LGBT Topluluğuna Bağlılık Ölçeğinin Türkçe Formunun Psikometrik Özelliklerinin Sınanması

Abstract

İnsanın en temel ihtiyaçlarından biri olan ait olmak ve bir toplulukta yerinin olduğunu hissetmek, kişilerin iyi oluşları için koruyucu bir etmendir. LGBTQ+ kişiler genel topluma kıyasla ayrımcılık, damgalama, yakınsak (proximal) stres gibi bu gruba özgü stres faktörlerini daha fazla yaşadıkları için bu kişilerin LGBTQ+ topluluğuna bağlılığı, sosyal destek alabilmeleri açısından önemli görülmektedir. Öte taraftan Türkiye alanyazınında LGBTQ+ topluluğuna bağlılığı doğrudan konu edinen bir araştırma bulunmamaktadır. Bu sebeple bu çalışmada Frost ve Meyer (2012) tarafından geliştirilen ve LGBT kişilerin LGBT topluluğuna bağlılığını ölçmeyi amaçlayan LGBT Topluluğuna Bağlılık Ölçeği Türkçeye uyarlanmış ve psikometrik özellikleri ölçeğin orijinalinden daha kapsayıcı bir katılımcı gruba erişilerek (kuir, çeşitli cinsel yönelim ve cinsiyet kimliği deneyimleri) LGBTQ+ bireyler üzerinde sınanmıştır. Ölçüt ve kartopu örnekleme yolu ile ulaşılan 450 kişi çalışmanın katılımcılarını oluşturmuştur. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda ölçeğin yapı geçerliliğini sağladığı ve orijinalinde olduğu gibi sekiz maddeden oluşan tek faktörlü bir yapı gösterdiği bulunmuştur. Yaklaşan ve uzaklaşan geçerliği için LGBT Topluluğuna Bağlılık Ölçeği’nin sırasıyla Çok Boyutlu Algılanan Sosyal Destek Ölçeği (ÇBASDÖ) ve Stres Ölçeği (DASÖ-21-SÖ) ile ilişkileri incelenmiştir. Buna göre LGBT Topluluğuna Bağlılık Ölçeği yaklaşan ve uzaklaşan geçerlik kanıtlarını sağlamaktadır. Ölçeğin iç tutarlık katsayısı ise Cronbach Alpha formülü ile hesaplanmış ve .90 bulunmuştur. Sonuç olarak, LGBT Topluluğuna Bağlılık Ölçeği’nin psikometrik özellikleri, ölçeğin Türkiye’de yaşayan LGBTQ+ yetişkinlerde kullanılmak için uygun olduğunu göstermiştir. LGBTQ+ topluluğuna bağlılık konusunda ulusal alanyazında yer alan ilk ölçme aracı olması sebebiyle alanyazına önemli bir katkı sunması beklenen LGBT Topluluğuna Bağlılık Ölçeği, madde sayısının az oluşu ve tek faktörlü bir yapı göstermesi sebebiyle kolay puanlanabilir ve uygulanabilir olarak değerlendirilebilir.

Keywords

• Topluluğa bağlılık
• LGBT Topluluğuna Bağlılık Ölçeği
• ölçek uyarlama
• LGBTQ+
• azınlık stresi modeli

Testing the Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the LGBT Community Connectedness Scale

Abstract

The feeling of belonging to a community that adopts a protective stance for the well-being of its members is an essential human need. It is well known that LGBTQ+ people experience more stress than other social groups because of discrimination, stigmatization, and self-stigmatization. Therefore, their connectedness to the LGBTQ+ community functions crucially in receiving social support. However, no study in Türkiye has yet comprehensively investigated the community connectedness of people identifying as LGBTQ+. Thus, the current study adapted Frost and Meyer’s (2012) LGBT Community Connectedness Scale to Turkish. This scale was designed to measure the connectedness of LGBT individuals to the LGBT community. The present study also tested the scale’s psychometrics with a more wide-ranging sample of LGBTQ+ people by reaching out to a more inclusive group of participants (queer, diverse sexual orientations, and gender identity experiences). The criterion and snowball sampling techniques were utilized to recruit four hundred and fifty participants. Confirmatory factor analyses confirmed the factor structure of the scale for this study’s sample, displaying an 8-item and one-factor structure. The divergent and convergent validity of the LGBT Community Connectedness Scale was tested via the instrument’s associations with the Multidimensional Social Support Scale and Stress Subscale. The internal consistency coefficient of the scale was evaluated as Cronbach Alpha .90. Thus, the LGBT Community Connectedness Scale was found to be reliable and valid for administration to LGBTQ+ people living in Türkiye. The LGBT Community Connectedness Scale is a short, one-factor scale that is easily scored and applied. It is expected to improve research outcomes in Türkiye because it is the first measurement tool employed in the national literature to assess the community connectedness of LGBTQ+ people.

