Research Article

The Educational Potential of Augmented Reality Technology: Experiences of Instructional Designers and Practitioners

Number: 15 January 25, 2019
EN

The Educational Potential of Augmented Reality Technology: Experiences of Instructional Designers and Practitioners

Abstract

In this study, the educational potential of the augmented reality (AR) technology was investigated in the context of the instructional designers and practitioners' experiences. Within this scope, intrinsic case study design was used in this study. 42 instructional designers and 10 practitioners participated in the research. The data were collected using open-ended questionnaire from instructional designers. Interviews were held with the practitioners through the semi-structured interview form created from the open-ended questionnaire. The qualitative data were analyzed with the content analysis method, using Nvivo 8.0 software. The participants suggested that AR would be more influential in the educational fields of science education, social studies, and health education. Among the most important instructional materials to be developed with AR technology are 3D materials, videos, and animations. The participants suggested that AR could be useful in the development of special applications for other fields of education. For example, AR could be used to create magic books, 3D demonstrations related to different subjects, and experimental simulations in the field of science education. Moreover, the participants suggested that AR could provide system design enhancements to better attract users’ attention, to improve retention, to increase user motivation, and to “concretize” virtually presented information by creating a fuller sense of reality in terms of educational. Lastly, in order to develop an AR application, several points must be considered in the stages of analysis, design, development, and implementation. We present these points for consideration in detail. The results obtained in this study can be used to guide future research studies on AR technology.  

Keywords

References

  1. Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20(2017), 1-11.
  2. Akçayır, M., Akçayır, G., Pektaş, H. M., & Ocak, M. A. (2016). Augmented reality in science laboratories: The effects of augmented reality on university students’ laboratory skills and attitudes toward science laboratories. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 334-342.
  3. Arvanitis, T. N., Petrou, A., Knight, J. F., Savas, S., Sotiriou, S., Gargalakos, M., et al. (2007). Human factors and qualitative pedagogical evaluation of a mobile augmented reality system for science education used by learners with physical disabilities. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 13(3), 243–250.
  4. Aziz, N. A. A., Aziz, K. A., Paul, A., Yusof A. M., & Noor, N. S. M. (2012). Providing augmented reality based education for students with attention deficit hyperactive disorder via cloud computing: Its advantages. Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT) pp.577-581.
  5. Azuma, R.T., (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385.
  6. Balog, A., & Pribeanu, C. (2010). The role of perceived enjoyment in the students’ acceptance of an augmented reality teaching platform: a structural equation modelling approach. Studies in Informatics and Control, 19(3), 319-330.
  7. Billinghurst, M., Kato, H., & Poupyrev, I. (2001). The Magic Book-Moving seamlessly between reality and virtuality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Application, 21(3), 6-8.
  8. Broll, W., Lindt, I., Herbst, I., Ohlenburg, J., Braun, A. K., & Wetzel, R. (2008). Toward next-gen mobile AR games. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 28(4), 40-48.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ömer Koçak
Ataturk University
Türkiye

Rabia Meryem Yılmaz *
Ataturk University
Türkiye

Sevda Küçük
Istanbul University
Türkiye

Yüksel Göktaş
Ataturk University
Türkiye

Publication Date

January 25, 2019

Submission Date

February 21, 2018

Acceptance Date

February 18, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Number: 15

APA
Koçak, Ö., Yılmaz, R. M., Küçük, S., & Göktaş, Y. (2019). The Educational Potential of Augmented Reality Technology: Experiences of Instructional Designers and Practitioners. Journal of Education and Future, 15, 17-36. https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.396286
AMA
1.Koçak Ö, Yılmaz RM, Küçük S, Göktaş Y. The Educational Potential of Augmented Reality Technology: Experiences of Instructional Designers and Practitioners. JEF. 2019;(15):17-36. doi:10.30786/jef.396286
Chicago
Koçak, Ömer, Rabia Meryem Yılmaz, Sevda Küçük, and Yüksel Göktaş. 2019. “The Educational Potential of Augmented Reality Technology: Experiences of Instructional Designers and Practitioners”. Journal of Education and Future, nos. 15: 17-36. https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.396286.
EndNote
Koçak Ö, Yılmaz RM, Küçük S, Göktaş Y (January 1, 2019) The Educational Potential of Augmented Reality Technology: Experiences of Instructional Designers and Practitioners. Journal of Education and Future 15 17–36.
IEEE
[1]Ö. Koçak, R. M. Yılmaz, S. Küçük, and Y. Göktaş, “The Educational Potential of Augmented Reality Technology: Experiences of Instructional Designers and Practitioners”, JEF, no. 15, pp. 17–36, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.30786/jef.396286.
ISNAD
Koçak, Ömer - Yılmaz, Rabia Meryem - Küçük, Sevda - Göktaş, Yüksel. “The Educational Potential of Augmented Reality Technology: Experiences of Instructional Designers and Practitioners”. Journal of Education and Future. 15 (January 1, 2019): 17-36. https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.396286.
JAMA
1.Koçak Ö, Yılmaz RM, Küçük S, Göktaş Y. The Educational Potential of Augmented Reality Technology: Experiences of Instructional Designers and Practitioners. JEF. 2019;:17–36.
MLA
Koçak, Ömer, et al. “The Educational Potential of Augmented Reality Technology: Experiences of Instructional Designers and Practitioners”. Journal of Education and Future, no. 15, Jan. 2019, pp. 17-36, doi:10.30786/jef.396286.
Vancouver
1.Ömer Koçak, Rabia Meryem Yılmaz, Sevda Küçük, Yüksel Göktaş. The Educational Potential of Augmented Reality Technology: Experiences of Instructional Designers and Practitioners. JEF. 2019 Jan. 1;(15):17-36. doi:10.30786/jef.396286

Cited By

If necessary, you can send an e-mail to jef.editor@gmail.com to contact the editor-in-chief.