Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2020, Volume: 40 Issue: 2, 767 - 802, 31.12.2020

Abstract

References

  • Amzi-Erdogdular, L. (2017). Alternative Muslim modernities: Bosnian intellectuals in the Ottoman and Habsburg Empires. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 59(4), 912–943. google scholar
  • Aunesluoma, J., & Rainio-Niemi, J. (2016). Neutrality as identity? Finland’s quest for security in the Cold War. Journal of Cold War Studies, 18(4), 51–78. google scholar
  • Bagchi, A. K. (2004). The developmental state in history and in the twentieth century. Regency Publications. google scholar
  • Berg-Andersson, B. (2019). EU:n Venäjän vastaisten kauppapakotteiden vaikutus länsimaiden vientiin (ETLA Raportti no. 95). google scholar
  • Block, F. (2016). Beyond embedded autonomy: Conceptualizing the work of developmental states. google scholar
  • In Y. W. Chu (Ed.), The Asian developmental state: Reexaminations and new departures (pp.57–72). Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Blumi, I. (2011). Reinstating the Ottomans. Alternative Balkan modernities, 1800-1912. Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2016). Models of developmental state (Sao Paulo School of Economics Working Paper 426). http://www.bresserpereira.org.br/papers/2016/350-Models-developmental-state-TD-426.pdf google scholar
  • Breznitz, D., & Ornston, D. (2013). The revolutionary power of peripheral agencies: Explaining radical policy innovation in Finland and Israel. Comparative Political Studies, 46(10), 1219–1245. google scholar
  • Bhambra, G. K. (2016). Comparative historical sociology and the state: Problems of method. Cultural Sociology, 10(3), 335–351. google scholar
  • Central Intelligence Agency. (1972). Finlandization in section: Helsinki’s experience with Moscow (Reference Title: ESAU LVI. RSS No. 0059/72). google scholar
  • Danielson, J. R. (1892). Suomen sisällinen itsenäisyys: Jatkuvien hyökkäysten torjumiseksi. Werner Söderström. google scholar
  • Evans, P. (2014). The capability enhancing developmental state: Concepts and national trajectories. In E. M. Kim & P. H. Kim (Eds.), The South Korean development experience: Beyond aid (pp.83–110). Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Fellman, S. (2019). Miten Suomi Muuttui? In Laine et al. (Eds.), Vaurastumisen Vuodet: Suomen taloushistoria teollistumisen jälkeen (pp. 293–303). Gaudeamus. google scholar
  • Fosu, A. K. (Ed.). (2013). Development success: Historical accounts from more advanced countries. Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Haapala, P. (2009). Modernisation of Finland 1800-2000. In M. Perkiö (Ed.), Perspectives to global social development (pp. 48–66). Tampereen Yliopistopaino. google scholar
  • Isohookana-Asunmaa, T. (2009). Kostamus – esimerkki politiikan ja kaupan toisiinsa kietoutumisesta. Faravid, 33, 227–245. google scholar
  • Jessop, B. (2013). The developmental state in an era of finance-dominated accumulation. In C. YinWah (Ed.), The Asian developmental state: Reexaminations and new departures (pp. 57–72).Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Johnson, C. (1999). The developmental state: Odyssey of a concept. In M. Woo-Cumings (Ed.), The developmental state (pp. 32–60). Cornell University Press. google scholar
  • Jussila, O. (1984). Finland’s progress to national statehood within the development of the Russian Empire’s administrative system. Studia Historica 16: Nationality and nationalism in Italy and Finland from the mid-19th century to 1918. SHS. google scholar
  • Jussila, O. (1987). Maakunnasta valtioksi: Suomen valtion synty. WSOY. google scholar
  • Jäntti, M., Saari, J. P., & Vartiainen, J. (2006). Growth and equity in Finland (UNU-WIDER Discussion Paper No. 2006/06). google scholar
