Effects of Phosphorus Fertilizer, Poultry Manure Applications with Bacillus megaterium M-3 Inoculation on Yield and Yield Components of Common Vetch (Vicia sativa)

Year 2024, Volume: 5 Issue: 3, 208 - 216, 30.09.2024

Dilara Kaynar , Binali Çomaklı

https://doi.org/10.56430/japro.1515747

Abstract

Phosphorus is considered one of the essential elements for legumes as it increases nitrogen fixation due to nodulation. Hence, for high productivity in legumes, it should be added as inorganic or organic fertilizer to soils containing insufficient phosphorus. Especially in recent years, using inorganic and organic fertilizers together has gained importance in terms of sustainable agriculture, considering plant growth and soil and environmental health together. The effects of three different doses of phosphorus fertilizer (0, 50, 100 kg P2O5 ha-1), and two different doses of poultry manure (0, 3 t ha-1) applications with two different doses (B0 or B1) of phosphorus solubilizing bacteria (Bacillus megaterium M-3) inoculation on hay yield and yield components of common vetch were examined in this study. In fact, while the highest hay yield and crude protein rate were obtained by bacterial inoculation together with phosphorus fertilizer application, the effect of poultry manure application on yield and yield parameters was variable. Instead, the applications had no significant effect on the number of main branches, ADF and NDF rates. Consequently, the application of 100 kg P2O5 ha-1 together with Bacillus megaterium inoculation can be recommended for high hay yield in common vetch under irrigated conditions in areas with poor or medium soils in terms of phosphorus.

Keywords

Fertilizer, Hay yield, Phosphorus, Phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria

Supporting Institution

Atatürk University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit

Project Number

BAP 2010/75

Thanks

This paper includes the results of the PhD thesis of the first author. The study was supported financially by Atatürk University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (BAP 2010/75).

