EN
Symbolic Capital and Privilege in the Ottoman Provinces: The Case of Seydişehir
Abstract
This article uses Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of the “social field” to analyze the production and contestation of hierarchy in a premodern imperial province. It argues that symbolic capital—derived from sacred lineage or state-sanctioned service—functioned as a productive and convertible asset, not merely as a static honorific. Using the pre-modern Ottoman town of Seydişehir as a case study, the analysis moves beyond the traditional askerî (ruler)-reaya (ruled) dichotomy to examine the strategies of the intermediate strata. Based on archival sources, the study maps the local social field, tracing how groups such as sayyids and zawiya sheikhs converted symbolic capital into economic capital and how the value of this capital was negotiated and challenged. The findings demonstrate that privilege was not a fixed state grant but a relational status, contingent on continuous struggles for recognition and vulnerable to devaluation by central authorities or nullification by coercive force. The study’s primary contribution is a sociological reconceptualization of the Ottoman provincial order as a dynamic field of symbolic power, offering a methodological model for applying sociological theory to historical archives.
Keywords
References
- Cevdet Dahiliye (C. DH.), no. 80/3960. google scholar
- Cevdet Darphane (C. DRB.), no. 1/37; no. 4/152; no. 6/264; no. 41/2047; no. 57/2831. google scholar
- Cevdet Maliye (C. ML.), no. 588/24210. google scholar
- Karaman Ahkâm Defteri (A.DVNS.AHK.KR.d.), vol. 1, p. 182/4; voL. 3, p. 156/3; vol. 3, p. 168/1; vol. 4, p. 293/1; vol. 6, p. 359/1; vol. 7, p. 136/1; vol. 9, p. 25; vol. 10, p. 21/1; vol. 13, p. 130, 133, 156/1, 156/4; vol. 16, p. 23/1; vol. 29, p. 159. google scholar
- Konya Şer’iyye Sicili (KŞS), vol. 54. google scholar
- Maliyeden Müdevver Defter (MAD.d.), vol. 241, p. 3a. google scholar
- Şikâyet Defteri (A.DVN.ŞKT.d.), vol. 14, p. 98; vol. 72, p. 49; vol. 118, p. 442. google scholar
- Tapu Tahrir Defteri (TT. d.), vol. 40; vol. 387; vol. 455; vol. 968; vol. 1135. google scholar
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Economic Sociology, Sociology (Other)
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Publication Date
December 15, 2025
Submission Date
June 10, 2025
Acceptance Date
November 21, 2025
Published in Issue
Year 2025 Number: 72
APA
Değerli Velet, A. (2025). Symbolic Capital and Privilege in the Ottoman Provinces: The Case of Seydişehir. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 72, 160-173. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2025-1716563
AMA
1.Değerli Velet A. Symbolic Capital and Privilege in the Ottoman Provinces: The Case of Seydişehir. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 2025;(72):160-173. doi:10.26650/JECS2025-1716563
Chicago
Değerli Velet, Ayşe. 2025. “Symbolic Capital and Privilege in the Ottoman Provinces: The Case of Seydişehir”. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, nos. 72: 160-73. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2025-1716563.
EndNote
Değerli Velet A (December 1, 2025) Symbolic Capital and Privilege in the Ottoman Provinces: The Case of Seydişehir. Journal of Economy Culture and Society 72 160–173.
IEEE
[1]A. Değerli Velet, “Symbolic Capital and Privilege in the Ottoman Provinces: The Case of Seydişehir”, Journal of Economy Culture and Society, no. 72, pp. 160–173, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.26650/JECS2025-1716563.
ISNAD
Değerli Velet, Ayşe. “Symbolic Capital and Privilege in the Ottoman Provinces: The Case of Seydişehir”. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 72 (December 1, 2025): 160-173. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2025-1716563.
JAMA
1.Değerli Velet A. Symbolic Capital and Privilege in the Ottoman Provinces: The Case of Seydişehir. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 2025;:160–173.
MLA
Değerli Velet, Ayşe. “Symbolic Capital and Privilege in the Ottoman Provinces: The Case of Seydişehir”. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, no. 72, Dec. 2025, pp. 160-73, doi:10.26650/JECS2025-1716563.
Vancouver
1.Ayşe Değerli Velet. Symbolic Capital and Privilege in the Ottoman Provinces: The Case of Seydişehir. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 2025 Dec. 1;(72):160-73. doi:10.26650/JECS2025-1716563