Digital Services and the Elderly: Practices, Challenges, and Strategies

Year 2025, Issue: 72, 122 - 143, 15.12.2025

Abdurrahman Kültür

https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2025-1698951

Abstract

This research seeks to understand the position of elderly individuals in the digitalization process by using the concepts of the digital divide, digital immigrant identity, and digital capital. This study investigates how these individuals engage with digital services, the nature of their usage patterns, the primary challenges they face, the influence of such services on their everyday lives, their adaptation to digital technologies, and the coping strategies they employ in response to their disadvantaged situations. The study specifically explores the experiences of 46 individuals aged 65 and above in Ankara, Turkiye, who use e-health, e government, and digital banking services. A qualitative methodology was adopted, and the participant group comprised elderly individuals living in Ankara who had used at least one of the aforementioned services. The data for the study were collected via semi-structured interviews with these participants. These interviews were analyzed using the MAXQDA24 software through descriptive analysis for a detailed evaluation. The research findings point out the factors affecting the ability of elderly individuals to engage with the digital world, which is closely linked to their level of digital capital and, in turn, shapes both their strategies of adaptation and their risk of exclusion from digital services. Findings reveal that low levels of digital capital can hinder elderly individuals’ ability to use digital services effectively, often leading them to rely on help from their immediate social networks. The findings of the study also point out that the COVID-19 pandemic significantly contributed to the digital adoption of older adults, fostering improvements in digital literacy, though often dependent on social support networks.

Keywords

digitalization , aging , digital capital , digital fear , age-related digital divide

Ethical Statement

The ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University with the official letter dated 22.02.2024 and numbered E.250394.

