Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2018, Issue: 14, 119 - 130, 25.07.2018
https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.408616

Abstract

References

  • Acat, M. B., &Demiral, S. (2002). Sources of Motivation in LearningForeign Language in Turkey.EducationalAdministration in Theory &Practice, 31,312-329.
  • Arnold, J., & Brown, H. D. (1999). A map of the terrain. In Arnold, J. Ed Affect in Language Learning.pp.1-24. Cambridge University Press.
  • Carpenter, J. K. (2011). An Exploratory Study of the Role of Teaching Experience in Motivation and Academic Achievement in a Virtual Ninth Grade English I Course. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Florida, Florida, U.S.
  • Dincer, A. (2011). Turkish EFL Speaking Course Students’ Motivational Orientations and Their Instructors’ Autonomy Support. (Unpublished master dissertation). Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2001a). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2001b). Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Fitzpatrick, L.E., McConnell, C.A., & Sasse, C.(2006) "Motivating the Reluctant, Novice Learner: Principles of Macroeconomics. Journal of Economics andEconomic Education Research, 7(2), 23-45.
  • Fredericks, A. D. (2005). The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Teaching College. New York: Penguin group.
  • Huett, J. B., Kalinowski, K., E. Moller, L., &Huett, K. C. (2008). Improving the Motivation and Retention of Online Students Through the Use of ARCS-Based E-Mails. American Journal of Distance Education, 223: 159-176.
  • Jang, B.G. Conradi, K. McKenna, M.C. Jones, J.S. (2015). “Motivation: Approaching an Elusive Concept Through the Factors That Shape it.” The Reading Teacher Vol .69 issue 2 pp. 239-247. Doi: DOI:10.1002/trtr.1365
  • Jacobson, T., & Xu, L. (2002). Motivating Students in Credit-based Information Literacy Courses: Theories and Practice. Libraries and the Academy, 2 (3), 423–441.
  • Johnson, M. (2012). A pilot Study Examining the Motivational Effect of Instructional Materials on EFL Learning Motivation. Journal of language and culture of Hokkaido 10: 39-47.
  • Keller, J.M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth Ed., Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status pp. 386–434. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Keller, J. M. (1987a). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 103: 2-10.
  • Keller, J. M. (1987b). The systematic process of motivational design. Performance &Instruction, 26(9), 1-8.
  • Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. New York: Springer.
  • Lin, L. (2008). ARCS Motivation Model in College English Classroom. (Unpublished master dissertation). Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China.Margueratt, D. (2007). Improving Learner Motivation Through Enhanced Instructional Design. Master, Athabasca University.
  • Malmström, M., &Öquist, A. (2016). Teacher's Leadership: A Maker or A Breaker of Students' Educational Motivation. School Leadership and Management, 36(4), 365-380.
  • McConnell, C., Hoover, G., & Sassed, C. (2001). Using the ARCS Model to Design Motivating Curriculum. Allied Academies International Conference. Academy of Educational Leadership. 61: 119-123.
  • Means, T. B., Jonassen, D. H., & Dwyer, F. M. (1997). Enhancing Relevance: Embedded ARCS Strategies vs Purpose. ETRandD45 (1): 5-17.
  • OECD. 2016. Low-Performing Students: Why They Fall Behind and How to Help Them Succeed, PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing
  • Paras, B., &Bizzocchi, J. (2005). Game, Motivation, and Effective Learning: An Integrated Model for Educational Game Design. Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 Conference: Changing Views – Worlds in Play.
  • Robb, C. (2010). The Impact of Motivational Messages on Student Performance in Community College Online Courses. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois, Illinois, U.S.
  • Selcuk, M. (2011). Demotivation in EFL Classes. Retrieved August, 12, 2013, from http://www.academia.edu/864982/Demotivation_in_EFL_Classes.
  • Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Lang. Teach, 45(2), 143–179. doi:10.1017/S0261444811000528.
  • Tze-Ming Chou, P. (2010). Advantages and Disadvantages of ESL Course Books. The Internet TESL Journal. 16 (11). Retrieved March, 9, 2013 from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Chou-CourseBooks.html.
  • Visser, J. (1990). Enhancing learner motivation in an instructor-facilitated learning context. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Florida State University, Florida, U.S.
  • Visser, J., & Keller, J. M. (1990). The clinical use of motivational messages: An inquiry into the validity of the ARCS model of motivational design. Instructional Science19: 467-500
  • Wajnryb, R. (1992). Classroom observation tasks. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wall, K., Higgins, S., & Smith, H. (2005). The visual helps me understand the complicated things: pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards. British Journal of Educational Technology 36: 851-867.
  • Wlodkowski, R. J. (1993). Enhancing adult motivation to learn: a guide to improving instruction and increasing learner achievement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Zuñiga, E. C. (2010). Fostering Risk Taking Through Pair Work Activities in an EFL Setting. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University, Ohio, U.S

