Review Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Integration of Research and Practice in Education: A Theoretical Perspective on Design Based Research

Year 2024, Volume: 12 Issue: 24, 780 - 799
https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1522744

Abstract

Design-based research is utilised to develop innovative solutions in learning areas in order to improve the quality of education and training processes. This study is a review study that aims to provide a general impression of design-based research (DBR) by mentioning the basic principles and methods of DBR. The narrative literature review technique, one of the types of literature review, is used in the study. It is thought that this study will be a guide for researchers who want to study DBR for the methodological parts of their studies. In this context, DBR, which combines theory and practice, which is one of the best examples of research and practice in education, is presented in detail.

Ethical Statement

Bilgilendirme Bu çalışmada insan veya hayvan deneklerinden veri toplanmamıştır. Bu nedenle çalışma, etik kurul onayı gerektiren çalışmalar kapsamında yer almadığından etik kurul onayı alınmamıştır.

References

  • Abdallah, M. M. S., & Wegerif, R. B. (2014). Design-based research (DBR) in educational enquiry and technological studies: A version for PhD students targeting the integration of new technologies and literacies into educational contexts. [Online Submission, ERIC: ED546471.] Alınan yer http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED546471.pdf
  • Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
  • Armstrong, M., Dopp, C., & Welsh, J. (2018). Design-based research. In R. Kimmons (Ed.), The students' guide to learning design and research. EdTech Books.
  • Bakker, A. (2004). Design research in statistics education: On symbolizing and computer tools. CD-β Pres.
  • Bakker, A. (2018). Design research in education: A practical guide for early career researchers. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203701010 Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003). The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001021
  • Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
  • Bell, P., & Sandoval, W. A. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: Introduction. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 109-201. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3904_1
  • Bronkhorst, L. H., & de Kleijn, R. A. (2016). Challenges and learning outcomes of educational design research for PhD students. Frontline Learning Research, 4(3), 75–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.14786/flr.v4i3.198 Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2020). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Campanella, M., & Penuel, W. R. (2021). Design based research in educational settings: Motivations, crosscutting features, and considerations for design. In Z. A. Philippakos, E. Howell, & A. Pellegrino (Ed.), Design-based research in education: Theory and applications (pp. 3- 22). Guilford Publications.
  • Christensen, K. D. N., & West, R. E. (2018). The development of design-based research. In R. E. West (Ed.), Foundations of learning and instructional design technology. BYU Open Learning Network.
  • Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
  • Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T.O’Shea (Ed.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15–22). Springer-Verlag.
  • Dede, C. (2004). If design-based research is the answer, what is the question? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 105-114. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_5
  • Design Based Research Collective. (2003). Design based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005
  • Gravemeijer, K. & Cobb, P. (2013). Design research from the learning design perspective. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Ed.). Educational design research part A: An introduction (pp. 72-113). SLO.
  • Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (1994). Educational development and developmental research in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(5), 443–471. Alınan yer https://www.jstor.org/stable/749485
  • Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6
  • Greenhalgh, T., Thorne, S., & Malterud, K. (2018). Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? European Journal of Clinical İnvestigation, 48(6). 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12931
  • Gregory, A. T., & Denniss, A. R. (2018). An ıntroduction to writing narrative and systematic reviews - tasks, tips and traps for aspiring authors. Heart, lung & Circulation, 27(7), 893–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2018.03.027
  • Hoadley, C. P. Creating context: Design based research in creating and understanding CSCL. (2002, January 7-11) Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community [Conference paper] Boulder, CO.
  • Kuzu, A., Çankaya, S., & Mısırlı, Z. A. (2011). Tasarım tabanlı araştırma ve öğrenme ortamlarının tasarımı ve geliştirilmesinde kullanımı. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 1(1), 19-35.
  • Lagemann, E. C. (2002). An elusive science: The troubling history of education research. University of Chicago Press.
  • Lijnse, P. L. (1995). “Developmental research” as a way to an empirically based “didactical structure” of science. Science Education, 79(2), 189–199.
  • McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. Routledge.
  • Mutlu, N. (2016). Tasarım ve geliştirme araştırma modeli. Y. Özden & L. Durdu (Ed.), Eğitimde üretim tabanlı çalışmalar için nitel araştırma yöntemleri içinde (1.baskı, ss.49–70). Anı Yayıncılık.
  • O’Neill, D. K. (2012). Designs that fly: What the history of aeronautics tells us about the future of design-based research in education. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 35(2), 19–140. http://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2012.683573
  • Oppl, S., Stary, C., & Oppl, S. (2022). On the ambiguous nature of theory in educational design-based research – reflecting and structuring from an is perspective. Educational Design Research, 6(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.15460/eder.6.1.1808
  • Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2013). Educational design research: Introduction and illustrative cases. SLO. Randolph, J.J. (2009). A Guide to writing the dissertation literature review. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(13), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.7275/b0az-8t74
  • Reeves, T. C. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Ed.), Educational design research (pp. 52–66). Routledge.
  • Reinking, D., & Bradley, B. A. (2008). On formative and design experiments: Approaches to language and literacy research. Teachers College Press.
  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2007). Method. In Lester (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 69-107). Information Age Publishing.
  • Scott, E. E., Wenderoth, M. P., & Doherty, J. H. (2020). Design-based research: A methodology to extend and enrich biology education research. Life Sciences Education, 19(11), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-11-0245
  • Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In R. Lesh & A. E. Kelly (Ed.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp.267-306). Erlbaum.
  • Sukhera J. (2022). Narrative reviews: Flexible, rigorous, and practical. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 14(4), 414–417. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-22-00480.1
  • Sylvester, A., Tate, M., & Johnstone, D. (2013). Beyond synthesis: re-presenting heterogeneous research literature. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(12), 1199–1215. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2011.624633
  • Şatana, N. S. (2015). Uluslararası ilişkilerde bilimsellik, metodoloji ve yöntem. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 12(46), 10-33. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.463026
  • van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Ed.), Design approaches and tools in education and training. Springer. van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K. P. E., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (2006). Educational design research. Routledge.
  • Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development 53(4), 5–23. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504682 Watling, S. (2014, March 23). Educational design research or educational action research: What’s the difference? Alınan yer https://suewatling.blogs.lincoln.ac.uk/2014/03/23/educational-design-research-or-educational-action-research-whats-the-difference/
  • Yüksel, A. (2023). Bilimsel araştırma: Temel yaklaşımlar ve metodoloji. Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri: Yeni perspektifler araştırma yöntemleri: Yeni uygulamalar ve bakış açıları içinde (1.baskı, ss.89-92). Seçkin Yayıncılık

