Web 2.0 Destekli Kelime Öğretimi: Beşinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Başarı ve İngilizce Dersine Yönelik Tutumları

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, Powtoon ve Kahoot ile zenginleştirilen kelime öğretiminin ortaokul beşinci sınıf öğrencilerinin İngilizce kelime okuma ve dinleme başarıları ile İngilizce dersine yönelik tutumları üzerindeki etkisi incelenmiştir. Araştırmada açımlayıcı sıralı karma yöntem deseni kullanılmıştır. Nicel aşama, deney ve kontrol gruplu ön test–son test yarı deneysel desenle yürütülürken, nitel aşama durum çalışması olarak yapılandırılmıştır. Katılımcılar, Kırşehir il merkezindeki bir devlet ortaokulunda öğrenim gören 32 beşinci sınıf öğrencisinden oluşmuştur. Deney grubunda kelime öğretimi Powtoon ve Kahoot etkinlikleriyle desteklenirken, kontrol grubunda öğretim programına dayalı mevcut öğretim süreci izlenmiştir. Nicel veriler her iki gruptan toplanmış, nitel veriler ise deney grubundaki öğrencilerin uygulamaya ilişkin görüşlerinden elde edilmiştir. Veriler, “Kelime Bilgisi Başarı Testi”, “İngilizce Dersine Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği” ve “yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu” kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Nicel analizlerde bağımsız ve bağımlı örneklemler t testleri, nitel verilerin analizinde ise betimsel analiz kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, kelime okuma başarısı, kelime dinleme başarısı ve İngilizce dersine yönelik tutum açısından deney grubu lehine anlamlı farklılıklar olduğunu göstermiştir. Görüşme sonuçları, öğrencilerin araçları eğlenceli, dikkat ve ilgi çekici ve motive edici bulduklarını; ayrıca bu araçların derse katılımı, sınıf içi etkileşimi ve kalıcılığı desteklediğini göstermiştir.

Keywords

• Web 2.0 araçları
• Kahoot
• Powtoon
• kelime öğretimi
• İngilizce dersine yönelik tutum

Web 2.0-Supported Vocabulary Instruction: Fifth-Grade Students’ Achievement and Attitudes toward the English Course

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of vocabulary instruction enriched with Powtoon and Kahoot on fifth-grade middle school students’ English vocabulary reading and listening achievement and their attitudes toward the English course. The study used an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. The quantitative phase followed a pretest–posttest quasi-experimental design with experimental and control groups, while the qualitative phase was structured as a case study. Participants were 32 fifth-grade students from a public middle school in the city center of Kırşehir. In the experimental group, vocabulary instruction was supported with Powtoon and Kahoot activities, whereas the control group followed regular curriculum-based instruction. Quantitative data were collected from both groups, and qualitative data were obtained from experimental group students’ views on the implementation. Data were gathered using the “Vocabulary Achievement Test”, the “Attitude Scale toward the English Course”, and “a semi-structured interview form”. Independent- and paired-samples t-tests were used for quantitative analysis, and descriptive analysis was used for qualitative data. The results showed significant differences favoring the experimental group in vocabulary reading achievement, vocabulary listening achievement, and attitudes toward the English course. Interview results showed that students found the tools enjoyable, attention- and interest-grabbing, and motivating, and stated that these tools supported participation in the course, classroom interaction, and learning retention.

Keywords

• Web 2.0 tools
• Kahoot
• Powtoon
• vocabulary instruction
• attitude toward the English course

References

1. Açıkgöz, Z. (2019). Effects of two different gamified student response systems on EFL students’ vocabulary achievement and intrinsic motivation. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Bahçeşehir University, Institute of Educational Sciences, İstanbul.
2. Agustina, D. P., Bilqis, M., & Imamyartha, D. (2026). The effect of using Powtoon animated videos assisted by teacher explanation on seventh-grade students’ vocabulary achievement. JEELS Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies, 13(1), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v13i1.5139
3. Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education, (11), 71-80.
4. Akkuş, İ., Özhan, U., & Çakır, H. (2021). Student views on the use of online student response systems: The kahoot! Case. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 25, 243-262. https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.25.10.
5. Al-Malki, M. A. (2020). Quizlet: an online application to enhance efl foundation students’ vocabulary acquisition at rustaq college of education, oman. Arab World English Journal Special Issue on CALL (6), 332-343.
6. Allen, J. (1999). Words, words, words: teaching vocabulary in grades 4-12. New York, Maine: Stenhouse Publications.
7. Altunkaya, H. (2015). The relationship between reading anxiety and reading comprehension skills of learners of turkish as a foreign language. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), İnönü University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Malatya.
8. Andres, V. D. (2002). The influence of affective variables on EFL/ESL learning and teaching. The Journal of The İmagination in Language Learning and Teaching, 7, 1-5.

