Integrating Mathematics Education with Technology and Sustainability: The Novel IMETS Framework

Year 2025, Volume: 13 Issue: 26, 1184 - 1215

Rusen Meylani

Abstract

The growing intersection of global sustainability challenges, mathematics education, and technological advancements has created an urgent need for educational frameworks that foster interdisciplinary learning. This paper introduces the Integrating Mathematics Education, Technology, and Sustainability (IMETS) Framework, a novel approach designed to enhance students’ mathematical understanding while promoting sustainable practices and leveraging modern technological tools. The IMETS Framework integrates three key components—sustainability, mathematics education, and technology—into a cohesive curriculum that prepares students to address real-world problems such as climate change, resource management, and social equity. The framework emphasizes using technology to create interactive and personalized learning experiences and embeds sustainability directly into the mathematics curriculum. By fostering critical thinking and problem-solving skills, the IMETS Framework equips students with the tools needed to navigate the complexities of the 21st century. This paper outlines the conceptual foundations of the framework, explores its practical applications in various educational contexts, and discusses its potential contributions to global educational goals, particularly the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Keywords

IMETS framework , mathematics education , sustainability , technology integration , critical thinking , problem-solving , sustainable development goals (SDGs)

Ethical Statement

Due to the scope and method of the study, ethics committee permission was not required.

