Dismissed Possibilities: Thingness, Posthumanism and Corporeal Feminism in Angela Carter’s Nights at the Circus

Abstract

In Angela Carter’s Nights at the Circus (1984), the protagonist Fevvers is a character with an overwhelming bodily presence, whose identity is mediated through her bodily performances and via the viewership of the spectacle that is her “self ”. Always facing the question “Is she fact or is she a fiction?”, the real identity and being of Fevvers seems to escape the reader through her magnified corporeality and performativity. Yet, as the episodes in which Fevvers performs as inanimate objects or is juxtaposed next to them show, the corporeal existence of Fevvers harbors many posthuman possibilities for subjectivity, even though Fevvers is also discovered to be severely marked by her human identity and femininity. Using a theoretical framework informed by writings on thing theory, posthumanism, and posthuman feminism, this paper explores the hybrid bodily existence of Fevvers from a post humanist angle to point out that despite demonstrating a general intuition towards a posthuman understanding of subjectivity and feminism as also claimed by former critics, Nights at the Circus finally dismisses such possibilities for a “corporeal feminism” as manifestoed by Elizabeth Grozs. Staying loyal to her human nature, the novel’s protagonist Fevvers turns down possibilities offered by her animal, thing, and machine beings and subsumes her hybridity under corporeal feminism.

Keywords

• Posthumanism
• thing theory
• Angela Carter
• feminism
• Nights at the Circus

References

1. Armstrong, I. (2012). Bodily things and thingly bodies: Circumventing the subject-object binary. In Katharina google scholar
2. Boehm (Ed.), Bodies and Things in Nineteenth-Century Literature and Culture (pp. 17-45). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
3. Bakhtin, M. (1984). Rabelais and his world. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. (Original work published in 1965) google scholar
4. Bartoloni, P. (2011). Thinking thingness: Agamben and Perniola. Annali d'Italianistica, 29, 141-162. google scholar
5. Bartoloni, P. (2012). Zeno’s thingness: on fetishism and bodies in Svevo’s La coscienza di Zeno. The Italianist, 32(3), 399-414. google scholar
6. Bennett, J. (2004). The force of things: Steps toward an ecology of matter. Political Theory, 32(3), 347-372. google scholar
7. Bhabha, H. (2004). The location of culture. London & New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published in 1994) google scholar
8. Boehm, K. (2012). Introduction: Bodies and things. In Katharina Boehm (Ed.), Bodies and Things in Nineteenth Century Literature and Culture (pp. 1-17). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar

9. Boxall, P. (2015). Science, technology, and the posthuman. In David James (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to British fiction since 1945 (pp. 127-142). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
10. Breitbach, J. (2011). The photo-as-thing. European Journal of English Studies, 15(1), 31-43. google scholar
11. Brown, B. (2001). Thing theory. Critical Inquiry, 28(1), 1-22. google scholar
12. Brown, B. (2006). Reification, reanimation, and the American uncanny. Critical Inquiry, 32(2), 175-207. google scholar
13. Carter, A. (1993). Nights at the circus. London: Penguin Books. (Original work published in 1984) google scholar
14. Cesaire, A. (2000). Discourse on colonialism. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press. (Original work published in 1950) google scholar
15. Cixous, H. (1976). The laugh of the Medusa. Signs, 1(4), 875-893. google scholar
16. Çalışkan, D. (2020). The hybrid other in Angela Carter’s novel Nights at the circus. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 19(2), 367-384. google scholar
17. Day, A. (1998). Angela Carter: The rational glass. Manchester & New York, NY: Manchester University Press. google scholar
18. Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published in 1972) google scholar
19. Fanon, F. (1986). Black skin, white masks. London: Pluto Press. (Original work published in 1952) google scholar
20. Genca, P. A. (2018). Grotesque bodies and spaces in Angela Carter’s The passion of new eve. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(1.2), 119-128. doi: 10.18026/cbayarsos.424070 google scholar
21. Grosz, E. (1987). Notes towards a corporeal feminism. Australian Feminist Studies, 2(5), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1 080/08164649.1987.9961562 google scholar
22. Grosz. E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press google scholar
23. Haraway D. (2001). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the late 20th Century. In Vincent B. Leitch (Ed.), Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism (pp. 2269-99). London & New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company. (Original work published in 1985) google scholar
24. Harman, G. (2005). Guerrilla metaphysics: Phenomenology and the carpentry of things. Chicago& La Salle, IL: Open Court. google scholar
25. Hutnyk, J. (2005). Hybridity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(1), 79-102. google scholar
26. Jones, J. (2006). Gender without genitals: Hedwig’s six inches. In Susan Stryker and Stephen Whittle (Eds.), The Transgender Studies Reader (pp. 449-67). London & New York, NY: Routledge. google scholar
27. Kitchens, J. (2016). Object entanglements: From postmodern subjectivity to posthuman thingness in Joss Whedon’s “Dollhouse”. Studies in Popular Culture, 38(2), 1-22. google scholar
28. O’Brien, W. (2006). Feminine freakishness: Carnivalesque bodies in Angela Carter’s Nights at the circus. Genders, 44. Retrieved from https://www.colorado.edu/gendersarchive1998-2013/2006/11/01/feminine-freakishness-carnivalesque-bodies-angela-carters-nights-circus. google scholar
29. Sattaur, J. (2012). Thinking objectively: An overview of “thing theory” in Victorian studies. Victorian Literature and Culture, 40(1), 347-357. google scholar
30. Seem, M. (1983). Introduction. In Gilles Deleuze & Felix Guattari, Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (pp. xv-xxiv). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
31. Schmidt, R. (1990). The journey of the subject in Angela Carter’s fiction. Textual Practice, 3, 56-75. https://doi. org/10.1080/09502368908582049 google scholar
32. Sellberg, K. (2015a). Monsters, margins and corporealizing choreographies. In Karin Sellberg, Lena Wanggren & Kamillea Again (Eds.), Corporeality and Culture: Bodies in Movement (pp. 47-53). Surrey: Ashgate. google scholar
33. Sellberg, K. (2015b). Embodied Platonisms: The erotic choreographies of Angela Carter and John Cameron Mitchell. In Karin Sellberg, Lena Wanggren & Kamillea Again (Eds.), Corporeality and Culture: Bodies in Movement (pp. 95-109). Surrey: Ashgate. google scholar
34. Thompson. L. A. (1979). The development of Marx’s concept of alienation: an introduction. Mid-American Review of Sociology, 4(1), 23-38. google scholar