OSTEOBLASTOM İLE İLGİLİ 2000 İLE 2022 YILLARI ARASINDA YAYIMLANAN BİLİMSEL YAYINLARIN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Abstract

Amaç: Bu bibliyometrik çalışmanın amacı, iyi huylu agresif bir kemik tümörü olan osteoblastom hakkında 2000 ile 2022 yılları arasında yayınlanan bilimsel çıktıları gözden geçirmektir. Yöntem: Osteoblastoma ile ilgili 2000-2022 yılları arasında yayınlanan bilimsel araştırma makaleleri hedeflendi ve veriler Web of Science veri tabanından elde edildi. Elde edilen veriler bibliyometrik programlar kullanılarak analiz edilmiş ve görselleştirilmiştir. Bulgular: Osteoblastom ile ilgili 2000-2022 yılları arasında yayınlanan toplam 679 makale dahil edilme kriterlerimizi karşıladı. Osteoblastom ile ilgili makalelerin çoğu (n=48) 2020 yılında yayınlanmıştır. 2000 ile 2022 yılları arasındaki yayın sayısı trendinde kayda değer bir zirve olmamıştır. Bu makaleler toplamda 10366 kez ve makale başına 15,27 kez atıf almıştır. En az 62 farklı ülke ve bölge, son 22 yılda osteoblastoma yayın araştırmalarına katıldı. Amerika Birleşik Devletleri (192) osteoblastoma yayınlarına en büyük katkıyı yapan ülke oldu ve bunu Çin (60), Hindistan (51), İtalya (50) ve Türkiye (46) izledi. 2000 ile 2022 yılları arasındaki tüm yıllarda en çok yayın yapan ülke Amerika oldu. 2022'de özellikle Çin'in yayınları arttı. Amerika Birleşik Devletleri aynı zamanda yayın işbirliğinin (atıf ve ortak yazarlık gibi) en yüksek olduğu ülke oldu. Sonuç: Yayınlanan makale sayısı beklenen düzeyin oldukça altındadır. Son yıllarda Çin'den yapılan bilimsel yayınların sayısı artsa da Amerika Birleşik Devletleri hala ilk sırada yer alıyor.

Keywords

• osteoblastom
• bibliyometrik
• çalışma

Evaluation of Scientific Publications on Osteoblastoma Published between 2000 and 2022

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this bibliometric study was to review the scientific outputs published between 2000 and 2022 on osteoblastoma, a benign aggressive bone tumor. Methods: Scientific research articles on osteoblastoma published between 2000 and 2022 were targeted and data were obtained from the Web of Science database. The data obtained were analyzed and visualized using bibliometric programs. Results: A total of 679 articles about osteoblastoma published between 2000-2022 met our inclusion criteria. Most of the articles on osteoblastoma (n=48) were published in 2020. There was no noteworthy peak in the trend of the number of publications between 2000 and 2022. These articles cited 10366 times in total and 15.27 times per article. At least 62 various countries and regions took part in osteoblastoma publishing research over the past 22 years. The United States (192) was the largest contributor to osteoblastoma publications followed by China (60), India (51), Italy (50), and Turkey (46). The United States was the country that published the most publications in all years between 2000 and 2022. Especially China's publications increased in 2022. The United States was also the country with the highest level of publication collaboration (such as citation and co-authorship) among countries. Conclusion: The number of published articles is well below the expected level. Although the number of scientific publications from China has increased in recent years, the United States still ranks first.

Keywords

• publication
• osteoblastoma
• bibliometric

References

1. 1. Limaiem F, Byerly DW, Mabrouk A, Singh R, Osteoblastoma, Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
2. 2. Mesfin A, Boriani S, Gambarotti M, Bandiera S, Gasbarrini A. Can Osteoblastoma Evolve to Malignancy? A Challenge in the Decision-Making Process of a Benign Spine Tumor. World Neurosurg 2020; 136:150-6.
3. 3. Güneş Z, Ayvaz M. Osteoblastom. Sabah D. İyi Huylu Kemik Tümörleri. 1. Baskı. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2020. p.31-7.
4. 4. Atesok KI, Alman BA, Schemitsch EH, Peyser A, Mankin H. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19(11):678-89. doi: 10.5435/00124635-201111000-00004. PMID: 22052644.
5. 5. Zoccali C, Novello M, Arrigoni F, Scotto di Uccio A, Attala D, Ferraresi V. Osteoblastoma: When the Treatment Is Not Minimally Invasive, an Overview. J Clin Med. 2021 10;10(20):4645. doi: 10.3390/jcm10204645. PMID: 34682768; PMCID: PMC8540995.
6. 6. Zhou F, Zhang T, Jin Y, Ma Y, Li Y, Zeng M, et al. Unveiling the knowledge domain and emerging trends of olfactory dysfunction with depression or anxiety: A bibliometrics study. Front Neurosci. 2022 8;16:959936. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.959936. PMID: 36161166; PMCID: PMC9493192.
7. 7. Zhou F, Zhang T, Jin Y, Ma Y, Xian Z, Zeng M, et al. Worldwide Tinnitus Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Published Literature Between 2001 and 2020. Front Neurol. 2022 31;13:828299. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.828299. PMID: 35173675; PMCID: PMC8841585.
8. 8. Ekici A, Alkan S, Aydemir S, Gurbuz E, Unlu AH. Trends in Naegleria fowleri global research: A bibliometric analysis study. Acta Trop. 2022;234:106603. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2022.106603. Epub 2022 Jul 9. PMID: 35817194.

