INTERNALIZATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION PROCESS: AN EVALUATION IN TERMS OF EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 22 - 45, 05.05.2025

Yiğit Kaymak

Öz

Evolutionary theory has revealed that technological change is a field of research that should be examined through evolutionary concepts, and has striven to internalize the relevant processes. This approach models technological development and innovation phenomena based on concepts that can lead to non-equilibrium situations such as uncertainty, change, bounded rationality, path dependence, cumulative learning, heterogeneity and natural selection. In doing so, it is determined that the relevant processes have micro dynamics and are embedded in institutional structures. In light of all this, this study reveals that evolutionary approaches develop a different style of analysis than the New Growth Theories, which tried to internalize R&D and innovation in the same years, and go beyond simple causality relations. Thus, it is understood that technological development and innovation occur as a result of numerous intertwined mechanisms and interactions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Innovation , Technological Development , Evolutionary Economics , Institutional Structure

TEKNOLOJİK GELİŞME VE İNOVASYON SÜRECİNİN İÇSELLEŞTİRİLMESİ: EVRİMCİ DİNAMİKLER ÜZERİNDEN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Öz

Evrimci teori, teknolojik değişimi ve inovasyon süreçlerini evrimci dinamikler üzerinden incelenmesi gereken birer araştırma alanı olduğunu ortaya koymuş ve ilgili süreçleri içselleştirme çabalarına girişmiştir. Bu yaklaşım, teknolojik gelişim ve inovasyon olgularını belirsizlik, değişim, sınırlı rasyonellik, patika bağımlılığı, birikimli öğrenme, heterojenite ve doğal seçilim gibi denge dışı durumlara yol açabilen kavramlara dayalı olarak modellemiştir. Bu şekilde, ilgili süreçlerin mikro dinamikler taşıdığı ve kurumsal yapılara içerilmiş olduğu belirlenmiştir. Tüm bunların ışığında, bu çalışmada, evrimci yaklaşımların yine aynı dönemlerde Ar-Ge ve inovasyonu içselleştirmeye çalışan Yeni Büyüme Teorilerinden farklı bir analiz tarzı geliştirdiği ve basit nedensellik ilişkilerinin dışına çıktığı ortaya koyulmuştur. Dolayısıyla, teknoloji ve inovasyonun çok sayıda iç içe geçmiş mekanizma ve etkileşimler sonucunda gerçekleştiği anlaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İnovasyon , Teknolojik Gelişme , Evrimci İktisat , Kurumsal Yapı

