.

Year 2019, Volume: 39 Issue: 1, 41 - 64, 30.06.2019

Eric Malczewski

Abstract

.

Keywords

.

Durkheim and the Nation

Abstract

This article elucidates key elements of the Durkheimian framework that bear specifically on studies of nations and nationalism. Durkheim’s theory of collective representations and his general theoretical view of the nature of human experience and the constitutive forces of social life are shown to offer leverage on problems of contemporary general interest to sociology. A Durkheimian approach to the study of nations and nationalism centers on three key elements: i) the definition of the form of collective consciousness characterizing the putative national unit; ii) a focus on the historical or genealogical development of the national unit; and, iii) the analysis of this unit in its theoretical aspect as a set of collective representations. Seeing nations and nationalism from a Durkheimian standpoint affords an understanding of these phenomena in terms of what they suggest about the nature of human social order as such. The contributions of Anthony Smith and Liah Greenfeld are discussed in light of this framework so as to make manifest the enduring significance of Durkheim’s thought.

Keywords

Durkheim, Nations, Nationalism, Political Sociology, Anthony Smith, Liah Greenfeld

References

• Alpert, H. (1939). Émile Durkheim and his sociology. New York, NY: Columbia University Press and London, UK: P.S. King & Son, Ltd.
• Alexander, J. (1982). Theoretical logic in sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• Alexander, J. (1982–1983). The antinomies of classical thought: Marx and Durkheim (Vol. 2 of Theoretical logic in sociology). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• Alexander, J. (1988). Durkheimian sociology: Cultural studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Alexander, J. (2008). Iconic experience in art and life: Surface/depth beginning with Giacometti’s Standing Woman. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(5), 1–19.
• Alexander, J. (2010). Iconic consciousness: The material feeling of meaning. Thesis Eleven, 103(1), 10–25.
• Alexander, J. (2012). Iconic power and performance: The role of the critic. In J. C. Alexander, D. Bartmanski, & B. Giesen (Eds.), Iconic power: Materiality and meaning in social life (pp. 25–38). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
• Alexander, J. (2013). Afterword. Nations and nationalism, 19(4), 693–695.
• Alexander, J., & Smith, P. (2001). The handbook of sociological theory. New York, NY: Kluwer.
• Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism. London, UK: Verso.
• Bartmanski, D. (2012). Iconspicuous revolutions of 1989: Culture and contingency in the making of political icons. In J. C. Alexander, D. Bartmanski, & B. Giesen (Eds.), Iconic power: Materiality and meaning in social life (pp. 39–66). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
• Bartmanski, D. (2014). The word/image dualism revisited: Towards an iconic conception of visual culture. Journal of Sociology, 50(2), 164–181.
• Bartmanski, D., & Alexander, J. (2012). Materiality and meaning in social life: Toward an iconic turn in cultural sociology. In J. C. Alexander, D. Bartmanski, & B. Giesen (Eds.), Iconic power: Materiality and meaning in social life (pp. 1–14). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
• Bellah, R. (1959). Durkheim and history. American Sociological Review, 24(4), 447–461. Bellah, R. (2005). Durkheim and ritual. In J. C. Alexander & P. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Durkheim (pp. 183–210). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Benoit, O. (2007). Ressentiment and the Gairy social revolution. Small Axe, 22(11), 95–111.
• Benoit, O. (2011). The question of national identity and the institutionalization of the visual arts in Grenada. Nations and Nationalism 17(3), 561–580.
• Bernard, T. (1983). The consensus-conflict debate: Form and content in social theories. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
• Brubaker, R. (2012). Religion and nationalism: Four approaches. Nations and Nationalism, 18(1), 2–20.
