Research Article

Isolation and Enzyme Activity Profiling of Phytohormone-Degrading Bacteria from Soil, Rhizosphere, and Tissues within the Camellia sinensis Ecosystem

Number: 2026 February 28, 2026
Ayşenur Eminoğlu *, Abdülkadir Yılmaz
TR EN

Isolation and Enzyme Activity Profiling of Phytohormone-Degrading Bacteria from Soil, Rhizosphere, and Tissues within the Camellia sinensis Ecosystem

Abstract

This study investigated the phytohormone-degrading potential of bacterial communities within the tea ecosystem. A total of 79 bacterial isolates were obtained from various microhabitats, including soil, rhizosphere, roots, and seeds, and screened for their ability to degrade ACC, IAA, and salicylic acid (SA). Selected active isolates were subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and their taxonomic affiliations were determined through phylogenetic analysis. The sequences clustered with reference species with significant bootstrap support, revealing that the isolates predominantly belonged to the genera Burkholderia, Acinetobacter, and Pseudomonas. Among the isolates, SA degradation activity was the least frequently observed, suggesting that specific ecological or agricultural conditions may influence the presence of SA-degrading microorganisms. ACC deaminase (ACCd) activity ranged from 0 to 2.58 µmol mg⁻¹ h⁻¹, with the highest value recorded in Burkholderia sp. isolate 6R1, consistent with previously reported ranges for Burkholderia species. The detection of IAA degradation across three genera indicates that this trait is widespread among diverse bacterial groups. These functional properties, which influence phytohormone balance in the tea microbiome, may play a role in modulating plant growth and stress responses. In conclusion, the findings demonstrate that bacteria isolated from the tea ecosystem possess the capacity to degrade key phytohormones, highlighting their potential as biological regulators for sustainable tea cultivation.

Keywords

Camellia sinensis , phytohormone degradation , ACCd , IAA , salicylic acid.

References

  1. Achard, P., Cheng, H., de Grauwe, L., Decat, J., Schoutteten, H., Moritz, T., van der Straeten, D., Peng, J., & Harberd, N.P. (2006). Integration of Plant Responses to Environmentally Activated Phytohormonal Signals. Science, 311(5757), 91- 94. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1118642
  2. Bag, S., Mondal, A., & Banik, A. (2022). Exploring tea (Camellia sinensis) microbiome: Insights into the functional characteristics and their impact on tea growth promotion. Microbiological Research, 254, 126890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2021.126890
  3. Bartsch, M., Bednarek, P., Vivancos, P.D., Schneider, B., von Roepenack-Lahaye, E., Foyer, C.H., Kombrink, E., Scheel, D., & Parker, J.E. (2010). Accumulation of isochorismate-derived 2,3-dihydroxybenzoic 3-O-β-D-xyloside in Arabidopsis resistance to pathogens and ageing of leaves. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 285(33), 25654-25665. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.092569
  4. Bechtold, U., & Field, B. (2018). Molecular mechanisms controlling plant growth during abiotic stress. Journal of Experimental Botany, 69(11), 2753- 2758. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery157
  5. Bora, P., & Bora, L.C. (2021). Microbial antagonists and botanicals mediated disease management in tea, Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze: An overview. Crop Protection, 148, 105711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105711
  6. Cerboneschi, M., Decorosi, F., Biancalani, C., Ortenzi, M.V., Macconi, S., Giovannetti, L., Viti, C., Campanella, B., Onor, M., Bramanti, E., & Tegli, S. (2016). Indole-3-acetic acid in plant- pathogen interactions: a key molecule for in planta bacterial virulence and fitness. Research in Microbiology, 167(9-10), 774-787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2016.09.002
  7. Chopra, A., Bobate, S., Rahi, P., Banpurkar, A., Mazumder, P.B., & Satpute, S. (2020). Pseudomonas aeruginosa RTE4: A Tea Rhizobacterium With Potential for Plant Growth Promotion and Biosurfactant Production. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 8, 861. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00861
  8. Conway, J.M., Walton, W.G., Salas-González, I., Law, T.F., Lindberg, C.A., Crook, L.E., Kosina, S.M., Fitzpatrick, C.R., Lietzan, A.D., Northen, T.R., Jones, C.D., Finkel, O.M., Redinbo, M.R., & Dangl, J.L. (2022). Diverse MarR bacterial regulators of auxin catabolism in the plant microbiome. Nature Microbiology, 7(11), 1817-1833. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-022-01244-3
  9. Duca, D., Lorv, J., Patten, C.L., Rose, D., & Glick, B.R. (2014). Indole-3-acetic acid in plant–microbe interactions. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 106(1), 85-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-013- 0095-y
  10. Ebenau-Jehle, C., Thomas, M., Scharf, G., Kockelkorn, D., Knapp, B., Schühle, K., Heider, J., & Fuchs, G. (2012). Anaerobic Metabolism of Indoleacetate. Journal of Bacteriology, 194(11), 2894–2903. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00250-12
APA
Eminoğlu, A., & Yılmaz, A. (2026). Isolation and Enzyme Activity Profiling of Phytohormone-Degrading Bacteria from Soil, Rhizosphere, and Tissues within the Camellia sinensis Ecosystem. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 2026. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1831268