In Vitro Establishment Procedures of Dog Rose (Rosa canina)
Abstract
Dog rose (Rosa canina) is one of the medicinal plants with important role on vitamin C and active ingredients but a few researches has been conducted on the in vitro efficient establishment of this plant. Therefore, for optimization of establishment stage of R. canina, this study was carried out by 8 decontamination procedures included T1: 5% Sodium Hypochlorite, T2: 10% Povidone Iodine, T3: commercial Dettol, T4: commercial Banzalkonium Chloride, T5: Mercury (II) Chloride for 5 min, T6: Mercury (II) Chloride for 8 min, T7: 2.5% Sodium Hypochlorite with Cefotaxime and Tetracycline, T8: Mercury (II) Chloride for 2 min with Cefotaxime and Tetracycline. for elimination of bacteria and fungi contamination. In this study minimum browning percentage was observed in T7 and T8 (6 and 8% respectively), Bacterial contamination was completely controlled in T7 and T8, Fungi contamination percentage was completely controlled (100%) by T2, T3, T4, T6 and partially controlled by T8 and non-controlled by T7. Maximum bud break percentage was observed in T8, T7 and T2. The highest shoot length in T2 and T7 but the lowest shoot lengths were observed in T6. In T2, T3 and T7, node numbers were more than other decontamination treatments. T8 on the base of browning percentage, bacteria and fungi contamination percentage, bud break percentage was better than other procedures. T7 and T2 on the base of shoot length and node numbers were decontamination procedure better than other procedures. In this investigation decontamination procedures are considered as one the most important steps for successful implementation of biotechnological techniques for R. canina
Keywords
References
- [1] IUCN. 2005. A guide to medicinal plants in North Africa. Center for Mediterranean cooperation, Malaga (Spain), pp: 256.
- [2] Sharafi Y. 2010. Biological characteristics of pollens in some genotypes of Rosa canina as main factors affecting fruit set. Afr. J. Med. Plants Res., 4: 2173-2175.
- [3] Khosh-Khui M, Sink KC. 1982. Micropropagation of new and old world rose species. J. Hortic. Sci., 57: 9-315.
- [4] Skirvin RM, Chu MC, Young HJ. 1990. Rose. In: Handbook of Plant Cell Culture, Ammirato P V., D R, Evans., W R, Sharp. and Bajaj Y P S (Eds.). New York: Mc- Graw Hill, New York: Springer, pp: 716-743.
- [5] Rout GR, Samantaray S, Mottley L, Das P. 1999. Biotechnology of the rose: A review of recent progress. Sci. Hortic., 81: 28-201.
- [6] Nikbakht A, Kafi M, Mirmasoudi M, Babalar M. 2005. Micropropagation of damask rose (rosa damascena mill.) cvs azaran and ghamsar. Int. J. Agri. Biol., 7: 535-538.
- [7] Senapati SK, Rout GR. 2008. Study of culture conditions for improved micropropagation of hybrid rose. Hort. Sci, (Prague), 35: 27-34.
- [8] Shirani S, Sariah M, Zakaria W, Maziah M. 2010. Scalp induction rate responses to cytokinins on proliferating shoot-tips of banana cultivars (Musa spp.). Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 5:128-134.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Mehdi Shirdel
This is me
Ali Reza Motallebi-azar
*
This is me
Sam Mokhtarzadeh
This is me
Fethi Ahmet Özdemir
This is me
Publication Date
August 31, 2017
Submission Date
March 15, 2017
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2017 Volume: 11 Number: 2