References

• Adeyemo, A. J., Akingbola, O. O., & Ojeniyi, S. O. (2019). Effects of poultry manure on soil infiltration, organic matter contents and maize performance on two contrasting degraded alfisols in southwestern Nigeria. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 8, 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-019-0273-7
• Amba, A. A., Agbo, E. B., Voncir, N., & Oyawoye, M. O. (2011). Effect of phosphorus fertilizer on some soil chemical properties and nitrogen fixation of legumes at Bauchi. Continental Journal of Agricultural Science, 5(1), 39-44.
• Azmi, F. M., Tajudin, N. S., & Shahari, R. (2019). Effects of different poultry manure rates of on early growth of fig (Ficus carica). Environmental Contaminants Reviews (ECR), 2(1), 19-22. https://doi.org/10.26480/ecr.01.2019.19.22
• Bayram, G., Turk, M., Carpici, E. B., & Celik, N. (2009). The effect of aeration and application of manure and fertilizer on the hay yield, its quality and botanical composition of the abandoned range. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4(5), 498-504.
• Belete, S., Bezabih, M., Abdulkadir, B., Tolera, A., Mekonnen, K., & Wolde-Meskel, E. (2019). Inoculation and phosphorus fertilizer improve food-feed traits of grain legumes in mixed crop-livestock systems of Ethiopia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 279, 58-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.04.014
• Bhat, T. A., Gupta, M., Ganai, M. A., Ahanger, R. A., & Bhat, H. A. (2013). Yield, soil health and nutrient utilization of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) as affected by phosphorus and bio-fertilizers under subtropical conditions of Jammu. International Journal of Modern Plant and Animal Sciences, 1(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33954.86729
• Chauhan, P. K., Upadhyay, S. K., Tripathi, M., Singh, R., Krishna, D., Singh, S. K., & Dwivedi, P. (2022). Understanding the salinity stress on plant and developing sustainable management strategies mediated salt-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and CRISPR/Cas9. Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews, 39(2), 311-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/02648725.2022.2131958
• Chen, Q., & Liu, S. (2019). Identification and characterization of the phosphate-solubilizing bacterium Pantoea sp. S32 in reclamation soil in Shanxi, China. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10, 2171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02171
• Chukwu, G. O., Tarfa, B. D., & Amapu, I. Y. (2014). Linking pedology and extension: Emerging trend in optimizing fertilizer recommendations and sustaining soil health in Nigeria. Sky Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management, 3(5), 42-49.
• Cömert, İ. H. (2014). Harran Ovası koşullarında uygun fiğ ve tritikale karışımının farklı fosfor dozlarının verim ve verim unsurlarına etkileri (Master’s thesis, Harran University). (In Turkish)
• Cüre, B. (2022). Kimyasal ve organik gübrelerin çevre üzerine etkisi. Uluslararası Biyosistem Mühendisliği Dergisi, 3(2), 98-107. (In Turkish)
• Debele, R. D. (2021). The effect of integrated organic and inorganic fertilizer on soil fertility and productivity. Journal of Ecology and Natural Resources, 5(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.23880/jenr-16000248
• Erkovan, H. I., Gullap, M. K., Haliloglu, K., & Koc, A. (2014). Substitution possibility of some biofertilizers for mineral phosphorus fertilizer in pea cultivation. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 19(2), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.81176
• Gee, G. W., & Bauder, J. W. (1986). Particle-size analysis. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 physical and minerological methods (pp. 383-411). American Society of Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c15
• Gerçekçioğlu, R., Ertürk, A., & Atasever, Ö. Ö. (2018). Bitki büyümesini teşvik edici rizobakteri (PGPR) uygulamasının eşme ayva çeşidinde (Cydonia vulgaris L.) verim ve meyve özellikleri üzerine etkileri. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(3), 209-216. https://doi.org/10.13002/jafag4299 (In Turkish)
• Goering, H. K., & Van Soest, P. J. (1970). Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Handbook.
• Gupta, G., Parihar, S. S., Ahirwar, N. K., Snehi, S. K., & Singh, V. (2015). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Current and future prospects for development of sustainable agriculture. Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology, 7(2), 096-102. https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-5948.1000188
• İmriz, G., Özdemir, F., Topal, İ., Ercan, B., Taş, M. N., Yakışır, E., & Okur, O. (2014). Bitkisel üretimde bitki gelişimini teşvik eden rizobakteriler (PGPR) ve etki mekanizmaları. Elektronik Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi, 12(2), 1-19. (In Turkish)
• Jones Jr., J. B. (1991). Kjeldahl method for nitrogen determination. Micro-Macro Publishing.
• Kaynar, D., & Çomaklı, B. (2023). Effects of different phosphorus sources on the yield and yield components of forage pea. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 54(2), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.5152/AUAF.2023.23084
• Kocagöz, Y. M., Bellitürk, K., & Hurma, H. (2022). Comparison of organic and chemical fertilizer use: The case of Muratlı district of Tekirdağ province. ADYUTAYAM Dergisi, 10(2), 108-127.
• Kurt, Z. (2019). Organik gübrelerin toprakların biyolojik özellikleri üzerine etkileri (Master’s thesis, Atatürk University). (In Turkish)
• Li, J. T., Zhong, X. L., Wang, F., & Zhao, Q. G. (2011). Effect of poultry litter and livestock manure on soil physical and biological indicators in a rice-wheat rotation system. Plant Soil and Environment, 57(8), 351-356. https://doi.org/10.17221/233/2010-PSE
• Masocha, B. L., & Dikinya, O. (2022). The role of poultry litter and its biochar on soil fertility and Jatropha curcas L. growth on sandy-loam soil. Applied Sciences, 12(23), 12294. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312294
• Matse, D. T., Huang, C. H., Huang, Y. M., & Yen, M. Y. (2020). Effects of co-inoculation of Rhizobium with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on the nitrogen fixation and nutrient uptake of Trifolium repens in low phosphorus soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 43(5), 739-752. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2019.1702205