Kaynakça

• Aktan, C. C. ve Yay, S. (2018) “Evrimci Kurumsal İktisat: Tarihsel Temelleri ve Katkıda Bulunan Başlıca Düşünürler”
• C. C. Aktan (der.) Yeni İktisat Okulları ve İktisadi Düşünce, Ankara, Seçkin Yayınları.
• Alchian, A. (1950) “Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory”, Journal of Political Economy, 58(3):211-221.
• Arthur, W. B. (1989) “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns and Lock-in by Historical Events”, The Economic Journal, 99(394):116-131.
• Aslanoğlu, E. (2001) “Ulusal Yenilenme Sistemleri Çerçevesinde Türkiye’de Teknoloji Politikaları”, Mülkiye Dergisi, 25(230):119-152.
• Bakırtaş, T. (2020) “Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de Ekonomik Kalkınma: Küresel Kalkınma Odaklı Sorunlar Yeni Model Arayışları”, Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Balzat, M. (2006)” An Economic Analysis of Innovation Extending the Concept of National Innovation Systems”, London: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Basalla, G. (2000) “Teknolojinin Evrimi”, Çev. Cem Soydemir, Ankara: TÜBİTAK Yayınları.
• Burgelman, R. A, Christensen, C. ve Wheelwright, S. C. (2004) “Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation”, 4th Edition, McGraw-Hill Education,
• Cameron, G. (1996) “Innovation and Economic Growth”, CEP Discussion Papers, 277, London.
• Cantner, U. ve Hanusch, H. (1999) “Heterogeneity and Evolutionary Change: Empirical Conception, Findings and Unresolved Issues”, Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsreihe, 190, Universität Augsburg.
• Carlsson, B. ve Stankicwicz, R. (1991) “On the Nature, Function and Composition of Technological Systems”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1(2):93-118.
• Chang, Y. C. ve Chen, M. H. (2004) “Comparing Approaches to Systems of Innovation: The Knowledge Perspective,” Technology in Society, 26(1):17-37.
• Christine, N.E. (2024) “Models of Innovation by Generations”, African Journal of Emerging Issues, 6(7):1-15.
• Cohendet, P. ve Llerena, P. (1997) “Learning, Technical Change, and Public Policy: How to Create and Exploit Diversity” Edquist, C. (eds.) System of Innovation-Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, London, Pinter. Colander, D., Holt, R. ve Rosser, B. (2004) “The Changing Face of Mainstream Economics”, Review of Political Economy, 16(4):485-499.
• Coombs, R., Saviotti, P. ve Walsh, V. (1987) “Economics and Technological Change”, London: Macmillan Press.
• Dahlman, C. ve Westphal, L.E. (1981) “The Meaning of Technological Mastery in Relation to Transfer of Technology”, The Annals of American Academy, 458:12-26.
• David, P. (1985) “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY”, The American Economic Review, 75(2): 332-337. Demir, Ö. (1996) “Kurumcu İktisat”, Ankara: Vadi Yayınları.
• Dosi, G. ve Orsenigo, L. (1988) “Coordination and Transformation: An Overview of Structures, Behaviour and Change in Evolutionary Environments” Dosi et al. (eds.) Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter Publishers.
• Dosi, G. ve Nelson, R. (1994) “An Introduction to Evolutionary Theories in Economics”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 4(3):153-172.
• Edquist, C. (1997) “System of Innovation-Technologies, Institutions and Organizations”, London: Pinter.
• Edquist, C. ve Hommen, L. (1999) “Systems of Innovation: Theory and Policy for the Demand Side”, Technology in Society, 21(1):63-79.
• Ekelund, B. R. ve Hébert, F. R. (2014) “A History of Economic Theory & Method”, Sixth Edition, Long Grove-Illinois, Waveland Press.
• Eren, E. (2015) “(Makro) İktisatta Gelişmeler: Yeni Bir (Makro) İktisada Doğru mu?”, Yildiz Social Science Review, 1(1):1-35.
• Erkan, H. (1998) “Bilgi Toplumu ve Ekonomik Gelişme”, 4. Baskı, Ankara: İş Bankası Yayınları.
• Eser, U. (1993) “Türkiye’de Sanayileşme”, Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
• Fagerberg, J. (1994) “Technology and International Differences In Growth Rates”, Journal of Economic Literature, 32(3):1147-1175.
• Fagerberg, J. (2003) “Schumpeter and the Revival of Evolutionary Economics: An Appraisal of the Literature, Journal of Evolutionary Economics”, 13(2):125-159.
• Fagerberg, J. ve Sapprasert, K. (2011) “National Innovation Systems: The Emergence of a New Approach”, Science and Public Policy, 38(9):669–679.
• Fransman, M. (1984) “Technological Capability in the Third World: an Overview and Introduction to Some of the Issues Raised in this Book” Fransman, M. ve King, K. (eds.) Technological Capability in Third World, London, Macmillan Press.
• Freeman, C. (1987) “Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons From Japan”, London: Pinter Publishers.
• Garcia, C. (1998) “Managing Innovation from an Evolutionary Perspective”, The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 9(2):5-15.
