Gelecek Zaman Perspektifi Ölçüm ve Kavramsallaştırmalarına Yeni Bir Bakış

Abstract

Zaman perspektifi bireylerin duygu ve düşüncelerini, mutluluk düzeylerini ve psikopatolojik semptomlarını etkileme gücüne sahiptir. Bu yüzden, özellikle Zimbardo Zaman Perspektifi yaklaşımı ve ölçümünün de etkisiyle zaman perspektifi son dönemde araştırmacıların ilgisini çekmektedir. Gelecek zaman perspektifi ise belirsizlik içeren doğası sebebi ile ayrıca ilgi odağı olmaktadır. Ancak, ilgili yazında zaman perspektifinin ölçümü ve kavramsallaştırılması ile ilgili farklı yaklaşımlar ve çelişkili bulgular bulunmaktadır. Bu farklılıkların ve çelişkilerin olası sebeplerinden birisi kullanılan ölçüm araçlarının, zaman perspektifini özellikle de gelecek boyutunu farklı şekillerde ele almasıdır. Bu yüzden, gelecek zaman perspektifini ölçen araçların birbirleri ile ilişkisi, bir başka deyişle, yapı geçerliklerinin bir arada ele alınması yazına ışık tutması açısından önemlidir. Buradan hareketle, gelecek boyutu ölçümünde kullanılan araçların ilişkileri incelenerek ilgili yazında yer alan çelişkili bulguların altında yatan sebeplere ışık tutulması amaçlanmıştır. Bu çalışmada, gelecek zaman perspektifinin ölçümünde kullanılan farklı ölçme araçlarının birbirleri ile ilişkisi 311 katılımcı üzerinde incelenmiştir. Gelecek perspektifini ölçmek için Zimbardo Zaman Perspektifi Ölçeği (ZZPÖ) gelecek boyutu, Dengeli Zaman Perspektifi Ölçeği’nin (DZPÖ) gelecek boyutu ve Geleceğe İlişkin Tutumlar Ölçeği (GİTÖ) kullanılmıştır. Pearson Momentler Çarpımı korelasyon analizleri ve ikinci dereceden faktör analizi sonuçları, yaygın olarak kullanılan ZZPÖ’nün gelecek boyutunun GİTÖ-planlı gelecek boyutu ile ilişkili olduğunu, dolayısıyla gelecek ile ilgili bilişsel bileşenleri ölçtüğünü göstermiştir. Ayrıca, analizler GİTÖ’nün olumlu ve korkulu gelecek boyutları ile DZPÖ-gelecek boyutlarının ilişkili olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu boyutlar ise gelecek perspektifinin duygusal bileşenlerine odaklanmaktadır. Bulgular, gelecek perspektifinin çok boyutlu ve farklı bileşenleri olan bir yapısı olduğuna işaret etmektedir.

Keywords

• Gelecek zaman perspektifi,Zimbardo zaman perspektifi ölçümü,ölçek geçerliği,ikinci dereceden faktör analizi,yapı geçerliği

A New Look at the Measurement and Concept of Future Time Perspective

Abstract

A new look at the measurement and concept of future time perspective shows that it has the potential to influence human emotion and cognition, well-being, and psychopathological symptoms. Therefore, especially following the Zimbardo Time Perspective approach and using its relevant measure, the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI), time perspective has attracted the attention of researchers. Future time perspective, with its ambiguous and uncertain nature, has attracted special attention among the past, present, and future perspectives. However, measurement and conceptualization of future time perspective is complex, and research in this field produced mixed and contradictory results. Therefore, the aim of the current study is to investigate the relationship between different future time perspective measures in order to provide a theoretical explanation about mixed findings and further the validity of relevant measures. In the current study, the relationship between different future time perspective measures was investigated using 311 participants. In order to measure future time perspective, the Future subscale of the ZTPI, the Future subscale of the Balanced Time perspective Scale (BTPS), and the Attitudes Towards Future Scale (ATFS) were administered. The results of correlation and second-order factor analyses revealed that the ZTPI-Future subscale is compatible with planned future subscale of ATFS. Thus, the ZTPI-Future subscale seems to measure the cognitive component of the future time perspective. The results indicated that future time perspective is a multi-dimensional construct that includes qualitatively distinct components.

Keywords

• Future time perspective,Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory,scale validation,second-order factor analysis,construct validity

References

1. Anderson, K. B., & Wood, M. D. (2005). Considering the future consequences of aggressive acts: Established and potential effects in the context of the general aggression model. In A. Strathman & J. Joireman (Eds.), Understanding behavior in the context of time içinde (pp. 85–107). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Basoğlu, M., Livanou, M., Crnobarić, C., Frančišković, T., Suljić, E., Durić, D., & Vranešić, M. (2005). Psychiatric and cognitive effects of war in former Yugoslavia. JAMA, 294, 580–590.
3. Boniwell, I. (2009). Perspectives on time. In S. Lopez (Ed.), Handbook of positive psychology içinde (pp. 295–302). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4. Boniwell, I., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Balancing time perspective in pursuit of optimal functioning. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 165–178). New Jersey, NJ: Wiley.
5. Buccheri, R., Gesu, V. D., & Saniga, M. (2000). Studies on the structure of time: From physics to psycho(patho)logy. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
6. Carelli, M. G., Wiberg, B., & Wiberg, M. (2011). Development and construct validation of the Swedish zimbardo time perspective ınventory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 220–227.
7. Drake, L., Duncan, E., Sutherland, F., Abernethy, C., & Henry, C. (2008). Time perspective and correlates of wellbeing. Time & Society, 17(1), 47–61.
8. Guarino, A., De Pascalis, V., & Di Chiacchio, C. (1999) Breast cancer prevention, time perspective, and trait anxiety. Unpublished manuscript, University of Rome, İtalya.

9. Güler, A. (2004). Relationship between self-construals and future time orientations. (Master’s Thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
10. Heidegger, M. (1992). The history of the concept of time: Prolegomena. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
11. Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300.
12. Holman, E. A., & Silver, R. C. (1998). Getting “stuck” in the past: Temporal orientation and coping with trauma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1146–1163.
13. Holman, E. A., & Silver, R. C. (2005). Future-oriented thinking and adjustment in a nationwide longitudinal study following the September 11th terrorist attacks. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 389–410.
14. Kauffman, D. F., & Husman, J. (2004). Effects of time perspective on student motivation: Introduction to a special issue. Educational Psychology Review, 16(1), 1–7.
15. Lang, F. R., & Carstensen, L. L. (2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 125–139.
16. Lens, W., & Tsuzuki, M. (2007). The role of motivation and future time perspective in educational and career development. Psychologica, 46, 29–42.
17. Levine, R. V., & Wolf, E. (1985). Social time: The heartbeat of culture. Psychology Today, 19, 28–35.
18. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in the social sciences: Selected theoretical papers. Oxford, UK: Harpers.
19. Luyckx, K., Lens, W., Smits, I., & Goossens, L. (2010). Time perspective and identity formation: short-term longitudinal dynamics in college students. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 34(3) 238–247.
20. Mahon, N. E., & Yarcheski, T. J. (1994). Future time perspective and positive health practices in adolescents. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 395–398.
21. Marko, K. W., & Savickas, M. L. (1998). Effectiveness of a career time perspective intervention. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52, 106–119.
22. McGrath, J. E., & Tschan, F. (2004). Temporal matters in social psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23. Morselli, D. (2013). The olive tree effect: Future time perspective when the future is uncertain. Culture & Psychology, 19, 305–322.
24. Nurmi, J. E. (2005). Thinking about and acting upon the future. Development of future orientation across the lifespan. In A. Strathman & J. Joireman (Eds.), Understanding behavior in the context of time içinde (pp. 31–58). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Associates Publishers.
25. Otrar, M., Eksi, H., Dilmac, B., & Sikin, A. (2002). The sources of stress, coping, and psychological well-being among Turkic and relative societies’ students in Turkey. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri (KUYEB), 2, 473–506.
26. Papastamatelou, J., Unger, A., Giotakos, O., & Athanasiodu, F. (2015). Is time perspective a predictor of anxiety and percieved stress? Some preliminary results from Greece. Psychological Studies, 60, 468–477.
27. Przepiorka, A., & Blanchio, A. (2016). Time perspective in internet and facebook addiction. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 13–18.
28. Sanna, L. J., Stocker, S. L., & Clarke, J. A. (2003). Rumination, imagination, and personality: Specters of the past and future in the present. In E. C. Chang & L. J. Sanna (Eds.), Virtue, vice, and personality: The complexity of behavior (pp. 105–124). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
29. Shipp, A. J., Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110, 1–22.
30. Shostrom, E. L. (1974). Manual for the Personal Orientation Inventory. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
31. Sircova, A., Van de Vijver, F., Osin, E., Milfont, T., Fieulaine, N., Kislali-Erginbilgic, A. … Nedeljković, J. (2014). A Global look at time: A 24-country study of the equivalence of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. SAGE Open, 4, 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2158244013515686.
32. Stein, K. B., Sarbin, T. R., & Kulik, J. A. (1968). Future time perspective: Its relation to the socialization process and the delinquent role. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32(3), 257–264.
33. Stolarski, M., Wojtkowska, K., & Kwiecinska, M. (2016). Time for love: Partners’ time perspectives predicts relationship satisfaction in romantic heterosexual couples. Time & Society, 25(3), 552–574.
34. Visser, P. L., & Hirsch, J. K. (2014). Health behaviors among college students: The influence of future time perspective and basic psychological need satisfaction. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 2, 88–99.
35. Webster D. J. (2011). A new measure of time perspective: Initial psychometric findings for the Balanced Time Perspective Scale (BTPS). Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 43(2),111–118.
36. Webster, D. J., & Ma, X., (2013). A balanced time perspective in adulthood: Well-being and developmental effects. Canadian Journal on Aging, 32(4), 433–442.
37. Wittmann, M. (2009). The inner experience of time. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 1955–1967.
38. Zaleski, Z. (1996). Future anxiety: Concept, measurement, and preliminary research. Personality and Individual Differences, 20(2), 165–174.
39. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual- differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288.