Research Article

Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk Profiles Across Different Phenotypes of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Volume: 15 Number: 6 November 30, 2025
EN TR

Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk Profiles Across Different Phenotypes of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Abstract

Aim: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a heterogeneous endocrine disorder affecting 5–10% of women of reproductive age and is increasingly recognized as a female-specific cardiometabolic condition. Although metabolic risk factors such as insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and hypertension are well established in PCOS, their distribution across distinct phenotypes remains controversial. Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, 240 women diagnosed with PCOS based on the 2003 Rotterdam criteria and 116 healthy controls aged 18–42 years were evaluated. Patients with PCOS were categorized into four phenotypes: (i) hyperandrogenism + oligo/anovulation + polycystic ovaries (HA+OA+PCO), (ii) hyperandrogenism + oligo/anovulation (HA+OA), (iii) hyperandrogenism + polycystic ovaries (HA+PCO), and (iv) polycystic ovaries + oligo/anovulation (PCO+OA). Anthropometric measurements, hormonal profiles, lipid panels, glucose-insulin parameters, and HOMA-IR indices were compared between groups. Results: Compared with controls, women with PCOS had significantly higher triglycerides, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, total testosterone, DHEAS, and LH/FSH ratio, while HDL cholesterol was lower (all p<0.05). Waist-to-hip ratio was elevated in the PCOS group despite similar BMI. Mean systolic BP was comparable, whereas diastolic BP was slightly lower in PCOS; both SBP and DBP varied significantly across phenotypes. Lipid and hormone profiles did not differ among subgroups. Although glucose and overall HbA1c were similar between PCOS and controls, HbA1c was significantly higher in the PCO+OA subgroup compared with HA+OA. Conclusion: PCOS is associated with adverse cardiometabolic risk factors independent of phenotype. These findings underscore the need for early cardiometabolic screening in all women with PCOS, while larger multicenter studies are warranted to delineate subtle inter-phenotypic variations.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

This retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Namık Kemal University Faculty of Medicine, between January 2010 and October 2013.

References

  1. 1- Deswal R, Narwal V, Dang A, Pundir CS. The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome: a brief systematic review. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2020;13(4):261-71.
  2. 2- Melson E, Davitadze M, Malhotra K, Mousa A, Teede H, Kempegowda P, et al. A systematic review of models of care for polycystic ovary syndrome highlights the gap in the literature, especially in developing countries. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1217468.
  3. 3- Teede HJ, Misso ML, Costello MF, Dokras A, Laven J, Moran L, et al. Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(9):1602-18.
  4. 4- Carmina E, Nasrallah MP, Guastella E, Lobo RA. Characterization of metabolic changes in the phenotypes of women with polycystic ovary syndrome in a large Mediterranean population from Sicily. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2019;91(4):553-60.
  5. 5- Baptiste CG, Battista MC, Trottier A, Baillargeon JP. Insulin and hyperandrogenism in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2010;122(1-3):42-52.
  6. 6- Luque-Ramírez M, Escobar-Morreale HF. Polycystic ovary syndrome as a paradigm for prehypertension, prediabetes, and preobesity. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2014;16(12):500.
  7. 7- Moran L, Teede H. Metabolic features of the reproductive phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15(4):477-88.
  8. 8- Shroff R, Syrop CH, Davis W, Van Voorhis BJ, Dokras A. Risk of metabolic complications in the new PCOS phenotypes based on the Rotterdam criteria. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(5):1389-95.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Clinical Sciences (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

November 29, 2025

Publication Date

November 30, 2025

Submission Date

October 2, 2025

Acceptance Date

November 23, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 15 Number: 6

APA
Aksu, E., & Gül, A. (2025). Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk Profiles Across Different Phenotypes of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Journal of Contemporary Medicine, 15(6), 307-314. https://doi.org/10.16899/jcm.1794476
AMA
1.Aksu E, Gül A. Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk Profiles Across Different Phenotypes of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. J Contemp Med. 2025;15(6):307-314. doi:10.16899/jcm.1794476
Chicago
Aksu, Erson, and Abdulaziz Gül. 2025. “Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk Profiles Across Different Phenotypes of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome”. Journal of Contemporary Medicine 15 (6): 307-14. https://doi.org/10.16899/jcm.1794476.
EndNote
Aksu E, Gül A (November 1, 2025) Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk Profiles Across Different Phenotypes of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Journal of Contemporary Medicine 15 6 307–314.
IEEE
[1]E. Aksu and A. Gül, “Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk Profiles Across Different Phenotypes of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome”, J Contemp Med, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 307–314, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.16899/jcm.1794476.
ISNAD
Aksu, Erson - Gül, Abdulaziz. “Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk Profiles Across Different Phenotypes of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome”. Journal of Contemporary Medicine 15/6 (November 1, 2025): 307-314. https://doi.org/10.16899/jcm.1794476.
JAMA
1.Aksu E, Gül A. Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk Profiles Across Different Phenotypes of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. J Contemp Med. 2025;15:307–314.
MLA
Aksu, Erson, and Abdulaziz Gül. “Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk Profiles Across Different Phenotypes of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome”. Journal of Contemporary Medicine, vol. 15, no. 6, Nov. 2025, pp. 307-14, doi:10.16899/jcm.1794476.
Vancouver
1.Erson Aksu, Abdulaziz Gül. Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk Profiles Across Different Phenotypes of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. J Contemp Med. 2025 Nov. 1;15(6):307-14. doi:10.16899/jcm.1794476