References

• Abbey, R., & Hyde, S. (2009). No country for older people? Age and the digital divide. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 7(4), 225-242. google scholar
• Abu-Shanab, E., & Al-Jamal, N. (2015). Exploring the gender digital divide in Jordan. Gender, Technology and Development, 19(1), 91-113. google scholar
• Aissaoui, N. (2021). The digital divide: a literature review and some directions for future research in light of COVID-19, Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 71 (8/9), 686-708. google scholar
• Amber, H., & Chichaibelu, B. B. (2023). Narrowing the gender digital divide in Pakistan: Mobile phone ownership and female labor force participation. Review of Development Economics, 27, 1354-1382. google scholar
• Antonio, A., & Tuffley, D. (2014). The gender digital divide in developing countries. Future Internet, 6(4), 673-687. google scholar
• Antonio, A. & Tuffley, D. (2015). Bridging the age-based digital divide. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence (IJDLDC), 6(3), 1-15. google scholar
• Bercovitz, K., & Pagnini, F. (2016). Mindfulness as an opportunity to narrow the grey digital divide. In D. Villani, P. Cipresso, A. Gaggioli, & G. Riva (Eds.), Integrating Technology in positive psychology practice (pp. 216-230). Harvard: Information Science Reference. google scholar
• Brannstrom, I. (2012). Gender and digital divide 2000-2008 in two Low-income economies in Sub-Saharan Africa: Kenya and SomaLia in official statistics. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 60-67. google scholar
• CarLo, S., & Nanetti, S. (2024). COVID-19 emergency: Boosting digitaLization and a missed opportunity for acquiring digitaL Literacy in the oLd popuLation. Stepp: Socialine Teorija, Empirija, Politika Ir Praktika, 28(28), 54-70. google scholar
• Cooper, J., & KugLer, M. B. (2009). The digital divide: The role of gender in human-computer interaction. In A. Sears & J. A. Jacko (Eds.), Human-computer interaction (pp. 21-34). London: CRC Press. google scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage Publishing. google scholar
• Cruz-Jesus, F., Vicente, M. R., Bacao, F., & OLiveira, T. (2016). The education-reLated digitaL divide: An anaLysis for the EU-28. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 72-82. google scholar
• Demoussis, M., & GiannakopouLos, N. (2006). Facets of the digital divide in Europe: Determination and extend of internet use. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(3), 235-246. google scholar
• Deursen, J., & Dijk, A. (2018). The first-LeveL digital divide shifts from inequaLities in physicaL access to inequalities in material access. New Media and Society, 21(2). google scholar Deursen, J. A., & Dijk, J. (2010). Internet skills and the digitaL divide. New Media and Society, 13(6), 893-911. google scholar
• Dijk, J. (2006). DigitaL divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34(4-5), 221-235. google scholar
• Dijk, J. (2017). DigitaL divide: Impact of access. Patrick Rössler (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Media Effect. New Jersey: Wiley Publishing. google scholar
• Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Cambridge: PoLity Press. google scholar
• Dijk, J. A. M. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. London: Sage PubLications. google scholar
• Dimaggio, P., Hargittai, E., CeLeste, C., & Shafer, S. (2004). Digital inequlity: From access to differentiated use. Kathryn M. Neckerman (Ed.). Social Inequality, içinde (pp. 355-400). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. google scholar
• Enoch, Y., & Söker, Z. (2006). Age, gender, ethnicity and the digital divide: university students’ use of web-based instruction. Öpen Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 21(2), 99-110. google scholar
• Fenley, S. (2010). Navigation and visualization techniques in e-learning and Internet research. In M. Ebner & M. Schiefner (Eds.), Looking toward the future of technology-enhanced education (pp. 55-88). New York: Information Science Reference. google scholar
• Fong, W. L. M. (2009). Digital divide between urban and rural regions in China. The Electroninc Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 36(6), 1-12. google scholar
• Friemel, T. N. (2016). The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media & Society, 18(2), 313-331. google scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2009). The role of income inequality in a multivariate cross-national analysis of the digital divide. Social Science Computer Review, 27 (1), 41-58. google scholar
• Furuholt, B., & Kristiansen, S. (2007). A rural-urban digital divide? Regional aspects of internet use in Tanzania. The Electroninc Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 31(6), 1-15. google scholar
• Gilleard, C., & Higgs, P. (2008). Internet use and the digital divide in the English longitudinal study of ageing. European Journal of Ageing, 5(3), 233. google scholar
• Glaser, B. ve Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Transaction Publishers. google scholar
• Hamelink, C. J. (2000). The ethics of cyberspace. London: Sage Publications. google scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2001). Second-Level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7(4). google scholar
• Huang, J., & Russell, S. (2006). The digital divide and academic achievement. Electronic Library, 24(2), 160-173. google scholar
• Huxhold, O., Hees, E., & Webster, N. J. (2020). Towards bridging the grey digital divide: changes in internet access and its predictors from 2002 to 2014 in Germany. European Journal of Ageing, 17, 271-280. google scholar
• Ignatow, G., & Robinson, L. (2017). Pierre Bourdieu: Theorizing the digital, Information, Communication & Society, 20(7), 950-966. google scholar
• Jessamy, C. W. (2011). Without a net: Librarians bridging the digital divide. Oxford: Libraries Unlimited. google scholar
• Lagace, M., Charmarkeh, H., Zaky, R., & FirzLy, N. (2016). From psychological to digital disengagement: ExpLoring the Link between ageism and the ‘grey digital divide’. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 18(1), 65-75. google scholar
• Lentz, R. G. & Oden, M. (2001). Digital divide or digitaL opportunity in the Mississippi DeLta Region of the US. Telecommunications Policy, 25(5), 291-313. google scholar