• McLean, E. O. (1982). Soil pH and lime requirement. In A. L. Page (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 2 chemical and microbiological properties (pp, 199-224). American Society of Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c12
• Meena, K. K., Sorty, A. M., Bitla, U. M., Choudhary, K., Gupta, P., Pareek, A., & Minhas, P. S. (2017). Abiotic stress responses and microbe-mediated mitigation in plants: The omics strategies. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8(172), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00172
• Meraklı, N., & Memon, A. (2020). Role of plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPR) in plant growth and development: Soil-plant relationship. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 8(12), 2590-2602. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i12.2590-2602.3785
• Mitran, T., Meena, R. S., Lal, R., Layek, J., Kumar, S., & Datta, R. (2018). Role of soil phosphorus on legume production. In R. S. Meena, A. Das, G. S. Yadav & R. Lal (Eds.), Legumes for soil health and sustainable management (pp. 487-510). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0253-4_15
• Nelson, D. W., & Sommers, L. E. (1982). Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In A. L. Page (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 2 chemical and microbiological properties (pp. 539-579). American Society of Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c29
• Nelson, R. E. (1982). Carbonate and gypsum. In A. L. Page (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 2 chemical and microbiological properties (pp. 181-197). American Society of Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c11
• Olsen, S. R., & Sommers, L. E. (1982). Phosphorus. In A. L. Page (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 2 chemical and microbiological properties (pp. 403-430). American Society of Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c24
• Osman, M. E. H., El-Sheekh, M. M., El-Naggar, A. H., & Gheda, S. F. (2010). Effect of two species of cyanobacteria as biofertilizers on some metabolic activities, growth, and yield of pea plant. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 46, 861-875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-010-0491-7
• Öksel, C., Balkan, A., Bilgin, O., Mirik, M., & Başer, İ. (2022). Investigation of the effect of Pgpr on yield and some yield components in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 27(1), 127-133. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.1019160
• Öncan Sümer, F., & Erten, H. (2022). Farklı fosfor dozlarının baklada (Vicia faba L.) Verim ve verim komponentleri ile protein oranı üzerine etkisi. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1), 103-109. https://doi.org/10.25308/aduziraat.1054859 (In Turkish)
• Rafaat, J. G. (2022). Effect of different levels of phosphorous fertilization on growth, and yield components of some common vetch (Vicia sativa L) varieties. Tikrit Journal for Agricultural Sciences, 22(4), 106-115. https://doi.org/10.25130/tjas.22.4.13
• Roba, T. B. (2018). Review on: The effect of mixing organic and inorganic fertilizer on productivity and soil fertility. Open Access Library Journal, 5, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1104618
• SAS. (2002). The SAS system for Windows. SAS. https://support.sas.com/downloads/browse.htm?fil=&cat=87
• Sawires, E. S. (2011). Effect of phosphorus fertilization and micronutrients on yield and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum, L.). Annals of Agricultural Science (Cairo), 46(1), 155-164.
• Solmaz, Y., Adiloğlu, A., & Turan, M. (2022). Mineral ve organik gübrelerin mikrobiyal kapsülasyonunun buğdayda bazı besin elementlerinin alımı üzerine etkisi. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 10(11), 2132-2139. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v10i11.2132-2139.5258 (In Turkish)
• Sümerli, M., Gül, İ., & Yılmaz, Y. (2002). Diyarbakır ekolojik şartlarında yem bezelyesi hatlarının verim ve verim öğelerinin belirlenmesi. Güneydoğu Anadolu Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitü Müdürlüğü Gelişme Raporları (Yayımlanmamış). (In Turkish)
• Tan, M. (2018). Baklagil ve buğdaygil yem bitkileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Yayınları. (In Turkish)
• TEMA. (2018). Organomineral gübre çalıştayı bildiriler kitabı. Türkiye Erozyonla Mücadele, Ağaçlandırma ve Doğal Varlıkları Koruma Vakfı. (In Turkish)
• Thomas, G. W. (1982). Exchangeable cations. In A. L. Page (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 2 chemical and microbiological properties (pp. 159-165). American Society of Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c9
• Truu, M., Ostonen, I., Preem, J. K., Lõhmus, K., Nõlvak, H., Ligi, T., & Truu, J. (2017). Elevated air humidity changes soil bacterial community structure in the silver birch stand. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8, 557. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00557
• Türk, M., & Yıldız, F. (2016). Effects of fertilization on seed yield and forage quality of common vetch (Vicia sativa Roth.). Scientific Papers. Series A. Agronomy, 59, 462-465.
• Türkkan, Ö. Y., & Kibar, B. (2022). Effects of different organic fertilizers on plant growth, yield, quality properties and element contents in Spinach. Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2), 208-222. https://doi.org/10.24180/ijaws.1094410
• Udvardi, M., & Poole, P. S. (2013). Transport and metabolism in 828 legume-rhizobia symbioses. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 64, 781-805. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120235
• Uyanık, M., Rezaeieh, K. A. P., Delen, Y., & Gürbüz, B. (2011). Baklagillerde bakteri aşılaması ve azot fiksasyonu. Ziraat Mühendisliği, 357, 8-12. (In Turkish)
• Yavuz, M., İptaş, S., Ayhan, V., & Karadağ, Y. (2009). Yem bitkilerinde kalite ve yem bitkilerinden kaynaklanan beslenme bozuklukları. In R. Avcıoğlu, R. Hatipoğlu & Y. Karadağ (Eds.), Yem bitkileri, genel bölüm (pp. 163-172). Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı Tarımsal Üretim ve Geliştirme Genel Müdürlüğü. (In Turkish)
• Yıldız, N., & Bircan, H. (1994). Uygulamalı istatistik. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları. (In Turkish)
• Yüksel, O., & Türk, M. (2019). The effects of phosphorus fertilization and harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 28(5), 4165-4170.