Assessment of Regulatory Ecosystem Services of Amasya University Hakimiyet Campus

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4, 521 - 527

Sultan Sevinç Kurt Konakoğlu , Kadir Tolga Çelik , Tuğba Üstün Topal , Öner Demirel , M. Bihter Bingül Bulut

https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1555094

Öz

Background: Population growth, increasing vehicle numbers, unplanned urbanization and rural-urban migration are reducing green spaces and exacerbating environmental problems such as air, water and noise pollution. In this context, university campuses serve as important small-scale urban models that play a crucial role in maintaining environmental and social well-being within urban ecosystems. Objectives: To evaluate the regulating ecosystem services provided by the tree canopy at Amasya University Hâkimiyet Campus (AUHC), such as air quality, energy savings, and carbon storage. Method: In this study, the land cover and ecosystem services of the AUHC were assessed using the i-Tree Canopy model. Six land cover classes defined for the study area (tree/shrub, grass/herbaceous vegetation, soil/bare ground, impervious buildings, impervious roads, other impervious surfaces) were assessed using 4000 random points and ecosystem services such as air quality were calculated. Results: The tree and shrub canopy covering 31.30% of the AUHC removes 261.53 kg of gaseous and particulate pollutants from the air annually, sequesters 36.57 tons of carbon, and stores a total of 918.42 tons of carbon. The economic value of these ecosystem services was calculated as $758 for air pollution removal and $44420 for carbon storage. The land cover distribution of the campus shows that 57.35% consists of impervious surfaces (buildings, roads) and 42.05% is green space. Conclusion: The tree canopy at the AUHC makes a significant contribution to ecosystem services such as improved air quality, carbon sequestration and storage, and these contributions and economic benefits could be further enhanced by increasing tree cover.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Regulatory ecosystem services, i-Tree Canopy model, Amasya University Hakimiyet Campus (AUHC), Türkiye

Etik Beyan

-

Destekleyen Kurum

-

Proje Numarası

-

Teşekkür

-

Amasya Üniversitesi Hâkimiyet Kampüsü’nün Düzenleyici Ekosistem Hizmetlerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Arka Plan: Nüfus artışı, artan araç sayısı, plansız kentleşme ve kırsaldan kente göç, yeşil alanları azaltmakta ve hava, su ve gürültü kirliliği gibi çevresel sorunları artırmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, üniversite kampüsleri, kentsel ekosistemlerin çevresel ve sosyal refahını sürdürmede önemli bir rol oynayan küçük ölçekli kentsel modeller olarak hizmet etmektedir. Amaç: Amasya Üniversitesi Hâkimiyet Kampüsü'ndeki (AÜHK) ağaç örtüsünün sağladığı düzenleyici ekosistem hizmetlerini (hava kalitesi, enerji tasarrufu ve karbon depolama gibi) değerlendirmektir. Yöntem: Bu çalışmada, AÜHK’ndeki arazi örtüsü ve ekosistem hizmetleri, i-Tree Canopy modeli kullanılarak değerlendirildi. Çalışma alanı için tanımlanan altı arazi örtüsü sınıfı (ağaç/çalı, çim/otsu bitki örtüsü, toprak/bitkisiz alan, geçirimsiz yapılar, geçirimsiz yollar, diğer geçirimsiz yüzeyler) 4000 rastgele nokta üzerinden değerlendirildi ve hava kalitesi gibi ekosistem hizmetleri hesaplandı. Bulgular: AÜHK'nün %31,30’unu kaplayan ağaç ve çalı örtüsü, yıllık olarak havadan 261,53 kg gaz ve partikül kirleticiyi temizlemekte, 36,57 ton karbonu tutmakta ve toplamda 918,42 ton karbon depolamaktadır. Bu ekosistem hizmetlerinin ekonomik değeri, hava kirliliğini temizleme için 758$ ve karbon depolama için 44420$ olarak hesaplanmıştır. Kampüsün arazi örtüsü dağılımı, %57,35'inin geçirimsiz yüzeyler (binalar, yollar) ve %42,05'inin yeşil alanlar olduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuç: AÜHK’ndeki ağaç örtüsünün hava kalitesini iyileştirme, karbon yakalama ve depolama gibi ekosistem hizmetleri açısından önemli katkılar sağladığını, ancak ağaç örtüsünün artırılmasıyla bu katkıların ve ekonomik faydaların daha da artabileceğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Düzenleyici ekosistem hizmetleri, i-Tree Canopy modeli, Amasya Üniversitesi Hâkimiyet Kampüsü (AÜHK), Türkiye