• Loges, W. E., & Jung, J. Y. (2001). ExpLoring the digitaL divide: Internet connectedness and age. Communication Research, 28(4), 536-562. Martin, S. (2003). Is the digitaL divide really cLosing? A critique of inequaLity measurement in nation onLine. IT&Society Journal, 4(1), 1-13. Martin, S. P., & Robinson, J. P. (2007). The income digital divide: Trends and predictions for LeveLs of internet use. Social Problems, 54(1), 1-22. google scholar
• Martînez-Alcalâ, C. I., Rosales-Lagarde, A., Perez-Perez, Y. M., Lopez-Noguerola, J. S., Bautista-Dîaz, M. L., & Agis-Juarez, R. A. (2021, July). The effects of COVID-19 on the digitaL Literacy of the eLderLy: norms for digitaL incLusion. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6). Frontiers Media SA. google scholar
• Martins Van Jaarsveld, G. (2020). The effects of COVID-19 among the elderly population: a case for closing the digital divide. Frontiers in psychiatry, 11. google scholar
• Mason, O. J., Stevenson, C., & Freedman, F. (2014). Ever-present threats from information technology: the Cyber-Paranoia and Fear Scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1-6. google scholar
• Meng, Q., & Li, M. (2002). New economy and ICT development in China. Information Economics and Policy, 14(2), 275-295. google scholar
• Millward, P. (2003). The “grey digital divide”: Perception, exclusion and barriers of access to the Internet for older people. First Monday, 8 (7). google scholar
• Morris, A. (2007). E-literacy and the grey digital divide: A review with recommendations. Journal of Information Literacy, 2(3), 1-17. google scholar
• Mubarak, F., & Suomi, R. (2022). Elderly forgotten? Digital exclusion in the information age and the rising grey digital divide. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Örganization, Provision, and Financing, 59. google scholar
• National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (1995). Falling through the net: A survey of the "have nots" in rural and urban America. https://www.ntia.gov/page/falling-through-net-survey-have-nots-rural-and-urban-america. google scholar
• National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (1998). Falling through the net II: New data on the digital divide. https:// www.ntia.gov/report/1998/falling-through-net-ii-new-data-digital-divide. google scholar
• Neves, B. B., Waycott, J., & Malta, S. (2018). Old and afraid of new communication technologies? Reconceptualising and contesting the “age-based digital divide’’. Journal of Sociology, 54(2), 236-248. google scholar
• Niehaves, B., & Plattfaut, R. (2014). Internet adoption by the elderly: employing IS technology acceptance theories for understanding the age-related digital divide. European Journal of Information Systems, 23, 708-726. google scholar
• Notten, N., Peter, J., Kraaykamp, G., &Valkenburg, P. M. (2009). Research note: Digital divide across borders—A cross-national study of adolescents’ use of digital technologies. European Sociological Review, 25(5), 551-560. google scholar
• O’Hara, K., ve Stevens, D. (2006). Power, poverty and digital divide. Oxford: Oneworld Publications. google scholar
• Park S. (2017). Digital capital. London: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
• Parks, J. B. (2013). The digital divide. San Diego: Reference Point. google scholar
• Peacock, S. E., & Künemund, H. (2007). Senior citizens and Internet technology: Reasons and correlates of access versus non-access in a European comparative perspective. European Journal of Ageing, 4(4), 191-200. google scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. google scholar
• Purba, H. & Hutabarat, F. (2022). The role of level of income and education on digital divide: A look at Jakarta work force. Jornal Terapan Ilmu Manajemen dan Bisnis, 5(2), 107-116. google scholar
• Ragnedda, M. (2018). Conceptualizing digital capital. Telematics and Informatics, 35, 2366-2375. google scholar
• Riddlesden, D., & Singleton A. D. (2014). Broandband speed equity: a new digital divide?. Applied Geography, 52, 25-33. google scholar
• Robinson, J. P., DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2003). New social survey perspectives on the digital divide. It & Society, 1(5), 1-22. google scholar
• Robinson, L. (2009). A taste for necessary. Information, Communication & Society, 12(4), 488-507. google scholar
• Scheerder, A., Deursen, J. A., & Dijk, J. (2017). Determinants of internet skills, use, and outcomes: A systematic review of the second and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1607-1624. google scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2006). Digital division or digital decision? A study of non-users and low-users of computers. Poetics, 34(4-5), 273-292. google scholar
• Servon, L. J. (2002). Bridging the digital divide: technology, community, and public policy. Oxford: Blachwell Publishing. google scholar
• Thoma, J. (2023). An urban-rural divide (or not?): Small firm Location and the use of digital Technologies. Journal of Rural Studies, 97, 214-223. google scholar
• Wang, P. Y. (2013). Examining the digital divide between rural and urban schools: Technology availability, teachers’ integration Level and students’ perception. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 2(2), 127-139. google scholar
• Witte, J. C., & Mannon, S. E. (2010). The internet and social inequalities. New York: Routledge Publishing. google scholar
• Wong, Y. C., Ho, M. K., Chen, H., Gu, D., & Zeng, Q. (2015). DigitaL divide challenges of children in Low income families: The case of Shanghai. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 33(1), 53-27. google scholar
• Yates, S. J. ve LockLey, E. (2020). DigitaL engagement and cLass: Economic, social, and cuLtural capital in a digital age. Simeon J. Yates ve RonaLd E. Rice (Eds). Oxford Handbook of Digital Technology and Society. New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
• Youssef A. B., Dhamani, M. & Ragni, L. (2022). ICT use, digital skills and students’ academic performance: ExpLoring the digital divide. Information, 13(3), 1-19. google scholar
• Zillien, N., & Hargittai, E. (2009). Digital distinction: Status specific types of internet usage. Social Science Quarterly 90(2), 274-291. google scholar