Keywords

• Community connectedness
• LGBT Community Connectedness Scale
• scale adaptation
• LGBTQ+
• minority stress model

References

1. Adler, A. (1964). Social interest: A challenge to mankind. Capricorn. google scholar
2. Aparicio-Garcıa, M. E., Dıaz-Ramiro, E. M., Rubio-Valdehita, S., Lopez-Nûnez, M. I. ve Garcıa-Nieto, I. (2018). Health and well-being of cisgender, transgender and non-binary young people. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10), 2133. https://doi.org/10.3390/yerph15102133 google scholar
3. Baıbuıoğlu, Y. (2021). Exploring the roles of perceived gender identity discrimination and post-traumatic cognitions on post-traumatic stress symptoms and flourishing among transgender individuals (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Middle East Technical University. https://open.metu.edu.tr/bitstream/handle/11511/93076/10425189.pdf google scholar
4. Barrett, D. C. ve Pollack, L. M. (2005). Whose gay community? Social class, sexual self-expression, and gay community involvement. Sociological Quarterly, 46(3), 437-456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2005.00021.x google scholar
5. Başar, K. ve Öz, G. (2016). Resilience in individuals with gender dysphoria: Association with perceived social support and discrimination. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 27(4), 225-234. https://doi.org/10.5080/u17071 google scholar
6. Bockting, W. O., Miner, M. H., Swinburne Romine, R. E., Hamilton, A. ve Coleman, E. (2013). Stigma, mental health, and resilience in an online sample of the US transgender population. American Journal of Public Health, 103(5), 943-951. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301241 google scholar
7. Çavdar, D. ve Çok, F. (2016). Türkiye’de LGBT’lerin okul yaşantıları. KAOS GL Dergisi, 151, 54-58. google scholar
8. Dreikurs Ferguson, E. (2020). Adler’s motivational theory: A historical perspective on belonging and the fundamental human striving. The Journal of Individual Psychology 76(1), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1353/jip.2020.0016. google scholar