References

• Alsina, Á., & Mulà, I. (2019). Advancing towards a transformational professional competence model through reflective learning and sustainability: The case of mathematics teacher education. Sustainability, 11(15), 4039. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154039 Angraini, L. M., & Nurmaliza, N. (2022). The effect of interactive multimedia-based learning on students’ mathematical critical thinking ability in the course of structure algebra. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 9(2), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v9i2.26839
• Anindita, A. D., Hasratuddin, M., & Pargaulan, S. M. (2021). Development of learning tools based on online realistic mathematics education to improve critical thinking ability and adversity quotient of students in MAN 1 Medan. Journal of Education and Practice, 12(2), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/12-2-11
• Ardhini, R. A., Rochmad, R., & Asih, T. S. N. (2022). Mathematical critical thinking ability based on self-concept in discovery learning model assisted by iSpring Suite. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 5(3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v5i3.13693
• Atoyebi, O. M., Atoyebi, S. B., & Ajao, A. F. (2023). The impact of mathematics anxiety on the mathematical value of secondary school students in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, 17(11), 236–254. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2023/v17i11570
• Ayu Trisnawati, R., & Mahmudi, A. (2023). Analysis of students’ mathematical critical thinking skills and collaborative collaboration skills. Edunity Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, 2(12), 1539–1548. https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity.v2i12.199
• Barwell, R., & Hauge, K. H. (2021). A critical mathematics education for climate change. In Applying critical mathematics education (pp. 166–184). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004465800_008
• Bazinet, R., & Marshall, A. M. (2015). Ethnomusicology, ethnomathematics, and integrating curriculum. General Music Today, 28(3), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1048371315573566
• Bennett, C. A., & Ruchti, W. (2014). Bridging stem with mathematical practices. Journal of Stem Teacher Education, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.30707/JSTE49.1Bennett
• Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2017). Technology usage in mathematics education research – A systematic review of recent trends. Computers and Education, 114, 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.004
• Brown, J. P. (2019). Real-world task context: Meanings and roles. In G. A. Stillman & J. P. Brown (Eds.), Lines of inquiry in mathematical modelling research in education (pp. 53–81). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14931-4_4
• Candraningtyas, S. R., & Khusna, H. (2023). Computational thinking ability becomes a predictor of mathematical critical thinking ability. Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 5(2), 247–263.
• Chasanah, A. N. (2019). Cognitive growth learning model to improve the students’ critical thinking skills. JRAMathEdu, 4(2), 112–123.
• Chimmalee, B., & Anupan, A. (2023). The effects of using flipped cloud learning with advancing mathematical thinking approaches on undergraduate students’ mathematical critical thinking. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 24(3), 240–260. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1125894
• Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). A framework for using genai to support student engagement in interdisciplinary learning from self-determination theory. ASCILITE Publications, 1–2.
• Crisostomo, A. T., & Reinertsen, A. B. (2020). Technology and sustainability for/in early childhood education and care. Policy Futures in Education, 18(4), 545–555.
• Dawn, N. K. E. (2011). Towards mathematical literacy in the 21st century: Perspectives from Singapore. Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal, 1(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.46517/seamej.v1i1.7 Delima, N. (2017). A relationship between problem solving ability and students’ mathematical thinking. Infinity Journal, 6(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v6i1.p21-28
• Domínguez-González, R., & Delgado-Martín, L. (2022). Arousing early strategic thinking about sdgs with real mathematics problems. Mathematics, 10(9), 1446. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10091446
• Drijvers, P. (2015). Digital technology in mathematics education: Why it works (or doesn’t). In S. J. Cho (Ed.). Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 135–151). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_8
• Drobnič Vidic, A. (2023). Comparison of interdisciplinary connections between mathematics and other subjects through student-centred approaches. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 12(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.10178
• Firdaus, F., Kailani, I., Bakar, M. N. B., & Bakry, B. (2015). Developing critical thinking skills of students in mathematics learning. Journal of Education and Learning (Edulearn), 9(3), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v9i3.1830
• Gamage, K. A. A., Ekanayake, S. Y., & Dehideniya, S. C. P. (2022). Embedding sustainability in learning and teaching: Lessons learned and moving forward—Approaches in stem higher education programmes. Education Sciences, 12(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030225
• Ghazali, M., Musa, M., Yakob, N., Hamzah, N. S., Shaari, M. Z., Rashid, R. A. A., Dewa, A., & Basharudin, M. H. (2024). Promoting sustainable development goals (sdgs) in an undergraduate preservice teachers’ mathematics course using decore+ methodology and assessing students’ SDG understanding through concept mapping. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 3(1), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263241231997
• Gottfried, M. (2016). The role of real‐life mathematics instruction on mathematics outcomes in kindergarten. British Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 314–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3207
• Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F.-L., & Ohtani, M. (2017). What mathematics education may prepare students for the society of the future? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(Suppl. 1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6
• Güder, Y., & Gürbüz, R. (2018). Interdisciplinary mathematical modeling activities as a transitional tool for stem education: Teacher and student opinions. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2), 170–198. https://doi.org/10.17984/adyuebd.457626
• Gürbüz, R., & Çalık, M. (2021). Intertwining mathematical modeling with environmental issues. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 79(3), 412–424. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/21.79.412
• Gürsan, S., Tapan-Broutin, M. S., & İpek, J. (2022). Mathematical thinking in elementary students: The role of metacognitive skills. Open Journal for Educational Research, 6(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojer.0601.06069g
• Hamidah, H., Kusuma, J. W., & Ilmadi, I. (2022). Learning analysis with ARIAS model on students’ critical thinking skills reviewed from learning styles. AlphaMath, 8(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.30595/alphamath.v8i1.13550
• Harjo, B., Kartowagiran, B., & Mahmudi, A. (2019). Development of critical thinking skill instruments on mathematical learning high school. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12410a
• Hendrajah, A. D., Yerizon, Y., & Arnawa, I. M. (2023). Development of mathematics learning tools based on realistic mathematics education to improve mathematical critical thinking ability for class VII middle school. Journal of Social Research, 2(10), 3636–3642. https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v2i10.1435
• Hidayati, D. W., & Kurniati, L. (2018). The influence of self regulated learning to mathematics critical thinking ability on 3D-shapes geometry learning using GeoGebra. JIPM, 7(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v7i1.2965
• Hsiao, P.-W., & Su, C.-H. (2021). A study on the impact of steam education for sustainable development courses and its effects on student motivation and learning. Sustainability, 13(7), 3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073772
• Hwang, S. (2022). Profiles of mathematics teachers’ job satisfaction and stress and their association with dialogic instruction. Sustainability, 14(11), 6925. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116925
• Ismail, N. (2014). Computer-based math curriculum reform: Incorporating digital technology into teaching mathematics. Mount Royal Undergraduate Education Review, 1(2).
• Johnson, J. D., Smail, L., Corey, D., & Jarrah, A. M. (2022). Using bayesian networks to provide educational implications: Mobile learning and ethnomathematics to improve sustainability in mathematics education. Sustainability, 14(10), 5897. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105897
• Kalaitzi, C. (2024). A mathematics intervention in kindergarten using shel silverstein’s “the missing piece meets the big o”: Early childhood educators’ perceptions on a teaching framework integrating literature in mathematics-related concepts. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 12(2), 75. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v12i2.6744
• Kanandjebo, L. N. (2024). Mathematics as a driver for sustainable development: Pre-service teachers’ perspectives on awareness, challenges, and implications for teacher training. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research, 6, 1–17.
• Kania, N., Fitriani, C., & Bonyah, E. (2023). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skills based on prior knowledge mathematics. International Journal of Contemporary Studies in Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.56855/ijcse.v2i1.248
• Kannadass, P., Hidayat, R., Siregar, P. S., & Husain, A. P. (2023). Relationship between computational and critical thinking towards modelling competency among pre-service mathematics teachers. TEM Journal, 12(3), 1370–1382.
• Karaarslan Semiz, G., & Isler Baykal, I. (2020). Middle school pre-service mathematics teachers’ opinions related to mathematics education for sustainability. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 20(89), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2020.89.6
• Karjanto, N., & Acelajado, M. J. (2022). Sustainable learning, cognitive gains, and improved attitudes in college algebra flipped classrooms. Sustainability, 14(19), Article 12500. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912500
• Kim, J., & Pang, J. (2022). An analysis of sustainable activities in Japanese, Korean, and Singaporean elementary mathematics textbooks, Korean. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(2), Article em2080. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11651
• Kollosche, D. (2023). Towards a critical epistemology of mathematics. Prometeica – Revista de Filosofía y Ciencias, (27), 825–833. https://doi.org/10.34024/prometeica.2023.27.15414
• Körtesi, P., Simonka, Z., Szabó, Z. K., Gunčaga, J., & Neag, R. (2022). Challenging examples of the wise use of computer tools for the sustainability of knowledge and developing active and innovative methods in steam and mathematics education. Sustainability, 14(20), Article 12991. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142012991
• Krishnan, S., & Raman, A. (2024). A bibliometric analysis on sustainable research in mathematics education. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i1/20417
• Kurniati, D., Trapsilasiwi, D., As’ari, A. R., Basri, H., & Osman, S. (2022). Prospective mathematics teachers’ critical thinking disposition in designing cognitive and psychomotor assessment instruments. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 7(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v7i1.11263
• Lafuente-Lechuga, M., Cifuentes-Faura, J., & Faura-Martínez, Ú. (2020). Mathematics applied to the economy and sustainable development goals: A necessary relationship of dependence. Education Sciences, 10(11), 339. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110339
• Lafuente-Lechuga, M., Cifuentes-Faura, J., & Faura-Martínez, Ú. (2024). Teaching sustainability in higher education by integrating mathematical concepts. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 25(1), 62–77.