Eğitimde Araştırma ve Uygulamanın Buluşması: Tasarım Tabanlı Araştırmaya Kuramsal Bir Bakış

Year 2024, Volume: 12 Issue: 24, 780 - 799
https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1522744

Abstract

Eğitim ve öğretim süreçlerinin kalitesini arttırmaya yönelik öğrenme alanlarında yenilikçi çözümlerin geliştirmesi için tasarım tabanlı araştırmadan yararlanılmaktadır. Bu çalışma, tasarım tabanlı araştırmanın (TTA) temel ilkelerinden, yöntemlerinden bahsederek TTA ile ilgili genel bir izlenim ortaya koymayı amaçlayan derleme bir çalışmadır. Çalışmada alanyazın incelemesi çeşitlerinden anlatı alanyazın incelemesi tekniği kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın TTA çalışmak isteyen araştırmacılara, çalışmalarının yöntem kısımları için yol gösteri olacağı düşünülmektedir. Bu bağlamda çalışmada eğitimde araştırma ve uygulamanın iyi örneklerinden olan teori ve pratiği birleştiren TTA detaylandırılarak sunulmaktadır.

References

  • Abdallah, M. M. S., & Wegerif, R. B. (2014). Design-based research (DBR) in educational enquiry and technological studies: A version for PhD students targeting the integration of new technologies and literacies into educational contexts. [Online Submission, ERIC: ED546471.] Alınan yer http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED546471.pdf
  • Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
  • Armstrong, M., Dopp, C., & Welsh, J. (2018). Design-based research. In R. Kimmons (Ed.), The students' guide to learning design and research. EdTech Books.
  • Bakker, A. (2004). Design research in statistics education: On symbolizing and computer tools. CD-β Pres.
  • Bakker, A. (2018). Design research in education: A practical guide for early career researchers. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203701010 Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003). The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001021
  • Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
  • Bell, P., & Sandoval, W. A. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: Introduction. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 109-201. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3904_1
  • Bronkhorst, L. H., & de Kleijn, R. A. (2016). Challenges and learning outcomes of educational design research for PhD students. Frontline Learning Research, 4(3), 75–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.14786/flr.v4i3.198 Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2020). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Campanella, M., & Penuel, W. R. (2021). Design based research in educational settings: Motivations, crosscutting features, and considerations for design. In Z. A. Philippakos, E. Howell, & A. Pellegrino (Ed.), Design-based research in education: Theory and applications (pp. 3- 22). Guilford Publications.
  • Christensen, K. D. N., & West, R. E. (2018). The development of design-based research. In R. E. West (Ed.), Foundations of learning and instructional design technology. BYU Open Learning Network.
  • Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
  • Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T.O’Shea (Ed.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15–22). Springer-Verlag.
  • Dede, C. (2004). If design-based research is the answer, what is the question? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 105-114. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_5
  • Design Based Research Collective. (2003). Design based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005
  • Gravemeijer, K. & Cobb, P. (2013). Design research from the learning design perspective. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Ed.). Educational design research part A: An introduction (pp. 72-113). SLO.
  • Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (1994). Educational development and developmental research in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(5), 443–471. Alınan yer https://www.jstor.org/stable/749485
  • Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6
  • Greenhalgh, T., Thorne, S., & Malterud, K. (2018). Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? European Journal of Clinical İnvestigation, 48(6). 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12931
  • Gregory, A. T., & Denniss, A. R. (2018). An ıntroduction to writing narrative and systematic reviews - tasks, tips and traps for aspiring authors. Heart, lung & Circulation, 27(7), 893–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2018.03.027
  • Hoadley, C. P. Creating context: Design based research in creating and understanding CSCL. (2002, January 7-11) Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community [Conference paper] Boulder, CO.
  • Kuzu, A., Çankaya, S., & Mısırlı, Z. A. (2011). Tasarım tabanlı araştırma ve öğrenme ortamlarının tasarımı ve geliştirilmesinde kullanımı. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 1(1), 19-35.