Proje Numarası

-

Kaynakça

• Aktaş, R., Öztürkci, A. & Ersoy Tonyaloğlu, E. (2022). Evaluation of multiecosystem services in urban areas: The case of Didim/Aydın. Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Agriculture Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 19(2), 275281.
• Bolund, P. & Hunhammar, S. (1999). Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29, 293-301.
• Çakmak, M.H. & Can, M. (2020). Assessing Regulating Ecosystem Services for Improving the Air Quality of Mamak District (Ankara). Bilge International Journal of Science and Technology Research, 4(2), 141-149. DOI: 10.30516/bilgesci.689509
• Colding, J. & Barthel, S. (2017). The role of university campuses in reconnecting humans to the biosphere. Sustainability, 9(12), 2349.
• Çorbacı, Ö.L., Turna, T. & Oğuztürk, G.E. (2020). Examining accessibility of public spaces in terms of landscape arrangement: A sample on Dicle University Campus. Duzce University Journal of Forestry, 16(1), 105-127.
• Çorbacı, Ö.L. & Ekren, E. (2021). An Investigation on poisonous plants used in urban open green areas: The case of Rize, Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry, 23(3), 824-836. DOI: 10.24011/barofd.954295
• Çorbacı, Ö.L. (2017). Sustainable landscape planning and design, Murat Özyavuz (Ed.), A review of Karabuk University iron and steel campus according to planting design principles (335-353 p). Peterlang.
• Coşkun Hepcan, Ç. & Hepcan, Ş. (2017). Assessing air quality improvement as a regulating ecosystem service in the Ege University housing campus. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 54(1), 113-120. DOI: 10.20289/zfdergi.299257
• Derkzen, M.L., Van Teeffelen, A.J.A. & Verburg, P.H. (2015). Quantifying urban ecosystem services based on highresolution data of urban green space: An assessment for Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52, 1020-1032.
• Dilaver, Z., Yuksel, U.D. & Yilmaz, F.C. (2017). Contribution of university campuses to climate change mitigation: Ankara University Tandogan campus case. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 26(12), 7018-7024.
• Doğan T.G. & Eroğlu E. (2021). Using GIS and the diversity indices: A combined approach to woody plant diversity in the urban landscape. In: Vegetation Index and Dynamics. Eusebio Cano Carmona (Ed.) InTech Open Press, 26 p.
• Doğan, T.G., Eroğlu, E. & Başaran, N. (2023). Assessing the relationship between plant species diversity and land heterogeneity: The case of Düzce. Conference: IV-International Rural Areas and Ecology Congress Within The Framework of Sustainable Development (RUDESU2023), November, Konya, Turkey.
• Dogmusoz, B.B. (2023). Benefit-cost analysis of an extensive green roof project in Izmir Kâtip Celebi University cigli campus. Online Journal of Art and Design, 11(3), 219-232.
• Elma, S. & Ortaçeşme, V. (2024). Estimating the economic value of green spaces through i-tree program. PEYZAJ - Eğitim, Bilim, Kültür ve Sanat Dergisi, 6(1), 31-49. DOI: 10.53784/peyzaj.1496082
• Ercan Oğuztürk, G. & Pulatkan, M. (2023). Interaction of urban and university campuses: KTU kanuni campus example. In Architectural Sciences and Urban/Environmental Studies -I, Ankara: İksad Publication, 22-43.
• Ersoy Tonyaloğlu, E. (2023). Investigation of regulatory ecosystem services in the case of Aydın Adnan Menderes university campus. Ecological Perspective, 3(1), 19-27.
• Ersoy Tonyaloğlu, E., Atak, B.K. &Yiğit, M. (2021). Assessment of air quality as a regulating ecosystem services in the case of Efeler-Aydın. Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Agriculture Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 18(1), 119-125. DOI: 10.25308/aduziraat.867541
• Ertekin, M. & Çorbacı, Ö.L. (2010). Landscape planning at university campuses (The landscape project case study of Karabük University). Kastamonu Universty Journal of Forestry Faculty, 10(1), 55-67. Forman, R.T.T. (2014). Urban ecology science of cities. In: Cambridge University Press, 462 p., New York, USA.
• Forman, R.T.T. (2008). Urban regions: Ecology and planning beyond the city. In: Cambridge University Press, 408 p., New York, USA.
