Olumlu/Olumsuz Duygulanım ve Özgün Kişilik: Duygu Düzenleme Güçlüklerinin Aracı Rolü

Abstract

Kişinin kendini bilmesi ve olası tüm dışsal baskılara rağmen kendine sadık kalabilmesi temelinde tanımlanan özgün kişiliğin yordayıcılarını inceleyen çalışmalar alan yazında görece sınırlı sayıdadır. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, olumlu/olumsuz duygulanım ile özgün kişilik arasındaki ilişkide duygu düzenleme güçlüklerinin aracı rolünü incelenmektir. Çalışmada Otantiklik Ölçeği, Olumlu ve Olumsuz Duygulanım Ölçeği ve Duygu Düzenleme Güçlükleri Ölçeği olmak üzere Türkçeye çevrilmiş olan üç ölçek kullanılmıştır. Bu çalışma İstanbul’daki bir vakıf üniversitesinin çeşitli bölümlerinde (sırasıyla Psikoloji, Sağlık Yönetimi, Uluslararası Ticaret, İşletme, İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği, Eczacılık, Biyoloji, İngiliz Dili ve Edebiyatı) lisans ve lisansüstü olmak üzere farklı sınıf düzeylerinde öğrenimine devam eden 184 üniversite öğrenci (120 kadın ve 64 erkek) ile yürütülmüştür. Katılımcıların yaşlarının ortalamasının 20.75 (SS= 1.97) olduğu bulgulanmıştır. Çalışmanın temel amacını test etmek için PROCESS Macro kullanılarak iki ayrı aracılık analizi yapılmıştır. Bulgular, duygu düzenleme güçlüklerinin hem olumlu duygulanım ile özgün kişilik, hem de olumsuz duygulanım ile özgün kişilik arasındaki ilişkilerde kısmi aracı role sahip olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Modellerden elde edilen sonuçlar incelendiğinde, olumlu duygulanıma kıyasla olumsuz duygulanımın özgün kişilik üzerinde daha güçlü etkiye sahip olduğu görülmüştür. Bulgulara göre, düşük düzeyde olumsuz duygulanıma sahip olan bireylerin, olumsuz duygulanım düzeyi yüksek olan bireylere kıyasla özgün kişiliğe ulaşma açısından daha avantajlı oldukları ileri sürülebilir. Öte yandan, düşük düzeyde olumlu duygulanıma sahip olan bireylerin, yüksek düzeyde olumlu duygulanıma sahip bireylere kıyasla özgün kişiliğe ulaşma açısından daha dezavantajlı olduğu görülmektedir. Çalışmanın sonuçları, duygu düzenleme güçlüklerinin azaltılmasını amaçlayan müdahalelerin, bireylerin özgün kişiliklilerinin desteklenmesine imkân sağlayabileceğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bunun özellikle olumsuz duygulanım düzeyi yüksek olan bireyler açısından daha fazla öneme sahip olduğu ileri sürülebilir.

Keywords

• Duygu düzenleme güçlükleri
• olumlu duygulanım
• olumsuz duygulanım
• özgün kişilik

Positive/ Negative Affectivity and Authentic Personality: The Mediator Role of Emotion Regulation Difficulties

Abstract

The studies on predictors of an authentic personality (which is defined as knowing and being faithful to oneself despite the possible influences of the external environment), are somewhat limited. The purpose of this study is to examine the mediating role of emotion regulation difficulties in the relationship between positive/negative affectivity and authentic personality. Three scales previously adapted to Turkish were used: The Authenticity Scale, The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule and The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. The study was carried out with 184 students (120 females and 64 male) from a private university in Istanbul. The participants were from various departments (psychology, health management, international trade, occupational health and safety, pharmacy, biology, English literature) as well as from different class levels (from 1st to 4th class, graduate level). The mean age was 20.75 (SD = 1.97). To test the main aim of the study, two separate mediation analyses were carried out by using PROCESS Macro. The results revealed that emotion regulation difficulties partially mediated the relationships between both positive affectivity and authentic personality as well as negative affectivity and authentic personality. When the results obtained from the models were examined, it was found that, compared to positive affectivity, negative affectivity had a stronger effect on authentic personality. According to the results, it can be argued that compared to those with lower levels of positive affectivity, those with higher levels of positive affectivity have a greater advantage in reaching their authentic personality. Furthermore, compared to those who have lower levels of negative affectivity, those who have higher levels of negative affectivity might be disadvantaged in reaching their authentic personality. The results of the study reveal that interventions aimed at reducing emotion regulation difficulties may enable individuals to support their authentic personality. It can be said that this is more important for individuals with high levels of negative affectivity.

