Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2025, Volume: 35 Issue: 1, 109 - 125, 19.06.2025
https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1485015

Abstract

References

  • Agamben, G. (1993a). Infancy and history: Essays on the destruction of experience (L. Heron, Trans.). Verso. google scholar
  • Agamben, G. (1993b). The coming community (M. Hardt, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
  • Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: The sovereign power and bare life (D. Heller-Roazen, Trans.). Stanford University Press. google scholar
  • Agamben, G. (1999). Potentialities: Collected essays in philosophy (D. Heller-Roazen, Trans.). Stanford University Press. google scholar
  • Agamben, G. (2000). Means without end: Notes on politics (V. Binetti & C. Cesarino, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
  • Agamben, G. (2005a). The time that remains: A commentary on the letter to the romans (P. Daly, Trans.). Stanford University Press. google scholar
  • Agamben, G. (2005b). State of exception (K. Attell, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. google scholar
  • Antakyalıoğlu, Z. (2022). The rhizome d'etre of posthumanism and the question of ethics: Revisiting Braidotti with Agamben. In Z. Antakyalıoğlu (Ed.), Post-Theories in Literary and Cultural Studies (pp. 85-97). Lexington Books. google scholar
  • Attridge, D. (2016). Tom McCarthy’s fiction: A reading diary. Etudes britanniques contemporaines 50 | 2016. https://doi.org/10.4000/ebc.3033 google scholar
  • Bartolini, P. (2011). Indistinction. In A. Murray & J. Whyte (Eds.), The Agamben dictionary. Edinburgh University Press. google scholar
  • Baudrillard, Jean. (1998). Simulacra and simulations. In M. Poster (Ed.), Selected writings. Stanford University Press. google scholar
  • Boxall, P. (2013). Twenty-first century fiction: A critical introduction. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Clarke, R. (2022, January 10). Tom McCarthy thinks the wrong Kurt Vonnegut book is famous. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/20/books/review/tom-mccarthy-by-the-book-interview.html google scholar
  • Colebrook, C., & Maxwell, J. (2016). Agamben. Polity. de la Durantaye, L. (2009). Giorgio Agamben: A critical introduction. Stanford University Press. google scholar
  • Duncan, D. (2010). Introduction. In Calling all agents: Transmission, death, technology: General secretary’s report to the international necronautical society. Vargas Publications. google scholar
  • Hart, M., Jaff, A., & Eburne J. (2013). An interview with Tom McCarthy. Comparative literature, 54(4), 656-682. https://doi.org/10.1353/cli.2013.0048 google scholar
  • Huber, N. (2018, August 1). Zero degree everything: An interview with Tom McCarthy. Novel: A Forum on Fiction, 51(2), 176-187. https://doi.org/10.1215/00295132-6846030 google scholar
  • Maxwell, J. (2011). Ethics. In A. Murray & J. Whyte (Eds.), The Agamben dictionary. Edinburg University Press. google scholar
  • McCarthy, T. (2016). Remainder. Alma Books. google scholar
  • McCarthy, T., & Critchley, S. (2007). The New York declaration: INS statement on inauthenticity. https:// tc3production.s3.amazonaws.com/upload/52228de602e3e620b1000205/sfinsnydeclaration.pdf google scholar
  • Millis, C. (2011). Happiness/Happy Life. In A. Murray & J. Whyte (Eds.), The Agamben dictionary. Edinburgh University Press. google scholar
  • Molad, Y. (2011). Expropriation. In A. Murray & J. Whyte (Eds.), The Agamben dictionary. Edinburgh University Press. google scholar
  • Povinelli, E. A. (2011). The persistence of hope: Critical theory and enduring in late liberalism. In J. Elliott & D. Attridge (Eds.), Theory after ‘theory’. Routledge. google scholar
  • Prozorov, S. (2014). Agamben and Politics: A Critical Introduction. Edinburgh University Press. google scholar
  • Rourke, L. (2010, September 18). In conversation: Lee Rourke and Tom McCarthy. The Guardian. https://www. theguardian.com/books/2010/sep/18/tom-mccarthy-lee-rourke-conversation google scholar
  • Sarıkaya Şen, M. (2017). The construction of vulnerability and monstrosity in slipstream: Tom McCarthy’s remainder. In J.M. Ganteau & S. Onega (Eds.), Victimhood and vulnerability in the 21st century fiction. Routledge. google scholar
  • Tuten, F. (2015, March 18). Tom McCarthy: Interview. Bomb magazine. https://bombmagazine.org/articles/tom-mccarthy/ google scholar
  • Vermeulen, P. (2012). The critique of trauma and the afterlife of the novel in Tom McCarthy’s remainder. MFS Modern Fiction Studies, 58(3), 549-568. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/ mfs.2012.0056. google scholar
  • Wark, M. (2016). Preface. In T. McCarthy, Remainder. Alma Books. google scholar
  • Watkin, W. (2011). Semiotic/Semantic. In A. Murray & J. Whyte (Eds.), The Agamben dictionary. Edinburgh University Press. google scholar