• Cerulo, K. (2014). Review of Mind, modernity, and madness: The impact of culture on human experience by Liah Greenfeld. American Journal of Sociology, 119(5), 1527–1528.
• Collins, R. (2005). The Durkheimian movement in France and in world sociology. In J. Alexander & P. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Durkheim (pp. 101–135). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Dayan, D., & Katz, E. (1988). Articulating consensus: The ritual and rhetoric of media events. In J. Alexander (Ed.), Durkheimian sociology: Cultural studies (pp. 161–186). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York, NY: Norton.
• Debs, M. (2013). Using cultural trauma: Gandhi’s assassination, partition and secular nationalism in post- independence India. Nations and Nationalism, 19(4), 635–653.
• Dingley, J. (2008). Nationalism, social theory, and Durkheim. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Du Bois, W. E. B. (1999). The souls of black folk. New York, NY: Norton. (Orginal work published 1903)
• Durkheim, É. (1930). De la division du travail social. Paris, FR: Quadrige Presses Universitaires de France. (Orginal work published 1893)
• Durkheim, É. (1937). Les règles de la méthode sociologique. Paris, FR: Quadrige Presses Universitaires de France. (Orginal work published 1895)
• Durkheim, É. (2004a). Le suicide: étude de sociologie. Paris, FR: Quadrige Presses Universitaires de France. (Orginal work published 1897)
• Durkheim, É. (1897-1898). Définition des phénomènes religieux. Année Sociologique, Année 2, 1–27.
• Durkheim, É. (1898a). L’Individualisme et les intellectuels. Revue Bleue, 4(X), 7–13. Paris: Éditions Mille et Une Nuits, 2002. (Orginal work published 1895)
• Durkheim, É. (1898b). Représentations individuelles et representations collectives. In Sociologie et philosophie (pp. 1–48). Paris, FR: Quadrige Presses Universitaires de France.
• Durkheim, E. (1898c). Préface. In L’Année sociologique (Vol. 1 première année, 1896-1897, pp. 1–7). Paris, FR: Alcan.
• Durkheim, É. (1901). Préface de la seconde édition. In É. Durkheim, Les règles de la méthode sociologique (pp. xi-xxiv).
• Durkheim, E. (1901-1902). Sociologie générale: Objet et méthode de la sociologie. In L’Année sociologique (Vol. 6, pp. 123–125). Paris, FR: Alcan.
• Durkheim, É. (2004b). Jugements de valeur et jugements de réalité. In Sociologie et philosophie (pp. 117–141). Paris, FR: Quadrige Presses Universitaires de France. (Original work published 1911)
• Durkheim, É. (1960). Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Paris, FR: Quadrige Presses Universitaires de France. (Original work published 1912)
• Durkheim, É. (1915). L’Allemagne au-dessus de tout: La mentalité allemande et la guerre. Paris, FR: Colin.
• Durkheim, E. (1938a). L’ Évolution pédagogique en France. Des origines à la Renaissance. Paris, FR: Alcan.
• Durkheim, E. (1938b). L’ Évolution pédagogique en France. De la Renaissance à nos jours. Paris, FR: Alcan.
• Durkheim, É. (1958). Socialism and Saint-Simon (C. Sattler, Trans.). Yellow Springs, Ohio: The Antioch Press.
• Durkheim, É. (1960). Montesquieu and Rousseau: Forerunners of sociology (R. Mannheim, Trans.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
• Durkheim, É. (1961). Moral education (E. Wilson, Ed.). New York, NY: Free Press. (Original work published 1925)
• Durkheim, É. (2003 [1957]). Professional ethics and civic morals. New York, NY: Routledge. Eastwood. J. (2006). The rise of nationalism in Venezuela. Gainesville, FL: The University Press of Florida.
• Emirbayer, M. (1996a). Durkheim’s contribution to the sociological analysis of history. Sociological Forum, 11(2), 263–284.
• Emirbayer, M. (1996b). Useful Durkheim. Sociological Theory, 14(2), 109–130. Emirbayer, M. (2004). The Alexander School of cultural sociology. Thesis Eleven, 79, 5–15.
• Fournier, M. (2013). Émile Durkheim: A biography. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
• Gehlke, C. (1915). Émile Durkheim’s contributions to sociological theory. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
• Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Giddens, A. (1971). Durkheim’s political sociology. The Sociological Review, 19(4), 477–519.
• Greenfeld, L. (1992). Nationalism: five roads to modernity. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
• Greenfeld, L. (1996). The modern religion? Critical Review, 10(2), 169–191.
• Greenfeld, L. (2001). The spirit of capitalism: Nationalism and economic growth. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
• Greenfeld, L. (2004). A new paradigm for the social sciences? Critical Review, 16(2–3), 288–322.
• Greenfeld, L. (2005a). Nationalism and the mind. Nations and Nationalism, 11(3), 325–341.
• Greenfeld, L. (2005b). The trouble with social science: A propos some new work on nationalism. Critical Review, 17(1–2), 101–116.
• Greenfeld, L. (2007). Main currents and sociological thought. In B. P. Frost & D. J. Mahoney (Eds.), Political reason in the age of ideology: Essays in honor of Raymond Aron (pp. 125–143). New Brunswick & London, UK: Transaction Publishers.
• Greenfeld, L. (2013). Mind, modernity, madness: The impact of culture on human experience. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
• Greenfeld, L., & Chirot, D. (1994). Nationalism and aggression. Theory and Society 9, 79–130.
• Guibernau, M. (1996). Nationalisms: the nation-state and nationalism in the twentieth century. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
• Guibernau, M. (1997). Marx and Durkheim on nationalism. In Hans-Rudolf Wicker (Ed.), Rethinking nationalism and ethnicity: The struggle for meaning and order in Europe (pp. 73– 90). New York, NY: Oxford.
• Guibernau, M. (2004). Anthony D. Smith on nations and national identity: A critical assessment. Nations and Nationalism, 10(1–2), 125–141.
• Hayes, C. (1926). Essays on nationalism. New York, NY: Macmillan.
• Hobsbawm, E. (1990). Nations and nationalism since 1780: Programme, myth, reality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Hunt, L. (1988). The sacred and the French revolution. In J. Alexander (Ed.), Durkheimian sociology: Cultural studies (pp. 25–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Johnson, T., Dandeker, C., & Ashworth, C. (1984). The structure of social theory. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
• Kane, A. (2000). Narratives of nationalism: Constructing Irish national identity during the Land War, 1879–1882. National Identities, 2(3), 245–264.
• Kim, M., & Schwartz, B. (2010). Northeast Asia’s difficult past: Essays in collective memory. New York, NY: Springer.
• Kurakin, D. (2015). Reassembling the ambiguity of the sacred: A neglected inconsistency in readings of Durkheim. Journal of Classical Sociology, 15(4), 377–395.
• Llobera, J. (1994). Durkheim and the national question. In W. Pickering & H. Martins (Eds.), Debating Durkheim (pp. 134–158). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Lukes, S. (1973). Émile Durkheim: His life and work a historical and critical study. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Malczewski, E. (2013). Durkheim’s sui generis reality and the central subject matter of social science. Current Perspectives in Social Theory, 31, 161–175.
• Malczewski, E. (2014). This is social science: A ‘patterned activity’ oriented to attaining objective knowledge of human society. The Journal of Classical Sociology, 14(4), 341–362.
• Malczewski, E. (2015a). Émile Durkheim. In A. Smith, J. Stone, & R. Dennis (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity and Nationalism. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
• Malczewski, E. (2015b). On the centrality of action: Social science, historical logics, and Max Weber’s legacy. The Journal of Historical Sociology, 28(4), 523–547.
• Malczewski, E. (2016). Materiality, iconic nature, and Albert Bierstadt’s ‘Great Pictures’. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 4(3), 359–384.
• Mellor, P. (2002). In defense of Durkheim: Sociology, the sacred and ‘society.’ Durkheimian Studies / Études Durkheimiennes, New Series, 8, 15–34.
• Merton, R. (1934). Durkheim’s division of labor in society, American Journal of Sociology, 40, 319–328.