Keywords

• Difficulties in emotion regulation
• positive affectivity
• negative affectivity
• authentic personality

References

1. Acun-Kapıkıran, N. (2015). Psikolojik gereksinimlerin doyumu ve duygu gereksinimi: Özgün benliğin aracı rolü. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 5(43), 1–10.
2. Akın, Ü. (2014). Does authenticity predict subjective happiness of Turkish teacher candidates. Journal of Educational & Instructional Studies in the World, 4(2), 48–54.
3. Akın, A. ve Akın, Ü. (2014). Authenticity as a predictor on hope in Turkish univeristy students. Education Sciences and Psychology, 28(2), 64–70.
4. Akyunus-İnce, M. (2012). Cognitive aspects of personality disorders: Influences of basic personality traits, cognitive emotion regulation and interpersonal problems. (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). ODTÜ, Ankara.
5. Baker, Z. G., Tou, R. Y., Bryan, J. L. ve Knee, C. R. (2017). Authenticity and well-being: Exploring positivity and negativity in interactions as a mediator. Personality and Individual Differences, 113, 235–239. doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.018
6. Baumann, N., Kaschel, R. ve Kuhl, J. (2007). Affect sensitivity and affect regulation in dealing with positive and negative affect. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 239–248. doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.05.002
7. Blair, K. A., Denham, S. A., Kochanoff, A. ve Whipple, B. (2004). Playing it cool: Temperament, emotion regulation, and social behavior in preschoolers. Journal of School Psychology, 42(6), 419–443.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2004.10.002
8. Boyraz, G. ve Kuhl, M. L. (2015). Self-focused attention, authenticity, and well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.029