• Genç, S. Y. ve Yardımcı, E. M. (2016) “Neoklasik İktisadi Düşünceye Eleştirel Bir Bakış: Thorstein Bunde Veblen”, Balkan Journal of Social Sciences, 5(9):106-114.
• Göker, A. (2000) “Niçin Bilim ve Teknoloji Politikası, Niçin Ulusal: Tarihsel Gelişim Ülke Örnekleri ve Türkiye”, Sosyal Demokrasi Derneği Söyleşileri, Ankara, Mart 2000.
• Gökten, K. (2006) “İktisatta Evrim Düşüncesi ve Evrimci İktisadın Teknolojiye Yaklaşımı”, Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 6(11):24-44.
• Grubb, M., Poncia, A. ve Pasqualino, R. (2024) “Dynamics of the Energy Transition: Innovation, Transition Economics, Path Dependency, and Decision Making”, World Bank Working Paper, 7/11/2024.
• Hanusch, H. ve Pyka, A. (2007) “Principles of Neo-Schumpeterian Economics”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31(2):275-289.
• Hodgson, G. (1992) “Thorstein Veblen and post-Darwinian Economics”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 16(3):285-301.
• Hodgson, G. (1996) “The Challenge of Evolutionary Economics”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 152(4):697-706.
• Hodgson, G. (1998a) “On the Evolution of Thorstein Veblen's Evolutionary Economics”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22(4):415-431.
• Hodgson, G. (1998b) “Evolutionary and Competence based Theories of the Firm”, Journal of Economic Studies, 25(1):25-56.
• Hodgson, G. (1998c) “The Approach of Institutional Economics”, Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1):166-192.
• Isaksen, A., Martin R. ve Trippl, M. (2018) “New Avenues for Regional Innovation Systems and Policy”, Isaksen et al. (eds.) New Avenues for Regional Innovation Systems -Theoretical Advances, Empirical Cases and Policy Lessons, Springer International Publishing.
• İşman, A. (2001) “Teknoloji Felsefesinin Temelleri”, Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1:1-19.
• Kaiserfeld, T. (2015) “Beyond Innovation: Technology, Institution and Change as Categories for Social Analysis”, First Edition, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Karahan, Ö. (2019) “Türkiye’de İnovasyon Politikası Uygulamasının Gelişimi” R. Kutlu Korlu ve G. Duman (eds.) Ekonomi ve Siyaset Üzerine Yazılar, Bursa, Ekin Yayınevi.
• Keresztes, G. (2020) “Innovation and Models of Innovation: A Brief Insight into the Definition and Different Models of Innovation”, International Scientific Journal "Innovations", 2:53-55.
• Kibritçioğlu, A. (1998) “İktisadi Büyümenin Belirleyicileri ve Yeni Büyüme Modellerinde Beşeri Sermayenin Yeri”, A.Ü. Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 53(1-4):207-230.
• Kuznets, S. (1930) “Secular Movements in Production and Prices”, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
• Kuznets, S. (1973) “Modern Economic Growth: Findings and Reflections”, The American Economic Review, 63(3):247-258.
• Lacasa, D. (2018) “Technology and Institutions in neo-Schumpeterian and Original Institutional Thinking”, Association for Evolutionary Economics (ASSA) Conference Paper, Philadelphia, January 5-7, 2018.
• Lall, S. ve Teubal, M. (1998) “Market-Stimulating Technology Policies in Developing Countries: A Framework with Examples from East Asia”, World Development, 26(8):1369-1385.
• Lenger, A. (2007) “Kurumsal İktisat ve Eleştirel Gerçeklik” E. Özveren (der.) Kurumsal İktisat, 1. Baskı, Ankara, İmge Kitapevi.
• List, F. (1841) “The National System of Political Economy”, Londra: Longmans.
• Lundvall, B-Å. (1992) “Introduction” Lundvall, B-Å. (eds.) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Londra, Pinter.
• Martin, R. ve Sunley, P. (2006) “Path Dependence and Regional Economic Evolution”, Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4):395-437.
• Matur, E. (2007) “Kurumsal İktisat Açısından Firma Kuramı” E. Özveren (der.) Kurumsal İktisat, Ankara, İmge Kitapevi.
• McKelvey, M. (1997) “Using Evolutionary Theory to Define Systems of Innovation” Edquist, C. (eds.) System of Innovation-Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, London, Pinter.
• Mckelvey, M. (1998) “Evolutionary Innovations: Learning, Entrepreneurship and the Dynamics of the Firm”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 8(2):157-175.
• Metcalfe, J. S. (1994) “Evolutionary Economics and Technology Policy”, The Economic Journal, 104(425):931-944.
• Metcalfe, J. S. (1995) “Technology Systems and Technology Policy in an Evolutionary Framework”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1):25-46.
• Metcalfe, J. S. (1997) “Science Policy and Technology Policy in a Competitive Economy”, International Journal of Social Economics, 24(7/8/9):723-740.
• Metcalfe, J. S. (2005) “Evolutionary Concepts In Relation to Evolutionary Economics” Dopfer, K. (eds.) The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics, Newyork, Cambridge University Press.
• Metcalfe, J. S. ve Georghiou, L. (1998) “Equilibrium and Evolutionary Foundations of Technology Policy”, STI Review, 22:75-100.