• Lestari, R., Prahmana, R. C. I., Chong, M. S. F., & Shahrill, M. (2023). Developing realistic mathematics education-based worksheets for improving students’ critical thinking skills. Infinity Journal, 12(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i1.p69-84
• Lestari, S. A. P., Nurapriani, F., & Kusumaningrum, D. S. (2024). Integrating sustainable development principles in learning mathematics to stimulate sustainable skills in future generations. Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem Industri, 13(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.26593/jrsi.v13i1.7167.1-10
• Madlung, A., Bremer, M., Himelblau, E., & Tullis, A. (2011). A study assessing the potential of negative effects in interdisciplinary math–biology instruction. CBE Life Sciences Education, 10(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-08-0102
• Makramalla, M., Coles, A., le Roux, K., & Wagner, D. (2025). Mathematics education for sustainable futures: A strengths-based survey of the field to invite further research action. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-025-10389-x
• Mayes, R., & Rittschof, K. (2021). Development of interdisciplinary stem impact measures of student attitudes and reasoning. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.631684 Melawati, Y., Rochmiyati, R., & Nurhanurawati, N. (2022). A needs analysis of HOTS-based assessment instruments for elementary school mathematics learning. Asian Journal of Educational Technology, 1(2), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.53402/ajet.v1i2.41
• Meylani, R. (2024). A critical glance at adaptive learning systems using artificial intelligence: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis of contemporary research literature. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(3), 3519–3547. https://doi.org/10.51460/baebd.1525452
• Meylani, R. (2024a). Transforming education with the Internet of Things: A journey into smarter learning environments. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 10(1), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3362
• Meylani, R. (2025a). A critical glance at technology’s role in mathematics education for a sustainable future: Advancing SDG 4 – Quality education through a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGS Review, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v5.n02.pe04566
• Meylani, R. (2025b). Gamification and game-based learning in mathematics education for advancing SDG 4: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis of contemporary research literature. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGS Review, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v5.n02.pe04567
• Meylani, R., Bitter, G., & Legacy, J. (2025). Impacts of professional development and implementation fidelity on online middle school mathematics: A quasi-experimental quantitative study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 26(2), 90–119. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1484344
• Moreno-Pino, F. M., Jiménez-Fontana, R., Cardeñoso Domingo, J. M., & Azcárate Goded, P. (2021). Study of the presence of sustainability competencies in teacher training in mathematics education. Sustainability, 13(10), 5629. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105629
• Mujib, M., Sukestiyarno, S., Suyitno, H., & Junaedi, I. (2022). Mathematical critical thinking profile-based Ennis and Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences. AlphaMath, 8(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.30595/alphamath.v8i1.13374
• Nahdiyah, Z., Netriwati, N., Anggraini, D., & Nendra, F. (2020). An analysis of mathematical critical-thinking ability: The impact of DCT (Dialogue Critical Thinking) and learning motivation. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 3(3), 219–226.
• Naidoo, J., & Reddy, S. (2023). Embedding sustainable mathematics higher education in the fourth Industrial Revolution era post-Covid-19: Exploring technology-based teaching methods. Sustainability, 15(12), 9692. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129692
• Nashrullah, F. R., Rochmad, R., & Cahyono, A. N. (2023). Mathematical critical thinking abilities of students in terms of self-regulated learning in realistic mathematics education assisted by mobile learning. Mathline, 8(3), 1035–1056.
• Nurdin, I. T., Putra, H. D., & Hidayat, W. (2023). The development of problem based learning google sites-assisted digital teaching materials to improve students’ mathematical critical thinking ability. (JIML) Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 6(4), 280–293. https://doi.org/10.22460/jiml.v6i4.18520
• Nurjaman, A., & Sari, I. P. (2017). The effect of problem posing approach towards students’ mathematical disposition, critical & creative thinking ability based on school level. Infinity Journal, 6(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v6i1.223
• Paredes, S., Cáceres, M. J., Diego-Mantecón, J.-M., Blanco, T. F., & Chamoso, J. M. (2020). Creating realistic mathematics tasks involving authenticity, cognitive domains, and openness characteristics: A study with pre-service teachers. Sustainability, 12(22), 9656.
• Pentang, J. T., Caubang, M. G. M., Tidalgo, A. M. L., Morizo, S. B., Bautista, R. M., Viernes, M. D. D., Jr., M. L. B., & Sercenia, J. C. (2023). Demystifying the relationship between confidence and critical thinking in mathematics among preservice teachers in west Philippines. European Journal of Educational Research, volume–12(volume–12), 1743–1754.
• Prendergast, M., Harbison, L., Miller, S., & Trakulphadetkrai, N. V. (2019). Pre-service and in-service teachers’ perceptions on the integration of children’s literature in mathematics teaching and learning in Ireland. Irish Educational Studies, 38(2), 157–175.
• Putra, J. D., Suryadi, D., & Juandi, D. (2022). Integration of principles of education for sustainable development in mathematics learning to improve student’s mathematical problem solving ability. IndoMath, 5(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.30738/indomath.v5i1.20
