Ergonomics-Related and Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in A High-Hazard Factory in Hatay Region

Year 2023, Volume: 13 Issue: 1, 36 - 41, 31.01.2023

Mehmet Erdem Nazan Savaş

https://doi.org/10.16899/jcm.1176447

Abstract

Objectives: The most common work-related diseases are musculoskeletal system disease. This study aims to determine the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) in a high-hazard factory and to determine sociodemographic, occupational, and ergonomic risks.
Methods: The research is cross-sectional and was conducted in a high-hazard factory, in Hatay, in 2017. The research population was all factory employees (N=190), and it was aimed to reach the whole population. Of the (97.3%), 185 employees participated in the study. Anthropometric measurements, the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Scale, the observation-based Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) Ergonomic Risk Analysis Scale, and a questionnaire developed by the researchers are used for data collection. In the statistical analyses p<0,05was accepted as significant.
Results According to the Cornell Scale, the frequency of WMSDs was 58.9%. The most common WMSDs were in the lumbar region (34.1%). According to the RULA Scale, 31.9% of the employees had 3rd and 4th-degree ergonomic risk. There were linear relationships between the Cornell Waist Score and each of the three RULA scores (p<0.001). The risk factors for WMSDs in the lumbar region were the presence of chronic disease (OR=5.35), hand tool use (OR=2.63), not having had a work accident (OR=0.04) and RULA scores (OR=1.61),
Conclusion: Approximately one-third of the high-hazard factory employees had a high ergonomic risk. WMSDs existed in more than half of the employees. As the ergonomic risk increases, WMSDs increase.

Keywords

Ergonomy, RULA, Work Related Musculo-Skeletal System Disorders

Supporting Institution

The financial support of the study was covered by Scientific Researches and Projects Coordination Unit of Mustafa Kemal University

Project Number

16445

Hatay’da Çok Tehlikeli Sınıfta Bir Fabrikada Ergonomi ve İş ile İlişkili Kas İskelet Sistemi Yakınmaları

Abstract

Amaç: İşle ilgili en sık görülen hastalıklar kas-iskelet sistemi hastalıklarıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, çok tehlikeli sınıfta yer alan bir fabrikada işe bağlı kas-iskelet sistemi rahatsızlıklarının İKİSR sıklığını ve sosyodemografik, iş ve ergonomik riskleri belirlemektir.
Yöntem: Araştırma kesitsel tipte olup 2017 yılında yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın evrenini fabrika çalışanlarının tamamı (N=190) oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmaya 185 fabrika çalışanı (%97,3) katılmış olup, verilerin toplanmasında antropometrik ölçümler, Cornell Kas İskelet Sistemi Rahatsızlık Anketi ve Hızlı Üst Ekstremite Değerlendirmesi (RULA) ergonomik risk analizi ölçeğine dayalı gözlem kullanılmıştır. İstatistiksel analizlerde p<0,05 anlamlı olarak kabul edildi.
Bulgular: Cornell Anketine göre İKİSR sıklığı %58,9 idi. En sık İKİSR bel bölgesindeydi (%34,1). RULA Ölçeğine göre çalışanların %31,9'u 3. ve 4. Derece ergonomik risk altındadır. Cornell Bel Skoru ile üç RULA skorunun her biri arasında doğrusal ilişkiler vardı. Bel bölgesinde İKİSR için risk faktörleri; kronik hastalık varlığı (OR=5,35), el aletleri kullanımı (OR=2,63), RULA puanı (OR=1,61) ve iş kazası geçirmemiş olmaktır. (OR=0,04).
Sonuç: Çalışanların yaklaşık üçte birinde yüksek ergonomik risk, yarısından fazlasında ise İKİSR bulunmaktadır. Ergonomik risk arttıkça İKİSR de artar.