  • Jäntti, M., & Vartiainen, J. (2013). The Finnish developmental state and its growth regime. In A. K Fosu (Ed.), Development success: Historical accounts from more advanced countries (pp. 23–42).Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Kekkonen, U. (November 27, 1960). Speech at the Paasikivi society (Accessed through the National Library of Finland’s Doria database). google scholar
  • Kelly, R. E. (2008). No ‘Return to the state’: Dependency and developmentalism against neoliberalism. Development in Practice, 18(3), 319–332. google scholar
  • Kettunen, P. (2019). Perifeerinen avantgardismi kansallisen toimijuuden suuntaajana. In J. Koponen google scholar
  • & S. Saaritsa (Eds.), Nälkämaasta hyvinvointivaltioksi: Suomi kehityksen kiinniottajana (pp.201–217). Gaudeamus. google scholar
  • Koponen, J., & Saaritsa, S. (Eds.). (2019). Nälkämaasta hyvinvointivaltioksi: Suomi kehityksen kiinniottajana. Gaudeamus. google scholar
  • Koponen, J., & Saaritsa, S. (2019). Suomi, historia, kehitys. In J. Koponen & S. Saaritsa (Eds.), Nälkämaasta hyvinvointivaltioksi: Suomi kehityksen kiinniottajana (pp. 11–31). Gaudeamus. google scholar
  • Korhonen, J. (2019). Empire, democracy, state and nation: Sociological occlusions of the Russian and German Empires (Doctoral Dissertation). Brown University, RI, USA. google scholar
  • Korhonen, J., & Niemeläinen, J. (2017). Solidarity and competition in the European Union. Theory reconstruction from an extended case study of welfare state emigration. Cahiers RESuME 7. https://doi.org/10.25517/RESuME-3KxjkBR-2017 google scholar
  • Kuisma, M. (2010). Sodasta syntynyt: Itsenäisen Suomen synty Sarajevon laukauksista Tarton Rauhaan. WSOY. google scholar
  • Kähönen, A. (2019). Vallankumouksen ja nationalismin ristipaineessa 1905-1932: Suomi hauraana valtiona. In J. Koponen & S. Saaritsa (Eds.), Nälkämaasta hyvinvointivaltioksi: Suomi kehityksen kiinniottajana (pp. 295–311). Gaudeamus. google scholar
  • Lee, Y. W. (2008). The Japanese challenge to neoliberalism: Who and what is ’normal’ in the history of the world economy? Review of International Political Economy, 15(4), 506–534. google scholar
  • Matala, S., & Sahari, A. (2017). Small nation, big ships winter navigation and technological nationalism in a peripheral country, 1878-1978. History and Technology 33(2), 220–248. google scholar
  • O Riain, S. (2000). The flexible developmental state: Globalization, information technology, and the “Celtic Tiger”. Politics & Society, 28(2), 157–193. google scholar
  • Ornston, D., & Vail, M. I. (2016). The developmental state in developed societies: Power, partnership, and divergent patterns of intervention in France and Finland. Comparative Politics 49(1), 1–21.
  • Osten-Sacken, W. B. V. D. (1909) (translated 1912). The Legal position of the grand-duchy of Finland in the Russian Empire. Lamley.
  • Saaritsa, S. (2019). Miten Suomi lakkasi olemasta kehitysmaa? Taloudellinen ja inhimillinen kehitys 1800- ja 1900-luvuilla. In J. Koponen & S. Saaritsa (Eds.), Nälkämaasta hyvinvointivaltioksi: Suomi kehityksen kiinniottajana (pp. 33–50). Gaudeamus.
  • Schienstock, G. (2007). From path dependency to path creation: Finland on its way to the knowledgebased economy. Current Sociology, 55(1), 92–109. google scholar Snyder, T., & Younger, K. (Eds.). (2018). The Balkans as Europe, 1821-1914. University of Rochester Press.
  • Talvitie, H. (2020). Juho Kusti Paasikivi Poliitikkona ja Historianfilosofina. https://www. historianswithoutborders.fi/juho-kusti-paasikivi-poliitikkona-ja-historianfilosofina/
  • Vares, V. (2011). The western powers and Finland during the Cold War: What was “Finlandization”? Arhivele Totalitarismului, XIX(3–4), 147–163.
  • Vartiainen, J. (1999). The economics of successful state intervention in industrial transformation. In M. Woo-Cumings (Ed.), The developmental state (pp. 200–234). Cornell University Press.
  • Zimmerman, A. (2006). Decolonizing Weber. Postcolonial Studies, 9(1), 53–79.

