EVALUATION OF CITTASLOW-SLOW CITY ASSOCIATION WITHIN THE CONSERVATION OF LANDSCAPE POTENTIAL
Öz
Depending on the progress of the city and globalization of today’s technology, rather than production, it has developed a way of life based on consumption. Fast living, fast-acting, fast consuming urban human profile, has caused to form standard habitats which are increasingly more uniform and loss of their distinctive natural and cultural landscape features (URL-1).
Cittaslow movement is revealed by the people in the urban areas where the rural, vernacular and traditional features has been lost. Natural and cultural landscape areas has an important place in this distinctive features.
Turkey has a total 10 members of the slow city union. In order to be a member of the Union, developing projects is required for realizing the criteria of the Union. In the current situation, there are total of 71 criteria of 7 policy chapters of the union (Şahin and Kutlu, 2014).
The purpose of this paper, is discussing whether Cittaslow association have or not have an effective role in the preservation of the landscape. In this context, the environmental, infrastructure and urban life quality policies will be searched together with the agricultural, touristic and craftsman policies. Some of these criteria which has an impact on the sustainability and protection of national and cultural landscape areas will be discussed and evaluated within the framework of Akyaka, Halfeti and Gökçeada Slow city examples of Turkey, that has been accepted to the union.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Referans1. Ada, E., Personal Photo Album.
- Referans2. Akyaka Belediyesi. http://www.akyaka.bel.tr/akyaka_belediyesi_tarihi.html.
- Referans3. Altman, I. and Chembers, M., 1980. Culture and Environment, Wadsworth. Inc, California.
- Referans4. Anonymus, 2014. Akyaka Nail Çakırhan ve Halet Çambel Kültür ve Sanat Evi Katalog 2014, Gökova Akyaka'yı Sevenler Derneği.
- Referans5. Bakırcı, M., 2002. Türkiye'de Baraj Yapımı Nedeni ile Yer Değiştiren Bir Şehir Halfeti, Coğrafya Dergisi, Sayı:10 S:55-78; İstanbul.
- Referans6. Bayer, M. Z., 1977. Peyzaj Mimarisi, Türk Tarih Kurumu, Ankara.
- Referans7. Cengiz, T., Akbulak, C., Özcan, H., Baytekin, H., 2013. Gökçeada'da Optimal Arazi Kullanımının Belirlenmesi, Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 19, s:148-162 http:// www.agr.ankara.edu.tr/journal.
- Referans8. Cittaslow Official Web Site, http://www.cittaslow.org/section/association.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
Türkçe
Konular
-
Bölüm
Derleme
Yazarlar
Elvan Ada
Bu kişi benim
Istanbul University, Faculty of Forestry, Department of Landscape Architecture
Türkiye
Doğanay Yener
Istanbul University, Faculty of Forestry, Department of Landscape Architecture
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
15 Aralık 2017
Gönderilme Tarihi
18 Eylül 2017
Kabul Tarihi
7 Aralık 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2017 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 16
Cited By
Halkla İlişkiler Perspektifinden Şehir Markalaşması ve Sakin Şehir (Cittaslow) Modeli
Aksaray İletişim Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.47771/aid.839705Cittàslow as An Alternative Path of Town Development and Revitalisation in Peripheral Areas: The Example of The Lublin Province
Sustainability
https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114160