This study is an attempt to review the efforts of fundamentalist scientists
(al-osoliyu: n) in the preparation of the lexical meanings which they call
«the names of words» or the terminology of word’s topics like (general
[-al-a:m], particular [-alh’a:S], the common [almuS’tarak], absolute
[almuTlaq], restricted [almuqayad] and others). It is a terminologies
of their own which they needed it to describe the words of the Islamic
ruling and it’s significances, and they seek to organize it, and to distribute
it’s levels, by a structured semantic treatment seems approach – in some
of it’s methodological procedures – to the treatments covered by some
contemporary scholars interested in the semantic and lexical researches,
especially the westerners. The importance of this fundamentalist treatment
it is issued by a particular linguistic vision, and a distinctive functional
mechanism and it represents a precise strategy to understand the appointed
legal discourse, and to extract it’s provisions and purposes. The purpose of
this study is to identify the features of this strategy, which we can summe up
it’s theme in: an original fundamentalist attempt to structuring the lexical
meaning
Word’s topics Fundamentalist definitions of the names of words Structuring of Lexical meaning Semantic analysis Opposition.
This study is an attempt to review the efforts of fundamentalist scientists
(al-osoliyu: n) in the preparation of the lexical meanings which they call
«the names of words» or the terminology of word’s topics like (general
[-al-a:m], particular [-alh’a:S], the common [almuS’tarak], absolute
[almuTlaq], restricted [almuqayad] and others). It is a terminologies
of their own which they needed it to describe the words of the Islamic
ruling and it’s significances, and they seek to organize it, and to distribute
it’s levels, by a structured semantic treatment seems approach – in some
of it’s methodological procedures – to the treatments covered by some
contemporary scholars interested in the semantic and lexical researches,
especially the westerners. The importance of this fundamentalist treatment
it is issued by a particular linguistic vision, and a distinctive functional
mechanism and it represents a precise strategy to understand the appointed
legal discourse, and to extract it’s provisions and purposes. The purpose of
this study is to identify the features of this strategy, which we can summe up
it’s theme in: an original fundamentalist attempt to structuring the lexical
meaning
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Journal Section | Makaleler |
Authors | |
Publication Date | June 20, 2012 |
Published in Issue | Year 2011 Issue: 19 |