From the Internet of Things to the Objectification of the Human Being: Sociopolitical Construction of Technology and a Critique of Society 5.0

Abstract

The Japanese government announced Society 5.0 on November 7, 2016 as a development project with the goal of a technology-themed and human-centered society with the aim of improving human lives. Japan explained the main mission of this program as facilitating and serving human life through technology and contributing to a comfortable and long life. This announcement discussed the organic bond between Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0; the goals of Society 5.0; the aspects affecting, changing, and transforming individuals and society within this framework; the new relationship networks and cultural elements; and their impact on values and meaning, individualization, and objectification of the individual. Since the inception of the idea of panopticon, the control, inspection, and surveillance of public and social order have been treated as a culturally romantic and engineering critique of technology in the connection of the power-individual relationship. This article examines if Society 5.0 will be able to accomplish a postmodern structure through a new culture (i.e., acculturation). In the search for answers to these questions, this article analyzes the situations that would occur in place of human relations and the structures that will be changed in the targeted social order.

Keywords

• Society 5.0
• internet of things (IoT)
• artificial intelligent
• algorithms
• objectification

References

1. Bağcı, C. (2016). Online society and visual socialities: A sociological analysis on social media and new serfdoms of free digital world. Journal of International Social Research, 9(42), 1029-1036. google scholar
2. Balta, E. (2019). Tedirginlik çağı: Şiddet aidiyet ve siyaset üzerine. Istanbul, Turkey: Iletisim Publishing. google scholar
3. Bauchspies, W. K., Croissant, J. & Restiuo, S. (2019). Science, technology and society: A sociological approach (B. Kuryel, Ü. Tatlıcan, & B. Balkız, Trans.). Istanbul, Turkey: Phoenix Publishing House. google scholar
4. Baudrillard, J. (2018). The transparency of evil: Essays on extreme phenomena (A. Ergüden , Trans.; 7th ed.). Istanbul, Turkey: Ayrinti Yayinlari Publishing House. google scholar
5. Bauman, Z. (2007). Liquid times: Living in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. google scholar
6. Bauman, Z. (2018). Society under siege (A. E. Pilgir, Trans.). Istanbul, Turkey: Ayrinti Yayinlari Publishing House. google scholar
7. Bauman, Z. (2020). On education (A. E. Pilgir, Trans.). Istanbul, Turkey: Ayrinti Yayinlari Publishing House. google scholar
8. Bayhan, V. (2002). Risk society. East-West Magazine, 19(3), 187-202. google scholar

9. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London, UK: Sage Publication. google scholar
10. Beese, B. (2018). The Fourth Age Smart Robots, Conscious Computers, and the Future of Humanity. (z-lib.org). epub, (e-book). google scholar
11. Bentham, J., Watkin, C. P., & Werret, S. (2019). Panopticon: The power of the eye (B. Çoban & Z. Özarslan, Trans.). Istanbul, Turkey: Su Publishing House. google scholar
12. Broadbent, E., Gougoulis, J., Luı, N., Pota, V., & Simons, J. (2017). What’s the worlds young people think and feel, generation z: Global citizenship survey. London, UK: Varkey Foundation. google scholar
13. Center for Research and Development Strategy. (2016, November 7). Future services & societal systems in society 5.0, center for research and develeopment strategy. Japan Science and Technology Center, CRDS-FY2016-WR-13. google scholar
14. Deguchi, A., Hirai, C., Matsuoka, H., Nakano, T., Oshima, K., Tai, M., & Tani, S. (2020). Society 5.0: A people-centric super-smart society. Singapore: Springer Open. google scholar
15. Esgin, A. (2013). Sociological orientation of the era of manufactured uncertainties: Discussions of “risk society” rooted in Ulrich Beck and Anthony Giddens. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 12(3), 683-696. google scholar
16. Fundamental Rights Agency. (2014). Handbook on European law on asylum, borders and migration. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights: Belgium. Retrieved from https://fra.europa.eu/en/themes/asylum-migration-and-borders google scholar
17. Fukuyama, M. (2018). Society 5.0: Aiming for a new human-centered society. Japan Spotlight, 27, 47-50. google scholar
18. Gardels, N. (2000). At century’s end: Great minds reflect on our times. A.Soljenitsin, I.İllich, C.Fuentes, B.Herry, A.Levvy, H.Toffler, O.Paz, J.Baudrillard, O.Stone, A.Moritina, D.Rockfeller, N.Mandela and others. (B. Ç. Dişbudak, Trans.). Istanbul, Turkey: Turkey İş Bank Cultural Publications. google scholar
19. Gardingen, V. T. (2018). Industry 4.0 and soceity 5.0- Comparing socio-political initiatives in Germany and Japan. Retrieved from http://politikperspektive.co.uk/articles/a-gardingen-nov-18.html google scholar
20. Graber, D. (2018). Bullshit jobs: A theory. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. google scholar
21. Granrath, L. (2017). Japan’s society 5.0: Going beyond industry 4.0. Retrieved from https://www.japanindustrynews. com/2017/08/japans-society-5-0-going-beyond-industry-4-0/ google scholar
22. Göka, E. (2020). Yalnızlık ve umut. Istanbul, Turkey: Kapı Yayınları. google scholar
23. Harari, Y. N. (2018). 21 Lessons for the 21st century (S.Siral, Trans.). Istanbul, Turkey: Collective Book. google scholar
24. Hass, M. & Thrsnert, O. (2020). Strategic Trends 2020. Zurich: Center for Security Studies google scholar
25. Hitachi and University of Tokyo Lab. (2018). Society 5.0: A people-centric super-smart society. Singapore: Springer Open. google scholar
26. JBF, Japan Business Federation. (2016). Towards realization of the new economy and society: Reform of the economy and society by the deepening of “society 5.0”. Retrieved from https://www.i-scoop.eu/industry-4-0/ society-5-0/ google scholar
27. JBF, Japan Business Federation. (2018). Policy proposal for society 5.0- Co-creating the future. Retrieved from http://www.keidanren.or.jp/en/policy/2018/095_outline.pdf google scholar
28. Kaku, M. (2018). The future of humanity (A. C. Çevik, Trans.; 2nd ed.). Ankara, Turkey: METU Press. google scholar
29. Kato, K. (2020). Society 5.0 at “DAVOS”. Retrived from thttp://www.hitachi.com/rev/column/gf/vol02/index.html google scholar
30. Kösemihal, N. Ş. (1971). Durkheim sosyolojisi. Istanbul, Turkey: Remzi Publishing House. google scholar
31. Kutlu, M. (2020). Kalbin sesi ile toprağa dönüş. Istanbul, Turkey: Dergah Publishing. google scholar
32. Lim, T. W. (2019). Section on industrial revolution 4.0. tech giants and digitized societies. Sinagapore: Palgrave. google scholar
33. Ministry of Development (2015). Öncelikli Dönüşüm Programları. Ankara, Turkey google scholar
34. Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of internet freedom. New York, NY: Public Affairs. google scholar
35. Olgaard, Daniel Moller (2020). Reflections on Naomi Klein’s Pandemic Shock Doctrine. google scholar
36. Retrived from https://www.e-ir.info/2020/09/15/reflections-on-naomi-kleins-pandemic-shock-doctrine/ google scholar
37. Orwell, G. (2011). Nineteen eighty-four (C. Üster, Trans.; 31st ed.). Istanbul, Turkey: Can Publishing. google scholar
38. Önday, O. (2019). Japan>s society 5.0: Going beyond industry 4.0. Business andEconomics Journal, 10(2), 1-6. doi: 10.4172/2151-6219.1000389 google scholar
39. Öztuna, B. (2019). Toplum 5.0: Süper akıllı toplum. Istanbul, Turkey: Ekin Publishing. google scholar
40. Reese, B. (2108). The fourth age: Smart robots, conscious computers and the future of humanity. New York, NY: Atria Books. google scholar
41. Salgues, B. (2018). Society 5.0, industry of future, technologies, methods and tools. London, UK: ISTE Ltd. & Wiley. google scholar
42. Schwanholz J., Graham T., & Stoll, P. T. (2018). Managing democracy in the digital age: Internet regulation, social media use, and online civic engagement. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG. google scholar
43. Sim, D. (2019). Soft society: Building density for everyday life. Washington, D.C: Island Press Books. google scholar
44. Sorokin, P. (1972). Social philosophies of an age of crisis (M. Tuncay., Trans.). Ankara, Turkey: Bilgi Publishing House. google scholar
45. Wallerstein, İ. (2000). The end of the world as we know it (T. Birkan, Trans.). Istanbul, Turkey: Metis Publishing. google scholar
46. Wallerstein, İ. & Hopkins, T. K. (2000). The age of transition trajectory of the world system 1945-2025 (N. Ersoy & E. Abadoğlu, Trans.). Istanbul, Turkey: Avesta Publishing. google scholar
47. Werrett, S. (1999). Potemkin and the panopticon: Samuel Bentham and the architecture of absolutism in eighteenth century Russia. Journal of Bentham Studies, 2, 1-25. google scholar