BibTex RIS Cite

İKTİSAT VE REALİZM İLİŞKİSİ: METODOLOJİK AÇIDAN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Year 2012, Volume: 62 Issue: 1, 215 - 230, 12.07.2012

Abstract

İktisat bilimi ve realizm arasındaki ilişki gerek iktisat metodolojistleri
gerekse de bilim felsefecileri arasında ilgi çeken güncel konulardan biridir.
Bu bağlamda, son yıllarda realist yaklaşımların özellikle iktisat felsefesi
alanında yeni yönelimlerden biri haline geldiği görülmektedir. Bu çalışmada,
iktisat ve realizm ilişkisi eleştirel bir bakış açısıyla ele alınarak metodolojik
açıdan bir değerlendirme yapılmaktadır.

References

  • Beaulier, Scott A.-Peter Boettke (2004), "The really real in economics", Transforming Economics: Perspectives on the critical realist project, Ed. by Paul Lewis, London, Routledge, pp.187-201.
  • Boyd, Richard N. (1984), "The Current Status of Scientific Realism", Scientific Realism, Ed. by Jarrett Leplin, University of California Press, pp.41-82.
  • Chakravartty, Anjan (2011), "Scientific Realism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Ed. by Edward N. Zalta, (Online) http://plato. stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/scientific-realism/, 11.12.2011.
  • Cruse, Pierre (2003), "On Scientific Realism", Richmond Journal of Philosophy, 3, Spring.
  • Deichsel, Simon (2011), "Against the pragmatic justification for realism in economic methodology", Erasmus Journal For Philosophy And Economics, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp. 23-41.
  • Dow, Sheila (2002), Economic Methodology: An Inquiry, Oxford University Press.
  • Fraassen, Bas C. van (1980), The Scientific Image, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
  • Friedman, Milton (1953), "The Methodology of Positive Economics", Essays In Positive Economics, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, pp.3-16.
  • Hodge, Duncan (2008), "Economics, realism and reality: a comparison of Mäki and Lawson", Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32, pp.163-202.
  • Jespersen, Jesper (2009), Macroeconomic Methodology: A PostKeynesian Perspective, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
  • Lawson, Tony (1997), Economics and Reality, London, Routledge.
  • Mäki, Uskali (1998), "Realism", The Handbook of Economic Methodology, Ed. by John B. Davis, D. Wade Hands, Uskäli Maki, Edward Elgar, , pp. 404-409.
  • Mäki, Uskali (2002), "Some nonreasons for nonrealism about economics", Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism, and Social Construction, Ed. by Uskali Mäki, Cambridge University Press, pp. 90-104.
  • Mäki, Uskali (2008), "Scientific realism and ontology", The New Palg¬ rave Dictionary of Economics (2n d Edition), Ed. by Steven N. Durlauf and
  • Lawrence E. Blume, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Mäki, Uskali (2011), "Scientific realism as a challenge to economics (and vice versa)", Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 1-12.
  • Popper, Karl (1978), "Three Worlds", The Tanner Lectures On Human Values, The University of Michigan, pp.143-167.
  • Putnam, Hilary (1984), "What's Realism?", Scientific Realism, Ed. by Jarrett Leplin, University of California Press, pp.140-153.
  • Sankey, Howard (1988), Scientific Realism and The Rationality of Science, Bodmin, Ashgate Publishing Co.
  • Votsis, Ioannis (2004), "The Epistemological Status Of Scientific Theories: An Investigation Of The Structural Realist Account", London School Of Economics And Political Science, PhD Thesis.
Year 2012, Volume: 62 Issue: 1, 215 - 230, 12.07.2012

