The Shadow of Crime: Impact on Prison Experiences and Recidivism Tendency

Abstract

This study aims to understand the impact of prison experiences on recidivism. A phenomenological approach was adopted, total of 15 people were interviewed and a semi-structured interview form was used. Network connections and snowball sampling were used to reach the participants. For this reason, we first attempted to understand the meanings attributed by the participants to concepts such as crime, criminality, and guilt. Prison experiences included daily functioning, adaptation processes and communication with inmates and staff. The impact of the participants’ prison experiences on their post-release lives and recidivism was analyzed. It was observed that the process of adaptation to prison differed according to the types of crimes, length of sentence and experiences. Prison experiences are not a reason for reoffending in themselves. Individual differences, familial reasons, criminal motivation and external factors related to post-prison conditions such as labeling and poverty, also play key roles in recidivism. The effect of the criminal subculture in prison on recidivism has also been observed. Prison experiences can trigger psychological problems, and after release, factors related to stigmatization, poverty, housing, employment, financial income, exclusion and official supervision make it difficult to adapt to social life.

Keywords

• Sociology of crime
• Prison
• Prison experiences
• Community adaptation
• Recidivism

References

1. Clemmer, D. (1970). The Prison Community. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. google scholar
2. Deady, C. W. (2014). Incarceration and Recidivism: Lessons from Abroad. http://www.antoniocasella.eu/nume/Deady_march2014.pdf google scholar
3. Esposito, M. (2014). The Rehabilitation Role of Punishment in Prisons in Italy. Theoretical Development and Sociological Considerations. Sociology Mind, (4), 183-191. google scholar
4. Foucault, M. (2015). Hapishanenin Doğuşu. (M. A. Kılıçbay, Trans. 6. bs). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi. google scholar
5. Green, D. P., & Winik, D. (2010). Using Random Judge Assignments to Estimate the Effects of Incarceration and Probation on Recidivism Among Drug Offenders. Criminology 48(2), 357-387. google scholar
6. Harding, D. J. and Harris, H. M. (2020). After Prison: Navigating Adulthood in the Shadow of the Justice System. New York: Russel Sage Found. google scholar
7. Kızmaz, Z. (2007). Cezaevi ve Hapsetmenin Suçu Engellemedeki Etkisi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (17), 1-25. google scholar
8. Livingston, J. (1996). Crime and Criminology. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. google scholar

9. Loeffler, C. E. and Nagin, D. S. (2022). The Impact of Incarceration on Recidivism. Annual Review of Criminology, 5, 133-152. google scholar
10. Mueller-Smith, M. (2015). The Criminal and Labor Market Impacts of Incarceration. Unpublished Working Paper, 18. google scholar
11. Nagin, D. S. and Snodgrass, G. M. (2013). The Effect of Incarceration on Reoffending: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Pennsylvania. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 29(4), 601-642. google scholar
12. Öztürk, B., & Erdem, M. R. (2006). Uygulamalı Ceza Hukuku ve Güvenlik Tedbirleri Hukuku. (9. bs). Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları. google scholar
13. Rose, P., Beebr, J. & Parker, D. (1995). Academic Rigour in the Lived Experience of Researchers Using Phenomenological Methods in Nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 21(6), 1123-1129. google scholar
14. Van Manen, M. (2007). Phenomenology of Practice. Phenomenology&Practice. 1(1), 11-30. google scholar
15. Walker, N. (1987). The Unwanted Effects of Long-term Imprissonment. Anthony E. Bottoms and Roy Light (Ed). In Problems of Long-Term Imprisonment, (pp. 183-199). London UK. google scholar
16. Wilson, A. (2015). A Guide to Phenomenological Research. Nursing Standard, 29(34), 38-43. google scholar