Erratum

The Use of Different Suture Methods in Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Fish

Volume: 7 Number: 4 December 31, 2022
EN TR

The Use of Different Suture Methods in Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Fish

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to compare the suture methods in wounds created for different purposes in the field of aquaculture. For this purpose, Tilapia fish, which took the second place after carp in the inland waters fish breeding of hot countries, were used. In the study, Control group (n = 3), simple suture (n = 3), U suture (n = 3) and X (Sultan) suture (n = 3) applications were performed. The fish were subjected to 7 days of adaptation before starting the study. During the study, feeding was done once a day with Tetra Discus food. For the formation of cut wounds, scales were removed in Tilapia fish under anesthesia, and 2 cm long incision were performed. As a result of the study, it was observed that the cut wounds were closed on the 6th day in the U suture group, at the end of the 7th day in the control group and simple suture groups, and the 9th day in the X suture group. It was observed that the absorbable suture materials were absorbed in all fish in which they were applied, but in the X suture group, 1 fish was absorbed at the end of the 9th day. It is concluded that it is healthier to prefer simple suture and U suture primarily in areas such as marking, remote sensing, monitoring and management of fish methods, and fish health.

Keywords

Fish diseases , Oreochromis niloticus , Wound , Suture methods

References

  1. Alderton, D. (2008). Encyclopedia of Aquarium & Pond Fish. Dorling Kindersley, China. p.94.
  2. Aslanbey, E. (2002). Veteriner genel operasyon bilgisi. Medipres, Ankara, 147-172.
  3. Bailey, M. & Sandford, G. (1998). The new guide to aquarium fish. Anness Publishing, United Kingdom. p.64.
  4. Capello, M., Soria, M., Potin, G., Cotel, P. & Dagorn, L. (2013). Effect of current and daylight variations on small-pelagic fish aggregations (Selar crumenophthalmus) around a coastal fish aggregating device studied by fine-scale acoustic tracking. Aquatic Living Resource, 26(1), 63–68.
  5. Cooke, S.J., Graeb, B.D.S., Suski, C.D. & Ostrand, K.G. (2003). Effects of suture material on incision healing, growth and survival of juvenile largemouth bass implanted with miniature radio transmitters: case study of a novice and experienced fish surgeon. Journal of Fish Biology, 62(1): 1366–1380.
  6. Cui, M., Zhang, H., Li, J., Liu, R., Wu, M., Xu, D. & Zhang, Q. (2019). Differential PCR detection of Streptococcus agalactiae and Streptococcus iniae in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) by a single primer pair. Journal of fish diseases, 42(8), 1211.
  7. Dagorn, L., Holland, K.N. & Itano, D.G. (2007). Behavior of yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) and bigeye (T. obesus) tuna in a network of fish aggregating devices (FADs). Marin Biology, 151(1), 595–606.
  8. El-Sappah, A.H., Shawky, A.S.H., Sayed-Ahmad, M.S. & Youssef, M.A.H. (2017). Estimation of heat shock protein 70 (hsp 70) gene expression in nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) using quantitative Real-Time PCR. Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research, 44(3), 1003-1015.
  9. Gemci, R. & Ulcay, Y. (2004). Ameliyat iplikleri tipleri özellikleri ve krome katgüt ile normal katgüt arasindaki mukavemet farklari. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 95-105.
  10. Harms, C.G. & Lewbart, G.A. (2000). Surgery in fish. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice. 3(3), 759-774.
APA
Sancak, T., & Önalan, Ş. (2022). The Use of Different Suture Methods in Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Fish. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 7(4), 597-601. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1209750