Abstract

References

  • Beaulier, Scott A.-Peter Boettke (2004), "The really real in economics", Transforming Economics: Perspectives on the critical realist project, Ed. by Paul Lewis, London, Routledge, pp.187-201.
  • Boyd, Richard N. (1984), "The Current Status of Scientific Realism", Scientific Realism, Ed. by Jarrett Leplin, University of California Press, pp.41-82.
  • Chakravartty, Anjan (2011), "Scientific Realism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Ed. by Edward N. Zalta, (Online) http://plato. stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/scientific-realism/, 11.12.2011.
  • Cruse, Pierre (2003), "On Scientific Realism", Richmond Journal of Philosophy, 3, Spring.
  • Deichsel, Simon (2011), "Against the pragmatic justification for realism in economic methodology", Erasmus Journal For Philosophy And Economics, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp. 23-41.
  • Dow, Sheila (2002), Economic Methodology: An Inquiry, Oxford University Press.
  • Fraassen, Bas C. van (1980), The Scientific Image, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
  • Friedman, Milton (1953), "The Methodology of Positive Economics", Essays In Positive Economics, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, pp.3-16.
  • Hodge, Duncan (2008), "Economics, realism and reality: a comparison of Mäki and Lawson", Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32, pp.163-202.
  • Jespersen, Jesper (2009), Macroeconomic Methodology: A PostKeynesian Perspective, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
  • Lawson, Tony (1997), Economics and Reality, London, Routledge.
  • Mäki, Uskali (1998), "Realism", The Handbook of Economic Methodology, Ed. by John B. Davis, D. Wade Hands, Uskäli Maki, Edward Elgar, , pp. 404-409.
  • Mäki, Uskali (2002), "Some nonreasons for nonrealism about economics", Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism, and Social Construction, Ed. by Uskali Mäki, Cambridge University Press, pp. 90-104.
  • Mäki, Uskali (2008), "Scientific realism and ontology", The New Palg¬ rave Dictionary of Economics (2n d Edition), Ed. by Steven N. Durlauf and
  • Lawrence E. Blume, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Mäki, Uskali (2011), "Scientific realism as a challenge to economics (and vice versa)", Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 1-12.
  • Popper, Karl (1978), "Three Worlds", The Tanner Lectures On Human Values, The University of Michigan, pp.143-167.
  • Putnam, Hilary (1984), "What's Realism?", Scientific Realism, Ed. by Jarrett Leplin, University of California Press, pp.140-153.
  • Sankey, Howard (1988), Scientific Realism and The Rationality of Science, Bodmin, Ashgate Publishing Co.
  • Votsis, Ioannis (2004), "The Epistemological Status Of Scientific Theories: An Investigation Of The Structural Realist Account", London School Of Economics And Political Science, PhD Thesis.
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Arş. Gör. Sinem Kutlu This is me

Publication Date July 12, 2012
Published in Issue Year 2012 Volume: 62 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Kutlu, A. G. S. (2012). İKTİSAT VE REALİZM İLİŞKİSİ: METODOLOJİK AÇIDAN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, 62(1), 215-230.
AMA Kutlu AGS. İKTİSAT VE REALİZM İLİŞKİSİ: METODOLOJİK AÇIDAN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası. July 2012;62(1):215-230.
Chicago Kutlu, Arş. Gör. Sinem. “İKTİSAT VE REALİZM İLİŞKİSİ: METODOLOJİK AÇIDAN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME”. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası 62, no. 1 (July 2012): 215-30.
EndNote Kutlu AGS (July 1, 2012) İKTİSAT VE REALİZM İLİŞKİSİ: METODOLOJİK AÇIDAN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası 62 1 215–230.
IEEE A. G. S. Kutlu, “İKTİSAT VE REALİZM İLİŞKİSİ: METODOLOJİK AÇIDAN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME”, İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 215–230, 2012.
ISNAD Kutlu, Arş. Gör. Sinem. “İKTİSAT VE REALİZM İLİŞKİSİ: METODOLOJİK AÇIDAN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME”. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası 62/1 (July 2012), 215-230.
JAMA Kutlu AGS. İKTİSAT VE REALİZM İLİŞKİSİ: METODOLOJİK AÇIDAN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2012;62:215–230.
MLA Kutlu, Arş. Gör. Sinem. “İKTİSAT VE REALİZM İLİŞKİSİ: METODOLOJİK AÇIDAN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME”. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, vol. 62, no. 1, 2012, pp. 215-30.
Vancouver Kutlu AGS. İKTİSAT VE REALİZM İLİŞKİSİ: METODOLOJİK AÇIDAN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2012;62(1):215-30.