Research Article

Investigation of the Presence and Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis in Subclinical Mastitis in Cattle Raised in the Aegean Region

Volume: 10 Number: 2 March 27, 2025
EN TR

Investigation of the Presence and Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis in Subclinical Mastitis in Cattle Raised in the Aegean Region

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to investigate the presence of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis and its antimicrobial susceptibility in cattle with subclinical mastitis in the Aegean Region. In 2024, 200 milk samples were collected from dairy farms in the region where subclinical mastitis was identified using the California Mastitis Test. The samples were analyzed through culture, Gram staining, and biochemical testing. Suspected isolates were confirmed using the VITEK 2 system and molecularly identified by PCR targeting the PIP gene. Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed via the Kirby-Bauer Disk Diffusion Method. Seven Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates were identified in the analysis. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests showed 71% sensitivity to enrofloxacin and gentamicin, 57% to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and 43% to oxytetracycline. In conclusion, although the detection rate of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis was low, it remains a significant pathogen in cattle with subclinical mastitis. Further studies on antibiotic resistance are essential for developing effective treatment strategies.

Keywords

Aegean Region , antimicrobial resistance , cattle , Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis , PCR , subclinical mastitis

References

  1. Abdelsalam, E.B. & Ahmed, M.A. (2017). Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis mastitis in Egyptian dairy goats. Small Ruminant Research, 152, 96-100. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.1507-1511
  2. Algammal, A.M. (2016). Molecular characterization and antibiotic susceptibility of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolated from sheep and goats suffering from caseous lymphadenitis. Zagazig Veterinary Journal, 44(1), 1-8.
  3. Baird, G.J. & Fontaine, M.C. (2011). Mastitis in dairy cattle caused by Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis and the feasibility of transmission by houseflies. Veterinary Research Communications, 35(3), 245-256. DOI: 10.1080/01652176.1996.9694623
  4. Babacan, O. (2024). Koyun ve kuzuların deri apselerinden Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis’in teşhisi. Harran University Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 13(2), 123-127. DOI: 10.31196/huvfd.1534493
  5. Bauer, A.W., Kirby, W.M.M., Sherris, J.C. & Turck, M. (1966). Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 45, 493.
  6. Cantekin, Z., Ergün, Y., Doǧruer, G., Saribay, M.K. & Solmaz, H. (2015). Comparison of PCR and culture methods for diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in dairy cattle. Kafkas University Veterinary Faculty Journal, 21(2), 277-282.
  7. Çelik, Ö., Sur, E. & Çetin, H. (2021). Aydın İli Söke İlçesinde Sütçü İneklerde Subklinik Mastitis Prevalansının ve Mastitise Neden Olan Aerobik Bakterilerin Belirlenmesi. Harran University Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 10(2), 100-106. DOI: 10.31196/huvfd.912187
  8. Çiftçi, M.K., Berkin, Ş., Erer, H., Erganiş, O., Kıran, M.M., Hatipoğlu, F. & SağlamY.S. (1996). Pathological and bacteriological studies on mastitis in goats. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 12(2), 105-114.
  9. CLSI. (2013). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; 23rd informational supplement. CLSI M100- S23. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  10. Connor, K.M. & Quirie, M. (2010). Outbreak of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis mastitis in a dairy herd. Australian Veterinary Journal, 88(4), 150-155. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751- 0813.2010.00560.x
APA
Nuhay, Ç. (2025). Investigation of the Presence and Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis in Subclinical Mastitis in Cattle Raised in the Aegean Region. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 10(2), 202-207. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1629149