  • Lagemann, E. C. (2002). An elusive science: The troubling history of education research. University of Chicago Press.
  • Lijnse, P. L. (1995). “Developmental research” as a way to an empirically based “didactical structure” of science. Science Education, 79(2), 189–199.
  • McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. Routledge.
  • Mutlu, N. (2016). Tasarım ve geliştirme araştırma modeli. Y. Özden & L. Durdu (Ed.), Eğitimde üretim tabanlı çalışmalar için nitel araştırma yöntemleri içinde (1.baskı, ss.49–70). Anı Yayıncılık.
  • O’Neill, D. K. (2012). Designs that fly: What the history of aeronautics tells us about the future of design-based research in education. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 35(2), 19–140. http://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2012.683573
  • Oppl, S., Stary, C., & Oppl, S. (2022). On the ambiguous nature of theory in educational design-based research – reflecting and structuring from an is perspective. Educational Design Research, 6(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.15460/eder.6.1.1808
  • Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2013). Educational design research: Introduction and illustrative cases. SLO. Randolph, J.J. (2009). A Guide to writing the dissertation literature review. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(13), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.7275/b0az-8t74
  • Reeves, T. C. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Ed.), Educational design research (pp. 52–66). Routledge.
  • Reinking, D., & Bradley, B. A. (2008). On formative and design experiments: Approaches to language and literacy research. Teachers College Press.
  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2007). Method. In Lester (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 69-107). Information Age Publishing.
  • Scott, E. E., Wenderoth, M. P., & Doherty, J. H. (2020). Design-based research: A methodology to extend and enrich biology education research. Life Sciences Education, 19(11), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-11-0245
  • Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In R. Lesh & A. E. Kelly (Ed.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp.267-306). Erlbaum.
  • Sukhera J. (2022). Narrative reviews: Flexible, rigorous, and practical. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 14(4), 414–417. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-22-00480.1
  • Sylvester, A., Tate, M., & Johnstone, D. (2013). Beyond synthesis: re-presenting heterogeneous research literature. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(12), 1199–1215. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2011.624633
  • Şatana, N. S. (2015). Uluslararası ilişkilerde bilimsellik, metodoloji ve yöntem. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 12(46), 10-33. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.463026
  • van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Ed.), Design approaches and tools in education and training. Springer. van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K. P. E., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (2006). Educational design research. Routledge.
  • Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development 53(4), 5–23. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504682 Watling, S. (2014, March 23). Educational design research or educational action research: What’s the difference? Alınan yer https://suewatling.blogs.lincoln.ac.uk/2014/03/23/educational-design-research-or-educational-action-research-whats-the-difference/
  • Yüksel, A. (2023). Bilimsel araştırma: Temel yaklaşımlar ve metodoloji. Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri: Yeni perspektifler araştırma yöntemleri: Yeni uygulamalar ve bakış açıları içinde (1.baskı, ss.89-92). Seçkin Yayıncılık
There are 40 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Curriculum Development in Education, Instructional Design
Journal Section Review Article
Authors

Aysu Karademir 0000-0003-1997-0309

Derya Girgin 0000-0002-6114-7925

Early Pub Date September 27, 2024
Publication Date
Submission Date July 26, 2024
Acceptance Date September 23, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 12 Issue: 24

Cite

APA Karademir, A., & Girgin, D. (2024). Eğitimde Araştırma ve Uygulamanın Buluşması: Tasarım Tabanlı Araştırmaya Kuramsal Bir Bakış. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 12(24), 780-799. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1522744

download13894               13896   13897 14842      


Creative Commons License


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Dear Authors;

We would like to inform you that ORCID, which includes 16 digit number will be requested from the authors for the studies to be published in JCER. It is important to be sensitive on this issue. 


Best regards...