9. Anjaniputra, A. G., & Salsabila, V. A. (2018). The merits of quizlet for vocabulary learning at tertiary level. Indonesian EFL Journal, 4(2), 1-11.
10. Baş, G. (2012). Attitude scale for elementary english course: validity and reliability study. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 411-424.
11. Başar, T., & Şahin, L. (2022). Technology integration in teaching English as a foreign language: A content analysis study. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 5(1), 204-222. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.972577.
12. Bensalem, E. (2018). The impact of whatsapp on EFL students’ vocabulary learning. Arab World English Journal, 9(1), 23-38.
13. Bozkurt-Türk, H. (2019). The effect of kahoot! As a student response system on the attitudes and success of university students in learning English vocabulary. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Düzce University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Düzce.
14. Chaiyo, Y., & Nokham, R. (2017). The effect of Kahoot, Quizizz and Google Forms on the student's perception in the classrooms response system. In 2017 International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology (ICDAMT), 01-04 March 2017 (pp. 178-182). Chiang Mai, Thailand.
15. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
16. Çakır, S. (2019). The effect of five different gamified student response applications on students’ vocabulary development and intrinsic motivation in EFL. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Bahçeşehir University, Institute of Educational Sciences, İstanbul.
17. Çaparlar, İ. (2021). The effects of online applications and learner opinions on english vocabulary learning: quizlet application. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Balıkesir University, Institute of Social Sciences, Balıkesir.
18. Çelik, T. (2021). Sosyal bilgilerde dijital dönüşümün yansımaları [Reflections of digital transformation in social studies]. Ankara: Anı Publishing.
19. Çinar, İ. (2019). The effects of Quizlet online vocabulary application on secondary school students’ vocabulary learning and attitudes towards English. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Eskişehir.
20. Dellos, R. (2015). Kahoot! A digital game resource for learning. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(4), 49-52.
21. Demirel, Ö. (2021). Yabancı dil öğretimi. dil pasaportu, dil dosyası, dil biyografisi [Foreign language teaching. language passport, language file, language biography]. (12th ed.). Ankara: Pegem Academy.
22. Demirpolat, B. C. (2015). Türkiye'nin yabancı dil öğretimiyle imtihanı: Sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri [The challenge for Turkey's foreign language teaching: Problems and solutions]. İstanbul: Turkuaz Matbaacılık Publishing.
23. EF Education First. (2025). EF English Proficiency Index. Retrieved from https://www.ef.com/wwen/epi/
24. Egbert, J. (2005). CALL essentials. principles and practice in CALL classrooms. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
25. Eker, S. (2011). Çağdaş Türk dili [Contemporary Turkish language]. Ankara: Grafiker Publishing.
26. Ertan, K. (2020). Investigating achievement, attitude and motivation in a gamified English course. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Hacettepe University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
27. Fakeye, D. O. (2010). Students’ personal variables as correlates of academic achievement in English as a second language in Nigeria. Journal of Social Sciences, 22(3), 205-211.
28. Fimbriani, S. C. (2016). The use of teaching media powtoon to improve eleventh grade of language class students’ writing ability at sma negeri 1 malang. (Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis), University of Muhammadiyah Malang.
29. Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
30. Gündoğdu, M. M., & Korucu, A. T. (2018). The effects of collaborative learning developed with blog technology on reflecting thinking skills towards problem solving and motivation levels and on academic success of secondary school students. Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty, 2(3), 196-226.
31. Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English (New ed.). England: Pearson Education Limited.
32. Hosseini, S. B., & Pourmandnia, D. (2013). Language learners’ attitudes and beliefs: Brief review of the related literature and frameworks. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4(4), 63-74.
33. Irawan, T. R. S., & Firdaus, M. (2025). Analyzing the use of Quizizz in vocabulary development for junior high school students. Al-Irsyad: Journal of Education Science, 4(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.58917/aijes.v4i2.170
34. Işık, A. (2008). Where do the mistakes in our foreign language education come from? Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 4(2), 15-26.
35. İşcan, A. (2018). Yabancı dil öğretimi ve yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğretiminin tarihçesi [History of foreign language teaching and teaching turkish as a foreign language]. In A. Şahin (Ed.). Yabancı Dil Olarak Türkçe Öğretimi/Kuramlar, Yaklaşımlar, Etkinlikler [Teaching Turkish as a Foreign Language: Theories, Approaches, and Practice] (pp.3-28). (2nd ed.). Ankara: Pegem Academy.
36. Karadağ, Ö. (2021). Kelime öğretimi [Teaching Vocabulary]. (3rd ed.). Ankara: Pegem Academy.
37. Karatay, H. (2007). Teaching vocabulary. Gazi University, Journal of Gazi Faculty of Education, 27(1), 141-153.
38. Kırkıç, K. A., & Boray, T. (2017). An innovative technique in teaching and learning english for turkey: Boray technique (BT). Journal of Education, Theory and Practical Research, 3(3), 13-29.
39. Kurtoğlu, U. (2021). Vocabulary teaching through Web 2.0 tools: a comparison of Kahoot! And Quizlet. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Trakya University, Institute of Social Sciences, Trakya.
