023-1429579

Abstract

The Justice Palace Fire in Vienna on the 15th July 1927 was a pivotal moment in the trajectory of the young First Austrian Republic. Also known as the July Revolt, it was an eruption of a long-standing partisan conflict. The resulting political deadlock left no ground for reconciliation and gave way to Austrofascism in the 1930s. The July Revolt was also a crucial episode in the evolution of crowd theory. The response of the Austrian government and the Viennese Press to this tragedy rested on the foundations of mass psychology and framed it as a struggle between Authority and Chaos. The Viennese Publicist Karl Kraus picked this account of ‘rabble’ apart in his periodical Die Fackel and emphasised the individual humanity of its victims. Author Elias Canetti witnessed the incidents of the 15th July himself. His book Crowds and Power (1960) admittedly drew many insights from that day’s memory. In contrast to mass psychology, Canetti’s crowd theory gave agency to the people who became masses. Kraus’ stress on humanity aided the transition from contempt-driven mass psychology to a fast anthropological and value-neutral crowd theory. This article examines the evolution of crowd theory catalysed by the July Revolt.

References

  • Andics, H. (1962). Der Staat, den keiner wollte. Österreich 1918-1938. Wien: Verlag Herder. google scholar
  • Borch, C. (2012). The politics of crowds: An alternative history of sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Botz, G. (2001). Der „15. Juli 1927“: Ablauf, Ursachen und Folgen. In: Leser, Norbert & Sailer-Wlasits, Paul (Eds.) google scholar
  • 1927 - als die Republik brannte (pp. 33-52). Vienna: Edition Va Bene. google scholar
  • Canetti, E. (1978). Crowds and Power. New York: Continuum Publishing. google scholar
  • Canetti, E. (1980). Die Fackel im Ohr. Die Lebensgeschichte 1921-1931. München: Carl Hanser Verlag. google scholar
  • Canetti, E. (1999). The Memoirs of Elias Canetti. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, Inc. google scholar
  • Canetti, E. (2007). Masse und Macht. Berlin: Claassen Verlag. google scholar
  • Colm, G. (1931). Masse. In A., Vierkandt (Ed.) Handwörterbuch der Soziologie (pp. 355-360). Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag. google scholar
  • Ebine, T. (2004). Ekstasis. Zum Massendiskurs in der Weimarer Republik. In: Neue Beitrage zur Germanistik. 3(1), 164-182. google scholar
  • Freud, S. (1989). Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego. W.W. Norton & Company. google scholar
  • Geiger, T. (1967). Die Masse und ihre Aktion: Ein Beitrag zur Soziologie der Revolutionen. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag. google scholar
  • Jonsson, S. (2013). Crowds and democracy. Colombia: Columbia University Press. google scholar
  • Kraus, K. (1927). Der Hort der Republik. In: Die Fackel. 29(766-770), 1-92. Online verfügbar: https://fackel.oeaw.ac.at/ google scholar
  • Le Bon, G. (2001). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. Batoche Books. google scholar
  • Leser, N. (2001). Der 15. Juli 1927 als Peripetie des Austromarxismus und der österreichischen Demokratie der Ersten Republik. In: Leser, Norbert & Sailer-Wlasits, Paul (Eds.) 1927 - als die Republik brannte (pp. 53-92). Vienna: Edition Va Bene. google scholar
  • Moscovici, S. (1986). Das Zeitalter der Massen: eine historische Abhandlung über die Massenpsychologie. München: Hanser. google scholar
  • Stieg, G. (1990). Frucht des Feuers. Canetti, Doderer, Kraus und der Justizpalastbrand. Edition Falter. google scholar
Year 2024, Issue: 51, 37 - 47, 26.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.26650/sdsl2023-1429579

