Research Article

The Effect of Psychological Contract Breach on Organizational Silence: The Moderating Effect of Psychological Capital

Number: 70 December 20, 2024
EN

The Effect of Psychological Contract Breach on Organizational Silence: The Moderating Effect of Psychological Capital

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of psychological capital in the relationship between perceptions of psychological contract breach and organizational silence. According to the results of the analysis, changes in psychological capital play an important role in the effect of psychological contract breach perception on defensive silence. Additionally, the sample was divided into 3 clusters according to psychological capital levels through cluster analysis to determine the regulatory effects of psychological capital. For each cluster, the effects of psychological contract breach perception on the independent variables of acquiescent, defensive, and prosocial silence were examined. As a result of the cluster analysis, it was observed that psychological contract breach perception caused a significant decrease in all types of silence (acquiescent, defensive, and prosocial) for the group with medium-level psychological capital. Psychological contract breach perception (PCB) at all capital levels (high, medium, and low) has been shown to reduce prosocial silence. These findings provided valuable information about psychological capital and its level, which is a unique resource for organizations.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdi, S. and Hosseini, S. R. (2015). Evaluation of the relationship between psychological capital and organizational silence (Case study: Employees of the branches of saderat bank in the city of Sanandaj). Asian Journal of Research in Banking and Finance Banking and Finance, 5(5), 1--10. https://doi.Org/10.5958/2249-7323.2015.00061.9 google scholar
  2. Allen, M. R. (2009). The affect of organızatıonal change by type and frequency on employee psychologıcal contracts (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/pqdtglobal/docview/305162235/70AB4D9ACA394D33PQ/1?accountid=8403 google scholar
  3. Al-Khlaifat, O. and AlZoubi, M. (2021). Organizational and Human Silence Factors and Their Impact on Decision-making in the Public School Sector. Dirasat:HumanandSocialSciences,48(4), 408-423. google scholar
  4. Antonaki, X. and Trivellas, P. (2014). Psychological contract breaches and organizational commitment in the Greek banking sector: the mediation effect of job satisfaction. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 148(2), 354-361. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v8n10p102 google scholar
  5. Arunachalam, T. (2020). The interplay between psychological contract breaches, stress, and job outcomes during organizational restructuring. Industrial and Commercial Training, 53(1), 15-28, doi:10.1108/ICT-03-2020-0026. google scholar
  6. Avey, J. B., Hughes, L.W., Norman, S. M., & Luthans, K. W. (2008). Using positivity, transformational leadership, and empowerment to combat employee negativity. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 29(2), 110-126. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730810852470 google scholar
  7. Avey, J. Luthans F., & Jensen, S. (2009). Psychological capital: A positive resource to combat employee stress and turnover. Human Resource Management, 48(5), 677-693. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20294 google scholar
  8. Aytaç, Ö. (2007). Türk Bürokrasi Kültürü: Yönetsel ve Toplumsal Bir Perspektif”, In R. Erdem & C.Ş. Çukur (Eds), Kültürel Bağlamda Yönetsel-Örgütsel Davranış. (pp. 135-182). 1. Baskı, Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları. google scholar google scholar

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Sociology (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 20, 2024

Submission Date

November 22, 2022

Acceptance Date

May 16, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Number: 70

APA
Durdağ, F. M., & Naktiyok, A. (2024). The Effect of Psychological Contract Breach on Organizational Silence: The Moderating Effect of Psychological Capital. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 70, 11-27. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2024-1207879
AMA
1.Durdağ FM, Naktiyok A. The Effect of Psychological Contract Breach on Organizational Silence: The Moderating Effect of Psychological Capital. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 2024;(70):11-27. doi:10.26650/JECS2024-1207879
Chicago
Durdağ, Fatma Merve, and Atılhan Naktiyok. 2024. “The Effect of Psychological Contract Breach on Organizational Silence: The Moderating Effect of Psychological Capital”. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, nos. 70: 11-27. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2024-1207879.
EndNote
Durdağ FM, Naktiyok A (December 1, 2024) The Effect of Psychological Contract Breach on Organizational Silence: The Moderating Effect of Psychological Capital. Journal of Economy Culture and Society 70 11–27.
IEEE
[1]F. M. Durdağ and A. Naktiyok, “The Effect of Psychological Contract Breach on Organizational Silence: The Moderating Effect of Psychological Capital”, Journal of Economy Culture and Society, no. 70, pp. 11–27, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.26650/JECS2024-1207879.
ISNAD
Durdağ, Fatma Merve - Naktiyok, Atılhan. “The Effect of Psychological Contract Breach on Organizational Silence: The Moderating Effect of Psychological Capital”. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 70 (December 1, 2024): 11-27. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2024-1207879.
JAMA
1.Durdağ FM, Naktiyok A. The Effect of Psychological Contract Breach on Organizational Silence: The Moderating Effect of Psychological Capital. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 2024;:11–27.
MLA
Durdağ, Fatma Merve, and Atılhan Naktiyok. “The Effect of Psychological Contract Breach on Organizational Silence: The Moderating Effect of Psychological Capital”. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, no. 70, Dec. 2024, pp. 11-27, doi:10.26650/JECS2024-1207879.
Vancouver
1.Fatma Merve Durdağ, Atılhan Naktiyok. The Effect of Psychological Contract Breach on Organizational Silence: The Moderating Effect of Psychological Capital. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 2024 Dec. 1;(70):11-27. doi:10.26650/JECS2024-1207879