Kazuo Ishiguro’s The Unconsoled:An Interdisciplinary Analysis

Abstract

The study proposes a theoretical analysis of Kazuo Ishiguro’s fourth novel, using the storytelling forms proposed by Kurt Vonnegut, along with the Freudian and Jungian oneiric theories, in order to decide the Kafkaesque texture of the narrative. The protagonist Ryder can open secret portals to physical places in his past and can reconfigure his reality based on memories. Firstly, the study discusses the intertextual connection of The Unconsoled with Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse-Five and Woolf ’s Orlando: A Biography while treating its Kantian value according to the domino effect and the quantum principle of probability. The second part analyses Ishiguro’s dream techniques, in conjunction with concepts like the Pygmalion and Golem effects, the imposter syndrome, the tunnel memory and Kahneman’s system 1 and 2 of thinking, for explaining Ryder’s irrational doings. The last part examines Ryder’s cognitive dissonance, his lack of anagnorisis, as well as his flow of consciousness, as compared to Woolf ‘s Mrs. Dalloway and Joyce’s Odysseus. The protagonist’s need for mental decluttering and willpower is then explained through the Stoic principles in Marcus Aurelius’ Meditations, as a way to strike a balance between creation and consumption, both in Ishiguro’s novel and in real life. The problems of the nameless European city are also interpreted from a game theoretical perspective, with the tragedy of the commons and the public goods game as examples of faulty cost-benefit relationships. Holistically speaking, the study highlights the meditative power of The Unconsoled, focusing on the narrative’s similitudes to the semantic-linguistic incomprehensibility of Joyce’s Finnegans Wake.

Keywords

• Kazuo Ishiguro
• The Unconsoled
• story shapes
• dream techniques
• mental decluttering

References

1. Aurelius, M. (2006). Meditations. Penguin Classics. google scholar
2. Babad, E. Y., et al. (1982). Pygmalion, Galatea and the Golem: Investigations of biased and unbiased teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(4), 459-474. https://doi.Org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.4.459 google scholar
3. Barron, E. N. (2011). Game theory: An introduction. John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
4. Basurto-Flores, R., Guzman-Vargas, L., Velasco, S., Medina, A., & Calvo Hernandez, A. (2018). On entropy research analysis: Cross-disciplinary knowledge transfer. Scientometrics, 117(1), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11192-018-2860-1. google scholar
5. Blanchette, J. (2008). The Pygmalion effect. Lulu. google scholar
6. Blass, J. H. (2012). The family counsellor. iUniverse. google scholar
7. Cave, T. (1988). Recognitions: A study in poetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press. google scholar
8. Chang, E. (2015, March 27). A language that conceals: An interview with Kazuo Ishiguro. Electric Lit. Retrieved from http://www.electricliterature.com/a-language-that-conceals-an-interview-with-kazuo-ishiguro-author-of-the-buried-giant/. google scholar