• Riawan, N. (2021). Mathematic thinking profile of students with high learning motivation. Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 11(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.20961/jmme.v11i1.52745
• Rico, A., Agirre-Basurko, E., Ruiz-González, A., Palacios-Agundez, I., & Zuazagoitia, D. (2021). Integrating mathematics and science teaching in the context of education for sustainable development: Design and pilot implementation of a teaching-learning sequence about air quality with pre-service primary teachers. Sustainability, 13(8), 4500.
• Rogora, E., & Tortoriello, F. S. (2021). Interdisciplinarity for learning and teaching mathematics. Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática, 35(70), 1086–1106.
• Rohaeti, E. E., & Koswara, D. (2018). Mathematical critical thinking and resiliency: Experiment of grade-7 students using the scientific approach. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v5i2.17322
• Sachdeva, S., & Eggen, P.-O. (2021). Learners’ critical thinking about learning mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), Article em0644. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11003 Samura, A. O. (2023). Improving students’ mathematical critical thinking ability using learning start with a questions. Journal of Didactic Mathematics, 4(1), 13–23.
• Sánchez-Caballé, A., & González-Martínez, J. (2021). Teaching maths within a transmedia learning approach. What is it and how sustainable can it be? Sustainability, 13(23), Article 13418. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313418
• Santoso, E. (2018). Mathematics classroom activities based on some topics in graph theory to develop critical thinking of primary and secondary school students. International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching, 2(2), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet.2018.020207
• Saputri, Y. E., & Rusnilawati, .(2023). Discovery learning through Educandy: Its effectiveness on students’ critical thinking ability and self-confidence. Thinking Skills and Creativity Journal, 6(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.23887/tscj.v6i1.61737
• Sari, D. R., & Caswita, . (2020). The analysis of mathematical critical thinking skills of students in junior high school. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Progressive Education (ICOPE 2019). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200323.103
• Scott, E. E., Wenderoth, M. P., & Doherty, J. H. (2020). Design-based research: A methodology to extend and enrich biology education research. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(2), es11. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-11-0245
• Serin, H. (2023). The role of technology in mathematics education: Promoting student achievement. International Journal of Social Sciences and Educational Studies, 10(2).
• Smith, C., & Morgan, C. (2016). Curricular orientations to real‐world contexts in mathematics. The Curriculum Journal, 27(1), 24–45.
• Solihah, P. A., Kaniawati, I., Samsudin, A., & Riandi, R. (2023). Prototype of greenhouse effect for improving problem-solving skills in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)-education for sustainable development (ESD): Literature review, bibliometric, and experiment. Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(1), 163–190.
• Steffensen, L. (2019). Teachers’ facilitation of students’ critical mathematic competences by engaging them in climate change. In Proceedings of the 2019 AERA Annual Meeting. American Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/10.3102/1441040
• Sukriyah, D., & Juniati, D. (2023). Analysis of critical thinking of prospective mathematics teachers in solving assessment problems. JME, 8(2), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.31327/jme.v8i2.1956
• Sutini, S., Sutawidjaja, A., Parta, I. N., & Susanto, H. (2017). Identification of critical thinking process in solving mathematic problems. IOSR Journal of Research and Method in Education, 7(4), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0704010510
• Syahputra, E., & Nasution, A. A. (2018). The concept of HOTS and relevant learning model. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL 2018). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aisteel-18.2018.108
• Szabó, Z. K., Körtesi, P., Gunčaga, J., Szabo, D., & Neag, R. (2020). Examples of problem-solving strategies in mathematics education supporting the sustainability of 21st-century skills. Sustainability, 12(23), Article 10113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310113
• Temel, H., & Gür, H. (2022). Opinions of elementary mathematics teacher candidates on the use of digital technologies in mathematics education. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 5(4), 864–889. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1151382
• Vintere, A. (2018). Study on engineering students experience in mathematics learning in context of sustainable development. Latvia University of Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev2018.17.N351
• Yanuari, N. F., & Turmudi, T. (2023). Critical thinking in mathematics education: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 6(2), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v6i2.241
• Yerizon, Triwani, & Musdi, E. (2022). Effectiveness of mathematics learning devices based on flipped classroom to improve mathematical critical thinking ability students. International Journal of Education and Management Engineering, 12(3), 41–46. Yuliani, A., Kusumah, Y. S., & Dahlan, J. A. (2021). Critical thinking: How is it developed with the experiential learning model in junior high school students? Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v12i1.8857
• Zehetmeier, S., & Krainer, K. (2011). Ways of promoting the sustainability of mathematics teachers’ professional development. ZDM, 43(6–7), 875–887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0358-x
• Zhu, H. (2023). Transforming mathematics education: Fostering critical thinkers. In K. M. Salleh, M. I. R. M. Mohammad Ismail, & L. Yuan (Eds.). Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Applied Psychology and Modern Education (ICAPME 2023) (pp. 108–114). Atlantis Press sarl. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-158-6_16