THE ONTOLOGY OF DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND IMAGES

Abstract

This article attempts to understand the fate of conventional notions of photographic indexicality and referentiality in the digital era where digital images have replaced analog images almost completely. Following a critical overview of relevant literature on digital photography, the author makes a conceptual distinction between referentiality and indexicality with respect to their implications for the notion of photographic realism. With a particular focus on the concept of indexicality, defined herein as an element that radically determines the definition of photography, the author argues that the image becomes a “thing” in digital images in the absence of indexicality by using Jean-Paul Sartre’s notion of “illusion of immanence”, a claim that would strongly challenge the view that digital images can still be regarded as photographs that themselves presuppose a particular relationship between an image and its object. 

Keywords

• Analog photography,digital photography,indexicality,referentiality,realism,simulation,illusion of immanence

References

1. Amelunxen, Hubertus v. 1996. “Photography after Photography: The Terror of the Body in Digital Space.” In Photography after Photography: Memory and the Representation in the Digital Age, ed. Hubertus v. Amelunxen et al., trans. Pauline Cumbers, 115-123.
2. Munich: G+B Arts. Archambault, Michael. “Film vs. Digital: A Comparison of the Advantages and Disadvantages.” http://petapixel.com/2015/05/26/film-vs-digital-a-comparison-of-theadvantages-and-disadvantages/.
3. Armstrong, Carol. 1998. Scenes in a Library: Reading the Photograph in the Book, 1843– 1975.
4. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Arnheim, Rudolf. 1974. “On the Nature of Photography.” Critical Inquiry 1 no.1: 149- 161.
5. Barthes, Roland. 1981. Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography, trans. Richard Howard. New York: Hill and Wang.
6. Batchen, Geoffrey. 1994. “Phantasm: Digital Imaging and the Death of Photography.” Aperture 136: 46-51.
7. Batchen, Geoffrey. 1997. Burning with Desire: The Conception of Photography. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
8. Batchen, Geoffrey. 2000. Each Wild Idea: Writing Photography History. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

9. Baudrillard, Jean. 1994. Simulacra and Simulation, trans. Sheila Faria Glaser. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
10. Baudrillard, Jean. 1996. The Perfect Crime, trans. Chris Turner. London and New York: Verso.
11. Baudrillard, Jean. 2007. Fatal Strategies. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
12. Bazin, André. 1967. “The Ontology of the Photographic Image.” In What is Cinema?, Vol. 1, trans. Hugh Gray, 9-16. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Orig. pub. 1958.)