• Merton, R. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 672–682.
• Mitchell, M. (1931). Émile Durkheim and the philosophy of nationalism. Political Science Quarterly, 46(1), 87–106.
• Montesquieu, C. (1989). The spirit of the laws. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Morrison, K. (2001). The disavowal of the social in the American reception of Durkheim. The Journal of Classical Sociology, 1(May), 95–125.
• Nakano, T. (2004). Theorising economic nationalism. Nations and Nationalism, 10(3), 211–229.
• Nefes, T. (2013). Ziya Gökalp’s adaptation of Emile Durkheim’s sociology in his formulation of the modern Turkish nation. International Sociology, 28(3), 335–350.
• Parsons, T. (1937). The structure of social action. New York, NY: Free Press.
• Phillips, T. (1996). Symbolic boundaries and national identity in Australia. The British Journal of Sociology, 47(1), 113–134.
• Ramp, W. (2008). Introduction: Durkheim redux. Journal of Classical Sociology, 8, 147–157. Riley, A. (2015). The social thought of Émile Durkheim. Los Angeles, LA: Sage.
• Rose-Greenland, F. (2013). The Parthenon Marbles as icons of nationalism in nineteenth-century Britain. Nations and Nationalism, 19(4), 654–673.
• Sandel, A. (2014). The place of prejudice: A case for reasoning within the world. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
• Sandel, M. (1982). Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Schmaus, W. (1994). Durkheim’s philosophy of science and the sociology of knowledge. Chicago, CA: The University of Chicago Press.
• Schmaus, W. (2004). Rethinking Durkheim and his tradition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Shils, E. (1957). Primordial, personal, sacred, and civil ties. The British Journal of Sociology, 7, 113–145.
• Shils, E. (1995). Nation, nationality, nationalism, and civil society. Nations and Nationalism, 1(1), 93–118.
• Smith, A. (1983). Nationalism and classical social theory. The British Journal of Sociology, 34(1), 19–38. Smith, A. (1986). The ethnic origins of nations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
• Smith, A. (1991). National identity. London, UK: Penguin.
• Smith, A. (1996). Opening statement: Nations and their pasts. Nations and Nationalism, 2(3), 358– 365.
• Smith, A. (1998). Nationalism and modernism. London, UK: Routledge. Smith, A. (2002). What is a nation? Geopolitics, 7(2), 5–32.
• Smith, A. (2014). The rites of nations: Elites, masses and the re-enactment of the “national past.” In R. Tsang & E. T. Woods (Eds.), The cultural politics of nationalism and nation-building (pp. 21–37). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Smith, P., & Alexander, J. (2005). Introduction: The new Durkheim. In J. Alexander & P. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Durkheim (pp. 183–210). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Tsang, R., & Woods, E.T. (Eds.). (2014). The cultural politics of nationalism and nation-building. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Türkmen-Dervişoğlu, G. (2013). Coming to terms with a difficult past: The trauma of the assassination of Hrant Dink and its repercussions on Turkish national identity. Nations and Nationalism, 19(4), 674–692.
• Turner, S. (1986). The search for a methodology of social science: Durkheim, Weber, and the Nineteenth-Century problem of cause, probability, and action. Dordrect, NL: Reidel.
• Verdery, K. (1999). The political lives of dead bodies: Reburial and post-socialist change. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
• Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice: a defense of pluralism and equality. New York, NY: Basic Books.
• Woods, E. T., & Debs, M. (2013). Towards a cultural sociology of nations and nationalism. Nations and Nationalism, 19(4), 607–614.
• Wyrtzen, J. (2013). Performing the nation in anti-colonial protest in interwar Morocco. Nations and Nationalism, 19(4), 615–634.
• Zubrzycki, G. (2011). History and the national sensorium: Making sense of Polish mythology. Qualitative Sociology, 34(1), 21–57.