The Shattering Symmetries between the Imaginary and the Symbolic in Carter’s The Magic Toyshop

Year 2021, Volume: 31 Issue: 1, 1 - 17, 23.06.2021

Nurten Birlik

Abstract

The Magic Toyshop tells the story of three siblings (Melanie, Jonathan and Victoria) and what they go through in Uncle Philip’s house, where they find themselves in a totally different psychic space which is characterised by the resonances of the imaginary and in which images function differently. Among these images, animal imagery is central to Melanie’s depiction of both the inhabitants of the house and the house itself. Through its emphasis on the images, along with the hard facts of life, the novel gives expression to the psychodynamics and the evolution (or lack of it) of the characters, and offers a context which attracts attention to the difference between the symbolic and the imaginary; also between the symbolic and the social, in Lacanian terms. Due to their foregrounded awareness of the imaginary dimension of material reality and Melanie’s role in transposing Finn to a union in which the symbolic codes prevail, the ending of the novel implies that rather than the traditional hierarchy of the patriarchal discourse, there will be another kind of relationship between Finn and Melanie. This essay aims to bring up a new hermeneutical frame about the novel through the discussion of the significance of their move from the symbolic to the imaginary, how they relate to material reality through images in Philip’s house, and how Melanie (with Finn) moves back to the symbolic, against the background of Lacanian ideas about the three registers, the logic of the signifiers, the imaginary father and ‘object little a’.

Keywords

Angela Carter, The Magic Toyshop, Lacan, literature, psychoanalysis

Project Number

yok

References

• Armitt, L. (2000). Contemporary Women’s Fiction and the Fantastic. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
• Butler, J. (2000). Antigone’s Claim. New York: Columbia UP.
• Carter, A. (1996). The Magic Toyshop. New York: Penguin.
• Day, A. (1998). Angela Carter: The Rational Glass. Manchester, UK: Manchester UP.
• Eagleton, T. (1983). Literary Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Freud, S. (1939). Moses and Monotheism. (K. Jones, Trans.). New York: Vintage.
• Gamble, S. (1997). Angela Carter: Writing from the Frontline. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP.
• Jouve, N. W. (2007). Mother is a Figure of Speech... In L. Sage (Ed.), Essays on the Art of Angela Carter Flesh and the Mirror (pp.151-183). London: Virago.
• Lacan, J. (2006). Écrits, The First Complete Edition in English. (B. Fink, Trans.). New York: W.W. Norton.
• ---.(1991). Le Séminaire, Livre XVII: L’envers de la psychanalyse (text established by J.A. Miller). Paris: Seuil.
• ---. (1993). The Psychoses: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book III.In J. A. Miller (Ed.). (R. Grigg, Trans.). London: Routledge.
• ---. J.(1992). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book VII The Ethics of Psychoanalysis 1959-1960. In J.A. Miller (Ed.), (D. Porter, Trans.). New York: W.W. Norton.
• Lloyd, M. (2007). Judith Butler: From Norms to Politics. Cambridge: Polity P.
• Müller, A. (1995). Angela Carter Identity Constructed / Deconstructed. Heidelberg: Universitätverlag C. Winter.
• Palmer, P. (1987). From ‘Coded Mannequin’ to Bird Woman: Angela Carter’s Magic Flight. In S. Roe (Ed.), Women Reading Women’s Writing (pp.179-205). Brighton: Harvester P.
• Peach, L. (2009). Angela Carter. (2nd ed.) Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Sage, L. (2007). Introduction. In L. Sage (Ed.), Essays on the Art of Angela Carter (pp.20-42). London: Virago.
• Sarup, M. (1992). Jacques Lacan. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
• Wyatt, J. (2000). The Violence of Gendering: Cartesian Images in Angela Carter’s The Magic Toyshop, The Passion of New Eve, and ‘Peter and the Wolf.’ In A. Easton (Ed.), Angela Carter (pp.58-83). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Žižek, S. (2000). Class Struggle or Postmodernism? In E. Laclau, J. Butler and S.
• Žižek (Eds.), Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left(pp.90-11).London and New York: Verso.