13. Binkley, Timothy. 1993. “Reconfiguring Culture.” In Future in Visions: New Technologies of the Screen, ed. Philip Hayward and Tana Wollen, 92-122. London: BFI.
14. Bolter, Jay David and Grusin, Richard. 2000. Remediation: Understanding New Media.
15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Crary, Jonathan. 1992. Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century.
16. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Cubitt, Sean et al. 2015. “Introduction: Materiality and Invisibility.” Digital Light, ed. Sean Cubitt et al., 7-20. London: Open Humanities Press.
17. Derrida, Jacques. 2010. Copy, Archive, Signature: A Conversation on Photography, trans. Jeff Fort. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
18. Doane, Mary A. 2007. “The Indexical and the Concept of Medium Specificity.” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 18, no. 1: 128-152.
19. Flusser, Vilém. 1986. “The Photograph as Post-Industrial Object: An Essay on the Ontological Standing of Photographs.” Leonardo 19, no. 4: 329-332.
20. Frosch, Paul. 2003. The Image Factory: Consumer Culture, Photography and the Visual Content Industry. Oxford and New York: Berg.
21. Geuens, Jean-Pierre. 2002. “The Digital World Picture.” Film Quarterly 55, no. 4: 16-27.
22. Gooskens, Geert. 2011. “The Digital Challenge: Photographic Realism Revisited.” Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics 3: 115-125.
23. Jäger, Gottfried. 1996. “Analogue and Digital Photography: The Technical Picture.” In Photography after Photography: Memory and the Representation in the Digital Age, ed. Hubertus v. Amelunxen et al., trans. Libby Fink, 107-119.
24. Munich: G+B Arts. Jäger, Gottfried. 2003. “Abstract Photography.” In Rethinking Photography I+II: Narration and New Reduction in Photography, ed. Ruth Horak, 162-195.
25. Salzburg: Fotohof Edition. Kember, Sarah. 1998. Virtual Anxiety: Photography, New Technologies and Subjectivity. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
26. Krauss, Rosalind E. 1986. The Originality of the Avant-Garde and Other Modernist Myths. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Lister, Martin. 2007. “A Sack in the Sand: Photography in the Age of Information.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 13, no. 3: 251-274.
28. Lister, Martin. 2009. “Photography in the Age of Electronic Imaging.” In Photography: A Critical Introduction, ed. Liz Wells, 311-344. London: Routledge.
29. Manovich, Lev. 2006. “The Paradoxes of Digital Photography.” In The Photography Reader, ed. Liz Wells, 240-249. London: Routledge.
30. Maynard, Patrick. 1983. “The Secular Icon: Photography and the Functions of Images.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 42, no. 2: 155-169.
31. Mitchell, William J. 1992. The Reconfigured Eye: Visual Truth in the Post-Photographic Era. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Nöth, Winfried. 2007. “The Death of Photography in Self-Reference.” In Self-Reference in the Media, ed. Winfried Nöth and Nina Bishara, 95-106. New York and Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
33. Palmer, Daniel. 2015. “Lights, Camera, Algorithm: Digital Photography’s Algorithmic Conditions.” In Digital Light, ed. Sean Cubitt et al., 144-162. London: Open Humanities Press.
34. Punt, Michael. 1995. “‘Well, Who You Gonna Believe Me or Your own Eyes?’: A Problem of Digital Photography.” The Velvet Light Trap – A Critical Journal of Film and Television 36: 220.
35. Ritchin, Fred. 1990. In Our Own Image: The Coming Revolution in Photography. New York: Aperture.
36. Ritchin, Fred. 1991. “The End of Photography as We Have Known It.” In Photo-Video: Photography in the Age of the Computer, ed. Paul Wombell, 8-15. London: Rivers Oram Press.
37. Roberts, John. “Photography after the Photograph: Event, Archive, and the Non-Symbolic.” Oxford Art Journal 32, no. 2: 281-298.
38. Robins, Kevin. 1995. “Will Image Move us Still?” In The Photographic Image in Digital Culture, ed. Martin Lister, 29-50. New York: Routledge.
39. Robins, Kevin. 1996. Into the Image: Culture and Politics in the Field of Vision. London and New York: Routledge.
40. Rodowick, David. 2001. Reading the Figural, or, Philosophy after the New Media. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
41. Røssaak, Elvind. 2011. “Algorithmic Culture: Beyond the Photo/Film-Divide.” In Between Stillness and Motion: Film, Photography, Algorithms, ed. Elvind Røssaak, 187-203. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
42. Rubinstein, Daniel and Sluis, Katrin. 2013. “The Digital Image in Photographic Culture: Algorithmic 
Photography and the Crisis of Representation.” In The Photographic Image in Digital Culture, ed. Martin Lister, 22-40. New York: Routledge, 2013.
43. Sartre, Jean-Paul. 2004. The Imaginary: A Phenomenological Psychology of the Imagination, trans. Jonathan Webber. New York, NY: Routledge (Orig. pub. 1940.)

44. Sartre, Jean-Paul. 2012. Imagination, trans. Kenneth Williford and David Rudrauf. New York, NY: Routledge. (Orig. pub. 1936.)

45. Sontag, Susan. 1975. On Photography. New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.
46. Vasselau, Cathryn. 2015. “Simulated Translucency.” In Digital Light, ed. Sean Cubitt et al., 163-178. London: Open Humanities Press.
47. Walton, Kendall. 1984. “Transparent Pictures: On the Nature of Photographic Realism.” Critical Inquiry 11, no. 2: 246-277.
48. Willemen, Paul. 2002. “Reflections on Digital Imagery: Of Mice and Men.” In New Screen Media: Cinema/Art/Narrative, ed. Martin Rieser and Andrea Zapp, 14-26. London: British Film Institute.
49. Willis, Anne-Marie. 1990. “Digitisation and the Living Death of Photography.” In Culture, Technology and Creativity in the Late Twentieth Century, ed. Philip Hayward, 197-208. London: John Libbey.