Instructional Practices that Motivate Students to Learn English

Year 2018, Issue: 14, 119 - 130, 25.07.2018
https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.408616

Abstract

Motivation to learn English plays a curial role in
students’ performance, achievement and attendance. This indicates that
instructors should put effort to motivate their students. The aim of this
article is to find out the instructional practices that motivate students to
learn English most. For that reason, ARCS motivational model (Keller, 2010) was
applied throughout ten weeks. By means of this model several motivational
tactics and strategies were inserted to the classroom instruction and students
were asked to write weekly comments about them at the end of each week. Using a
qualitative research design, comments from 30 students were collected and
analyzed. As a result, we have reached the conclusion that students’ comments
can be evaluated under two headings. The first heading includes comments
related to classroom instruction and the second one is related to instructor
behavior and we tried to explain it in detail in this article.

References

  • Acat, M. B., &Demiral, S. (2002). Sources of Motivation in LearningForeign Language in Turkey.EducationalAdministration in Theory &Practice, 31,312-329.
  • Arnold, J., & Brown, H. D. (1999). A map of the terrain. In Arnold, J. Ed Affect in Language Learning.pp.1-24. Cambridge University Press.
  • Carpenter, J. K. (2011). An Exploratory Study of the Role of Teaching Experience in Motivation and Academic Achievement in a Virtual Ninth Grade English I Course. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Florida, Florida, U.S.
  • Dincer, A. (2011). Turkish EFL Speaking Course Students’ Motivational Orientations and Their Instructors’ Autonomy Support. (Unpublished master dissertation). Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2001a). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2001b). Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Fitzpatrick, L.E., McConnell, C.A., & Sasse, C.(2006) "Motivating the Reluctant, Novice Learner: Principles of Macroeconomics. Journal of Economics andEconomic Education Research, 7(2), 23-45.
  • Fredericks, A. D. (2005). The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Teaching College. New York: Penguin group.
  • Huett, J. B., Kalinowski, K., E. Moller, L., &Huett, K. C. (2008). Improving the Motivation and Retention of Online Students Through the Use of ARCS-Based E-Mails. American Journal of Distance Education, 223: 159-176.
  • Jang, B.G. Conradi, K. McKenna, M.C. Jones, J.S. (2015). “Motivation: Approaching an Elusive Concept Through the Factors That Shape it.” The Reading Teacher Vol .69 issue 2 pp. 239-247. Doi: DOI:10.1002/trtr.1365
  • Jacobson, T., & Xu, L. (2002). Motivating Students in Credit-based Information Literacy Courses: Theories and Practice. Libraries and the Academy, 2 (3), 423–441.
  • Johnson, M. (2012). A pilot Study Examining the Motivational Effect of Instructional Materials on EFL Learning Motivation. Journal of language and culture of Hokkaido 10: 39-47.
  • Keller, J.M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth Ed., Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status pp. 386–434. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Keller, J. M. (1987a). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 103: 2-10.
  • Keller, J. M. (1987b). The systematic process of motivational design. Performance &Instruction, 26(9), 1-8.
  • Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. New York: Springer.
  • Lin, L. (2008). ARCS Motivation Model in College English Classroom. (Unpublished master dissertation). Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China.Margueratt, D. (2007). Improving Learner Motivation Through Enhanced Instructional Design. Master, Athabasca University.
  • Malmström, M., &Öquist, A. (2016). Teacher's Leadership: A Maker or A Breaker of Students' Educational Motivation. School Leadership and Management, 36(4), 365-380.
  • McConnell, C., Hoover, G., & Sassed, C. (2001). Using the ARCS Model to Design Motivating Curriculum. Allied Academies International Conference. Academy of Educational Leadership. 61: 119-123.
  • Means, T. B., Jonassen, D. H., & Dwyer, F. M. (1997). Enhancing Relevance: Embedded ARCS Strategies vs Purpose. ETRandD45 (1): 5-17.
  • OECD. 2016. Low-Performing Students: Why They Fall Behind and How to Help Them Succeed, PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing
  • Paras, B., &Bizzocchi, J. (2005). Game, Motivation, and Effective Learning: An Integrated Model for Educational Game Design. Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 Conference: Changing Views – Worlds in Play.
  • Robb, C. (2010). The Impact of Motivational Messages on Student Performance in Community College Online Courses. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois, Illinois, U.S.
  • Selcuk, M. (2011). Demotivation in EFL Classes. Retrieved August, 12, 2013, from http://www.academia.edu/864982/Demotivation_in_EFL_Classes.
  • Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Lang. Teach, 45(2), 143–179. doi:10.1017/S0261444811000528.
  • Tze-Ming Chou, P. (2010). Advantages and Disadvantages of ESL Course Books. The Internet TESL Journal. 16 (11). Retrieved March, 9, 2013 from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Chou-CourseBooks.html.
  • Visser, J. (1990). Enhancing learner motivation in an instructor-facilitated learning context. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Florida State University, Florida, U.S.
  • Visser, J., & Keller, J. M. (1990). The clinical use of motivational messages: An inquiry into the validity of the ARCS model of motivational design. Instructional Science19: 467-500
  • Wajnryb, R. (1992). Classroom observation tasks. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wall, K., Higgins, S., & Smith, H. (2005). The visual helps me understand the complicated things: pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards. British Journal of Educational Technology 36: 851-867.
  • Wlodkowski, R. J. (1993). Enhancing adult motivation to learn: a guide to improving instruction and increasing learner achievement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Zuñiga, E. C. (2010). Fostering Risk Taking Through Pair Work Activities in an EFL Setting. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University, Ohio, U.S
There are 32 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Pınar Yüncü Kurt