Abstract

References

  • Andics, H. (1962). Der Staat, den keiner wollte. Österreich 1918-1938. Wien: Verlag Herder. google scholar
  • Borch, C. (2012). The politics of crowds: An alternative history of sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Botz, G. (2001). Der „15. Juli 1927“: Ablauf, Ursachen und Folgen. In: Leser, Norbert & Sailer-Wlasits, Paul (Eds.) google scholar
  • 1927 - als die Republik brannte (pp. 33-52). Vienna: Edition Va Bene. google scholar
  • Canetti, E. (1978). Crowds and Power. New York: Continuum Publishing. google scholar
  • Canetti, E. (1980). Die Fackel im Ohr. Die Lebensgeschichte 1921-1931. München: Carl Hanser Verlag. google scholar
  • Canetti, E. (1999). The Memoirs of Elias Canetti. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, Inc. google scholar
  • Canetti, E. (2007). Masse und Macht. Berlin: Claassen Verlag. google scholar
  • Colm, G. (1931). Masse. In A., Vierkandt (Ed.) Handwörterbuch der Soziologie (pp. 355-360). Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag. google scholar
  • Ebine, T. (2004). Ekstasis. Zum Massendiskurs in der Weimarer Republik. In: Neue Beitrage zur Germanistik. 3(1), 164-182. google scholar
  • Freud, S. (1989). Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego. W.W. Norton & Company. google scholar
  • Geiger, T. (1967). Die Masse und ihre Aktion: Ein Beitrag zur Soziologie der Revolutionen. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag. google scholar
  • Jonsson, S. (2013). Crowds and democracy. Colombia: Columbia University Press. google scholar
  • Kraus, K. (1927). Der Hort der Republik. In: Die Fackel. 29(766-770), 1-92. Online verfügbar: https://fackel.oeaw.ac.at/ google scholar
  • Le Bon, G. (2001). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. Batoche Books. google scholar
  • Leser, N. (2001). Der 15. Juli 1927 als Peripetie des Austromarxismus und der österreichischen Demokratie der Ersten Republik. In: Leser, Norbert & Sailer-Wlasits, Paul (Eds.) 1927 - als die Republik brannte (pp. 53-92). Vienna: Edition Va Bene. google scholar
  • Moscovici, S. (1986). Das Zeitalter der Massen: eine historische Abhandlung über die Massenpsychologie. München: Hanser. google scholar
  • Stieg, G. (1990). Frucht des Feuers. Canetti, Doderer, Kraus und der Justizpalastbrand. Edition Falter. google scholar
There are 18 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects World Languages, Literature and Culture (Other)
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Sunil Choudhary 0009-0003-9154-650X

Publication Date June 26, 2024
Submission Date January 31, 2024
Acceptance Date May 30, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Issue: 51

Cite

APA Choudhary, S. (2024). Rabble, Masses or Humanity: Kraus and Canetti Responding to the July Revolt of 1927. Studien Zur Deutschen Sprache Und Literatur(51), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.26650/sdsl2023-1429579
AMA Choudhary S. Rabble, Masses or Humanity: Kraus and Canetti Responding to the July Revolt of 1927. Studien zur deutschen Sprache und Literatur. June 2024;(51):37-47. doi:10.26650/sdsl2023-1429579
Chicago Choudhary, Sunil. “Rabble, Masses or Humanity: Kraus and Canetti Responding to the July Revolt of 1927”. Studien Zur Deutschen Sprache Und Literatur, no. 51 (June 2024): 37-47. https://doi.org/10.26650/sdsl2023-1429579.
EndNote Choudhary S (June 1, 2024) Rabble, Masses or Humanity: Kraus and Canetti Responding to the July Revolt of 1927. Studien zur deutschen Sprache und Literatur 51 37–47.
IEEE S. Choudhary, “Rabble, Masses or Humanity: Kraus and Canetti Responding to the July Revolt of 1927”, Studien zur deutschen Sprache und Literatur, no. 51, pp. 37–47, June 2024, doi: 10.26650/sdsl2023-1429579.
ISNAD Choudhary, Sunil. “Rabble, Masses or Humanity: Kraus and Canetti Responding to the July Revolt of 1927”. Studien zur deutschen Sprache und Literatur 51 (June 2024), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.26650/sdsl2023-1429579.
JAMA Choudhary S. Rabble, Masses or Humanity: Kraus and Canetti Responding to the July Revolt of 1927. Studien zur deutschen Sprache und Literatur. 2024;:37–47.
MLA Choudhary, Sunil. “Rabble, Masses or Humanity: Kraus and Canetti Responding to the July Revolt of 1927”. Studien Zur Deutschen Sprache Und Literatur, no. 51, 2024, pp. 37-47, doi:10.26650/sdsl2023-1429579.
Vancouver Choudhary S. Rabble, Masses or Humanity: Kraus and Canetti Responding to the July Revolt of 1927. Studien zur deutschen Sprache und Literatur. 2024(51):37-4.