40. Kuş, B., & Alişah, A. (2025). Using Quizlet application to improve academic vocabulary learning in Turkish preparatory schools. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 168–172. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2025.7.3.17
41. Lale, K. (2025). The effect of a teaching programme based on the use of Wordwall application, one of the Web 2.0 tools, on vocabulary teaching in 5th grade English lesson. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Sivas.
42. Lennartsson, F. (2008). Students' motivation and attitudes towards learning a second language: British and Swedish students' points of view. Retrieved from http://lnu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:206523/FULLTEXT01.pdf
43. Levy, M. (1997). CALL: Context and conceptualization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. Licorish, S. A., Owen, H. E., Daniel, B., & George, J. L. (2018). Students’ perception of Kahoot’s influence on teaching and learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(1), 1-23.
45. Liu, C.C., Wang, P. C., & Tai, S. J. D. (2016). An analysis of student engagement patterns in language learning facilitated by web 2.0 technologies. ReCALL, 28(2), 104-122.
46. Medina, E. G., & Hurtado, C. P. (2017). Kahoot! a digital tool for learning vocabulary in a language. Revista Publicando, 12(1), 441-449.
47. MoNE (2013). Amendment to the Secondary School Part of the Weekly Course Schedule for Primary Education Institutions (Primary and Secondary Schools). Retrieved from https://www.memurlar.net/common/news/documents/572077/ek-1-28052013-22.pdf
48. MoNE. (2018). English language curriculum (Primary and lower secondary school grades 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8). Ankara: Ministry of National Education.
49. MoNE (2022). 2022 Central Examination Report for Secondary Education Institutions (Education Analysis and Evaluation Reports Series). Retrieved from https://cdn.eba.gov.tr/icerik/2022/06/2022_LGS_rapor.pdf
50. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Oblinger, D. (2005). Learners, learning & technology. EDUCAUSE Review, 40(5), 67-75.
52. O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved from https://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.htmlm
53. Özdemir, O. (2026). How digital gamified learning enhances vocabulary learning and retention in EFL classrooms: An experimental study using Kahoot! Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 15(1), 88–112. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.1667817
54. Özer, B., & Korkmaz, C. (2016). Factors affecting student achievement in foreign language teaching. EKEV Academy Journal, 67, 59-84.
55. Pishghadam, R., & Zabihi, R. (2012). Crossing the threshold of Iranian TEFL. Applied Research in English, 1(1), 57-71.
56. Putri, A. S. A., & Akhiriyah, S. (2024). The use of web-based vocabulary games to improve junior high school students’ vocabulary mastery in reading. Journal of English Teaching, 10(3), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v10i3.6090
57. Saraçoğlu, G. (2019). Opinions of high school students and teachers on kahoot use. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Research, 13(29), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.29329/mjer.2019.210.1
58. Scott, D., & Beadle, S. (2014). Improving the effectiveness of language learning: CLIL and computer assisted language learning. Education and Training. Retrieved from https://www.ecml.at/Portals/1/resources/Articles%20and%20publications%20on%20the%20ECML/CLIL%20and%20CALL%20report_July.2014.pdf?ver=2017-07-11-151504-977.
59. Semaan, C., & Ismail, N. (2018). The effect of using powtoon on learning english as a foreign language. International Journal of Current Research, 10(5), 69262-69265.
60. Setiawan, A., & Soeharto, S. (2020). Kahoot-based learning game to improve mathematics learning motivation of elementary school students. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1),39-48.
61. Smith, A. N. (1971). The importance of attitude in foreign language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 55(2), 82-88.
62. Solomon, G., & Schrum, L. (2007). Web 2.0: new tools, new schools. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
63. Suna, Y., & Durmuşçelebi, M. (2013). A compilation work about why turkey suffers from learning and teaching English. OPUS Journal of Society Research, 3(5), 7-24.
64. Syafitri, A., Asib, A., & Sumardi, S. (2018). An application of Powtoon as a digital medium: Enhancing students’ pronunciation in speaking. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 5(2), 295-317
65. Şen, Ü. (2022). Dil eğitiminin temel kavramları [Basic concepts of language education]. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
66. Tenekeci, M. (2020). Use of web and mobile applications in Turkish teaching and awareness of the teachers about it. Milli Egitim Journal, 49(227), 429-445.
67. Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Malaysia: Longman.
68. Türegün-Çoban, B., & Adıgüzel, A. (2022). The effect of web 2.0 tools on students’ achievement and attitude in distance english language education. IBAD Journal of Social Sciences, 12, 164-180. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.961403
69. Vahdat, S., & Mazareian, F. (2020). The impact of Telegram on learning of collocational knowledge among EFL high school students. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 4(3), 37-51.
70. Walker, A., & White, G. (2017). Technology enhanced language learning: Connecting theory and practice. (10th ed.). The UK: OUP Oxford.
71. Wichadee, S., & Pattanapichet, F. (2018). Enhancement of performance and motivation through application of digital games in an english language class. Teaching English with Technology, 18(1), 77-92.
72. Yürük, N. (2019). Edutainment: Using Kahoot! As a review activity in foreign language classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 2(2), 89-101.
73. Zarzycka-Piskorz, E. (2016). Kahoot it or not? Can games be motivating in learning grammar? The Journal of Teaching English with Technology, 16(3), 17-36.