9. 9. Şahin S, Alkan S. Contribution of Turkey in Heart Transplant Research: A Web of Science Database Search. Exp Clin Transplant 2023;21(2):150-7.
10. 10. Öntürk Akyüz H, Özlü A. Analysis of Publication on Pain in the Field of Nursing by Bibliometric Analysis Method: Analysis of Nursing Studies on Pain. Chron Precis Med Res. 2022. 10;3(2):95-8.
11. 11. Alkan S, Önder T, Oğuz Mızrakçı S. Bibliometric analysis of global rabies research between 1992-2022. Journal of Zoonotic Diseases 2023; 7(1): 217-28.
12. 12. Han G, Liu T, Kang P. Bibliometric analysis of Ewing sarcoma from 1993 to 2022. BMC Cancer 2023;23(1):272.
13. 13. Lin H, Wang X, Huang M, Li Z, Shen Z, Feng J, et al. Research hotspots and trends of bone defects based on Web of Science: a bibliometric analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 8;15(1):463. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01973-3.
14. 14. Markowitz MI, Donato Z, Constantinescu DS, Al-Hardan W, Baron M, Crawford B. Orthopedic approaches for bone sarcoma: A bibliometric review of the 50 most cited papers. J Orthop. 2023 9;38:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.03.006..
15. 15. Kuyubaşı SN, Demirkıran ND, Kozlu S, Öner SK, Alkan S. Global Analysis of Chronic Osteomyelitis Publications with a Bibliometric Approach. Cyprus J Med Sci 2023;8:8-12.
16. 16. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33(1):159–74.
17. 17. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software Survey: VOSviewer, a Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping. Scientometrics 2010; 84(2): 523–38.
18. 18. Huajiao L, Haizhong A, Yue W, Jiachen H, Xiangyun G. Evolutionary features of academic articles co-keyword network and keywords co-occurrence network: Based on two-mode affiliation network. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, 2016 vol. 450(C), pages 657-669.
19. 19. Liu, X., Zhan, F.B., Hong, S., Niu, B.,Liu, Y. A bibliometric study of earthquake research: 1900–2010. Scientometrics, 2012,92, 747-765.
20. 20. AlRyalat SAS, Malkawi LW, Momani SM. Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases. J Vis Exp 2019;(152).
21. 21. Alkan S, Gökçe ON, Şahinoğlu MS. A Quantitative Study of The Most Influential Articles on Cytomegalovirus in Solid Organ Transplantation. Biotech&Strategic Health Res 2022; 6(2): 122-30.
22. 22. Panchbhavi M. Top 100 cited Articles in Charcot Neuroarthropathy. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2022;16(8):102578.
23. 23. Yildirim AC, Dindar Demiray EK, Alkan S. Bibliometric analysis of amebiasis research. J Clin Med Kaz 2022;19(6):38-42.
24. 24. Vahle JL, Sato M, Long GG, Young JK, Francis PC, Engelhardt JA, et al. Skeletal changes in rats given daily subcutaneous injections of recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1-34) for 2 years and relevance to human safety. Toxicol Pathol. 2002;30(3):312-21. doi: 10.1080/01926230252929882.
25. 25. Khan MQ, Shahid A, Uddin MI, Roman M, Alharbi A, Alosaimi W, et al. Impact analysis of keyword extraction using contextual word embedding. PeerJ Comput Sci. 2022;30;8:e967. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.967.
26. 26. Baik HU, Seo BK, Kim GR, Ku JE. A Keyword Analysis Study on Postpartum Obesity Using Big Data. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;20;18(16):8807. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168807.