• Nelson, R. (1981) “Research on Productivity Growth and Productivity Differences: Dead ends and New Departures”, Journal of Economic Literature, 19(3):1029-1064.
• Nelson, R. (1995) “Recent Evolutionary Theorizing about Economic Change”, Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1):48-90.
• Nelson, R. (2008) “Economic Development from the Perspective of Evolutionary Economic Theory”, Oxford Development Studies, 36(1):9-21.
• Nelson, R. ve Winter, S. G. (1974) “Neoclassical vs Evolutionary Theories or Econonıic Growth: Critique and Prospectus”, The Economic Journal, 84(336):886-905.
• Nelson, R. ve Winter, S. G. (1977) “In Search of Useful Theory of Innovation”, Research Policy, 6(1): 36-76.
• Nelson, R. ve Winter, S. G. (1982) “An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change”, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Nelson, R. ve Winter, S. G. (2002) “Evolutionary Theorizing in Economics”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(2):23–46.
• Nelson, R. ve Rosenberg, N. (1993) “Technical Innovation and National Systems” Nelson, R. (eds.) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, New York, Oxford University Press.
• OECD (1999) “Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach”, OECD Proceedings, Paris: OECD.
• O’Donnell, L. A. (1973) “Rationalism, Capitalism and Entrepreneur: The Views of Veblen and Schumpeter”, History of Political Economy, 5(1):199-214.
• Özveren, E. (1998) “An Institutionalist Alternative to Neoclassical Economics?” Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 21(4):469-530.
• Özveren, E. (2007) “Kurumsal İktisat: Aralanan Karakutu” E. Özveren (der.) Kurumsal İktisat, Ankara, İmge Kitapevi.
• Robert, V. ve Yoguel, G. (2022) “Exploration of Trending Concepts in Innovation Policy”, Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, 3(2):259-292.
• Rothwell, R. (1994) “Towards the Fifth‐generation Innovation Process”, International Marketing Review, 11(1):7-31
• Rutherford, M. (1984) “Thorstein Veblen and the Process of Institutional Change”, History of Political Economy, 16(3):331-348.
• Rutherford, M. (2001) “Institutional Economics: Then and Now”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(3):173-194.
• Samuels, W. (1977) “Technology Vis-à-Vis Institutions in the JEI: A Suggested Interpretation”, Journal of Economic Issues, 11(4):871-895.
• Saviotti, P. P. (1997) “Innovation Systems and Evolutionary Theories” Edquist, C. (eds.) System of Innovation-Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, London, Pinter.
• Saviotti, P. P. ve Metcalfe, J. S. (1991) “Present Development and Trends in Evolutionary Economics” Saviotti, P. P. ve Metcalfe, J. S (eds.) Evolutionary Theories of Economic and Technological Change Present Status and Future Prospects, London, Routledge.
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1939) “Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of The Capitalist Process”, New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1934) “The Theory of Economic Development”, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Simmie, J. (2012) “Path Dependence and New Technological Path Creation in the Danish Wind Power Industry”, European Planning Studies, 20(5):753-772.
• Smith, K. (2000) “Innovation as a Systemic Phenomenon: Rethinking The Role of Policy”, Enterprise & Innovation Management Studies, (1)1:73-102.
• Soyak, A. (1996) “Teknolojik Gelişme ve Özelleştirme”, İstanbul: Kavram Yayınları.
• Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G. ve Koch, J. (2005) “Organizational Paths: Path Dependency and Beyond”, 21st EGOS Colloquium, Berlin, June 30-July 2.
• Şaylan, G. (1995) “Değişim, Küreselleşme ve Devletin Yeni İşlevi”, 1.Baskı, Ankara: İmge Yayınevi.
• Tuncel, C. O. (2008) “Heteredoks Bir Mikro İktisat Teorisine Doğru: Evrimci İktisadın Teknolojik Gelişme Yaklaşımı ve Firmanın Doğası”, Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 167:1-32.
• Utterback, M. J. (1974) “Innovation in Industry and the Diffusion of Technology”, Science, 183(4125):620-626.
• Veblen, T. (1908) “On the Nature of Capital”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 22(4):517-542.
• Veblen, T. (1961) “The Place of Science in Modern Civilization and Other Essays”, New York: Russell &Russell.
• Veblen, T. (1898) “Why is Economics not an Evolutionary Science”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 12(4):373-397.
• Verspagen, B. (2004) “Innovation and Economic Growth” Fagerberg, J. et al. (eds.) Handbook of Innovation, Newyork, Oxford University Press.
• Walker, D. (1977) “Thorstein Veblen's Economic System”, Economic Inquiry, 15(2):213-237.
• Williamson, O.E. (1990) “A Comparison of Alternative Approaches to Economic Organization”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 146( 1):61-71.
• Witt, U. (2002) “How Evolutionary is Schumpeter’s Theory of Economic Development?”, Industry and Innovation, 9(1/2):7-22.