Research Article

Comparisons of treatment protocols for SARS-COV-2 in early pandemic: Single center experience ın Turkey

Volume: 12 Number: 2 March 15, 2022
EN TR

Comparisons of treatment protocols for SARS-COV-2 in early pandemic: Single center experience ın Turkey

Abstract

Objective: In this retrospective observational study, we aimed to investigate the COVID 19 treatment protocols applied in our hospital in terms of side effects and 28-day mortality. Methods: All 621 patients diagnosed as COVID-19 and treated with any drugs were included in the study. Inclusion criteria for patients were hospitalization with COVID-19 diagnosis and being over 18 years old. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to the treatments against COVID-19: Group 1 (only favipiravir), Group 2 (hydroxychloroquine (HQ)+ Azithromycin (AZ), Group 3 (only HQ), and Group 4 (HCQ+AZ +antibiotics). The gender, age, medications, underlying comorbidities, possible side effects due to the treatments (cardiotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity), and mortality rates were evaluated. Results: There was no difference in terms of side effects between treatment groups. Mortality rates were lowest in the HQ+AZ group. HCQ+AZ treatment was the most effective treatment protocol. Conclusion: It can be concluded from the study that the higher mortality rate due to favipiravir may be due to the administration of this drug only to critically ill patients during the initial period of the pandemic.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

yok

Project Number

yok

References

  1. 1. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/index.html [Accessed date: 01.March. 2021].
  2. 2. Turkish Republic Ministry of Health Covid-19 Guideline (https://covid19bilgi.saglik.gov.tr/depo/rehberler/COVID-19_Rehberi.pdf) [Accessed date: 01.March. 2021].
  3. 3. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports/[Accessed date: 01.March. 2021].
  4. 4. Sun J, Deng X, Chen X, et al. Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in COVID-19 Patients in China: An Active Monitoring Study by Hospital Pharmacovigilance System. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020;108(4):791-7.
  5. 5. Md Insiat Islam Rabby. Current Drugs with Potential for Treatment of Covid-19: A Literature Review. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2020;23(1):58–64. 6. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020;395(10229):1054-62. 7. Şener A. COVİD-19 (SARS COV-2) Tedavisi. J Biotechinol & Strategic Health Res. 2020; 4: 97-104.
  6. 8. Arapović J, Skočibušić S. The first two months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Single-center experience. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2020;20(3):396-400.
  7. 9. Furuta Y, Komeno T, Nakamura T. Favipiravir (T-705), a broad spectrum inhibitor of viral RNA polymerase. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2017;93(7):449-63. 10. Joshi S, Parkar J, Ansari Aet al. Role of favipiravir in the treatment of COVID-19. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;102:501-8.
  8. 11. Ghasemnejad-Berenji M, Pashapour S. Favipiravir and COVID-19: A Simplified Summary. Drug Res (Stuttg). 2021;71(3):166-70.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 15, 2022

Submission Date

October 14, 2021

Acceptance Date

November 20, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 12 Number: 2

APA
Alkan, S., Önder, T., Şener, A., Doğan, E., Gönlügür, U., Şimşek, T., Çetin, A. U., & Yüksel, B. (2022). Comparisons of treatment protocols for SARS-COV-2 in early pandemic: Single center experience ın Turkey. Journal of Contemporary Medicine, 12(2), 182-188. https://doi.org/10.16899/jcm.1009652
AMA
1.Alkan S, Önder T, Şener A, et al. Comparisons of treatment protocols for SARS-COV-2 in early pandemic: Single center experience ın Turkey. J Contemp Med. 2022;12(2):182-188. doi:10.16899/jcm.1009652
Chicago
Alkan, Sevil, Taylan Önder, Alper Şener, et al. 2022. “Comparisons of Treatment Protocols for SARS-COV-2 in Early Pandemic: Single Center Experience ın Turkey”. Journal of Contemporary Medicine 12 (2): 182-88. https://doi.org/10.16899/jcm.1009652.
EndNote
Alkan S, Önder T, Şener A, Doğan E, Gönlügür U, Şimşek T, Çetin AU, Yüksel B (March 1, 2022) Comparisons of treatment protocols for SARS-COV-2 in early pandemic: Single center experience ın Turkey. Journal of Contemporary Medicine 12 2 182–188.
IEEE
[1]S. Alkan et al., “Comparisons of treatment protocols for SARS-COV-2 in early pandemic: Single center experience ın Turkey”, J Contemp Med, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 182–188, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.16899/jcm.1009652.
ISNAD
Alkan, Sevil - Önder, Taylan - Şener, Alper - Doğan, Ebru - Gönlügür, Uğur - Şimşek, Tuncer - Çetin, Adil Uğur - Yüksel, Buse. “Comparisons of Treatment Protocols for SARS-COV-2 in Early Pandemic: Single Center Experience ın Turkey”. Journal of Contemporary Medicine 12/2 (March 1, 2022): 182-188. https://doi.org/10.16899/jcm.1009652.
JAMA
1.Alkan S, Önder T, Şener A, Doğan E, Gönlügür U, Şimşek T, Çetin AU, Yüksel B. Comparisons of treatment protocols for SARS-COV-2 in early pandemic: Single center experience ın Turkey. J Contemp Med. 2022;12:182–188.
MLA
Alkan, Sevil, et al. “Comparisons of Treatment Protocols for SARS-COV-2 in Early Pandemic: Single Center Experience ın Turkey”. Journal of Contemporary Medicine, vol. 12, no. 2, Mar. 2022, pp. 182-8, doi:10.16899/jcm.1009652.
Vancouver
1.Sevil Alkan, Taylan Önder, Alper Şener, Ebru Doğan, Uğur Gönlügür, Tuncer Şimşek, Adil Uğur Çetin, Buse Yüksel. Comparisons of treatment protocols for SARS-COV-2 in early pandemic: Single center experience ın Turkey. J Contemp Med. 2022 Mar. 1;12(2):182-8. doi:10.16899/jcm.1009652