Theorizing the Developmental State beyond Nation-State Histories and Trajectories: The Non-Sovereign Model and the Case of Finland

Year 2020, Volume: 40 Issue: 2, 767 - 802, 31.12.2020

Abstract

Developmental state theorization has largely centered on sovereign nation-states and the post-World War II era even while, first, historical work has shown important continuities across even the 1917-1919 divide and, second, recently the importance of a capabilities approach that extends beyond the confines of strictly sovereign state agency has been stressed. Focusing on these two considerations, this article brings historical variance to the developmental state literature by introducing the non-sovereign model that is based on the Finnish national historical trajectory. It argues that the Finnish developmental state project began in the pre-independence era in the Russian Empire and continued along the same core strategy through the interwar years and Finlandization under the Soviet Union all the way to membership in the European Union.

References

  • Amzi-Erdogdular, L. (2017). Alternative Muslim modernities: Bosnian intellectuals in the Ottoman and Habsburg Empires. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 59(4), 912–943. google scholar
  • Aunesluoma, J., & Rainio-Niemi, J. (2016). Neutrality as identity? Finland’s quest for security in the Cold War. Journal of Cold War Studies, 18(4), 51–78. google scholar
  • Bagchi, A. K. (2004). The developmental state in history and in the twentieth century. Regency Publications. google scholar
  • Berg-Andersson, B. (2019). EU:n Venäjän vastaisten kauppapakotteiden vaikutus länsimaiden vientiin (ETLA Raportti no. 95). google scholar
  • Block, F. (2016). Beyond embedded autonomy: Conceptualizing the work of developmental states. google scholar
  • In Y. W. Chu (Ed.), The Asian developmental state: Reexaminations and new departures (pp.57–72). Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Blumi, I. (2011). Reinstating the Ottomans. Alternative Balkan modernities, 1800-1912. Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2016). Models of developmental state (Sao Paulo School of Economics Working Paper 426). http://www.bresserpereira.org.br/papers/2016/350-Models-developmental-state-TD-426.pdf google scholar
  • Breznitz, D., & Ornston, D. (2013). The revolutionary power of peripheral agencies: Explaining radical policy innovation in Finland and Israel. Comparative Political Studies, 46(10), 1219–1245. google scholar
  • Bhambra, G. K. (2016). Comparative historical sociology and the state: Problems of method. Cultural Sociology, 10(3), 335–351. google scholar
  • Central Intelligence Agency. (1972). Finlandization in section: Helsinki’s experience with Moscow (Reference Title: ESAU LVI. RSS No. 0059/72). google scholar
  • Danielson, J. R. (1892). Suomen sisällinen itsenäisyys: Jatkuvien hyökkäysten torjumiseksi. Werner Söderström. google scholar
  • Evans, P. (2014). The capability enhancing developmental state: Concepts and national trajectories. In E. M. Kim & P. H. Kim (Eds.), The South Korean development experience: Beyond aid (pp.83–110). Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Fellman, S. (2019). Miten Suomi Muuttui? In Laine et al. (Eds.), Vaurastumisen Vuodet: Suomen taloushistoria teollistumisen jälkeen (pp. 293–303). Gaudeamus. google scholar
  • Fosu, A. K. (Ed.). (2013). Development success: Historical accounts from more advanced countries. Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Haapala, P. (2009). Modernisation of Finland 1800-2000. In M. Perkiö (Ed.), Perspectives to global social development (pp. 48–66). Tampereen Yliopistopaino. google scholar
  • Isohookana-Asunmaa, T. (2009). Kostamus – esimerkki politiikan ja kaupan toisiinsa kietoutumisesta. Faravid, 33, 227–245. google scholar
  • Jessop, B. (2013). The developmental state in an era of finance-dominated accumulation. In C. YinWah (Ed.), The Asian developmental state: Reexaminations and new departures (pp. 57–72).Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Johnson, C. (1999). The developmental state: Odyssey of a concept. In M. Woo-Cumings (Ed.), The developmental state (pp. 32–60). Cornell University Press. google scholar
  • Jussila, O. (1984). Finland’s progress to national statehood within the development of the Russian Empire’s administrative system. Studia Historica 16: Nationality and nationalism in Italy and Finland from the mid-19th century to 1918. SHS. google scholar