“Everything Must Leave Some Kind of Mark”: An Agambenian Reading of Tom McCarthy’s Remainder

Year 2025, Volume: 35 Issue: 1, 109 - 125, 19.06.2025
https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1485015

Abstract

The concept of “remnant” or “remainder” holds a special place in Giorgio Agamben’s philosophy. Across his discussions of language/law, bios/zoe, and potentiality/ impotentiality, Agamben dismantles binary oppositions through the concept of ‘remainder,’ focusing on the zone of indistinction that exceeds division and dialectical thinking. The concept of remainder, which functions as a key in the thought of Agamben, is also the title of Tom McCarthy’s debut novel Remainder (2005). The novel unfolds the story of an unnamed thirty-year-old man whose life takes a dramatic turn after an accident involving “something falling from the sky.” Following his emergence from a coma, he finds himself in a threshold where he is a remnant of his former identity. For months, he endeavours to recover both his memory and motor control with the expectation that he will eventually return to a semblance of normalcy. But contrary to expectations, he develops a fixation on recreating, re-enacting, and simulating specific scenes and situations that linger in his memory as disjointed images. From Agamben’s standpoint, he might be approached as the ‘remainder’ of the human/inhuman binary, akin to a ‘remnant’ during the time of the end, a parody of the sovereign who suspends law to create his state of exception, or a ‘kink’ in the smoothly operating system of simulations. This paper offers a reading of Tom McCarthy’s Remainder from Giorgio Agamben’s perspective and provides an analysis of its eccentric character’s relationship with time, space, and reality by delving into the threshold he occupies.

References

  • Agamben, G. (1993a). Infancy and history: Essays on the destruction of experience (L. Heron, Trans.). Verso. google scholar
  • Agamben, G. (1993b). The coming community (M. Hardt, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
  • Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: The sovereign power and bare life (D. Heller-Roazen, Trans.). Stanford University Press. google scholar
  • Agamben, G. (1999). Potentialities: Collected essays in philosophy (D. Heller-Roazen, Trans.). Stanford University Press. google scholar
  • Agamben, G. (2000). Means without end: Notes on politics (V. Binetti & C. Cesarino, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
  • Agamben, G. (2005a). The time that remains: A commentary on the letter to the romans (P. Daly, Trans.). Stanford University Press. google scholar
  • Agamben, G. (2005b). State of exception (K. Attell, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. google scholar
  • Antakyalıoğlu, Z. (2022). The rhizome d'etre of posthumanism and the question of ethics: Revisiting Braidotti with Agamben. In Z. Antakyalıoğlu (Ed.), Post-Theories in Literary and Cultural Studies (pp. 85-97). Lexington Books. google scholar
  • Attridge, D. (2016). Tom McCarthy’s fiction: A reading diary. Etudes britanniques contemporaines 50 | 2016. https://doi.org/10.4000/ebc.3033 google scholar
  • Bartolini, P. (2011). Indistinction. In A. Murray & J. Whyte (Eds.), The Agamben dictionary. Edinburgh University Press. google scholar
  • Baudrillard, Jean. (1998). Simulacra and simulations. In M. Poster (Ed.), Selected writings. Stanford University Press. google scholar
  • Boxall, P. (2013). Twenty-first century fiction: A critical introduction. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Clarke, R. (2022, January 10). Tom McCarthy thinks the wrong Kurt Vonnegut book is famous. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/20/books/review/tom-mccarthy-by-the-book-interview.html google scholar
  • Colebrook, C., & Maxwell, J. (2016). Agamben. Polity. de la Durantaye, L. (2009). Giorgio Agamben: A critical introduction. Stanford University Press. google scholar
  • Duncan, D. (2010). Introduction. In Calling all agents: Transmission, death, technology: General secretary’s report to the international necronautical society. Vargas Publications. google scholar
  • Hart, M., Jaff, A., & Eburne J. (2013). An interview with Tom McCarthy. Comparative literature, 54(4), 656-682. https://doi.org/10.1353/cli.2013.0048 google scholar
  • Huber, N. (2018, August 1). Zero degree everything: An interview with Tom McCarthy. Novel: A Forum on Fiction, 51(2), 176-187. https://doi.org/10.1215/00295132-6846030 google scholar
  • Maxwell, J. (2011). Ethics. In A. Murray & J. Whyte (Eds.), The Agamben dictionary. Edinburg University Press. google scholar
  • McCarthy, T. (2016). Remainder. Alma Books. google scholar
  • McCarthy, T., & Critchley, S. (2007). The New York declaration: INS statement on inauthenticity. https:// tc3production.s3.amazonaws.com/upload/52228de602e3e620b1000205/sfinsnydeclaration.pdf google scholar
  • Millis, C. (2011). Happiness/Happy Life. In A. Murray & J. Whyte (Eds.), The Agamben dictionary. Edinburgh University Press. google scholar
  • Molad, Y. (2011). Expropriation. In A. Murray & J. Whyte (Eds.), The Agamben dictionary. Edinburgh University Press. google scholar
  • Povinelli, E. A. (2011). The persistence of hope: Critical theory and enduring in late liberalism. In J. Elliott & D. Attridge (Eds.), Theory after ‘theory’. Routledge. google scholar
  • Prozorov, S. (2014). Agamben and Politics: A Critical Introduction. Edinburgh University Press. google scholar
  • Rourke, L. (2010, September 18). In conversation: Lee Rourke and Tom McCarthy. The Guardian. https://www. theguardian.com/books/2010/sep/18/tom-mccarthy-lee-rourke-conversation google scholar
  • Sarıkaya Şen, M. (2017). The construction of vulnerability and monstrosity in slipstream: Tom McCarthy’s remainder. In J.M. Ganteau & S. Onega (Eds.), Victimhood and vulnerability in the 21st century fiction. Routledge. google scholar
  • Tuten, F. (2015, March 18). Tom McCarthy: Interview. Bomb magazine. https://bombmagazine.org/articles/tom-mccarthy/ google scholar
  • Vermeulen, P. (2012). The critique of trauma and the afterlife of the novel in Tom McCarthy’s remainder. MFS Modern Fiction Studies, 58(3), 549-568. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/ mfs.2012.0056. google scholar
  • Wark, M. (2016). Preface. In T. McCarthy, Remainder. Alma Books. google scholar
  • Watkin, W. (2011). Semiotic/Semantic. In A. Murray & J. Whyte (Eds.), The Agamben dictionary. Edinburgh University Press. google scholar
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects World Languages, Literature and Culture (Other)
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Zekiye Antakyalıoğlu 0000-0002-6031-834X