• Ghorbankhani, Z., Zarrabi, M. M. & Ghorbankhani, M. (2023). The significance and benefits of green infrastructures using I‑Tree canopy software with a sustainable approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(6), 14893-14913. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03226-9
• Hilde, T. & Paterson, R. (2014). Integrating ecosystem services analysis into scenario planning practice: Accounting for street tree benefits with i-Tree valuation in Central Texas. Journal of environmental management, 146, 524-534.
• Kim G. & Coseo P. (2018) Urban park systems to support sustainability: the role of urban park systems in hot arid urban climates. Forests, 9(7), 439.
• Konakoğlu, B. & Şenses, S. (2023). Investigation of Positioning Performance of Precise Point Positioning (PPP) Technique in Woodland Areas Using CSRS-PPP Software. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Sciences and Engineering, 23(3), 730-739.
• Kurt Konakoglu, S.S. & Celik, K.T. (2023). Examination of Amasya University hakimiyet campus' potential to become a sustainable and green campus. 3rd International Architectural Sciences and Applications Symposium, 14-15 September, Napoli, Italy, Proceedings Book, 492-504 p.
• Kurt Konakoğlu, S.S. & Keskiner, M.T. (2021). The concept of ecological sustainability examined via 3D shadow analysis: the case of Amasya University hâkimiyet campus. Artvin Coruh University Journal of Forestry Faculty, 22(2), 266-277.
• Malkoç, E. (2024). Air quality impact of natural protected areas: A case study of Sarayiçi Tavuk Forest, Edirne, Türkiye. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 25(3), 333- 339. DOI: 10.18182/tjf.1442373
• MEA. (2005). Ecosystems and human well- being: a framework for assessment. MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/Fr amework.html
• Oğuztürk, G.E. & Murat, C. (2023). Analysis of RTEÜ zihni derin campus with image processing methods in terms of thermal comfort. Duzce University Journal of Forestry, 19(2), 118-128. DOI: 10.58816/duzceod.1401102
• Şahin Arslan, N. (2021). Investigation of mitigating effect of the parks on air pollution in the case of Corum. Turkish Journal of Forest Science, 5(2), 401-407. DOI: 10.32328/turkjforsci.917787
• Şahin Körmeçli, P. (2023). Evaluation of the air pollution reducing effect by urban parks: The case of Altınpark, Ankara. Artvin Çoruh University Faculty of Forestry Journal, 24(2), 23-30. DOI: 10.17474/artvinofd.1295845
• Sarı, D., Kurt, U., Resne, Y. & Çorbacı, Ö.L. (2020). Ecosystem services provided by tree species used in urban parks: Rize case, Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 5(4), 541-550. DOI: 10.35229/jaes.774967
• Srivanit, M. & Hokao, K. (2013). Evaluating the cooling effects of greening for improving the outdoor thermal environment at an institutional campus in the summer. Building and Environment, 66, 158- 172.
• Tülek, B. & Ersoy Mirici, M. (2019). Green Infrastructure and Ecosystem Services on Urban Systems, Peyzaj, 1(2), 1-11.
• USDA. (2021). United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, i-Tree Tools. i-Tree Canopy, https://www.fs.usda.gov/nrs/pubs/gtr/gtr_nrs200- 2021.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 19.08.2024.
• Ustun Topal, T. & Demirel, O. (2023) Measuring air quality impacts of green areas and ecosystem services (ESs) using web-based i-tree canopy tool: A case study in İstanbul. Turkish Journal of Forest Science, 7(2), 253-266. DOI: 10.32328/turkjforsci.1341656
• Wang, X., Wang, Y., Qu, X., Huang, B., Li, Z., Sun, J., ... & Yang, X. (2021). Urban trees in university campus: structure, function, and ecological values. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 45183-45198.
• Wibowo, A., Yussof, M.M., Hamzah, T.A.A. & Salleh, K.O. (2019). Urban heat signature impact on university campus. In: Iop Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (vol. 338, no. 1, p. 012027). Bristol, UK.
• Yin, S., Shen, Z., Zhou, P., Zou, X., Che, S. & Wang, W. (2011). Quantifying air pollution attenuation within urban parks: An experimental approach in Shanghai, China. Environmental Pollution, 159(8-9):2155- 2163.