Keywords

ergonomi, iş ile ilişkili kas iskelet sistemi yakınmaları, RULA

Project Number

16445

References

• 1. Türkkan A. İşe bağlı kas-iskelet sistemi hastalıkları ve sosyoekonomik eşitsizlikler. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2009;35(2):101-6.
• 2.Cabeças JM. Occupational musculoskeletal disorders in Europe: impact, risk factors and preventive regulations. 2006.
• 3. Hooper G, Sher JL, Mulligan PJ. Work-related disorders of the upper limb.The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume. 2002;84(3):322-3.
• 4. Kilbom s, Armstrong T, Buckle P, Fine L, Hagberg M, Haring-Sweeney M, et al. Musculoskeletal Disorders: Work-related Risk Factors and Prevention. International journal of occupational and environmental health. 1996;2(3):239-46.
• 5.Melhorn JM, Gardner P. How we prevent prevention of musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2004(419):285-96.
• 6. Buckle P. Ergonomics and musculoskeletal disorders: overview. Occupational medicine. 2005;55(3):164-7.
• 7. Nazmi B. Mesleksel kas iskelet sistemi hastalıkları. İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Dergisi 2007;34:10-3.
• 8. Stellman JM. Encyclopaedia of occupational health and safety: International Labour Organization; 1998.
• 9.Punnett L, Wegman DH. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the epidemiologic evidence and the debate. Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology. 2004;14(1):13-23.
• 10. Yildirim Y, Gunay S, Karadibak D. Identifying factors associated with low back pain among employees working at a package producing industry. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation. 2014;27(1):25-32.
• 11. Devereux J, Vlachonikolis I, Buckle P. Epidemiological study to investigate potential interaction between physical and psychosocial factors at work that may increase the risk of symptoms of musculoskeletal disorder of the neck and upper limb. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2002;59(4):269-77.
• 12. RodriGuez Y, ViÑA S, Montero R. A Method for Non-experts in Assessing Exposure to Risk Factors for Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders—ERIN.Industrial Health. 2013;51(6):622-6.
• 13. Erdinc O, Hot K, Ozkaya M. Turkish version of the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Work. 2011;39(3):251-60
• 14. Mc Atamney L, Nigel Corlett E. RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Applied ergonomics. 1993;24(2):91-9.
• 15. Roman-Liu D. Comparison of concepts in easy-to-use methods for MSD risk assessment. Applied ergonomics. 2014;45(3):420-7.
• 16. Telles S, Dash M, Naveen K. Effect of yoga on musculoskeletal discomfort and motor functions in professional computer users. Work. 2009;33(3):297-306.
• 17. Fagarasanu M, Kumar S. Musculoskeletal symptoms in support staff in a large telecommunication company. Work. 2006;27(2):137-42.
• 18. Rudakewych M, Valent-Weitz L, Hedge A, editors. Effects of an ergonomic intervention on musculoskeletal discomfort among office workers. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting; 2001: SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.
• 19.Menzel NN, Brooks SM, Bernard TE, Nelson A. The physical workload of nursing personnel: association with musculoskeletal discomfort. International journal of nursing studies. 2004;41(8):859-67.
• 20. Tamrooiy FR, Javar MA, Salimi S, Mohammadpour H, Avakh A, Faizollahi S. A survey on prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in dentists of Tehran and their posture assessment by RULA method. Int Res J Appl Basic Sci. 2015;9(5):666-71.
• 21. Mean V, Abdullah NS, Dawal SZM, Aoyama H, Sothea K, editors. Investigation on Musculoskeletal Symptoms and Ergonomic Risk Factors at Metal Stamping Industry. Advanced Engineering Forum; 2013: Trans Tech Publ.
• 22. Jansen K, Luik M, Reinvee M, Viljasoo V, Ereline J, Gapeyeva H, et al. Musculoskeletal discomfort in production assembly workers. ActaKinesiologiaeUniversitatisTartuensis. 2012;18:102-10.
• 23. Choobineh A, Tabatabaee SH, Behzadi M. Musculoskeletal problems among workers of an Iranian sugar-producing factory. International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE. 2009;15(4):419-24.
• 24. Yildirim Y, Gunay S, Karadibak D. Identifying factors associated with low back pain among employees working at a package producing industry. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation. 2014;27(1):25-32.
• 25. Wijnhoven HA, de Vet HC, Picavet HS. Explaining sex differences in chronic musculoskeletal pain in a general population.Pain. 2006;124(1-2):158-66.
• 26. Leclerc A, Gourmelen J, Chastang J-F, Plouvier S, Niedhammer I, Lanoë J-L. Level of education and back pain in France: the role of demographic, lifestyle and physical work factors. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health.2009;82(5):643-52.
• 27. Karimi N, Moghimbeigi A, Motamedzade M, Roshanaei G. Evaluation of Related Risk Factors in Number of Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Carpet Weavers in Iran. Safety and Health at Work. 2016;7(4):322-5.
• 28. Nahit E, Hunt I, Lunt M, Dunn G, Silman A, Macfarlane G. Effects of psychosocial and individual psychological factors on the onset of musculoskeletal pain: common and site-specific effects. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2003;62(8):755-60.