9. Dickens, C. (2014). A Christmas carol. Create Space. google scholar
10. Dirac, P. A. M. (1932). Relativistic quantum mechanics. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 136, 453-464. http://doi. org/10.1098/rspa.1932.0094. google scholar
11. Dooley, K. (2009). The Butterfly Effect of the “Butterfly Effect”. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences, 13(3), 279-288. google scholar
12. Eastwood, M. A. (2017). Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 110(5), 335-336. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcw193. google scholar
13. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press. google scholar
14. Fludernik, M. (1999). Defining (in)sanity: The narrator of the yellow wallpaper and the question of unreliability. Transcending Boundaries: Narratology in Context, Tubingen: Narr, 75-95. google scholar
15. Freud, S. (1953). The interpretation of dreams (second part) and on dreams. London: The Hogarth Press. google scholar
16. Gudder, S. P. (1970). A superposition principle in physics. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 11(1), 1037-1040. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1665193. google scholar
17. Hunnewell, S. (2008, Spring). The art of fiction: Kazuo Ishiguro. The Paris Review, 184(196). Retrieved from http:// www.theparisreview.org/interviews/5829/the-art-of-fiction-no-196-kazuo-ishiguro. google scholar
18. Ishiguro, K. (1990). A pale view of hills. Vintage International. google scholar
19. Ishiguro, K. (2013). The unconsoled. Bloomsbury House. google scholar
20. Ishikawa, S. (2012). Quantum mechanics and the philosophy of language: Reconsideration of traditional philosophies. Journal of Quantum Information Science, 2(1), 2-9. https://doi.org/10.4236/jqis.2012.21002. google scholar
21. Johnson, S. (2019, December 27). Kurt Vonnegut on 8 shapes of stories. Big Think. Retrieved from http://www. bigthink.com/culture-religion/vonnegut-shapes?rebelltitem=3. google scholar
22. Johnson, S., & Pawlak, J. (2017, October 5). Mixing Kafka with Jane Austen: Ishiguro wins literature Nobel. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-nobel-prize-literature/mixing-kafka-with-jane-austen-ishiguro-wins-literature-nobel-idUSKBN1CA15R. google scholar
23. Joyce, J. (2002). Finnegans wake. Faber & Faber. google scholar
24. Jung, C.G. (2014). Analytical psychology: Its theory and practice. Routledge. google scholar
25. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. google scholar
26. Kant, I. (1999). Critique of pure reason. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
27. Kupczynski, M. (2017). Can we close the Bohr-Einstein quantum debate? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 375: 20160392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0392. google scholar
28. Laplace, P. S. (2012). A philosophical essay on probabilities. Forgotten Books. google scholar
29. Luo, S.-P. (2003). Living the wrong life: Kazuo Ishiguro’s unconsoled orphans. Dalhousie Review, 83(1), 51-80. google scholar
30. Mason, G. (1989). An interview with Kazuo Ishiguro. Contemporary Literature, 30(3), 335-347. google scholar
31. Merton, R. K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review, 8(2), 193-210. google scholar
32. Mollick, E. R. (2006). Establishing Moore’s law. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 28(3), 62-75. google scholar
33. Morford, M. (2007). Classical mythology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
34. Mullangi S., & Jagsi, R. (2019). Imposter syndrome: Treat the cause, not the symptom. JAMA. 322(5), 403-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.9788. google scholar
35. Murphy, N. (2011, September 6). The Shape of Stories. Broadsheet. Retrieved from https://www.broadsheet. ie/2011/09/06/the-shape-of-stories/. google scholar
36. Oosterwijk, S., Lindquist, K. A., Anderson, E., Dautoff, R., Moriguchi, Y., & Barrett, L. F. (2012). States of mind: emotions, body feelings and thoughts share distributed neural networks. NeuroImage, 62(3), 2110-2128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.079. google scholar
37. Pearce, W. (2014). Running the rat race. Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia, 20(1), 74-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/22201173.2014.10844572. google scholar
38. Pignatiello, G. A., Martin, R. J., & Hickman, R. L., Jr (2020). Decision fatigue: A conceptual analysis. Journal of Health Psychology, 25(1), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105318763510. google scholar
39. Reitano, N. (2007). The good wound: Memory and community in The Unconsoled. Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 49(4), 361-386. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40755493. google scholar
40. Safer, M. A., et al. (1999). Tunnel memory for traumatic events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 99-117. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199804)12:2<99::AID-ACP509>3.0.CO;2-7. google scholar
41. Shah, A. K., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). The path of least resistance: Using easy-to-access information current directions, Psychological Science, 18(4), 232-236, Sage Publications, Inc. Retrieved from https://www.jstor. org/stable/20696037. google scholar
42. Spini, L. J. (2009). One infinity. A visible universe of invisible energy: A shift in human consciousness & evolution of one love. iUniverse. google scholar
43. Surhone, L. M. (2010). Tragedy of the commons: Garrett Hardin, the commons, diner’s dilemma, enlightened selfinterest, population control, inverse commons, common heritage of mankind. Betascript Publishing. google scholar
44. Targ, R. (2004). Limitless mind: A guide to remote viewing and transformation of consciousness. San Francisco: New World Library. google scholar
45. Temple, E. (2018, November 8). How Kazuo Ishiguro used dream techniques to write his most polarising novel: Revelations from the Nobel Laureate’s archives. Literary Hub. Retrieved from https://www.lithub.com/how-kazuo-ishiguro-used-dream-techniques-to-write-his-most-polarizing-novel/. google scholar
46. The Nobel Prize in literature 2017-Press Release. NobelPrize.org. Retrieved from https://www.nobelprize.org/ prizes/literature/2017/summary/>. google scholar
47. Vonnegut, K. (1991). Slaughterhouse-five. Vintage. google scholar
48. Vonnegut, K. (2004, February 4). Shape of stories lecture. Eva CollinsAlonso. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=GOGru_4z1Vc&t=40s. google scholar
49. Vorda, A., & Herzinger, K. (1994). Stuck on the margins: An Interview with Kazuo Ishiguro. Face to Face: Interviews with Contemporary Novelists. Houston: Rice University Press. google scholar
50. Wiseman, R., & Milton, J. (1999). Experiment one of the SAIC remote viewing program: A critical reevaluation. Journal of Parapsychology, 62(4), 297-308. google scholar
51. Woolf, J. (2010). The mystery of Lewis Carroll: Discovering the whimsical, thoughtful, and sometimes lonely man who created Alice in Wonderland. New York: St. Martin’s Press. google scholar
52. Woolf, V. (1973). Orlando: A biography. Mariner Books. google scholar