Todd Phillips’in Joker Filmine Jungcu ve Nietzscheci bir Yaklaşım

Abstract

Todd Phillips’in Joker (2019) filmi sadece psikolojik bir dram sunmakla kalmamaktadır, ayrıntılı bir karakter vakasını gözler önüne sermektedir. Joker filminde psikolojik ve sosyal olmak üzere iki temel katman bulunmaktadır. Psikolojik katman bağlamında izleyiciler, ruhsal anlamda hasta bir bireyin yavaşça kötü bir katile dönüşmesine tanıklık etmektedir. Bu makale, Todd Phillips’in Joker yapımını Jungcu ve Nietzscheci bakış açısıyla analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Arthur’un ruhsal durumunu Jung’un arketipleri penceresinden yorumlayan bu çalışma, onun kendi içinde bulunan gölge arketipine karşı vermiş olduğu yoğun mücadeleyi açığa çıkarmaktadır ki Arthur bu mücadeleyi kaybetmeye mahkumdur. Arthur’un gölge figürünün persona, ego ve kendiliğini kullanarak tüm bu saldırılara karşı direnme çabası tamamıyla nafiledir. Bu bağlamda, Jung’a ait kavramlar, Friedrich Nietzsche’nin nihilizm ve nihilist kuruntular kavramları ile karşılaştırmalı olarak irdelenmektedir. Buna ek olarak, nihilist kuruntular olgusu, psikiyatri alanında tanımlanan cotard sendromu ve kişiliğini kaybetme gibi olgularla ilişkilendirilmektedir. Çalışma, ayrıca Nietzsche ve Jung’un hayatlarının belirli dönemlerinde yaşadıkları etkileşimleri ve ortak yönlerini de açığa çıkarmaktadır. Bunlara bağlı olarak çalışmanın sonucunda Joker filminde nihilist kuruntuların, gölge figürünün egemenliğine giden yoldaki temel sebep olduğu sonucuna varılmaktadır.

Keywords

• Joker
• Carl G. Jung
• Friedrich Nietzsche
• gölge
• arketipler
• nihilist kuruntular

A Jungian & Nietzschean Approach to Todd Phillips’ Joker

Abstract

Todd Phillips’ Joker (2019) is an origin story which not only portrays a psychological drama but also forms a good example of a detailed character study case. The film embodies two main layers which are psychological and social. Within the context of the psychological layer, the viewers witness the gradual metamorphosis of a mentally-ill person into an evil villain. This article aims to analyse Todd Phillips’ Joker from a Jungian and Nietzschean perspective. By interpreting Arthur Fleck’s mental condition through the window of Jungian archetypes, the article reveals that Arthur experiences an intense inner struggle against his shadow, which he ultimately loses. His efforts to resist these attacks using his persona, ego, and self are in vain. To that end, Jung’s views are interconnected with Friedrich Nietzsche’s notion of nihilistic delusions which are referred to with an overview of Nietzsche’s nihilism. In addition, the nihilistic delusions are associated with the cotard syndrome and the notion of depersonalization within the field of psychiatry. The study also exposes the common ground between Nietzsche and Jung by exploring the interactions in specific periods of their lives. Thus, it has been concluded that Arthur’s nihilistic delusions are the ultimate cause of the events leading to the supremacy of the shadow in Joker.

Keywords

• Joker
• Carl G. Jung
• Friedrich Nietzsche
• the shadow
• archetypes

References

1. Ansell-Pearson, K. (1994). An Introduction to Nietzsche as Political Thinker: The Perfect Nihilist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Baker, G. (2018). Nihilism and Philosophy: Nothingness, Truth and World. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
3. Bishop, P. (1995). The Dionysian Self: C.G. Jung’s Reception of Friedrich Nietzsche. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
4. Casement, A. (2001). Carl Gustav Jung. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
5. Domenici, G. (2019). Jung’s Nietzsche: Zarathustra, The Red Book, and “Visionary” Works. Basingstoke: Springer.
6. Huskinson, L. (2004). Nietzsche and Jung: The Whole Self in the Union of Opposites. New York: Psychology Press.
7. Jung, C. G. (1965). Memories, Dreams, Reflections. New York: Random House.
8. Jung, C. G. (1968). Analytical Psychology: Its Theory and Practice. New York: Vintage Books/Random House.

9. Jung, C. G. (2014). Collected Works of C.G. Jung, Volume 9 (Part 1): Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
10. Jung, C. G., Read, H., Fordham, M., & Adler, G. (1973). The Collected Works of C. G. Jung: pt. 1. The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
11. LaLlave, J. A., & Gutheil, T. G. (2012). Expert witness and Jungian archetypes. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 35(5-6), 456-463. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.09.012
12. Lewin, N. A. (2009). Jung on War, Politics and Nazi Germany: Exploring the Theory of Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. London: Karnac Books.
13. Nietzsche, F. W. (1989). On the Genealogy of Morals: Ecce Homo; Translated by Walter Kaufmann; Friedrich Nietzsche; Edited, with Commentary, by Walter Kaufmann. New York: Vintage Books.
14. Nietzsche, F. W. (2009). On the Genealogy of Morals: A Polemical Tract (I. Johnston, Trans.). Arlington: Richer Resources.
15. Phillips, T. (Director). (2019). Joker [Motion picture]. USA: Warner Bros.
16. Radovic, F. (2016). The sense of death and non-existence in nihilistic delusions. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 16(4), 679-699. doi:10.1007/s11097-016-9467-x
17. Robertson, R. (2016). Jungian Archetypes: Jung, Gödel, and the History of Archetypes. New York: Open Road Media.
18. Schacht, R. (1994). Nietzsche, Genealogy, Morality: Essays on Nietzsche’s On the Genealogy of Morals. Oakland: University of California Press.