9. Bradley, B., DeFife, J. A., Guarnaccia, C., Phifer, J., Fani, N., Ressler K. J. ve Westen, D. (2011). Emotion disregulation and negative affect: Association with psychiatric symptoms. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 72 (5), 685–691. doi: 10.4088/jcp.10M06409BLU
10. Butler, E. A., Lee, T. L., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Emotion regulation and culture: Are the social consequences of emotion suppression culture-specific? Emotion, 7(1), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.1.30
11. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık: Conway, A. M., Tugade, M. M., Catalino, L. I., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions: Form, function, and mechanisms. The Oxford handbook of happiness içinde (s. 17–34). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199557257.013.0003.
12. Cooper, A. B., Sherman, R. A., Rauthmann, J. F., Serfass, D. G. ve Brown, N. A. (2018). Feeling good and authentic: Experienced authenticity in daily life is predicted by positive feelings and situation characteristics, not trait-state consistency. Journal of Research in Personality, 77, 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.09.005
13. Diamond, L. M. ve Aspinwall, L. G. (2003). Emotion regulation across the life span: An integrative perspective emphasizing self-regulation, positive affect, and dyadic processes. Motivation and Emotion, 27(2), 125–156. doi: 10.1023/A:1024521920068
14. English, T. ve John, O. P. (2013). Understanding the Social Effects of Emotion Regulation: The Mediating Role of Authenticity for Individual Differences in Suppression, Emotion, 13(2), 314–329. doi: 10.1037/A0029847
15. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.218
16. Fredrickson, B. L. (2003). The value of positive emotions: The emerging science of positive psychology is coming to understand why it’s good to feel good. American Scientist, 91(4), 330–335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
17. Gençöz, T. (2000). Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: A study of validity and reliability. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 15,19–28.
18. Gratz, K. L. ve Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factorstructure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41–54. doi: 10.1007/s10862-008-9102-4
19. Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 1–26. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781
20. Gross, J. J. ve John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348. doi: 1037/0022-3514.85.2.
21. Hamilton, J. L., Burke, T. A., Stange, J. P., Kleiman, E. M., Rubenstein, M., Scopelliti, K. A., ...ve Alloy, L. B. (2017). Trait affect, emotion regulation, and the generation of negative and positive interpersonal events. Behavior Therapy, 48(4), 435–447. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2017.01.006
22. Hallion, L. S., Steinman, S. A., Tolin, D. F. ve Diefenbach, G. J. (2018). Psychometric properties of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale (DERS) and its short forms in adults with emotional disorders. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 539. |https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00539
23. Harter, S. (2002). Authenticity. C.R. Snyder ve S. J. Lopez (Ed.). Handbook of Positive Psychologyiçinde (s. 382–394). New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
25. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations (2. Baskı). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
26. İlhan, T. ve Özdemir, Y. (2013). Otantiklik ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4(40), 142–153.
27. İmamoğlu, E. O. ve Karakitapoğlu-Aygün Z. (2004). Self-construals and values in different cultural and socioeconomic contexts. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 130(4), 277–306. doi: 10.3200/MONO.130.4.277-306
28. Kernis, M. H. ve Goldman, B. (2006). A Multicomponent Conceptualization of Authenticity: Theory and Research, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 283–357. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2601(06)38006-9
29. Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R. and Kurokawa, M. (2000). Culture, Emotion, and Well-being: Good Feelings in Japan and the United States, Cognition & Emotion, 14(1), 93–124. doi: 10.1080/026999300379003
30. Knoll, M. ve Van Dick, R. (2013). Authenticity, employee silence, prohibitive effect of organizational identification. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(4), 346–360. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2013.804113
31. Lenton, A. P., Slabu, L., Sedikides, C. ve Power, K. (2013). I feel good, therefore I am real: Testing the causal influence of mood on state authenticity. Cognition & Emotion, 27(7), 1202–1224. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.778818
32. Lopez, S. J. (2011). The encyclopedia of positive psychology. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.Markus, H. R. ve Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224
33. .Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Culture and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Sciences, 5, 420–430. doi:10.1177/1745691610375557
34. Mesquita, B. (2001). Emotions in collectivist and individualist contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 68–74. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.68
35. Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R. ve Pereg, D. (2003). Attachment theory and affect regulation: The dynamics, development, and cognitive consequences of attachment-related strategies. Motivation and Emotion, 27(2), 77–102. doi: 10.1023/A:1024515519160
36. Moneta, G. B., Vulpe, A. ve Rogaten, J. (2012). Can positive affect “undo” negative affect? A longitudinal study of affect in studying. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(4), 448–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.011
37. Ochsner, K. N. ve Gross, J. J. (2005). The cognitive control of emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(5), 242–249. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.010