9. Eker, D. ve Arkar, H. (1995). Perceived social support: Psychometric properties of the MSPSS in normal and pathological groups in a developing country. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology: The International Journal for Research in Social and Genetic Epidemiology and Mental Health Services, 30(3), 121-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00802040 google scholar
10. Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N. ve Hyun, H. (2018). How to design and evaluate research in education (10. Baskı). McGraw-Hill Education. google scholar
11. Frost, D. M. ve Meyer, I. H. (2012). Measuring community connectedness among diverse sexual minority populations. Journal of Sex Research, 49(1), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.565427 google scholar
12. Göçmen, İ. ve Yılmaz, V. (2017). Exploring perceived discrimination among LGBT individuals in Turkey in education, employment, and health care: Results of an online survey. Journal of Homosexuality, 64(8), 1052-1068. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2016.1236598 google scholar
13. Grant, J. M., Mottet, L. A., Tanis, J. J. ve Min, D. (2011). Transgender discrimination survey. National center for transgender equality and national gay and lesbian task force: Washington, DC, USA. Erişim adresi: http://endtransdiscrimination.org/PDFs/NTDS_Report.pdf. google scholar
14. Hair, J. J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. ve Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7. Baskı). Pearson google scholar
15. Hendricks, M. L. ve Testa, R. J. (2012). A conceptual framework for clinical work with transgender and gender non-conforming clients: An adaptation of the Minority Stress Model. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 43(5), 460. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029597 google scholar
16. Herek, G. M. ve Glunt, E. K. (1995). Identity and community among gay and bisexual men in the AIDS era: Preliminary findings from the Sacramento men’s health study. G. M. Herek ve B. Greene (Ed.), AIDS, identity, and community: The HIV epidemic and lesbians and gay men içinde, (2. Baskı, s. 55-77). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483326917ILGA-Europe. (2021). Rainbow Europe country index. ILGA-Europe. https://www.ilgaeurope.org/rainboweurope google scholar
17. Kaniuka, A., Pugh, K. C., Jordan, M., Brooks, B., Dodd, J., Mann, A. K., Williams, S. L. ve Hirsch, J. K. (2019). Stigma and suicide risk among the LGBTQ population: Are anxiety and depression to blame and can connectedness to the LGBTQ community help?. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 23(2), 205-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2018.1560385 google scholar
18. Kiperman, S., Schacter, H. L., Judge, M. ve DeLong, G. (2022). LGBTQ+ youth’s identity development in the context of peer victimization: A mixed methods investigation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(7), 3921. https://doi.org/10.3390/yerph19073921 google scholar
19. Landers, S. ve Gilsanz, P. (2009). The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered persons in Massachusetts. Massachusetts Department of Public Health. https://www.mass.gov/eohhs/docs/dph/commissioner/lgbt-health-report.pdf. google scholar
20. La Voy, S. K., Brand, M. J. L. ve McFadden, C. R. (2013). An important lesson from our past with significance for our future: Alfred Adler’s Gemeinschaftsoefühl. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 69(4), 280-293. google scholar
21. Lovibond, P. F. ve Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(3), 335-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U google scholar
22. McConnell, E. A., Janulis, P., Phillips II, G., Truong, R. ve Birkett, M. (2018). Multiple minority stress and LGBT community resilience among sexual minority men. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000265 google scholar
23. McMillan, D. W. ve Lorion, R. P. (2020). Sense of community, pathway to, or bridge from alienation?. Journal of Community Psychology, 48(6), 1706-1714. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22406 google scholar
24. Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674 google scholar
25. Muldoon, O. T., Haslam, S. A., Haslam, C., Cruwys, T., Kearns, M. ve Jetten, J. (2019). The social psychology of responses to trauma: Social identity pathways associated with divergent traumatic responses. European Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 311-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1711628 google scholar
26. Muldoon, O. T., Lowe, R. D. ve Schmid, K. (2016). Identity and psychological health. McKeown, S., Haji, R. ve Ferguson, N. (Ed.) Understanding Peace and Conflict Through Social Identity Theory içinde (s. 135-144). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29869-6_9 google scholar
27. O’Handley, B. ve Courtice, E. L. (2022). Mental well-being, social support, and the unique experiences of transgender and nonbinary people during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 31(2), 163-175. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2022-0024 google scholar
28. Palangi, A. (2020). Resilience factors and mental health among LGBTQ adults in Canada and the United States (Order No. 27549209). http://proxy.lib.odu.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/resilience-factors-mental-health-among-lgbtq/docview/2424516945/se-2 google scholar
29. Parmenter, J. G., Galliher, R. V. ve Maughan, A. D. (2020). An exploration of LGBTQ+ community members’ positive perceptions of LGBTQ+ culture. The Counseling Psychologist, 48(7), 1016-1047. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000020933188 google scholar
30. Pflum, S. R., Testa, R. J., Balsam, K. F., Goldblum, P. B. ve Bongar, B. (2015). Social support, trans community connectedness, and mental health symptoms among transgender and gender nonconforming adults. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 2(3), 281. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000122 google scholar
31. Reisner, S. L., Vetters, R., Leclerc, M., Zaslow, S., Wolfrum, S., Shumer, D. ve Mimiaga, M. J. (2015). Mental health of transgender youth in care at an adolescent urban community health center: A matched retrospective cohort study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56(3), 274-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.10.264 google scholar
32. Rogers, M. L., Hom, M. A., Janakiraman, R. ve Joiner, T. E. (2021). Examination of minority stress pathways to suicidal ideation among sexual minority adults: The moderating role of LGBT community connectedness. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 8(1), 38.https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000409 google scholar
33. Sperry, L. (2015). Diagnosis, case conceptualization, culture, and treatment. L. Sperry, J. Carlson, J. Duba-Sauerheber ve J. Sperry (Ed.), Psychopathology and psychotherapy: DSM-5 diagnosis, case conceptualization, and treatment içinde (3. Baskı, s. 15-25). Routledge. google scholar
34. Stall, R., Pollack, L., Mills, T. C., Martin, J. N., Osmond, D., Paul, J., Binson, D., Coates, T. J. ve Catania, J. A. (2001). Use of antiretroviral therapies among HIV-infected men who have sex with men: a household-based sample of 4 major American cities. American Journal of Public Health, 91(5), 7. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.91.5.767 google scholar
35. Turner, J. C. (2010). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. T. Postmes ve N. R. Branscombe (Ed.) Rediscovering Social Identity içinde (s. 210-234). Psychology Press. google scholar
36. Yıldırım, A., Boysan, M. ve Kefeli, M. C. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21). British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 46(5), 582-595.67. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.91.5.767 google scholar
37. Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G. ve Farley, G. K. (1988). The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal Of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2 google scholar
38. Zimmerman, L., Darnell, D. A., Rhew, I. C., Lee, C. M. ve Kaysen, D. (2015). Resilience in community: A social ecological development model for young adult sexual minority women. American Journal of Community Psychology, 55(1), 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-015-9702-6 google scholar