The Anti-Speciesist Stance in J. M. Coetzee’s Novels: An Analysis of Animal-Standpoint

Year 2023, , 107 - 124, 04.07.2023

Kubilay Geçikli

https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2022-1085724

Abstract

Animal-standpoint criticism focuses on the way human rights are treated in literary texts. It is against speciesism, which is a kind of species-based discrimination which gives different values to different species and inevitably leads to a hierarchy among species. Speciesism is thus regarded as a kind of racism by those defining and theorizing the field of animal-standpoint criticism, which is essentially against the supremacy of the human species over animals and which seeks the establishment of equality among species. Animal rights are emphasized by this criticism and the idea that animals are to be used for human benefits and/or progress is challenged. J. M. Coetzee, the South African novelist known for his allegorical works of fiction set in unknown times and places as well as his questioning stance on matters of colonialism, remains a writer of fiction who consciously tries to give a voice to animals, which cannot speak for themselves and are subjected to not only illegal but cruel treatment by human beings. For Coetzee, it is wrong to permit the establishment of a hierarchy between humans and animals and to disregard animal rights seeing them as entities in the service of human beings. From Disgrace to Life and Times of Michael K., several novels, as well as nonfictional works by Coetzee, focus in some way or another on the rights of animals and the strange ties between human beings and them. It is realised in this treatments of animals that Coetzee also carries out his critique of Western rationalism through his focus on the related issue.

Keywords

Speciesism, Animal-Standpoint Criticism, J. M. Coetzee, Animal Rights, English Novel

Project Number

Yok

References

• Aaltola, E. (2010). “Coetzee and alternative animal ethics”. In A. Leist & P. Singer (Eds.), J. M. Coetzee and ethics, Columbia University Press, 119-144. google scholar
• Aristotle. (2009). Politics, trans. by E. Barker, Oxford University Press. google scholar
• Bach, R. E. (2018). Birds and other creatures in renaissance literature: shakespeare, descartes, and animal studies, Routledge. google scholar
• Best, S. (2014). The politics of total liberation: revolution for the 21st century, Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
• Coetzee, J. M. (2000). Disgrace, Penguin Books. google scholar
• ------------------(2003). Elizabeth Costello, Penguin Books. google scholar
• ------------------(2007). Diary of a Bad Year, Harvill Secker. google scholar
• Coleman, D. (2009). “The dog-man: race, sex, species, and lineage in coetzee’s disgrace”. In Twentieth-Century Literature, 55:4, pp. 597-617. google scholar
• Danta, C. (2018). Animal fables after darwin: literature, speciesism, and metaphor, Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• Fellenz, M. R. (2007). Moral menagerie: philosophy and animal rights, University of Illinois Press. google scholar
• Foltz, R. C. (2006). Animals in islamic tradition and muslim cultures, Oneworld Publications. google scholar
• Franklin, J. H. (2005). Animal rights and moral philosophy, Columbia University Press. google scholar
• Fudge, E. (2002). Animal, Reaktion Books. google scholar
• Goatly, A. (2006). “Humans, animals, and metaphors”. In Society & animals, 14:1, pp. 15-37. google scholar
• Head, D. (1997). J. M. Coetzee, Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• Heerden, A. van. (2010). “Disgrace, desire, and the dark side of the new south africa”. In J. M. Coetzee and Ethics. In A. Leist & P. Singer (Eds.), J. M. Coetzee and ethics, Columbia University Press, 43-63. google scholar
• Herron, T. (2005). “The dog man: becoming animal in coetzee’s disgrace”. In Twentieth Century Literature, 51: 4, pp. 467-490. google scholar
• Horta, O. (2010). “What is speciesism?”. In Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 23:3, pp. 243-266. google scholar
• Hovanec, C. (2018). Animal subjects: literature, zoology, and british modernism, Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• Kant, I. (1997). Lectures on ethics, trans. by P. Heath, Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• Leist, A. & Singer, P. (2010) J. M. Coetzee and ethics, Anton Leist & Peter Singer (Eds.), Columbia University Press. google scholar
• Linzey, A. (1998). Animal gospel, Westminster John Knox Press. google scholar
• Meyer, W. B. & Guss, D.M.T. (2017). Neo-Environmental determinism: geographical critiques, Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
• Mulhall, S. (2008). The wounded animal: j. m. coetzee & the difficulty of reality in literature and philosophy, Princeton University Press. google scholar
• Oerlemans, O. (2007). “A defense of anthropomorphism: comparing coetzee and gowdy”. In Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal, 40:1, pp. 181-196. google scholar
• Ortiz-Robles, M. (2016). Literature and animal studies, Routledge. google scholar
• Ovid. (1958). The metamorphoses, trans. by Horace Gregory, The Viking Press. google scholar
• Regan, T. (2003). Animal rights, human wrongs: an introduction to moral philosophy, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. google scholar
• Ryder, R. D. (2011). Speciesism, painism, and happiness: a morality for the 21st century, Imprint Academic. google scholar
• ----------------(2003). Painism: a modern morality, Open Gate Press. google scholar
• ----------------(1998). The political animal, the conquest of speciesism, McFarland Publishing. google scholar
• Singer, P. (2002). Animal liberation, Ecco. google scholar
• ------------(2006). In defense of animals: the second wave, Peter Singer (Ed.) Blackwell Publishing. google scholar
• Vinding, M. ( 2015). Speciesism: why it is wrong and the implications of rejecting it, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. google scholar
• Wiegandt, K. (2019). J. m. coetzee’s revisions of the human: posthumanism and narrative form, Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar