Bilişsel Psikoloji Bakış Açısından Sosyal Etkileşimin Toplumsal Bellek Üzerindeki Rolü

Abstract

Toplumsal bellek, sosyal bilimlerin sosyoloji, tarih, antropoloji ve siyaset bilimi gibi çeşitli disiplinlerinde kapsamlı biçimde çalışılmıştır. Bu durum, terim hakkında çok çeşitli tanımlamaların ortaya çıkmasıyla sonuçlanmıştır. Toplumsal belleğin disiplinler arasında kabul gören bir tanımı olmasa da terimin tüm kullanımlarını bağlayan ortak zemin, toplumsal belleğin bir grup tarafından paylaşılan, sosyal bağlam ya da kültürel ürünler tarafından yeniden şekillendirilen ve grup üyelerinin sosyal kimliği üzerinde önemli rolü olan bir bellek formu olmasıdır. Bellek süreçleri, psikologların temel ilgi alanlarından biridir. Ancak ilginç bir biçimde, toplumsal belleğin sorularının psikoloji alanında sistematik olarak araştırılmasına henüz yeni başlanmıştır. Bu derlemenin amacı, bilişsel psikoloji alanındaki deneysel çalışmalardan elde edilen bulguların toplumsal belleğin sorularına uygulanmasıdır. Bu derleme özellikle sosyal etkileşimin belleğin yeniden yapılandırılmasındaki ve farklı bireylerin bellek temsillerinin birbirine yakınsayarak ortak bir geçmiş temsiline dönüşmesindeki rolüne yönelik deneysel çalışmalara odaklanmaktadır. Deneysel ortamda gerçek yaşamın basitleştirilmiş simülasyonlarını oluşturan bu çalışmalar, belleğin sosyal bulaşıcılığı, ortaklaşa hatırlama, sosyal bağlamda seçici hatırlama ve hatırlamaya bağlı unutma gibi paradigmaların toplumun ortak anılarının oluşumu ve hatırlanmasının altında yatan bilişsel mekanizmaların bir temsili olabileceğini ileri sürer. Derleme, bu çalışmaları inceledikten sonra, toplumsal bellek üzerine gerçekleştirilen deneysel ve betimleyici çalışmaların bulguları arasındaki paralelliklere odaklanacaktır. Derleme, son olarak, laboratuvar ortamındaki deneysel çalışmaların, toplumsal olaylara ilişkin anıların oluşumu ve hatırlanmasına yönelik genel prensipler sunarak, toplumsal belleğin altında yatan bilişsel mekanizmaların anlaşılmasına ilişkin katkı sunabileceği görüşüyle sonlanacaktır. Bu derleme, bilişsel psikoloji bakış açısını benimsemekle birlikte, çeşitli disiplinlerin farklı anlayışlarını harmanlayarak toplumsal bellek çalışmalarında disiplinler arası bir yaklaşımı teşvik etmeyi ve toplumsal belleğin daha iyi anlaşılmasına katkıda bulunacak yeni araştırma sorularına yön vermeyi ümit etmektedir.

Keywords

• Toplumsal bellek
• bilişsel psikoloji
• toplumsal olay
• deneysel psikoloji
• sosyal etkileşim
• yapılandırıcı bellek

Role of Social Interaction in Collective Memory from the Perspective of Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

Collective memory has been studied extensively in various disciplines of the social sciences, such as sociology, history, anthropology, and political science, resulting in various definitions for the term. Although there is not a well-accepted conceptualization for collective memory across disciplines, the common ground that binds all uses of the term is that collective memory is a form of memory shared by a group, reshaped by social artifacts, and that has an important role in the social identity of the group’s members. Memory processes have been of central interest to psychologists. However, systematic investigation of the issues in collective memory from a psychological perspective has just begun. The review aims to apply the findings obtained from experimental studies in cognitive psychology to the issues in collective memory. This review focuses on the experimental studies on the role of social interaction in the reconstruction of memories and convergence among individuals on a shared representation of the past. The studies in experimental settings have generated simplified simulations of real life and suggest that social contagion of memory, collaborative recall, selective retrieval, and retrieval-induced forgetting in social contexts may represent cognitive mechanisms underlying the formation and retrieval of collective memories. After exploring these studies, the review focuses on the parallels between the experimental and exploratory studies on collective memory. Finally, the conclusion proposes that studies in the lab setting can contribute to understanding cognitive mechanisms underlying collective memories in real life, providing general principles to predict collective memories’ formation and maintenance. Although this review adopts a cognitive psychological perspective, it attempts to blend insights from various approaches, to encourage an interdisciplinary approach to studying collective memory and devise new research questions to improve the understanding of collective memory

Keywords

• Collective memory
• cognitive psychology
• public event
• experimental psychology
• social interaction
• reconstructive memory

References

1. Alpar, G., Er, N. ve Uçar Boyraz, F. U. (2007). Görgü tanıklığında bellek hataları: Olay sonrası bilginin ve tuzak soruların hatırlama ve kaynak izleme üzerindeki etkisi. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 10(20), 1-17.
2. Anderson, M. C., Bjork, E. L. ve Bjork, R. A. (2000). Retrieval-induced forgetting: Evidence for a recall-specific mechanism. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(3), 522-530. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03214366
3. Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A. ve Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1063-1087. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1063
4. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70, 1-70. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093718Assmann, J. (1995). Collective memory and cultural identity. New German Critique, 65, 125-133.
5. Barnier, A. J., Sutton, J., Harris, C. B. ve Wilson, R. A. (2008). A conceptual and empirical framework for the social distribution of cognition: The case of memory. Cognitive Systems Research, 9(1-2), 33-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.07.002
6. Bartlett, F. C. (1932/1995). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., Bryner, S. ve Thomas III, R. L. (1997). A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(5), 1176-1189. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.23.5.1176
8. Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R. ve Henry, S. (2000). Costs and benefits of collaborative remembering. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 14(6), 497-507. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0720(200011/12)14:6<497::aid-acp665>3.0.co;2-4

9. Belli, R. F., Lindsay, D. S., Gales, M. S. ve McCarthy, T. T. (1994). Memory impairment and source misattribution in postevent misinformation experiments with short retention intervals. Memory & Cognition, 22(1), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03202760
10. Bilgin, N. (2013). Tarih ve kolektif bellek. İstanbul: Bağlam.Blatz, C. W. ve Ross, M. (2009). Historical memories. P. Boyer ve J. Wertsch (Ed.). Memory in mind and culture içinde (s. 223-237.). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511626999.013
11. Blumen, H. M. ve Rajaram, S. (2008). Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall. Memory, 16(3), 231-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701804495
12. Bohannon III, J. N. ve Symons, V. L. (1992). Flashbulb memories: Confidence, consistency, and quantity. E. Winograd ve U. Neisser (Ed.), Emory symposia in cognition, 4. Affect and accuracy in recall: Studies of “flashbulb” memoriesiçinde (s. 65-91). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511664069.005
13. Brewer, W. F. ve Treyens, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13(2), 207-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(81)90008-6 Brown, R. ve Kulik, J. (1977). Flashbulb memories. Cognition, 5(1), 73-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(77)90018-x
14. Brown, N. R., Lee, P. J., Krslak, M., Conrad, F. G., GB Hansen, T., Havelka, J. ve Reddon, J. R. (2009). Living in history: How war, terrorism, and natural disaster affect the organization of autobiographical memory. Psychological Science, 20, 399-405. https://doi.org/10.1037/e527352012-062
15. Castano, E. ve Giner-Sorolla, R. (2006). Not quite human: Infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 804–818. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.804
16. Chrobak, Q. M. ve Zaragoza, M. S. (2008). Inventing stories: Forcing witnesses to fabricate entire fictitious events leads to freely reported false memories. Psychonomic Bulletin ve Review, 15(6), 1190-1195. https://doi.org/10.3758/pbr.15.6.1190
17. Coman, A., Brown, A. D., Koppel, J. ve Hirst, W. (2009a). Collective memory from a psychological perspective. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 22(2), 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-009-9057-9
18. Coman, A., Manier, D. ve Hirst, W. (2009b) Forgetting the unforgettable through conversation: Socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting of September 11 memories. Psychological Science, 20(5), 627–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02343.x
19. Coman A ve Hirst W. (2012). Cognition through a social network: The propagation of socially shared retrieval induced forgetting in social networks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 321-336. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025247
20. Coman, A. ve Hirst, W. (2015). Social identity and socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting: The effects of group membership. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 717-722. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000077
21. Coman, A., Kolling, A., Lewis, M. ve Hirst, W. (2012). Mnemonic convergence: From empirical data to large-scale dynamics. S.J. Yang, A.M. Greenberg ve M. Endsley (Ed.) International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction içinde (s. 256-265). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29047-3_31
22. Coman, A., Momennejad, I., Drach, R. D. ve Geana, A. (2016). Mnemonic convergence in social networks: The emergent properties of cognition at a collective level. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(29), 8171-8176. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525569113
23. Coman, A., Stone, C. B., Castano, E. ve Hirst, W. (2014). Justifying atrocities: The effect of moral-disengagement strategies on socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1281-1285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614531024
24. Congleton, A ve Rajaram S. (2011). The influence of learning methods on collaboration: Prior repeated retrieval enhances retrieval organization, abolishes collaborative inhibition, and promotes post-collaborative memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(4), 535-551. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024308
25. Corning, A., Gaidys, V. ve Schuman, H. (2013). Transformative events and generational memory: A case study over time in Lithuania. Sociological Forum, 28(2), 373-394. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12023
26. Crombag, H. F., Wagenaar, W. A. ve Van Koppen, P. J. (1996). Crashing memories and the problem of ‘source monitoring’. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10(2), 95-104.
27. Cuc, A., Koppel, J. ve Hirst, W. (2007). Silence is not golden: A case for socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Science, 18(8), 727–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01967.x
28. Cuc, A., Ozuru, Y., Manier, D. ve Hirst, W. (2006). On the formation of collective memories: The role of a dominant narrator. Memory & Cognition, 34(4), 752-762. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193423
29. Drivdahl, S. B. ve Zaragoza, M. S. (2001). The role of perceptual elaboration and individual differences in the creation of false memories for suggested events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15(3), 265-281. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.701
30. Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T. ve Levine, J. M. (2009). Shared reality: Experiencing commonality with others’ inner states about the world. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(5), 496-521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01161.x
31. Er, N. (2003). A new flashbulb memory model applied to the Marmara earthquake. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 503-517. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.870
32. Er, N., Alpar, G. ve Uçar, F. (2005). Görgü tanığının bellek yanılsamaları ve güven kararları: Bağımsız bellek bildirimlerinden sonraki test ve soru turu değişkenlerinin etkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 20(56), 45-60.
33. Fenn, K. M., Griffin, N. R., Uitvlugt, M. G. ve Ravizza, S. M. (2014). The effect of Twitter exposure on false memory formation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(6), 1551–1556. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0639-9
34. French, L., Garry, M. ve Mori, K. (2008). You say tomato? Collaborative remembering leads to more false memories for intimate couples than for strangers. Memory, 16(3), 262-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701801491
35. Gabbert, F., Memon, A. ve Allan, K. (2003). Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other’s memories for an event?. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(5), 533-543. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.885
36. Gabbert, F., Memon, A., Allan, K. ve Wright, D. B. (2004). Say it to my face: Examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9(2), 215-227. https://doi.org/10.1348/1355325041719428
37. Halbwachs, M. (1950/1980). The collective memory. New York: Harper Colophon Books.Harris, C.B., Paterson, H.M. ve Kemp, R.I. (2008). Collaborative recall and collective memory: What happens when we remember together? Memory, 16(3), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701811862
38. Harris, C. B., Barnier, A. J., Sutton, J. ve Keil, P. G. (2010). How did you feel when “The Crocodile Hunter” died? Voicing and silencing in conversation influences memory for an autobiographical event. Memory, 18(2), 185-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210903153915
39. Harris, C. B., Barnier, A. J. ve Sutton, J. (2013). Shared encoding and the costs and benefits of collaborative recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(1), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028906
40. Henkel, L. A. (2014). Point-and-shoot memories the influence of taking photos on memory for a museum tour. Psychological Science, 25(2), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504438
41. Hirst, W. ve Coman, A. (2018). Building a collective memory: The case for collective forgetting. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, 88-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.002
42. Hirst, W. ve Echterhoff, G. (2008). Creating shared memories in conversation: Toward a psychology of collective memory. Social Research, 75(1), 183-216.
43. Hirst, W. ve Echterhoff, G. (2012). Remembering in conversations: The social sharing and reshaping of memories. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 55-79. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100340
44. Hirst, W. ve Manier, D. (2008). Towards a psychology of collective memory. Memory, 16(3), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701811912
45. Hirst, W., Manier, D. ve Cuc, A. (2003). The construction of a collective memory. B. Kokinov ve W. Hirst (Ed.), Constructive memory içinde (s. 111-116). Sofya: New Bulgarian University.
46. Hirst, W., Phelps, E. A., Buckner, R. L., Budson, A. E., Cuc, A., Gabrieli, J. D., ... ve Meksin, R. (2009). Long-term memory for the terrorist attack of September 11: Flashbulb memories, event memories, and the factors that influence their retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015527
47. Irwin-Zarecka, I. (1994). Frames of remembrance: The dynamics of collective memory. New Brunswick: Transaction. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203791592
48. Kensinger, E. A., Choi, H. Y., Murray, B. D. ve Rajaram, S. (2016). How social interactions affect emotional memory accuracy: Evidence from collaborative retrieval and social contagion paradigms. Memory & Cognition, 44(5), 706-716. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0597-8
49. Koppel, J., Wohl, D., Meksin, R. ve Hirst, W. (2014). The effect of listening to others remember on subsequent memory: The roles of expertise and trust in socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting and social contagion. Social Cognition, 32(2), 148-180. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2014.32.2.148
50. Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M. ve Pansky, A. (2000). Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 481-537. 1. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.481
51. Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N. ve Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018
52. Lewandowsky, S., Stritzke, W. G., Freund, A. M., Oberauer, K. ve Krueger, J. I. (2013). Misinformation, disinformation, and violent conflict: From Iraq and the “War on Terror” to future threats to peace. American Psychologist, 68(7), 487-501. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034515
53. Li, H. ve Sakamoto, Y. (2014). Social impacts in social media: An examination of perceived truthfulness and sharing of information. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 278–287. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9518-4.les2
54. Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G. ve Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.4.1.19
55. Loftus, E. F. ve Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(74)80011-3
56. Loftus, E. F. ve Zanni, G. (1975). Eyewitness testimony: The influence of the wording of a question. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 5, 86-88. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03336715
57. Marsh, R., Cook, G. ve Hicks, J. (2006). Gender and orientation stereotypes bias source-monitoring attributions. Memory, 14(2), 148-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210544000015
58. Marsh, E. J. ve Rajaram, S. (2019). The digital expansion of the mind: Implications of Internet usage for memory and cognition. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.11.001
59. Meade, M. L., Nokes, T. J. ve Morrow, D. G. (2009). Expertise promotes facilitation on a collaborative memory task. Memory, 17(1), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210802524240
60. Meade, M. L. ve Roediger, H. L. (2002). Explorations in the social contagion of memory. Memory & Cognition, 30, 995-1009. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194318
61. Mısırlısoy, M. ve Ceylan, S. (2014). Olay sonrası yanlış bilgi paradigması: Yaşlanma ve stresin etkisi. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 17(33), 60-73.Mitchell, K. J. ve Zaragoza, M. S. (1996). Repeated exposure to suggestion and false memory: The role of contextual variability. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(2), 246-260. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0014
62. Mitchell, K. J. ve Zaragoza, M. S. (2001). Contextual overlap and eyewitness suggestibility. Memory & Cognition, 29(4), 616-626. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03200462
63. Muller, F., Bermejo, F. ve Hirst, W. (2016). Argentines’ collective memories of the military Junta of 1976: Differences and similarities across generations and ideology. Memory, 24(7), 990-1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2015.1061013
64. Muller, F., Bermejo, F. ve Hirst, W. (2018). Cultural and communicative memories: Contrasting Argentina’s 1976 coup d’état and the 2001 economic-political-social crisis. Memory, 26(7), 974-984. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2018.1431283
65. Mutlutürk, A., Boduroğlu, A. ve Tekcan, A. İ. (2018). Kişisel ve toplumsal bellek. S. Gülgöz, S. Öner ve B. Ece Uslu (Ed.), Hayatı hatırlamak: Otobiyografik belleğe bilimsel yaklaşımlar (s. 111-116). İstanbul: Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları
66. Novick, P. (1999). The Holocaust in American life. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/106.2.534
67. Olick, J. K. (1999). Collective memory: The two cultures. Sociological Theory, 17, 333-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00083
68. Olick, J. K. ve Robbins, J. (1998). Social memory studies: From “collective memory” to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 105-140. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.105
69. Ost, J., Vrij, A., Costall, A. ve Bull, R. (2002). Crashing memories and reality monitoring: Distinguishing between perceptions, imaginations and ‘false memories’. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(2), 125-134. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.779
70. Páez, D., Bellelli, G. ve Rimé, B. (2009). Flashbulb Memories, Culture and Collective Memories: Psychosocial processes related to rituals, emotions, and memories. O. Luminet ve A. Curci (Ed.). Flashbulb Memories: New Issues and New Perspectives içinde (s. 227-246). Hove and New York: Psychology Press.
71. Páez, D. ve Liu, J. (2010). Collective memory of conflicts. D. Bar-Tal (Ed.) Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: Social psychological perspective içinde (s. 105-124). Hove and New York: Psychology Press.
72. Peker, M. ve Tekcan, A. İ. (2009). The role of familiarity among group members in collaborative inhibition and social contagion. Social Psychology, 40, 111-118. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335.40.3.111
73. Pereira-Pasarin, L. P. ve Rajaram, S. (2011). Study repetition and divided attention: Effects of encoding manipulations on collaborative inhibition in group recall. Memory & Cognition, 39(6), 968-976. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0087-y
74. Pezdek, K. (2003). Event memory and autobiographical memory for the events of September 11, 2001. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 1033-1045. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.984
75. Rajaram, S. ve Pereira-Pasarin, L. P. (2007). Collaboration can improve individual recognition memory: Evidence from immediate and delayed tests. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(1), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194034
76. Roediger III, H. L. ve Abel, M. (2015). Collective memory: A new arena of cognitive study. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(7), 359-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.04.003
77. Roediger III, H. L. ve McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 803-814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803
78. Roediger III, H. L., Meade, M. L. ve Bergman, E. (2001). Social contagion of memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 365-71. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196174
79. Roediger III, H. L., Zaromb, F. M. ve Butler, A. C. (2009). The role of repeated retrieval in shaping collective memory. P. Boyer ve J. Wertsch (Ed.). Memory in mind and culture içinde (s. 29-58.). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511626999.009
80. Schuman, H., Akiyama, H. ve Knauper, B. (1998). Collective memories of Germans and Japanese about the past half-century. Memory, 6(4), 427-454. https://doi.org/10.1080/741942611
81. Schuman, H. ve Rodgers, W. L. (2004). Cohorts, chronology, and collective memories. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(2), 217-254. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfh012
82. Schuman, H. ve Scott, J. (1989). Generations and collective memories. American Sociological Review, 54(3), 359-381. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095611
83. Sparrow, B., Liu, J. ve Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776–778. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745
84. Stone, C. B., Coman, A., Brown, A. D., Koppel, J. ve Hirst, W. (2012). Toward a science of silence: The consequences of leaving a memory unsaid. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(1), 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611427303
85. Stone, C. B. ve Jay, A. C. (2019). From the individual to the collective: The emergence of a psychological approach to collective memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(4), 504-515. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3564
86. Surprenant, A. M. ve Neath, I. (2009). Principles of memory. New York: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698010392131
87. Svob, C., Brown, N. R., Reddon, J. R., Uzer, T. ve Lee, P. J. (2014). The transitional impact scale: Assessing the material and psychological impact of life transitions. Behavior Research Methods, 46(2), 448-455. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0378-2
88. Tekcan, A. İ., Boduroglu, A., Mutlutürk, A. ve Erciyes, A. A. (2017). Life-span retrieval of public events: Reminiscence bump for high-impact events, recency for others. Memory & Cognition, 45(7), 1095-1112. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0724-1
89. Tekcan, A. I., Ece, B., Gülgöz, S. ve Er, N. (2003). Autobiographical and event memory for 9/11: Changes across one year. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 1057-1066. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.985
90. Walther E, Bless H, Strack F, Rackstraw P, Wagner D ve Werth L. (2002). Conformity effects in memory as a function of group size, dissenters and uncertainty. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 793–810. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.828
91. Wang, Q. (2019). The individual mind in the active construction of its digital niche. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(1), 25-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.12.005
92. Wang, Q. ve Aydin, Ç. (2009). Cultural issues in flashbulb memory. O. Luminet ve A. Curci (Ed.), Flashbulb memories içinde (s. 247–268). New York: Psychology Press.
93. Weldon, M. S. ve Bellinger, K. D. (1997). Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 1160-1175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.23.5.1160
94. Wertsch, J. V. (2002). Voices of collective remembering. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511613715
95. Wertsch, J. V. ve Roediger, H. L. (2008). Collective memory: Conceptual foundations and theoretical approaches. Memory, 16(3), 318-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701801434
96. Yamashiro, J. (2017). Convergence on collective memories: Central speakers and distributed remembering (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). The New School for Social Research of The New School University, New York.
97. Yardi, S. ve Boyd, D. (2010). Dynamic debates: An analysis of group polarization over time on twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 316-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610380011
98. Yaron-Antar, A. ve Nachson, I. (2006). Collaborative remembering of emotional events: The case of Rabin’s assassination. Memory, 14(1), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210444000502
99. Zaragoza, M. S. ve Mitchell, K. J. (1996). Repeated exposure to suggestion and the creation of false memories. Psychological Science, 7(5), 294-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00377.x