  • Jussila, O. (1987). Maakunnasta valtioksi: Suomen valtion synty. WSOY. google scholar
  • Jäntti, M., Saari, J. P., & Vartiainen, J. (2006). Growth and equity in Finland (UNU-WIDER Discussion Paper No. 2006/06). google scholar
  • Jäntti, M., & Vartiainen, J. (2013). The Finnish developmental state and its growth regime. In A. K Fosu (Ed.), Development success: Historical accounts from more advanced countries (pp. 23–42).Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Kekkonen, U. (November 27, 1960). Speech at the Paasikivi society (Accessed through the National Library of Finland’s Doria database). google scholar
  • Kelly, R. E. (2008). No ‘Return to the state’: Dependency and developmentalism against neoliberalism. Development in Practice, 18(3), 319–332. google scholar
  • Kettunen, P. (2019). Perifeerinen avantgardismi kansallisen toimijuuden suuntaajana. In J. Koponen google scholar
  • & S. Saaritsa (Eds.), Nälkämaasta hyvinvointivaltioksi: Suomi kehityksen kiinniottajana (pp.201–217). Gaudeamus. google scholar
  • Koponen, J., & Saaritsa, S. (Eds.). (2019). Nälkämaasta hyvinvointivaltioksi: Suomi kehityksen kiinniottajana. Gaudeamus. google scholar
  • Koponen, J., & Saaritsa, S. (2019). Suomi, historia, kehitys. In J. Koponen & S. Saaritsa (Eds.), Nälkämaasta hyvinvointivaltioksi: Suomi kehityksen kiinniottajana (pp. 11–31). Gaudeamus. google scholar
  • Korhonen, J. (2019). Empire, democracy, state and nation: Sociological occlusions of the Russian and German Empires (Doctoral Dissertation). Brown University, RI, USA. google scholar
  • Korhonen, J., & Niemeläinen, J. (2017). Solidarity and competition in the European Union. Theory reconstruction from an extended case study of welfare state emigration. Cahiers RESuME 7. https://doi.org/10.25517/RESuME-3KxjkBR-2017 google scholar
  • Kuisma, M. (2010). Sodasta syntynyt: Itsenäisen Suomen synty Sarajevon laukauksista Tarton Rauhaan. WSOY. google scholar
  • Kähönen, A. (2019). Vallankumouksen ja nationalismin ristipaineessa 1905-1932: Suomi hauraana valtiona. In J. Koponen & S. Saaritsa (Eds.), Nälkämaasta hyvinvointivaltioksi: Suomi kehityksen kiinniottajana (pp. 295–311). Gaudeamus. google scholar
  • Lee, Y. W. (2008). The Japanese challenge to neoliberalism: Who and what is ’normal’ in the history of the world economy? Review of International Political Economy, 15(4), 506–534. google scholar
  • Matala, S., & Sahari, A. (2017). Small nation, big ships winter navigation and technological nationalism in a peripheral country, 1878-1978. History and Technology 33(2), 220–248. google scholar
  • O Riain, S. (2000). The flexible developmental state: Globalization, information technology, and the “Celtic Tiger”. Politics & Society, 28(2), 157–193. google scholar
  • Ornston, D., & Vail, M. I. (2016). The developmental state in developed societies: Power, partnership, and divergent patterns of intervention in France and Finland. Comparative Politics 49(1), 1–21.
  • Osten-Sacken, W. B. V. D. (1909) (translated 1912). The Legal position of the grand-duchy of Finland in the Russian Empire. Lamley.
  • Saaritsa, S. (2019). Miten Suomi lakkasi olemasta kehitysmaa? Taloudellinen ja inhimillinen kehitys 1800- ja 1900-luvuilla. In J. Koponen & S. Saaritsa (Eds.), Nälkämaasta hyvinvointivaltioksi: Suomi kehityksen kiinniottajana (pp. 33–50). Gaudeamus.
  • Schienstock, G. (2007). From path dependency to path creation: Finland on its way to the knowledgebased economy. Current Sociology, 55(1), 92–109. google scholar Snyder, T., & Younger, K. (Eds.). (2018). The Balkans as Europe, 1821-1914. University of Rochester Press.
  • Talvitie, H. (2020). Juho Kusti Paasikivi Poliitikkona ja Historianfilosofina. https://www. historianswithoutborders.fi/juho-kusti-paasikivi-poliitikkona-ja-historianfilosofina/
  • Vares, V. (2011). The western powers and Finland during the Cold War: What was “Finlandization”? Arhivele Totalitarismului, XIX(3–4), 147–163.
  • Vartiainen, J. (1999). The economics of successful state intervention in industrial transformation. In M. Woo-Cumings (Ed.), The developmental state (pp. 200–234). Cornell University Press.
  • Zimmerman, A. (2006). Decolonizing Weber. Postcolonial Studies, 9(1), 53–79.
There are 44 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Sociology
Journal Section RESEARCH ARTICLES
Authors