38. Pinto, D. G., Maltby, J., Wood, A. M. ve Day, L. (2012). A behavioral test of Horney’s linkage between authenticity and aggression: People living authentically are less-likely to respond aggressively in unfair situations. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(1), 41–44. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.010
39. Preece, D. A., Becerra, R., Robinson, K., Dandy, J. ve Allan, A. (2018). Measuring emotion regulation ability across negative and positive emotions: The Perth Emotion Regulation Competency Inventory (PERCI). Personality and Individual Differences, 135, 229–241. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.025
40. Quirin, M., Pruessner, J. C. ve Kuhl, J. (2008). HPA system regulation and adult attachment anxiety: individual differences in reactive and awakening cortisol. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 33(5), 581–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.01.013
41. Preacher, K. J. ve Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
42. Rugancı, N. R. (2008). The relationship among attachment style, affect regulation, psychological stres and mental construct of the relational world. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). ODTÜ, Ankara.
43. Salmela, M. (2005). What is emotional authenticity? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 35(3), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2005.00273.x
44. Sarıçam, H. (2015). Life satisfaction: Testing a structural equation model based on authenticity and subjective happiness. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 46 (2), 278–284. doi: 10.1515/ppb-2015-0034
45. Satıcı, S. A., Kayış, A. R. ve Akın, A. (2013). Investigating the predictive role of social self-efficacy on authenticity in Turkish university students. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9(3), 572–580. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/02.07.pr0.112.2.519-528
46. Scharf, M. ve Mayseless, O. (2010). Finding the authentic self in a communal culture: developmental goals in emerging adulthood. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 130, 83–95.doi: 10.1002/cd.283
47. Sheldon, K. M. ve Ryan, R. M. (2011). Positive psychology and self-determination theory: A natural interface. Human autonomy in Cross-Cultural Context içinde (s. 33–44). Springer, Dordrecht.
48. Seto, E. ve Schlegel, R. J. (2017). Becoming your true self: Perceptions of authenticity across the lifespan. Self and Identity, 17(3), 310v326. doi: 10.1080/15298868.2017.1322530
49. Slabu, L. Lenton, A. P., Sedikides, C. ve Bruder, M. (2014). Trait and state authenticity across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psyhology, 45(9), 1347–1373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114543520
50. Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
51. Taşçıoğlu, C. ve Tosun, L. P. (2018). Facebook’taki benlik sunumları, otantiklik ve psikolojik iyi oluş. Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi,6(12), 103–125. doi: 10.7816/nesne-06-12-06
52. Tamir, M. ve Mauss, I. B. (2011). Social cognitive factors in emotion regulation: Implications for well-being. Emotion Regulation and Well-being içinde (s. 3 1–47). Springer, New York, NY.
53. Tortella-Feliu, M., Balle, M. ve Sese, A. (2010). Relationship between negative affectivity, emotion regulationi anxiety and depressive symptoms in adolescents examined through structural equation modeling. Journal of Anxiety Disordrs, 24(7), 686–683. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.04.012
54. Tugade, M. M. ve Fredrickson, B. L. (2007). Regulation of positive emotions: Emotion regulation strategies that promote resilience. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(3), 311–333. doi: 10.1007/s10902-006-9015-4
55. Turliuc, M. N. ve Bujor, L. (2013). Emotion regulation between determinants and consequences. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 848–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.218
56. Vess, M., Leal, S. A., Hoeldtke, R. T., Schlegel, R. J. ve Hicks, J. A. (2016).True self-alienation positively predicts reports of mindwandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 45, 89–99. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2016.08.018
57. Wang, Y. ve Li, Z. (2018). Authenticity as a mediator of the relationship between power contingent self-esteem and subjective well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1066. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01066. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01066
58. Watson, D. (2005). Positive affectivity: The disposition to experience pleasurable emotional states. Handbook of Positive Psychology (Ed. C. R. Snyder ve Shane J. Lopez) içinde (s.106-119). Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199396511.001.0001
59. Watson, D., Clark, L. A. ve Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063
60. Watson, D. ve Pennebaker, J. W. (1989). Health complaints, stress, and distress: exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychological Review, 96(2), 234–254. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.96.2.234
61. Wenzel, A. J. ve Lucas-Thompson, R. G. (2012). Authenticity in college-aged males and females, how close others are perceived, and mental health outcomes. Sex Roles, 67(5-6), 334–350. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0182-y
62. White, N. J. ve Tracey, T. J. G. (2011). An examination of career indecision and application to dispositional authenticity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78(2), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.09.015
63. Wickham, R. E., Williamson, R. E., Beard, C. L., Kobayashi, C. L. ve Hirst, T. W. (2016). Authenticity attenuates the negative effects of interpersonal conflict on daily well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 60, 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2015.11.006
64. Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Baliousis, M. ve Joseph, S. (2008). The authentic personality: A theoretical and empirical conceptualization and the development of authenticity scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(3), 385–399. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.55.3.385
65. Yöntem, M. K. ve İlhan, T. (2013). Benlik kurguları ve otantikliğin özgecilik üzerindeki yordayıcı gücünün incelenmesi. Turkish Studies, 8(8), 2291–2302. doi: 10.7827/TurkishStudies.5477