Liquid Friendship in Brian Lobel’s Purge

Abstract

The advent of technological advancements in contemporary society has had a profound impact on our lives by greatly facilitating various aspects of human life from communication to transportation and changing not only the media people utilize in their everyday lives but also their traditions, values, and relationships. Thus, these changes have sparked debate regarding the overall positive or negative implications of these developments as the dynamic nature of all kinds of human relationships in modern times varying from everyday relationships of friendships, partnerships and sexual encounters to kinship and family has increasingly begun to be characterized by transience, fragility, ambivalence and rapid change. These characteristics are attributed to the impact of modern technological advancements, namely the proliferation of social media applications. The purpose of this study is to examine how social media applications shape relationships today with a specific focus on Brian Lobel’s Purge (2011) in light of Zygmunt Bauman’s ideas of liquid modernity. Since Brian Lobel’s Purge (2011) is a play about making the decision to end or maintain friendship through social media applications, it provides us with pertinent examples for scrutinizing the themes of transience, fragility, vulnerability and ambivalence that have become the hallmarks of the modern relationships in the age of liquid modernity.

Keywords

• Social Media
• Brian Lobel
• Liquid Modernity
• Zygmunt Bauman
• Media Effects

References

1. Bauman, Z. & Donskis, L. (2013). Moral Blindness: The Loss of Sensitivity in Liquid Modernity. Polity Press. google scholar
2. Bauman, Z. (2003). Foreword. Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds. viii-xiii. Polity Press. google scholar Butler, S. (2020). Response from Season Butler, Purge Associate Artist. In B. Lobel’s Purge. London: Oberon Books. google scholar
3. Chambers, D. (2013) Social Media and Personal Relationships: Online Intimacies and Networked Friendship. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
4. Datareportal. (2023). The Latest Facebook Statistics: Everything You Need to Know. Retrieved Jan 4, 2023, from https://datareportal.com/essential-facebook-stats google scholar
5. Dawn, T. (2016). American Live Artist Brian Lobel Questions Why Purging Your Facebook Friends Is Art - Popspoken. Popspoken. Accessed 21 May 2020. http://popspoken.com/arts/2016/03/brian-lobel-interview. google scholar
6. Ellison, N., Lampe, C., Steinfeld, C., and Vitak, J. (2011b) ‘With a Little Help from My Friends: How Social Network Sites Affect Social Capital Processes’, In Papacharissi, Z. (ed.), A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites (pp. 124-145). New York: Routledge. google scholar
7. Grannan, C. (2020). What’s the Difference Between Emoji and Emoticons?. Accessed 10 November 2020. https:// www.britannica.com/story/whats-the-difference-between-emoji-and-emoticons google scholar
8. Hong, G. (2016). Purge - An Interview with Brian Lobel. ArtHop. Accessed 11 April 2020. https://arthop. co/ editorials/purge-interview-brian-lobel-nus-arts-festival-2016. google scholar

9. Leong, D. (2014). Getting unfriendly. R.AGE. Accessed 3 April 2020. https://www.rage.com.my/getting-unfriendly/ google scholar
10. Lobel, B. (2016. Purge. London: Oberon Books. google scholar
11. Tokunagresa, R.S. (2011) ‘Friend me or you’ll strain US: Understanding negative events that occur over social networking sites’, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(7-8), pp. 425-432. doi:10.1089/ cyber.2010.0140. google scholar
12. van Dijck, J. (2011) ‘Facebook as a Tool for Producing Sociality and Connectivity’, Television & New Media, 13(2), pp. 160-176. doi:10.1177/1527476411415291. google scholar
13. Wilkinson, D. (2013). Feature: Brian Lobel's 'Purge'- a space for dialogue. A Younger Theatre. Accessed 3 April 2020. https://www.ayoungertheatre.com/feature-brian-lobels-purge-a-space-for-dialogue-facebook-performance/ google scholar
14. Zizek, S. (1997). The Plague of Fantasies. London: Verso. google scholar