Juho Korhonen This is me 0000-0002-5128-4010

Publication Date December 31, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 40 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Korhonen, J. (2020). Theorizing the Developmental State beyond Nation-State Histories and Trajectories: The Non-Sovereign Model and the Case of Finland. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 40(2), 767-802.
AMA Korhonen J. Theorizing the Developmental State beyond Nation-State Histories and Trajectories: The Non-Sovereign Model and the Case of Finland. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology. December 2020;40(2):767-802.
Chicago Korhonen, Juho. “Theorizing the Developmental State Beyond Nation-State Histories and Trajectories: The Non-Sovereign Model and the Case of Finland”. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology 40, no. 2 (December 2020): 767-802.
EndNote Korhonen J (December 1, 2020) Theorizing the Developmental State beyond Nation-State Histories and Trajectories: The Non-Sovereign Model and the Case of Finland. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology 40 2 767–802.
IEEE J. Korhonen, “Theorizing the Developmental State beyond Nation-State Histories and Trajectories: The Non-Sovereign Model and the Case of Finland”, İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 767–802, 2020.
ISNAD Korhonen, Juho. “Theorizing the Developmental State Beyond Nation-State Histories and Trajectories: The Non-Sovereign Model and the Case of Finland”. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology 40/2 (December 2020), 767-802.
JAMA Korhonen J. Theorizing the Developmental State beyond Nation-State Histories and Trajectories: The Non-Sovereign Model and the Case of Finland. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology. 2020;40:767–802.
MLA Korhonen, Juho. “Theorizing the Developmental State Beyond Nation-State Histories and Trajectories: The Non-Sovereign Model and the Case of Finland”. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, vol. 40, no. 2, 2020, pp. 767-02.
Vancouver Korhonen J. Theorizing the Developmental State beyond Nation-State Histories and Trajectories: The Non-Sovereign Model and the Case of Finland. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology. 2020;40(2):767-802.