Hüseyin Kurt This is me

Publication Date July 25, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Issue: 14

Cite

APA Yüncü Kurt, P., & Kurt, H. (2018). Instructional Practices that Motivate Students to Learn English. Journal of Education and Future(14), 119-130. https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.408616
AMA Yüncü Kurt P, Kurt H. Instructional Practices that Motivate Students to Learn English. JEF. July 2018;(14):119-130. doi:10.30786/jef.408616
Chicago Yüncü Kurt, Pınar, and Hüseyin Kurt. “Instructional Practices That Motivate Students to Learn English”. Journal of Education and Future, no. 14 (July 2018): 119-30. https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.408616.
EndNote Yüncü Kurt P, Kurt H (July 1, 2018) Instructional Practices that Motivate Students to Learn English. Journal of Education and Future 14 119–130.
IEEE P. Yüncü Kurt and H. Kurt, “Instructional Practices that Motivate Students to Learn English”, JEF, no. 14, pp. 119–130, July 2018, doi: 10.30786/jef.408616.
ISNAD Yüncü Kurt, Pınar - Kurt, Hüseyin. “Instructional Practices That Motivate Students to Learn English”. Journal of Education and Future 14 (July 2018), 119-130. https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.408616.
JAMA Yüncü Kurt P, Kurt H. Instructional Practices that Motivate Students to Learn English. JEF. 2018;:119–130.
MLA Yüncü Kurt, Pınar and Hüseyin Kurt. “Instructional Practices That Motivate Students to Learn English”. Journal of Education and Future, no. 14, 2018, pp. 119-30, doi:10.30786/jef.408616.
Vancouver Yüncü Kurt P, Kurt H. Instructional Practices that Motivate Students to Learn English. JEF. 2018(14):119-30.

If necessary, you can send an e-mail to jef.editor@gmail.com to contact the editor-in-chief.