Publication Date June 19, 2025
Submission Date May 16, 2024
Acceptance Date January 6, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 35 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Antakyalıoğlu, Z. (2025). “Everything Must Leave Some Kind of Mark”: An Agambenian Reading of Tom McCarthy’s Remainder. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, 35(1), 109-125. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1485015
AMA Antakyalıoğlu Z. “Everything Must Leave Some Kind of Mark”: An Agambenian Reading of Tom McCarthy’s Remainder. Litera. June 2025;35(1):109-125. doi:10.26650/LITERA2024-1485015
Chicago Antakyalıoğlu, Zekiye. “‘Everything Must Leave Some Kind of Mark’: An Agambenian Reading of Tom McCarthy’s Remainder”. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies 35, no. 1 (June 2025): 109-25. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1485015.
EndNote Antakyalıoğlu Z (June 1, 2025) “Everything Must Leave Some Kind of Mark”: An Agambenian Reading of Tom McCarthy’s Remainder. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies 35 1 109–125.
IEEE Z. Antakyalıoğlu, “‘Everything Must Leave Some Kind of Mark’: An Agambenian Reading of Tom McCarthy’s Remainder”, Litera, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 109–125, 2025, doi: 10.26650/LITERA2024-1485015.
ISNAD Antakyalıoğlu, Zekiye. “‘Everything Must Leave Some Kind of Mark’: An Agambenian Reading of Tom McCarthy’s Remainder”. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies 35/1 (June2025), 109-125. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1485015.
JAMA Antakyalıoğlu Z. “Everything Must Leave Some Kind of Mark”: An Agambenian Reading of Tom McCarthy’s Remainder. Litera. 2025;35:109–125.
MLA Antakyalıoğlu, Zekiye. “‘Everything Must Leave Some Kind of Mark’: An Agambenian Reading of Tom McCarthy’s Remainder”. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, vol. 35, no. 1, 2025, pp. 109-25, doi:10.26650/LITERA2024-1485015.
Vancouver Antakyalıoğlu Z. “Everything Must Leave Some Kind of Mark”: An Agambenian Reading of Tom McCarthy’s Remainder. Litera. 2025;35(1):109-25.